Age-Related Differences in Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis—Toward an Improved Analysis of Data on Age-Related Differences in Cancer Sensitivity in the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Epidemiologic Measures of Association Saeed Akhtar, PhD Associate Professor, Epidemiology Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Aga Khan University,
Advertisements

Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
© Department of Statistics 2012 STATS 330 Lecture 32: Slide 1 Stats 330: Lecture 32.
M2 Medical Epidemiology
Logistic Regression I Outline Introduction to maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) Introduction to Generalized Linear Models The simplest logistic regression.
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Age-Related Differences in Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis—Toward an Improved Analysis of Data on Age-Related Differences in Cancer Sensitivity in the.
Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment and Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Cancer Risks from Early-Life Exposures March 29, 2005 Hugh A. Barton,
probability distributions
CHAPTER 3 Life Span Considerations
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 9 Inferences Based on Two Samples.
Multiple Linear Regression Model
Age-Related Differences in Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis—Toward a Quantitative Analysis of Empirical Data Researchers: Dale Hattis, Principal Investigator.
Case-Control Studies. Feature of Case-control Studies 1. Directionality Outcome to exposure 2. Timing Retrospective for exposure, but case- ascertainment.
Risk Assessment II Dec 9, Is there a “safe” dose ? For effects other than cancer:
1 Normal Distributions Heibatollah Baghi, and Mastee Badii.
Marshall University School of Medicine Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology BMS 617 Lecture 12: Multiple and Logistic Regression Marshall University.
BC Jung A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - IV ( Overview of Vital Statistics & Demographic Methods) Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES.
David Yens, Ph.D. NYCOM PASW-SPSS STATISTICS David P. Yens, Ph.D. New York College of Osteopathic Medicine, NYIT l PRESENTATION.
EPA’s cancer risk assessment guidelines: General overview Jim Cogliano, Ph.D. United States Environmental Protection Agency* Office of Research and Development.
Lecture #3 Hazards and their effects. Epidemiology = The study of the distribution and causes of disease and injuries in human populations. – Epidemiologists.
Factors Affecting Drug Activity Chapter 11 Pages
UNAIDS/WHO Working Group on Global HIV/AIDS/STI Surveillance Making HIV Prevalence and AIDS Estimates UNAIDS/WHO Working Group on Global HIV/AIDS and STI.
Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC) Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens David H. Phillips* COC Chairman Descriptive vs. Quantitative.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
(IAQ). What is Risk Assessment? Risk assessment: provides information on the health risk Characterizes the potential adverse health effects of human exposures.
Derivation of Dose-Based Detection Limits for Drinking Water and Effluent Compliance Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast – Pilgrim Station Presented.
Radiophamaceuticals in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging Vasken Dilsizian, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Radiology Director of Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine and.
BPS - 5TH ED.CHAPTER 6 1 An important measure of the performance of a locomotive is its "adhesion," which is the locomotive's pulling force as a multiple.
Pediatric Medication Administration Module D. Pediatric Classifications Age RangeClassifications < 38 weeks gestationPremature infant < 1 monthNeonate.
Copyright © 2002 University of Maryland School of Nursing. All rights reserved. Comparison of Pharmacology and Toxicology This material was developed at.
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
Sampling Design and Analysis MTH 494 Ossam Chohan Assistant Professor CIIT Abbottabad.
Chapter 4 Control Charts for Measurements with Subgrouping (for One Variable)
June 8, 2004Seafood: Assessing the Benefits and Risks1 of 17 Assessing and Managing the Risks Associated With Eating Seafood Don Schaffner, Ph.D. Professor.
Regression Analysis A statistical procedure used to find relations among a set of variables.
1 Statistics in Drug Development Mark Rothmann, Ph. D.* Division of Biometrics I Food and Drug Administration * The views expressed here are those of the.
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NE-SRA June 19, 2007 Why are Kids Different? Underlying Biological and Physiological Characteristics.
SCOEL and Carcinogens Group A: Non-threshold genotoxic carcinogens; for risk low-dose assessment the linear non-threshold (LNT) model appears appropriate.
BACKGROUND Benzene is a known carcinogen. Occupational exposure to benzene is an established risk factor for leukaemia. Less is known about the effects.
Introduction to the Statistical Analysis of the Clinical Trials
WP4. Assessment of environmental impacts and resulting externalities from multi-media (air/water/soil) impact pathways A. Rabl, T. Bachmann, R. Torfs -
Risk Assessment.
Chapter 15.3 Risk Assessment 2002 WHO report: “Focusing on risks to health is the key to preventing disease and injury.” risk assessment—process of evaluating.
An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 9 Inferences Based on Two Samples.
COURSE: JUST 3900 INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE Test Review: Ch. 4-6 Peer Tutor Slides Instructor: Mr. Ethan W. Cooper, Lead Tutor © 2013.
Case control & cohort studies
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
Toxicity Lecture 2. The Case of Jennifer Strange YES or NO Is there a substance that is toxic at any dose? YES or NO Is there a substance that is safe.
Marshall University School of Medicine Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology BMS 617 Lecture 13: Multiple, Logistic and Proportional Hazards Regression.
Effects on Children: Beyond Asthma NESCAUM Health Effects Workshop Joann Held July 29, 2008 with thanks to: Gary Ginsberg, Ph.D. Connecticut Dept Public.
Chapter 2. **The frequency distribution is a table which displays how many people fall into each category of a variable such as age, income level, or.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
Annual Ramazzini Days Carpi, October 28th , 2016
Factors Affecting Drug Activity
Epidemiologic Measures of Association
Risk Assessment Dec 4 -6, 2006.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
THE DOSE MAKES THE POISON
Risk Assessment Dec 7, 2009 Timbrell 3rd Edn pp 16-21
Body weight at harvest (g) Left kidney:body weight ratio (g/kg)
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Epidemiology MPH 531 Analytic Epidemiology Case control studies
Bart Ostro, Chief Air Pollution Epidemiology Unit
Adding and Subtracting Rational Expressions
Presumptions Subgroups (samples) of data are formed.
Presentation transcript:

Age-Related Differences in Susceptibility to Carcinogenesis—Toward an Improved Analysis of Data on Age-Related Differences in Cancer Sensitivity in the EPA Children’s Cancer Risk Guidance Document Researchers: Dale Hattis, Principal Investigator Rob Goble, Research Professor Abel Russ, Research Associate Jen Ericson and Jill Mailloux, Student Research Assistants Margaret Chu, EPA Project Monitor

INNOVATIVE ASPECTS OF THE ANALYSIS NOW IN PROCESS Compare measures of potency, rather than uncorrected cancer incidence, among groups. Where dosage spans multiple age groups, use dummy variables to represent the observed tumor risk as the sum of cancer contributions from dosing in different periods: –The periods are: fetal (gd 12-19), pre-weaning (1-21 d); weaning - 2 mo; adult (2 mo - 2 yr). –Where continuous dosing occurs in only a fraction of a period that fraction is used as the corresponding “dummy” rather than 1. Use likelihood methods to first derive appropriate statistical weighting of the different observations, and (eventually) to avoid bias from excluding “0” points (two phases of analysis). Express dosage for animals of different weights on a metabolically consistent basis (either concentration in air or food, or per unit body weight to the three quarters power).

Other Improvements--Correcting Various Data Problems (With the aid of Hugh Barton) Adding esophageal tumors for DEN (liver, but not esophageal tumors included in “Table 4” analysis) Correcting exposure time for vinyl chloride; adding additional control and comparison group information for 52 week exposures Consolidating 6000 and dose groups for vinyl chloride--both well over saturating levels

The Poisson One-hit Transformation--From the Fraction of Animals with at Least One Tumor to The Number of Tumors Per Animal

Effect of the One-Hit Transformation for Various Observations of % Tumors in Animal Groups

EPA “Table 4” Analysis for Continuously-Dosed Mutagenic Carcinogens

Effect of the One-Hit Transformation on the Calculations of Tumor Risks in the Juvenile Groups for Continuously- Administered Mutagenic Carcinogens

Effect of the One-Hit Transformation on the Existing Distribution of Juvenile/Adult Risk/Dosing Time Ratios for Continuously-Administered Mutagenic Carcinogens

Use of Part-Period Dummy Variables in Combination To Represent Different Exposure Patterns--Maltoni Vinyl Chloride Experiments