Sarbanes Oxley Act. WHY? Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Advertisements

© 2007 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP® SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Presented by: Julie M. Allen
Chapter 19-Securities Securities Regulation Public Offerings of New Securities. zWhen “going public” there are many different types of securities that.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 UAA – ACCT 316 – Fall 2003 Accounting Information Systems Dr. Fred Barbee.
1 4 th session: Corporate Governance – Sarbanes Oxley Performance Evaluation IMSc in Business Administration October-November 2009.
Forces of Change Don H. Hansen Health Care Services Partner
Professional Ethics Chapter 4.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Benefits of Act Three quarters of the financial executives in the Oversight Systems survey said that their company had realized.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 2 What Is It? Act passed by Congress in response to the recent and continuing corporate scandals. Signed into law July 30, Established.
Arthur Andersen By: Darshana Patel & Kareen Ratnam Date: February 27, 2009 Teacher: Ms. Cuttle Course: BAT4M1.
The Role of the Public Accountant in the American Economy
Copyright © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning
1 Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 June 29,  SOX 404 Background 3  SOX 404 Goals 4  SOX 404 Requirements 5  SOX 404 Assertions 6  SOX 404 Compliance.
Fraud and SOX Compliance McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. WHY? Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 Response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals.
The Current Status of Corporate Governance in the USA An overview of the cause and effect of recent legislation.
COMPLIANCE & SOX.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Overview and Update. 2 Accounting Governance (Before Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002) SEC has always had statutory authority to oversee.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Overview and Update. Copyright, K. Klose, UMUC, Accounting Governance (Before Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002) SEC has always.
Sarbanes Oxley Act (Sox) Corporate and Auditing Accountability, Responsibility and Transparency Act of 2002 Rick Stephan Hayes, Ph.D., CPA California State.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Ernesto G. Rodriguez EC 521 Winter 2007.
BA 427 – Assurance and Attestation Services Lecture 12 The New Regulatory Environment.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act a.k.a. “SOX”
Learning Objectives LO1 Explain the importance of auditing. LO2 Distinguish auditing from accounting. LO3 Explain the role of auditing in information risk.
The Age of Compliance How Sarbanes-Oxley affects IT management.
IS Security, Audit, and Control (Dr. Zhao)
The Impact of Sarbanes Oxley and the Era of Corporate Governance on Nonprofit Organizations January 17, 2008 Facilitators Gary J. Dubas, CPA, CVA - Partner.
Importance of Auditing
1-1 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter 01 The Role of the Public Accountant in the American Economy McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Good to Great Governance. Audit Trends in Municipal Government GFOA November 4, 2004.
Implementation Issues of Sarbanes-Oxley CASE Presentation September 23, 2004 By Denise Farnan.
Sarbanes Oxley Act (2002) A brief summary. What is Sarbanes-Oxley? Legislation intended to restore the public’s confidence in investing and the securities.
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
Signed into law on July 30, 2002 Response to highly publicized corporate scandals Provisions affect corporate governance, accounting, and auditing Purpose.
1 Today’s Presentation Sarbanes Oxley and Financial Reporting An NSTAR Perspective.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. The Sarbanes Oxley Act consists of 11 Sections I – Public Company Accounting Oversight Board II – Auditor independence III – Corporate.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Chapter 19-1 Chapter 19 BUSINESS & SOCIETY Ethics and Stakeholder Management Carroll & Buchholtz 6e Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management,
CReCER Meeting Managua 2012 Bruce Overton, Assistant Director Office of International Affairs.
Audit Committee Roles & Responsibilities Audit Committee July 20, 2004.
Chapter 1 Auditing: Integral to the Economy Copyright © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Principles of Accounting (Accounting 1 for BBA - Undergraduate) SBS Victor Yerris, PhD
1 Sarbanes-Oxley Overview. 2 Sarbanes-Oxley Act Summary The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 §201Prohibited Non-Audit Services §202Audit Committee Pre-Approval.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Public Law (JFZ edited)
The New SEC Auditor Independence Rules: Implications for Audit Committees and Management
WorldCom This fraud occurred in a major public company and went undetected for 3-4 years. How could this occur? Why did this occur? Was Betty Vinson a.
Chapter 4 Ethics and Financial Reporting
Sarbanes-Oxley Act SOX Logan Cousins, Jordan Hensberger, Darren Kilby, Emily Messer, Ben Sweger.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act a.k.a. “SOX” Georgia CTAE Resource Network Curriculum Office, February 2009 To accompany curriculum for the Georgia Peach State Career.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved Why Accounting Information Is Important Recent accounting problems for corporations and their auditors.
Professional Conduct, Independence, and Quality Control
Sarbanes Oxley Act. General Provisions of SOX To make rules governing audits of public companies To make rules governing audits of public companies To.
BusinessAllstars.com 1 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 BusinessAllstarsPresents Copyright © 2004 by Gainbridge Associates All right reserved This material may.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Sarbanes-Oxley: Its effect on the accounting profession Signed into law on July 30, 2002 Response to highly publicized corporate scandals Provisions affect.
Impact On Government Contractors
The CPA Profession Chapter 2.
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
The Financial Statement Auditing Environment
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
ACCOUNTING: The Language of Business
OBJECTIVE 4-5 Apply the AICPA Code rules and interpretations on independence and explain their importance. Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Presentation transcript:

Sarbanes Oxley Act

WHY? Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 Response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals including those affecting Enron, Tyco International, Peregrine Systems and WorldCom. Response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals including those affecting Enron, Tyco International, Peregrine Systems and WorldCom.corporate and accounting scandalsEnronTyco International Peregrine SystemsWorldComcorporate and accounting scandalsEnronTyco International Peregrine SystemsWorldCom Significant problems – conflict of interest and incentive compensation practices Significant problems – conflict of interest and incentive compensation practices Auditing firms – significant non-audit or consulting work – far more lucrative than auditing engagement Auditing firms – significant non-audit or consulting work – far more lucrative than auditing engagement

WHY? These scandals resulted in a decline of public trust in accounting and reporting practices. These scandals resulted in a decline of public trust in accounting and reporting practices.accounting Wide-ranging and establishes new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. Wide-ranging and establishes new or enhanced standards for all U.S. public company boards, management, and public accounting firms.public companypublic company

General Provisions of S/Ox To make rules governing audits of public companies To make rules governing audits of public companies To oversee audits and audit firms To oversee audits and audit firms Independent of Federal Government Independent of Federal Government Self-funded through fees assessed on CPA firms and publicly traded companies Self-funded through fees assessed on CPA firms and publicly traded companies Not applicable to NFP (not for profit) or foreign listed companies Not applicable to NFP (not for profit) or foreign listed companies

Governing Members Quasi-public agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, which is charged with overseeing, regulating, inspecting, and disciplining accounting firms in their roles as auditors of public companies. Quasi-public agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, which is charged with overseeing, regulating, inspecting, and disciplining accounting firms in their roles as auditors of public companies.Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board

PCAOB’s Duties Write audit standards, temporarily they have adopted the AICPA’s (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) Write audit standards, temporarily they have adopted the AICPA’s (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) Register public CPA firms to do audits Register public CPA firms to do audits Set Quality Control standards for audits Set Quality Control standards for audits Do peer reviews of CPA firms – at least every three years Do peer reviews of CPA firms – at least every three years Investigate and discipline Investigate and discipline CPE (Continuing Professional Education) CPE (Continuing Professional Education) Review company disclosures and financial statements at least every three years Review company disclosures and financial statements at least every three years

The Act also covers issues such as The Act also covers issues such as auditor independence – limit conflicts of interest, auditor independence – limit conflicts of interest, auditor corporate responsibility – senior executives take individual responsibility for accuracy and completeness, corporate responsibility – senior executives take individual responsibility for accuracy and completeness, internal control assessment, and internal control assessment, and internal control internal control enhanced financial disclosure – timely reporting of material changes enhanced financial disclosure – timely reporting of material changes Five Members, three of whom must NOT be CPAs Five Members, three of whom must NOT be CPAs If the chair is a CPA, that person must be out of the business of auditing for the prior 5 years If the chair is a CPA, that person must be out of the business of auditing for the prior 5 years

Provisions for CPA firms Maintain audit papers for 7 years Maintain audit papers for 7 years Managing Partner rotation every 5 yrs. Managing Partner rotation every 5 yrs. Second partner rotation every 5 yrs. Second partner rotation every 5 yrs. Audit manager rotation every 7 years Audit manager rotation every 7 years Reports to audit committee Reports to audit committee All material findings All material findings Disclose fees for all types of services in proxy statement Disclose fees for all types of services in proxy statement Review disclosures of firm Review disclosures of firm Attest to Internal Control of firm Attest to Internal Control of firm

Independence Rules Can’t do other types of work for clients, - Other work needs pre- approval by audit committee Can’t do other types of work for clients, - Other work needs pre- approval by audit committee Can’t do audit if CEO, CFO from their firm, 1 year wait period Can’t do audit if CEO, CFO from their firm, 1 year wait period

Audit Committee Reports Operating committee of a publicly held company. Committee members are normally drawn from members of the Company's board of directors. An audit committee of a publicly traded company in the United States is composed of independent or outside directors. Operating committee of a publicly held company. Committee members are normally drawn from members of the Company's board of directors. An audit committee of a publicly traded company in the United States is composed of independent or outside directors. companyboard of directorsoutside directors companyboard of directorsoutside directors Reports Reports All critical accounting policies All critical accounting policies Alternate treatments Alternate treatments Internal Control findings Internal Control findings Material weaknesses Material weaknesses

Corporate Provisions Corporate Officers Corporate Officers Certify means they have Certify means they have Reviewed the reports Reviewed the reports Reviewed internal control Reviewed internal control Certify that there are no material weaknesses Certify that there are no material weaknesses Certify that there is no fraud Certify that there is no fraud Report fairly presents the financial condition of the company Report fairly presents the financial condition of the company

Corporate Provisions Corporate Officers Corporate Officers Can’t influence audit Can’t influence audit No trading during blackout periods No trading during blackout periods In pro-formas, no material untrue statements, reconciliation In pro-formas, no material untrue statements, reconciliation No officer loans No officer loans File any trading information within two business days File any trading information within two business days Code of ethics Code of ethics Disclose off-balance sheet financing Disclose off-balance sheet financing Disclose any non-GAAP financial measures Disclose any non-GAAP financial measures

Corporate Provisions Audit Committee of Board Audit Committee of Board Responsible for oversight of external audit Responsible for oversight of external audit Be independent of the firm Be independent of the firm Set up whistle-blowing provisions Set up whistle-blowing provisions One must be financial expert One must be financial expert

Penalties General penalties If alter, destroy, cover-up or falsify documents with objective to hinder investigation – fines and up to 20 years If alter, destroy, cover-up or falsify documents with objective to hinder investigation – fines and up to 20 years Give back to firms any bonuses, incentive compensation or equity based compensation earned within 12 months Give back to firms any bonuses, incentive compensation or equity based compensation earned within 12 months False certification - $1m and up to 10 yrs. False certification - $1m and up to 10 yrs. Willful false cert. - $5 m and up to 20 yrs. Willful false cert. - $5 m and up to 20 yrs. Company can hold up any payments to officers Company can hold up any payments to officers

Penalties Audit firms Temporary suspension from industry Temporary suspension from industry Temporary or permanent revocation of license Temporary or permanent revocation of license Can’t go to another firm if suspended or license revoked Can’t go to another firm if suspended or license revoked Fines of up to $100,000 personal for each violation, firm up to $2 m Fines of up to $100,000 personal for each violation, firm up to $2 m If intentional up to $750,000 personal, firm up to $15 m If intentional up to $750,000 personal, firm up to $15 m Destroy working papers within 5 years – fine and up to 10 years. Destroy working papers within 5 years – fine and up to 10 years.

Arthur Andersen LLP, based in Chicago, was once one of the "Big Five" accounting firms (the other four are PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young and KPMG), performing auditing, tax, and consulting services for large corporations. Arthur Andersen LLP, based in Chicago, was once one of the "Big Five" accounting firms (the other four are PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young and KPMG), performing auditing, tax, and consulting services for large corporations.Chicago"Big Five" accounting firmsPricewaterhouseCoopers Deloitte Touche TohmatsuErnst & Young KPMGauditingtax consultingcorporationsChicago"Big Five" accounting firmsPricewaterhouseCoopers Deloitte Touche TohmatsuErnst & Young KPMGauditingtax consultingcorporations In 2002 the firm voluntarily surrendered its licenses to practice as Certified Public Accountants in the U.S. pending the result of prosecution by the Department of Justice over the firm's handling of the auditing of Enron, the energy corporation, resulting in the loss of 85,000 jobs. In 2002 the firm voluntarily surrendered its licenses to practice as Certified Public Accountants in the U.S. pending the result of prosecution by the Department of Justice over the firm's handling of the auditing of Enron, the energy corporation, resulting in the loss of 85,000 jobs.Certified Public AccountantsU.S.Department of JusticeauditingEnronCertified Public AccountantsU.S.Department of JusticeauditingEnron