“How to Make Our Ideas Clear” Philosophy 1 Spring, 2002 G. J. Mattey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Subject-Matter of Ethics
Advertisements

What is it like to be me? Trying to understand consciousness.
Teaching and Learning Mathematics Laurinda Brown
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
“The Fixation of Belief” Philosophy 1 Spring, 2002 G. J. Mattey.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Why Critical Thinking Is Important Critical thinking is a skill. It is active interpretation and evaluation of observation, communication, information.
Views of Knowledge- Rationalism. Rationalism Rationalism- The belief that reason, without the aid of sensory perception, is capable of arriving at some.
Free will vs. Fate Copyright This presentation was created following the Fair Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia. Certain materials are included.
Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Computer Ethics PHILOSOPHICAL BELIEF SYSTEMS Chapter 1 Hassan Ismail.
Kant, Transcendental Aesthetic
Lecture Three “The Problem of Knowledge” Think (pp. 32 – 48)  Review last lecture  Descartes’ Clear and Distinct Ideas  “The Trademark Argument”  The.
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
Descartes on scepticism
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Philosophy A philosophy is a system of beliefs about reality.
Signs and Symbols.
INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING BY DR MIKE KURIA DAYSTAR UNIVERSITY FOR THE CLASS GRA 613: INTRODUCTION TO GRADUATE STUDIES.
GOVERNMENT Write words or draw pictures that come to mind about when you hear the word “government.” What is the reason or purpose for having a government?
Epistemology Revision
BERKELEY’S CASE FOR IDEALISM (Part 2 of 2)
HUMAN NATURE IN THE HINDU TRADITION THE UPANISHADS PHILOSOPHY 224.
Chapter 3: Social Science and Political Philosophy By Bryan Hugues Sean Cullen & Courtney Fretz.
Chapter 2: Reality Modern Metaphysics: Descartes
6. Conceptualization & Measurement
BERKELEY’S CASE FOR IDEALISM (Part 1 of 2) Text source: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, sectns. 1-21,
PHIL 224 The Upanishadic Vision of the Human. THN s : Some Common Features As we will see, theories of human nature typically include some common elements.
CHAPTER THREE: REALITY AND BEING P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
Free Will FREEDOM VERSUS DETERMINISM. Are human beings free to make moral decisions and to act upon them? Are they determined by forces outside and.
 Doubt- to be uncertain about something, to hesitate to believe  Dualism- the belief that the mind and body are separate (but interact). Mind is a kind.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Philosophy 224 Divine Persons: Broad on Personal Belief.
The Turn to the Science The problem with substance dualism is that, given what we know about how the world works, it is hard to take it seriously as a.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
“Cogito, ergo sum.” “I think, therefore I am.”.  chief architect of 17 th C intellectual revolution  laid foundations of ‘modern scientific age’
Greek Classical Philosophy “Western philosophy is just a series of footnotes to Plato.”
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 10 Epistemology #3 (Berkeley)
1/9/2016 Modern Philosophy PHIL320 1 Kant II Charles Manekin.
Lesson 1: What would life be like in a State of Nature? Pages 1 to 6.
Anselm’s “1st” ontological argument Something than which nothing greater can be thought of cannot exist only as an idea in the mind because, in addition.
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
1. 2 David Hume’s Theory of Knowledge ( ) Scottish Empiricist.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Rene Descartes The Father of Modern Philosophy
Plato vs. Aristotle (Metaphysics). Metaphysics The branch of philosophy that deals with the first principles of things, including abstract concepts such.
METAPHYSICS The study of the nature of reality. POPEYE STUDIES DESCARTES.
The philosophy of Ayn Rand…. Objectivism Ayn Rand is quoted as saying, “I had to originate a philosophical framework of my own, because my basic view.
Introduction to Philosophy Descartes’ First Meditation
A Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools
Basic concepts in Ethics
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Philosophy and History of Mathematics
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Descartes’ trademark argument
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Rationalism.
Bellwork In two large groups, analyze the post-it notes for ABSTRACT or CONCRETE concepts Does the example fit the description of ABSTRACT or CONCRETE?
Descartes -- Meditations Four
Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
Descartes and Hume on knowledge of the external world
Presentation transcript:

“How to Make Our Ideas Clear” Philosophy 1 Spring, 2002 G. J. Mattey

Clear and Distinct Conceptions Logicians distinguish between conceptions in two ways –Clear vs. obscure –Distinct vs. confused A clear idea is one that is recognized whenever it is met with –Never mistaken for another (rare) –So familiar that there is no hesitation in using it (common) A distinct idea is one that has nothing unclear in it

A Priorism Familiarity and abstract distinctness are outmoded as means of perfecting thought Descartes tried to pass from the method of authority to that of a priority using clarity and distinctness as a sign of the a priori He did not distinguish between being clear and seeming to be so Leibniz got no further by trying to understand all conceptions in terms of definition

Economy The easiest way to have clear ideas is to have meager and restricted ones Those who have rich conceptions, primarily youth, are led astray Intellectual maturity will help, but often it comes too late Many people’s intellectual lives are ruined by their pursuit of unclear ideas

Thought and Belief Doubt is hesitancy, and it stimulates the mind to action It is overcome by a decision to act in a certain way, i.e., by belief Active thought is primarily directed toward the production of belief, which is thought at rest But application of belief raises new doubts The ultimate end of thought is action

Pragmatism Beliefs which produce the same action are the same Different meanings are a function of different practices We mean by our conception of wine the effects it has on our senses Consideration of practical effects allows the highest degree of clarity

An Example: Freedom Could I have resisted temptation and not done something of which I am ashamed? The answer depends only on the possible arrangement of facts Relative to the question of blame, yes –If I had willed to do otherwise, I would have done so Relative to the question of the power of temptation, no –Some temptations have an irresistible effect

An Example: Force Philosophers try to distinguish between force as acceleration and as cause of acceleration Some say that force is an unknown cause These distinctions make no practical difference To know the accelerations and the laws governing them is to know what force is

Reality There are three grades of clarity in our conception of reality –Familiarity: a child’s conception is clear in this way –Distinctness: the real is that whose characteristics are independent of what they are thought to be by any individual –Practice: the real is that which is destined to be agreed upon by all who investigate

Ideal Agreement There is no conflict between the criteria of distinctness and practice The real is independent only of what individuals think The practical criterion is an ideal one, not depending on what any one individual may think Even though the criterion of reality involves remote considerations, it gives us a clear conception of what reality is