CXC Chandra Users' Committee Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 8 725 proposals *6.4 oversubscribed (based on time) GTO for review: due 3 rd April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Central Texas Section, Region 5 Senior Member Program Presented at the IEEE Membership Development Retreat February 28 - March 1, 2003 By Joe Redfield.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
European COoperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research Role and rules of procedure for Management Committee Carine Petit Science Officer.
Technical Assessment Review / Decision Briefing Template
1 Project Smart Metering Portfolio Foundation & DCC Day 1 Updates April 2013.
CUC Oct 2013 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 15 Peer Review  June 2013, Hilton Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 15  13 topical panels,
School Innovation Fund (SIF) Grant Round 3: RFP: TA-15 Getting Started Conference Call July 16, 2014: 2:00 P.M. - 3:00 P.M.
ATPMM – a Guide to TELSOM/ATRC Project Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation Workshop on ASEAN TELSOM Project Implementation & Funding Management Manual.
Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre April 1, 2010.
1 HST Cycle 12 TAC Results Bob Williams TIPS – 17 April 2003.
CXC Response to June 04 Report 1.Bakeout Status: Paul Plucinsky 2.CIAO upgrade information: Jonathan McDowell 3.DS9 and visualization scripts: Jonathan.
19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.
CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Cycle 5 Chair+Pundit Questionaire  Circulation: 15 people (12 chairs, 3 pundits)  Responses: 8 (7 chairs,
Chandra Users’ Committee, Apr 2007 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed.
AVUTA BUDGET TIMELINE 10 FEB :00 PM DISTRICT CONFERENCE ROOM A AVUTA BUDGET MEETING PURPOSE- DEVELOP INITIAL BUDGET ATTENDEES: * EXECUTIVE BOARD.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11 Peer Review Proposal Numbers:  668 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
1 The Path to the Ph.D. in IS: Part 4, The Dissertation.
Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2006 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 8  725 submitted proposals  *6.4 oversubscribed.
Users' Committee, 25 Oct 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12 Peer Review  June 2010, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 12 
Chandra Users’ Committee, 9-10 Apr 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra User Committee Meeting Roger J. Brissenden 25 June 2002.
Director's Office Chandra Users’ Committee, Sept 2007 Chandra Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed (based on time)  48 LP, 10.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.
25 June 2002Chandra Users’ Committee, Belinda Wilkes XMM/Chandra Schedules AO date 15 Dec 2002 Deadline 15 March 2003 Peer Review ~15 June 2002 AO date.
Chandra Director’s Office Chandra’s Second Decade  Lifetime: ≥15-20 years (RJB’s presentation)  Is all key Chandra science enabled by current proposal.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
Tracking Chandra Science Productivity Publication Metrics special thanks to John Bright, Arnold Rots, and Sherry Winkelman (Archive Group) and Mihoko Yukita.
CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Edward M. Mattison 29 June 2004.
Grants Seminar September 26, :30 pm 109 LRC Kevin McDonough Chair, Faculty Grants Committee Andrew Smentkowski NMU Grant Writer.
CUC, 29 June 2004Belinda Wilkes, Assistant Director CXC Response to Jan 2004 CUC Report 1,2: relate to peer review (Belinda) 3: high-risk science category:
NCAR Diversity Committee FY14 Request for Proposals NCAR Diversity RFP August 2013 Helen Moshak, NCAR Operations Director.
Community Development & Planning Grant Pre-Application Meeting April 17,
COLLEGE SUMMITS WEBINAR Tennessee College Access & Success Network Susan Rhodes, The Ayers Foundation.
United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED) Revised documents and procedures for assessing Member States’ implementation efforts.
Market Coordination Team Update to RMS.  MCT Kick-off Meeting Update… –1 st MCT Meeting was held on 3/2 (Austin) Twenty five people were in attendance.
URBACT Third Call for Proposals 09 Dec 2011 – 15 March 2012.
Kentucky Work Ready Communities Recertification Recertification updates Extension requests.
RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.
Workshops on Discussion Draft of Guidelines December 2014.
State of Kansas Financial Management System Needs Assessment Validation Steering Committee Meeting October 25, 2006.
CUC Oct 2012 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 14 Peer Review   June 2012, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 14  13 topical.
RTF Staff, Subcommittee and Work Updates October 4, 2011.
Program Planning for the 18 th World Congress of Soil Sciences Larry Wilding, Texas A&M Lee Sommers, Colorado State Co-Chairs, Organizing Committee.
HR Administration ‘Day 1’ Readiness Overview
Toward the Senior Review Rob Petre. Senior Review proposal details Due March 12, 2008 Competing against: XMM, INTEGRAL, RXTE, Swift, Galex, WMAP, Spitzer.
Market Systems Release Update Modifications Committee Meeting 65 December 3rd
Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness Grant Multi – Year Award Process Matthew R. Jones Sr. Grants Management Specialist Grants and Registration Branch.
GO Program: Cycle 1 process, results, and Cycle 2 schedule Koji Mukai Astro-E2 Guest Observer Facility.
Thank you to our Major Underwriter.
GLAST Science Support Center November 17, 2006 GUC Face-to-Face Meeting GLAST GI Program (with revised schedule) David Band, GSSC.
1 Spring Business Meeting Regional Haze SIP Development Survey San Francisco, California April 9, 2003.
Community Forum Budgets Lutterworth, Broughton Astley & Rural West Community Forum 2012/2013.
GO Program: Past, Present & Future Koji Mukai Suzaku Guest Observer Facility.
Compliance Update July Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance ERCOT’s May score was 146.1; June’s score was May has typically.
FINAL DRAFT Report visit May 9-13 Operations / Project Management Support BA-L1002 Barbados Housing and Neighborhood Upgrading Program Phase 1 16 May 2011.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Project Operating Guide. Purpose of Projects To advance the mission of the organization To provide value to ICIS Members.
IUCN WCPA Best Practice Guidelines and Technical Report Series - Overview 1 Technical Report & 10 Best Practice documents in preparation 1 Technical Report.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST NA3 Execution Plan Malcolm Atkinson Director of the National e-Science Centre.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
Bilingual Education Update APRIL 1, 2016 WEBINAR.
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
Meeting Procedure.
Security week June 2017 © ETSI All rights reserved.
REPLENISHMENT GRANTS.
Proposal Cycle: Updates and Plans
United Way of Benton & Lincoln Counties
After this meeting… Voting period begins
Presentation transcript:

CXC Chandra Users' Committee Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle proposals *6.4 oversubscribed (based on time) GTO for review: due 3 rd April (for competed targets

CXC Chandra Users' Committee Time request and oversubscription

CXC Chandra Users' Committee Peer Review: Cycle June Topical Panels, June, 10.5 Msecs: 2 Normal Stars, WD, Planetary Systems and Misc 2 SN, SNR + Isolated NS 3 WD Binaries + CVs, BH and NS Binaries, Galaxies: Populations 2 Galaxies: Diffuse Emission, Clusters of Galaxies 3 AGN, Extragalactic Surveys Big Project Panel, June, 6 Msecs: 12 panel chairs, 3-4 pundits Allocate time for LP and VLP projects

CXC Chandra Users' Committee Big Project Panel Schedule Wed 21 June, 7pm: ~ 1hour organisational meeting: Get hardcopies, discuss procedure for next day Time for chairs to organize summary of GO program Thurs 22 June, am: Triage meeting: summarize GO program and decide which proposals NOT to discuss Thurs am-pm: Reading time, chairs meetings as needed Thurs 4pm: Presentation and discussion of proposals Initial voting Frid am: Final discussion and voting

CXC Chandra Users' Committee Constrained Observations As in Cycle 7, the official limit is 15% of observations: Counting individual pointings Dividing long observations into orbit-sized chunks Counting TOO follow-ups Cycle 7, peer-review approved constrained observations were 22% of the total due to teething problems in the GUI code and the need to count some by hand. The CUC report has been updated to include this information.

CXC Chandra Users' Committee CUC recommendations: CDO Grant Award Periods: as implemented for Cycle 7, all awards will not be eligible for a 2 year period with a 1 year no-cost extension available on request Peer Review: Big Project Panel: an additional half day has been added to the schedule for the BPP to allow more reading and discussion time and reduce the stress level on all participants Peer Review: started inviting senior people in Dec 2005, have a larger percentage already. Are now in the final stages of inviting reviewers. CUC Presentations: posted on CUC website by Friday before meeting CUC Reports: We are now posting preliminary responses to the CUC report recommendations 4-8 weeks after the report is received. Budget Proposal Timeline: 14 Sept 2006, back 2 weeks from Cycle 7 (itself delayed by 2 weeks). We plan to send out letters first week of August.

CXC Chandra Users' Committee CUC Recommendations: non-CXC Level 3 Catalog: held a detailed scientific review 8,9 Fen 2006 at the CXC. Draft report is on line, Jonathan has presented the results and our responses. Calibration: description of detector regions over which calibration data are valid included in Larry’s presentation. Cross-Calibration:Herman’s presentation included a description of the current status of cross-calibration. Published on the website: space.mit.edu/ASC/calib/crosscal