Good to Great: A Culture of Discipline Group 1 Taylor Skidmore JT Lehosky Tara Ferguson Sunny To.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Good to Great AND THE Downtown Development Association of Lincolnton Why Business Thinking is Not the Answer.
Advertisements

Team 5 Katelyn Reed Monica Longer Kristen Hodge Venessa Rodriguez.
Chapter 5 The Free Enterprise System
July 30th – August 1st, 2013 McCormick Place, Chicago, IL Anatomy Of A Great Strategy Dan Greene.
Bunde Walker James Yost Trent Hemann. FIRST WHO…THEN WHAT Initial thoughts: Set new direction Set new vision and strategy for company Then get people.
Good to Great Chapter 6 – Culture of Discipline Team #1: Chris Bolinger Jeff Ward Ben Baker Jordan Guenther Josh Carver Chris Athens.
Good to Great Chapter 6 – A Culture of Discipline
Mamie Dupre Bess Luker Alicia Estrada Ryan Dupriest Taylor Watts.
THE HEDGEHOG CONCEPT (SIMPLICITY WITHIN THE 3 CIRCLES) By: Sean, Sarah, Sara, Daisy, and Cher.
THE FLYWHEEL AND THE DOOM LOOP Good to Great. Introduction Momentum of the flywheel eventually kicks in after a lot of persistent pushing.
Student Affairs Professional Development Conference– October 16, 2008 Good To Great … a discussion of Jim Collins book Disciplined People – Level 5 leadership,
Summary of Good to Great by Jim Collins
Team II Josh Pavlik, Jennifer Rogas, Logan Reynolds, Corbin Ray, Marlee Armstrong, Amy Drake.
Business Models BA 560 Prof. Thomas Dowling Fall Term, 2005.
Confront the Brutal Facts Technology Accelerators
Good To Great – The Journey ! CONFRONT THE BRUTAL FACTS HEDGEHOG CONCEPT LEVEL 5 LEADERSHIP DISCIPLINED PEOPLE FIRST WHO… THEN WHAT DISCIPLINED THOUGHT.
 This is because of how they respond to growth  ACCT 2301 Professor Steve Buchheit, spoke of his father’s appliance business loosing shipments of refrigerators.
Marketing Essentials Section 3.1 Capitalism
Making Human Resource Management Strategic
Essentials of Management Chapter 4
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 4 How Businesses Work.
Ch. 6: A Culture of Discipline Meghan Davidson Berklye Dominguez Justin Pickard Michael Simpson Andrew Varga.
Chapter 4 How Businesses Work McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Learning Goal: Understand how to calculate investments using decimals and percentages in a mock stock market investment.
GROUP 1 TIMOTHY LOVELAND BRENT GAFFORD JOHN MENTH ZACHARY MAYOR Good to Great Chapter 6: A Culture of Discipline.
Please do not talk at this timeApril 19 HW: Chapter 15.2 Cornell Notes (Pg. 127A/B) Lost Generation/Great Depression Quiz on Monday.
Good to Great Chapter 6 A Culture of Discipline
1 Economic Decisions and Systems 1-1 Satisfying Needs and Wants
Case Studies. The ‘Fits-and-Starts’ Organization 2-16.
Free Enterprise System
GOOD TO GREAT Takeaways…
GREAT Church GOOD Church to. Presented by: Lost Sheep Ministries.
A Review of GOOD _ TO _ GREAT By Jim Collins Presented by Arnold Goldman President of The Alternative Board of South Broward.
Building the case for change Workforce Academy. Building blocks of change establishing the case for change assessing readiness for change building sponsorship.
Team 6 Will Kerlick Bryan Fetterman Reece Macdonald Molly Murdock John Fletcher.
Welcome to ECON 2301 Principles of Macroeconomics Dr. Frank Jacobson Mr. Stuckey Week 2 Class 1.
Hedgehog Concept “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing The hedgehog sees what is essential, and ignores the rest You want to.
The Free Enterprise System
Results By Design Simple not Easy The Journey from Good to Great.
The Golden Circle, Dating and Building a Cathedral
+ The Free Enterprise System Chapter #5. + Chapter Objectives Explain the characteristics of a free enterprise system Distinguish between price and non-price.
Chapter 1 Good Is the Enemy of Great Team 2 Shawn Buck Ashley Burnett Whitney Horton Kelly Riester Mickea Smith Sam Snelling Jennifer Shotts.
Causes of the Great Depression Mr. Blais America in the World (TVP)
 The Free Enterprise System.  Traits of Private Enterprise.
Presented by Team 6 Andrei Gololobov, Laura McMannis, Svetlana Grimes.
Good To Great: Book Review By Elias, Jason, Ryan, Stephanie, Scott.
Roger May Lauren Heldreth Jade Black Kody Roach Taylor Hutcherson.
 WHEN YOU COMPARE GREAT COMPANIES WITH GOOD ONES, MANY WIDELY PRACTICED BUSINESS NORMS TURN OUT TO CORRELATE WITH MEDIOCRITY.
Good To Great By Jim Collins
Group 6: Wayni Hebert, Sterling Rose, Justin Simpson, Gwen Singleton, Krista Wells.
Team 5 Good to Great Technology Accelerators. Hedgehog Concept 1. What can you be the best in the world at. 2. What best drives your economic engine.
GOOD IS THE ENEMY OF GREAT Team 2.  Jim Collins – Author  “You know, Jim, we love Built to Last around here. You and your coauthor did a very fine job.
Leadership Excellence Good to Great Damon Burton University of Idaho.
MORE FACTS ABOUT INVESTING PERSONAL FINANCE. EMERGENCY FUNDS  An ___________account needs to have a high degree of _______ and __________.  High safety.
1 Creating Good-to- GREAT Company.
SOME OF THE GOOD TO GREAT RESEARCH TEAM. Ratio of Cumulative Stock Returns To General Market Good to Great Companies Comparison Companies © Copyright.
Katy Lovett, Matt Snowden, and CJ Baker.  How do companies go from go to great?  What methods were used in research?  What concepts exemplified good-to-great.
Moving From Good to Great
Missouri School Counselor Association and MSCA Region Emerging Leaders We are looking for Level 5 Leaders \ Missouri School Counselor Association and MSCA.
CH Team 1 Section: 092 Book: Good to Great Document Title: Chapter 6, A culture of Discipline. Presentation Date:
FROM CRASH TO DEPRESSION  1927  1928  The markets increased steadily….  Stock prices continued to climb, year after year!  Seeing the Stock.
(Simplicity within the Three Circles)
Good to Great: Chapter 6 By: Jake Alonzo Charly Cone Natalie Bohman Meredithe Marshall Michael Scott Mikey Via Virginie Charlotte Milhaud A Culture of.
THE HEDGEHOG CONCEPT (Simplicity within the Three Circles)
Overview of Good to Great
“Good to Great” by Jim Collins Some Highlights
Learning Objectives Identify stakeholders’ roles in business ethics
Milos Kustudija – Matt Zaney – Dustin Pace
The Free Enterprise System
Good to Great Why some companies make the Leap and Others Don’t An Empirical Study by Jim Collins January 2004 Clearwater, Fl.
Presentation transcript:

Good to Great: A Culture of Discipline Group 1 Taylor Skidmore JT Lehosky Tara Ferguson Sunny To

Amgen George Rathmann cofounded Amgen Amgen creates blood products to improve lives of people suffering through chemotherapy and kidney dialysis Stock price multiplied over 150 times between 1983 and 2000

Avoid the “Death Spiral” The purpose of bureaucracy is to compensate for incompetence and lack of discipline a problem that largely goes away if you have the right people in the first place.

Rathmann on his time at Abbott ture.html#audio=76 ture.html#audio=76 Responsibility Accounting (Bernard H. Semler) ◦ Every item of cost, income, and investment would be clearly identified with a single individual responsible for that item.

What we’re going to say Freedom within a Framework A culture, not a tyrant Fanatical adherence to the Hedgehog Concept Start a Stop Doing List

Freedom Within a Framework Freedom and responsibility within the framework of a highly developed system The good-to-great companies built a consistent system with clear constraints, but they also gave people freedom and responsibility within the framework of that system. They hired self-disciplined people who didn’t need to be managed, and then managed the system, not the people.

Freedom Within a Framework Cont. Circuit City: Bill Rivas, “It was a combination of great store managers who had ultimate responsibility for their individual stores, operating within a great system.” Google: Their commitment to innovation depends on everyone being comfortable sharing ideas and opinions. Every employee is a hands-on contributor, and everyone takes on several roles.

Creating a Culture of Discipline DISCIPLINED People DISCIPLINED Thought DISCIPLINED Action BUILDUP… BREAKTHROUGH!

Creating a Culture of Discipline Disciplined People: The transition begins not by trying to discipline the wrong people into the right behaviors, but by getting self-disciplined people in the first place. Disciplined Thought: You need the discipline to confront the brutal facts of reality, while believing that you will create a path to greatness. Disciplined Action: Many companies try to jump right to disciplined action, but with out the first two steps it is difficult to sustain.

Culture of Discipline Cont. Everyone would like to be the best, but most organizations lack the discipline to figure out with egoless clarity what they can be the best at and the will to do whatever it takes to turn potential into reality. Example: Wells Fargo in contrast to Bank of America. ◦ Carl Reichardt, “There’s to much waste in banking, getting rid of it takes tenacity, not brilliance.”

A Culture, Not A Tyrant Approach to discipline: ◦ Good-to-great companies had Level 5 leaders – built an enduring culture of discipline ◦ Unsustained companies had Level 4 leaders – who personally disciplined the organization through sheer force Ex. 1 – Burroughs Corp. – Ray MacDonald ◦ Controlled conversations, told all the jokes, criticized those not as smart as he ◦ 13 years reign – remarkable results ◦ Left, and the company was frozen by indecision and had “an inability to do anything” (Business Week)

A Culture, Not a Tyrant Ex. 2 – Rubbermaid – Stanley Gault ◦ “Yes, but I’m a sincere tyrant” ◦ Brought strict discipline – rigorous planning, competitor analysis, market research, hard-nosed cost control, etc ◦ “There is an incredible thoroughness in Rubbermaid’s approach to life.” ◦ Rose dramatically under Gault - declined just as fast when he left Ex. 3 – Chrysler – Lee Iacocca ◦ “Right away I knew this place was in a state of anarchy [and] needed a dose of order and discipline – and quick.” – Iacocca ◦ Entirely overhauled the management structure ◦ “I felt like an Army Surgeon…We had to do radical surgery, saving what we could.” - Iacocca ◦ Distracted or not, it’s clear that being a folk hero is a demanding sideline

FANATICAL ADHEARENCE TO THE HEDGEHOG CONCEPT The best in the world at Passion What drives your economic engine

Pitney Bowes Close relationship to the U.S. Postal Service and its patents on postage meter machines  100% of the metered mail market, no competition, huge market, never a loss  monopoly Forced to license its patents to competitors Losing market, failing in investments, losing money

P.B. (cont.) Level 5 Fred Allen: best in the world at servicing the back rooms of businesses, passion about the delivering messages Model of disciplined diversification. 45% of high-end fax market, investment in new technologies and products, link backroom machines to the Internet Point: what happens when a company lacks the discipline to stay within the 3 circles and what can happen when it regains that discipline

Other Companies Not follow the rules of the 3 circles Lacked the discipline to understand its 3 circles or lacked the discipline to stay within the 3 circles R.J.Reynolds – tobacco company, cancer, diversify away from its circles; bought a shipping container company and an oil company  RJR failed, sold Sea- Land versus Philip Morris, stayed and redifined its circles In events of crisis, companies need to react by redefining their Hedgehog Concept, not stepping out of their circles. A great company is much more likely to die of indigestion from too much opportunity than starvation from too little.  opportunity selection.

Nucor v. Bethlehem Steel Success of Nucor: ◦ translate simple concept into disciplined action consistent with that concept ◦ Four layers of management, 25 members, no better benefits for executives ◦ Well paid workers, executives and workers on the same boat ◦ Status and authority in Nucor come from the leadership capabilities, not the position Crisis in Bethlehem: ◦ Extravagant office, corporate aircraft, golf course, country club, shower priority based on exec. Rank ◦ 70s & 80s, Bethlehem declined, for the culture (climbing social hierarchy rather than customers, competitors, or changes in external world) Result: ◦ 80s: Nucor = 1/3 size of Bethlehem ◦ 90s: Nucor’s revenue surpassed, Nucor’s average 5-year profit per employee exceeded 10 times, $1 invested in Nucor beat $1 invested in Bethlehem by >200 times ◦ Nucor’s workers’ loyalty to the company  simple, crystalline Hedgehog Concept about aligning worker interests and the extent to be consistent with that concept

Corp. What are we best in the world at? - Search Engine: “better and faster at finding the right answer than any other search engines at the time” Passion: “Great isn’t good enough” - “We see being great at something as a starting point, not an endpoint. We set ourselves goals we know we can't reach yet, because we know that by stretching to meet them we can get further than we expected.” Denominator: “Focus on the customers and all else will follow” “The needs for information crosses all borders.” All they did to build a billion dollar empire: STICK

Start a “Stop Doing” List Display of a remarkable discipline to unplug all sorts of extraneous junk Kimberly-Clark – Darwin Smith ◦ Stop playing the annual forecast game with Wall Street ◦ Unplugged titles within the company ◦ Unplugged layers of reporting – if you couldn’t justify why you needed 15 people reporting to you, then you would have none ◦ Unplugged from all paper industry trade associations to become a “consumer company”

Budget Mechanism Good-to-great companies institutionalized the discipline of “stop doing” through a budget mechanism ◦ What is the purpose of budgeting?  Which arenas should be fully funded and which should not be funded at all Kimberly-Clark didn’t reallocate resources ◦ They completely eliminated the paper business, sold the mills, and invested all the money into their emerging consumer business Competitor of Kimberly-Clark ◦ “What they did is not fair…We just have too much invested in it, and we couldn’t have brought ourselves to do it.”

Taking a Risk Once a great company understands their 3 circles, they rarely hedge their bets ◦ All had the guts to make investments – once they understand their Hedgehog Concept! The most effective investment strategy is a highly undiversified portfolio when you are right. ◦ Highly undiversified – investing fully in those things that fit squarely within the 3 circles and eliminating everything else ◦ Being right – understanding the Hedgehog Concept

Being Right How do you know when you are right? ◦ If you have Level 5 leaders on the bus ◦ If you confront the brutal facts of reality ◦ If you create a climate where the truth is heard ◦ If you work within the 3 circles ◦ If you frame all decisions in the context of a crystalline H.C. ◦ If you act from understanding and not bravado Once you know the right thing, do you have the discipline to do the right thing and, equally important, to stop doing the wrong things?

A Culture of Discipline Wrap-Up Need freedom (and responsibility) within a framework ◦ Getting disciplined people who engage in disciplined though and who then take disciplined action ◦ “Rinse your cottage cheese” You want a culture, and not a tyrant ◦ Culture of discipline vs. a tyrant who disciplines Fanatical adherence to the Hedgehog Concept ◦ Single most important form of discipline ◦ Willingness to shun opportunities that fall outside the 3 circles “Stop doing” list ◦ Eliminates junk – Must know when! ◦ More important than “to-do” lists