Next Generation eLearning Can Technology Learn from the Learners: The case for Adaptive Learning Objects Vincent Wade Research Director, Knowledge & Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eurosoil Freiburg 2004 – Education in Pedology E-Learning in Soil Science – What are the Perspectives? Ludger Herrmann University of Hohenheim.
Advertisements

Opportunities for the Use of Recommendation and Personalization Algorithms in meLearning Environments Tom E. Vandenbosch World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)
CONCEPTUAL WEB-BASED FRAMEWORK IN AN INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT FOR DISTANCE LEARNING Amal Oraifige, Graham Oakes, Anthony Felton, David Heesom, Kevin.
Elearning Quality for Learning Repositories in Secondary Education Elearning Quality for Learning Repositories in Secondary Education e-Learning Quality:
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING & CAPACITY BUILDING
They’re Computer Savvy, Right? Well, Maybe…
Sharing Content and Experience in Smart Environments Johan Plomp, Juhani Heinila, Veikko Ikonen, Eija Kaasinen, Pasi Valkkynen 1.
Towards Adaptive Web-Based Learning Systems Katerina Georgouli, MSc, PhD Associate Professor T.E.I. of Athens Dept. of Informatics Tempus.
Personalized and adaptive eLearning Applications in LSMs
Click to edit Master title style HELP ME! Higher Education Launch Pad Mobile Enhanced Julie Murphy and Adele Cushing.
TEACHING WITH PRIMARY SOURCES Level III Training Section Two ADULT LEARNING MODULE.
Dynamic Contextual eLearning – Dynamic Content Discovery, Capture and Learning Object Generation from Open Corpus Sources Shay Lawless, Knowledge & Data.
Dynamic Content Discovery, Harvesting and Delivery, from Open Corpus Sources, for Adaptive Systems Séamus Lawless Knowledge & Data Engineering Group, Trinity.
Evaluating teaching and learning Prof Sarah Moore.
Dylan Grace, President ISSU.  Plan for when and how the new Junior Cycle will be introduced has been outlined  Expectation that new senior cycle and.
Teaching Language in Context First edition 1986 Third edition 2001
ETT 229 Fall 2004 Introductions & Standards. Agenda 10:00-10:40 – Introductions 10:40-11:15 – Standards presentation.
Sharing Knowledge in Adaptive Learning Systems Miloš Kravčík Dragan Gašević Fraunhofer FIT, GermanySimon Fraser University, Canada
Good teaching, good teachers and comparative analysis Fernando Reimers.
E-Learning Practices at PPU Dr. Mahmoud Hasan AL-Saheb Palestine Polytechnic University Administrative Sciences and Informatics College,
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
Manchester, 2007 Adaptive learning paths for improving Lifelong Learning experiences Ana Elena Guerrero Roldán, Julià Minguillón Universitat Oberta de.
University of Jyväskylä – Department of Mathematical Information Technology Computer Science Teacher Education ICNEE 2004 Topic Case Driven Approach for.
The Multi-model, Metadata-driven Approach to Content and Layout Adaptation Knowledge and Data Engineering Group (KDEG) Trinity College,
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Faculty of Education and Arts Video Conferencing in a Multi-Campus Tertiary Context: Exploring the strengths and weaknesses Katrina Kavanagh :
E_learning.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Web 2.0 with Alert Support for Busy Parents in Suzuki Method of Children Music Teaching Cheuk-ting CHAN Dept of Music HK Baptist University
Source: Erica MelisLeActiveMath Language-enhanced, user-adaptive, interactive eLearning for Mathematics Erica Melis Competence Center for Technology-Enhanced.
Debbie Poslosky Taken from the Common Core Standard Document.
Learning Development and Innovation Overview and Updates Steve Wyn Williams March 2013.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Why Educators need to be educated in technology By Diane Harris CEP 812 July
Recommendations for Best Practice. Best Practice This section will present an analysis of the literature in the following categories: Organization of.
Teaching Metadata and Networked Information Organization & Retrieval The UNT SLIS Experience William E. Moen School of Library and Information Sciences.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Curriculum Design. A Learner Centered Approach May, 2007 By. Rhys Andrews.
University of Dublin Trinity College Localisation and Personalisation: Dynamic Retrieval & Adaptation of Multi-lingual Multimedia Content Prof Vincent.
Reporter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Information Communication Technology and the New University A View on e-Learning Cheol, H. O. (2003).
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
Problem based learning (PBL) Amal Al Otaibi CP, MME.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Illustrations and Answers for TDT4252 exam, June
Sharing Design Knowledge through the IMS Learning Design Specification Dawn Howard-Rose Kevin Harrigan David Bean University of Waterloo McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Dimensions and parameters for the evaluation of e-learning Dr. Bernhard Ertl.
1© 2013 by Nelson Education Ltd. CHAPTER TEN Transfer of Training.
1 Hypermedia learning and prior knowledge: domain expertise vs. system expertise. Timothy J. F. Mitchell, Sherry Y. Chen & Robert D. Macredie. (2005) Hypermedia.
2 nd International Workshop on Managing Ubiquitous Communications and Services Trinity College, Dublin December 13 th & 14 th, 2004
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
What is LITERACY? Literacy LITERACY IS…the ability to identify, understand, interpret, create, communicate, compute, and use printed and written materials.
Centre for Learning Technology Centre for Learning Technology A3EH vs A3H Vincent P. Wade Director, Knowledge & Data Engineering Research Group Trinity.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
An Experience Report from the Use of Digital Repositories in Building a New Module Simon McGinnes Trinity College Dublin.
English Reading Guidance with Learning Portfolio Analysis Ting-Ting Wu Graduate School of Technological and Vocational Education, National Yunlin University.
Egerton University, Njoro 28 th April, 2009 OER Africa An introduction.
Informatics for Scientific Data Bio-informatics and Medical Informatics Week 9 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information.
Robert Sidford 21 st Century Learning Coordinator Washoe County School District Reading: The Core 21 st Century Competency February 26 th, 2016.
Critical Information Literacy
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Teaching Evaluations at TTU Using the IDEA Instrument
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Strategies and Techniques
The Tech Classroom – YouTube
Versioning in Adaptive Hypermedia
TPS Workshop Objectives
Presentation transcript:

Next Generation eLearning Can Technology Learn from the Learners: The case for Adaptive Learning Objects Vincent Wade Research Director, Knowledge & Data Engineering Research Group Computer Science Dept. Trinity College Dublin Director Center for Learning Technology Trinity College Dublin

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning2 Student Centric e -Learning Goal of Adaptive, Personalised e-Learning: “to provide e-learning content, activities and collaboration, adapted to the specific needs and influenced by specific preferences and context of the student, based on the sound pedagogic strategies”

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning3 What does it offer the learner? What does it offer the teacher? Some Questions? How difficult is it to achieve? Does it need an army of engineers, developers And subject matter experts? What is Adaptive, Personalised eLearning? What record of success does it have?

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning4 Motivation ‘One size doesn’t fit all’! –Different people have different needs, likes, preferences, skills, abilities –Are in different locations, using different devices, With different connectivity –Are in different circumstances, using service for different reasons …… Large variety of Users, very variable circumstances, large ‘hyper’space

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning5 Motivation Digital Content very expensive to develop => need to ensure re-use Need to automate ‘transformation’ process of digital content - to ensure greater usability

Adapt to Learner’s … Learner Prior Knowledge & Expertise Cognitive & Learning Style Learning Style Learning History Aims and Goals Preferences & Learning Culture Communication Style & Needs

Some Examples …...

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning8 Benefits of Personalised e -Learning Pedagogic –Improved quality & effectiveness (no two students are identical) –Improved Relevancy –Reduced cognitive overload, reduced learning time –Improve retention –Empower learner (take more responsibility, more active participation)

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning9 Benefits of Personalised e -Learning Management –Promote Resource (content) Reuse / Reduced Costs –Ability to introduce Multiple courses across same content repository –Enable further e -learning opportunities

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning10 Adapting to What? Knowledge about the subject Knowledge about the system Goals Interests Culture Language Capabilities (Dis)Abilities Preferences Learner

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning11 Case Study: Trinity College Dublin Engineering Faculty: Dept. of Computer Science 7 Different Degrees –Computer Engineering,Computer Science, Info. Technology etc. Various ‘Databases’ courses taught on different degree, to different student years (1 st - 4 th ), with varying learning objectives & syllabi

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning12 Multi-model, Metadata Driven Approach Metadata to describe Adaptive Resources Multi-model Two versions of the approach –3 Models – Content, Learner and Narrative (PLS) –N Models – At least one Narrative, the rest are metadata based (APeLS) User Trial and Feedback

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning13 The Learner Model The Learner Model contains information about the Learner’s … –Pre-knowledge (Prior Knowledge) –Objectives and Goals –Cognitive and Learning Style Learner Model Pre-knowledge Objectives Learning Style

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning14 The Content Model (Learning Objects) The Content Model must accurately represent the unit of material (a fine grained LO) The model must represent each LO from three perspectives… –General Information –Pedagogical Information –Technical Information

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning15 The Narrative Model (cont.) The Narrative Model representS relationships between CONCEPTS These relationships include… –Pre-requisites –Suggested optional concepts Narrative Model Start PointsRelationships

Adaptive Service Adaptive Personalised Learning Service (APeLS) Architecture Learning Objects Model Learner Model Learning Object Mdl Narrative Learner Models Learner Portal Narrative Models

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning17 The Personalised Learning Service - Reconciling the Models The Adaptive Engine must determine the core and optional material for the learner Learner Model Pre-knowledge Objectives Learning Style Learning Object Model Keywords Content Type Supported Learning Style Narrative Model Start PointsRelationships

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning18 Authoring Adaptive Personalised eLearning Course Design = Model Design + Learning ObjectAuthoring Development of Models –Concept Space (ontological approach) –Narrative Model (pedagogic/Instructional design based models) e.g Case Based, Web Quests, Didactic, Learning Spaces etc. –Adaptive Property selection –Content (Learning Objects)

Course Design = Model Design + Leaning ObjectAuthoring Development of Models –Concept Space (ontological approach) –Narrative Model (pedagogic/Instructional design based models) e.g Case Based, Web Quests, Didactic, Learning Spaces etc. –Adaptive Property selection –Content Piglets Authoring Adaptive Personalised eLearning Learner Model Learning Object Model Narrative Model Concept Model Context Model Learner

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning20 Evaluation APeLS used to deliver RDBMS course to 120 final year students (two degrees) Pre-test instrument for VARK & prior knowledge in DBMS Learners able to rebuild their personalized course via instrumentation Highly popular with student body Continual refinement & re-personalization by student for various reasons

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning21 Average Question Scores on Database Examinations 1998 – 2003

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning22 Student Opinions Very high satisfaction rating of course (87%) All students used the ‘adaptive’ controls to take responsibility for their e-learning 60% satisfied with level of control offered by the ‘adaptive’ controls Some interesting observations –frequent student re-personalisation for specific time objective

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning23 the story so far … Adaptive Hypermedia Services facilitates: –graceful enhancement and scalability of content service –support multiple courses & learning experiences –empower user (learner) –interpretative Semantic Web driven approach allows evolution of adaptivity

© Vincent P. WadeAdaptive Personalised eLearning24 Thank you………… any questions ………