Diffraction of “low energy” electrons from free-standing transmission gratings Ben McMorran and Alex Cronin University of Arizona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Advertisements

Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
NSLS-II Stability Workshop – User Requirements Working Group – Day 1 Stability Requirements for soft x-ray coherent microscopy/imaging -- C. Jacobsen :
Matter wave interferomery with poorly collimated beams
Groups: WA 2,4,5,7. History  The electron microscope was first invented by a team of German engineers headed by Max Knoll and physicist Ernst Ruska in.
Tomsk Polytechnic University1 A.S. Gogolev A. P. Potylitsyn A.M. Taratin.
Anton Samusev JASS’05 30 March – 9 April, 2005 Saint Petersburg State Polytechnical University, Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute Polarization effects.
Low energy electron beam as a nondestructive diagnostic tool for high power beams. P. Logachev, D. Malutin, A. Starostenko, BINP, RUPAC’2006, Novosibirsk.
Sub-picosecond Megavolt Electron Diffraction International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy June 21, 2006 Fedor Rudakov Department of Chemistry, Brown.
Electron Microscope. Light Resolution  The resolution of a microscope is limited by the diffraction of light. Single diffractionSingle diffraction 
Optical Alignment with Computer Generated Holograms
Lab meetings Week of 6 October
Using Atomic Diffraction to Measure the van der Waals Coefficient for Na and Silicon Nitride J. D. Perreault 1,2, A. D. Cronin 2, H. Uys 2 1 Optical Sciences.
Using Atomic Diffraction to Measure the van der Waals Coefficient for Na and Silicon Nitride J. D. Perreault 1,2, A. D. Cronin 2, H. Uys 2 1 Optical Sciences.
De Broglie wave phase shifts induced by surfaces 20 nm away Alex Cronin John Perreault Ben McMorran Funding from: Research Corporation and NSF NSF University.
R. M. Bionta SLAC November 14, 2005 UCRL-PRES-XXXXXX LCLS Beam-Based Undulator K Measurements Workshop Use of FEL Off-Axis Zone Plate.
Andrei Nomerotski 1 CPC2 and Electron Microscopy A.Nomerotski 7//9/2007  Worldwide efforts to develop sensors for keV electrons for Transmission.
HIS Ion Source Larry Lamm, Research Professor, Technical Director March, 2009 Nuclear Science Laboratory.
Chapter 25 Waves and Particles Midterm 4 UTC
1 Nondestructive Measurement of Charged Particles Kensuke Homma / Kazuhiro Hosokawa Hiroshima University 1. A novel principle of charged particle sensing.
Types of Microscopes Simple Microscope - contains only one lens. ex. magnifying glass Compound Light Microscope - a system of two lens that work together.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Daily Challenge, 1/7 If light is made of waves and experiences interference, how will the constructive and destructive interference appear to us?
Study of Phase-Dispersive X-Ray Imaging Tomomi Ohgaki and Ichita Endo (Hiroshima Univ.)
Studying micro-objects with SEM (Scanning electron microscope) Student: Michał Łępicki (Warsaw University of Technology) Supervisor: Oleg Leonidovich Orelovich.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
Crystallography and Diffraction. Theory and Modern Methods of Analysis Lectures Electron Diffraction Dr. I. Abrahams Queen Mary University of London.
The physics of electron backscatter diffraction Maarten Vos AMPL, RSPHYSSE, Australian National University, Acton 0200, Canberra Aimo Winkelmann Max Planck.
XI. Reflection high energy electron diffraction
SEM Scanning Electron Microscope
Grid Fabrication and Characterization Brian Dennis, GSFC Gordon Hurford, UCB.
e- beam 2D sample e- beam 3D
S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V.
Christoph Gabor, ASTeC HIPPI—Meeting (WP 5) 26 th – 28 th September 2007 Non—destructive transverse emittance measurement device The Front End Test Stand.
Chapter 1 Section 4 Tools and Techniques (specifically microscopes) p
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
Diffraction (6.161 Lab3) Tony Hyun Kim 10/21/2008.
El-Mul Technologies Ltd – Confidential & Proprietary El-Mul Technologies El-Mul Technologies Ltd – Confidential & Proprietary Prof. Eli Cheifetz, Chairman.
A.E. GunnæsMENA3100 V08 Electron Diffraction (ED) in the transmissions electron microscope.
Calculation of the Coded Aperture zero-beam-size image (the “image”). The CA fitting procedure: The image is parameterized as a Sum-Of-Gaussians.
Summer '07 at CLS Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Peter ChenChithra Karunakaran & Konstantine Kaznatcheev.
06 Oct 05Space Science & Technology Dept1 Solar Orbiter Consortium Meeting 03 Mar 06 Optical Design Of Solar Orbiter Normal Incidence Spectrometer KF Middleton.
Copyright 2009 CSEM | PhD Seminar, 4 th June 2009| V. Revol | Page 0 X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging Vincent Revol Zürich,
IPM Sim 2016 workshop Discussion sessions – main points.
LINAC4 emittance measurements BI Day Divonne, 24 th November 11/24/2011 B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, D. Gerard, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI 1.
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques. Contents 1.Optics (1): Stops, Pupils, Field Optics and Cameras 2.Basic Electromagnetics –Math –Maxwell's equations.
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope
LIGHT BACKSCATTERING ANALYSIS of Textured Silicon SAMPLES
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques
C-Line Windowless Operation:
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
What is XPS? XPS (x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) is also known as ESCA (electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis). XPS provides chemical information.
Twisted Electrons Planning Discussion
Investigation of the microstructure in the Yttrium-Tantalate-Zirconia system Thursday, August 27, 2015.
Prototype production and test
SEM In-situ Experiments for Breakdown Study
MEASUREMENT OF THE WAVELENGTH OF MONOCHROMATIC LIGHT
TEM (Transition Electron Microscope)
Wave Phenomena Resolution
Measuring Polarizability with an Atom Interferometer
Ch. 2.2 Viewing Cells.
Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation Spectrometer Design and Optimization
Measurements from Viktor Mechanics from Richard Model from Fabian
Lau Interferometry with Visible Light and Electron Waves
Timed photon counter 5 ΔV 4 ΔV 3 ΔV 30 μm 2 ΔV ΔV Diameter 30 μm Pitch
Electron Optics and the Lau Interferometer
The Microscope.
Chapter 27 Problems 1,11,12,15,16,22,32,33,36,49,56.
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Presentation transcript:

Diffraction of “low energy” electrons from free-standing transmission gratings Ben McMorran and Alex Cronin University of Arizona

free-standing silicon nitride gratings note the cross section

SEM basics objective lens sample ~3mm to 42mm 100 µm aperture SE I +10V detector PMT phosphor ~ +500V

SEM basics sample SE I +10V detector PMT phosphor ~ +500V objective lens ~3mm to 40mm 100 µm aperture

basic setup to observe diffraction objective lens diffraction grating 4 µm diameter tungsten wire ~30 mm SE I ~40 mm 100 µm aperture

images of 4 micron wire through diffraction grating 4 keV beam twist = -10±2° 1.5 keV beam twist = 5±3°

images of 4 micron wire through diffraction grating 4 keV beam twist = -10±2° 1.5 keV beam twist = 5±3°

images of 4 micron wire through diffraction grating 1.5 keV beam twist = 5±3° 4 keV beam twist = -10±2°

images of 4 micron wire through diffraction grating spacing between orders Δs  E -1/2 why is there asymmetry? keV beam twist = -10±2° 1.5 keV beam twist = 5±3°

grating geometry   w l gold coating grating bar grating k vector

grating geometry  ( ,z) z

grating geometry z  ( ,z)

grating geometry  ( ,z) z

grating geometry  ( ,z) z

grating geometry  ( ,z) z

grating geometry  ( ,z) z

grating geometry  ( ,z) z

grating geometry  ( ,z) z

calculation of phase due to image charge o{o{ z  ( ,z) r1r1 r2r2

calculation of phase due to image charge o{o{ z  ( ,z) r1r1 r2r2

calculation of phase due to image charge o{o{ z  ( ,z) r1r1 r2r2

calculation of phase due to image charge o{o{ z  ( ,z) r1r1 r2r2 where

calculation of phase due to image charge o{o{ z  ( ,z) r1r1 r2r2 where

calculation of phase due to image charge o{o{ z  ( ,z) r1r1 r2r2 where E = 1 keV  v ~ 10 7 m/s  τ ~ sec

target twist axis Electron beam So, if we measure diffraction at different twist angles…

…we ought to see something like this:

grating 1 st aperture target (4 µm wire) sliding platform 3 rd aperture description of apparatus

grounding strap twist lever tilt stage

diffraction profiles - comparison 10±2°: 5±2°: 0±2°: -10±2°: 500 eV 1.5 keV 4 keV

data refining keV beam twist = -10±2° 1.5 keV beam twist = 5±3°

4 keV beam twist = -10±2° keV beam twist = 5±3° data refining

1.5 keV beam twist = 5±3° boil images down to I n data – compare to theory keV beam twist = -10±2° data refining

conclusion have seen diffraction of electrons with energies down to 500 eV through a transmission grating have seen asymmetry in diffraction pattern due to interaction with grating a simple model using image charges seems to explain asymmetry

goals more angles with better precision more energies include detector capable of measuring absolute intensity of diffraction orders (not just relative intensity) search for energy-dependent permittivity