Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
EdTPA: Task 1 Support Module Mike Vitale Mark L’Esperance College of Education East Carolina University Introduction edTPA INTERDISCIPLINARY MODULE SERIES.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Teacher Performance Assessment (edTPA) Partner School Visits Winter, 2014.
Customizing Professional Development Wall School District 51-5.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - Schedule and Honorarium 3.Assignment B - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness Project Specialist Effectiveness October 15, 2013.
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.
Tim Wagner, MYP Coordinator
Hanmer School – Margaret Zacchei Highcrest School – Maresa Harvey Webb School – Michael Verderame Emerson-Williams School – Neela Thakur Charles Wright.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Page 1 Caren Falascino, MYP Teacher Tim Wagner, MYP Coordinator.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Teacher in Residence  Sign in and take any graded homework from your folders.  Turn in your TWS – Teaching Context and Unit Overview  Please.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
Contemporary Issues September 8, Adjunct Professor Kristin P. O’Neil Office Hours: Scheduled on an individual.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Lesson Planning Session Planning effective, standards-based lessons within the practice teaching classroom.
Early Childhood Teacher Educators Building Capacities in Future Teacher Leaders --Pamela Owen, Ed.D., Mount Vernon Nazarene University --Krishana White,
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
Data/MTSS Team Training September, Learning Goals Data/MTSS Team members will be able to assist teachers in using data to write a SMARTer PDP goal.
District One Administrator Institute Elementary Literacy Session August 17, 2005.
N. Katherine Standard’s Exit Portfolio
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
AssessmentAssessment. Assessment What are some of the components of assessment.
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Initial Comparisons February, Crosswalk with SEPs InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Learning and Learning 1. Learner Development (11 standards)
Day 7. Agenda What’s the Buzz “Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of ELLs and students with disabilities” Mini-Lesson:
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
MODULE 2 INTRODUCTION AND MODULE OVERVIEW INFORMATION STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ASSIGNMENTS.
MODULE 3 INTRODUCTION AND MODULE OVERVIEW STANDARDS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS ASSIGNMENTS.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
INTASC Standards By: Maddie Gonsalves.
INTASC Standards By: Jackie Celia.
Coordinator of Field Placements
Cooperating Teacher In-Service
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Presentation transcript:

Today’s Agenda 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule 1.Professional Day 2.Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan 3.Assignment B - Honorarium and Schedule

Professional Day  Let’s look at the packet  Letters  Evaluation  Checklist  Hours log  Let’s look at the packet  Letters  Evaluation  Checklist  Hours log

Assignment B  Due Tuesday, October 2nd  See website - Assignment BAssignment B  Don’t forget your calendar when you meet with your cooperating teacher!  Due Tuesday, October 2nd  See website - Assignment BAssignment B  Don’t forget your calendar when you meet with your cooperating teacher!

Teacher Standards  Ultimately these are what all your classes are preparing you for  Something to assess you with  Uniformity across all teacher preparation programs and for beginning teachers  Ultimately these are what all your classes are preparing you for  Something to assess you with  Uniformity across all teacher preparation programs and for beginning teachers

INTASC & MN SEP  INTASC - Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium  MN SEP - Minnesota Standards of Effective Practice  INTASC - Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium  MN SEP - Minnesota Standards of Effective Practice

INTASC & MN SEP  One - Subject Area  Two - Student Learning  Three - Diverse Learners  Four - Instructional Strategies  Five - Learning Environment  Six - Communication  Seven - Planning Instruction  Eight - Assessment  Nine - Reflection & Professional Development  Ten - Collaboration, Ethics & Relationships  One - Subject Area  Two - Student Learning  Three - Diverse Learners  Four - Instructional Strategies  Five - Learning Environment  Six - Communication  Seven - Planning Instruction  Eight - Assessment  Nine - Reflection & Professional Development  Ten - Collaboration, Ethics & Relationships

Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson  Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility  Domain 1: Planning and Preparation  Domain 2: The Classroom Environment  Domain 3: Instruction  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities (within each domain sits components) See pages for overview  Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility  Domain 1: Planning and Preparation  Domain 2: The Classroom Environment  Domain 3: Instruction  Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities (within each domain sits components) See pages for overview

Setting Goals within Framework  What is a goal?  Why set a goal?  How do we know when we’ve achieved it?  Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan  What is a goal?  Why set a goal?  How do we know when we’ve achieved it?  Assignment A - SMART Goal and Improvement Plan

SMART Goal Focus Area  Domain 3: Instruction  Component 3d: Providing Feedback to Students  Domain 3: Instruction  Component 3d: Providing Feedback to Students

My Goal  To provide effective feedback to teacher-candidates.

My SMART Goal  To provide feedback to teacher- candidates in General Instructional Methods and Apprenticeship Middle School within two weeks of giving the assignment, using rubrics and/or performance task lists that are provided to the teacher-candidates prior to their turning in of the assignment.

SMART Goal Justification  Last spring in both my mid-term evaluation and end of the term evaluation many students remarked that I need to be more timely in returning assignments.  I personally like written feedback that is specific to the assignment.  I want to continue my work in designing formative and summative assessments that require more engagement on the students part.  Finally, between other work and family responsibilities I can easily fall behind in returning student work.  Last spring in both my mid-term evaluation and end of the term evaluation many students remarked that I need to be more timely in returning assignments.  I personally like written feedback that is specific to the assignment.  I want to continue my work in designing formative and summative assessments that require more engagement on the students part.  Finally, between other work and family responsibilities I can easily fall behind in returning student work.

My Improvement Plan In order to achieve my goal I need to: 1.Meet with Julia to better understand and practice using the types of rubrics we’ll use for General Instructional Methods. 2.I will create either a rubric and/or a performance task list for each assignment; it will be given with the assignment so that teacher-candidates know exactly what they’ll be graded on prior to turning in the assignment. All assignments can be accessed on my website. 1.Meet with Julia to better understand and practice using the types of rubrics we’ll use for General Instructional Methods. 2.I will create either a rubric and/or a performance task list for each assignment; it will be given with the assignment so that teacher-candidates know exactly what they’ll be graded on prior to turning in the assignment. All assignments can be accessed on my website.

My Improvement Plan cont. 1.I will use the same rubric and/or performance task list to assess the assignment. I will also write specific comments to provide more constructive feedback for the teacher-candidate. 2.I will meet every other week with Dan and Mike to discuss assignments and assessment. 3.I will consult my calendar on a regular basis to be sure I return items within two week time period! 1.I will use the same rubric and/or performance task list to assess the assignment. I will also write specific comments to provide more constructive feedback for the teacher-candidate. 2.I will meet every other week with Dan and Mike to discuss assignments and assessment. 3.I will consult my calendar on a regular basis to be sure I return items within two week time period!

My Improvement Plan cont. 1.In addition to meeting with Julia regarding assessment, I will work with my former SIP coach regarding alignment between assignments and assessments. 2.I will have teacher-candidates fill out an evaluation about my work towards my goal. 1.In addition to meeting with Julia regarding assessment, I will work with my former SIP coach regarding alignment between assignments and assessments. 2.I will have teacher-candidates fill out an evaluation about my work towards my goal.

Professional Development Plan  Examples of goal setting as part of contractual agreement:  PDP PDP  PDP Winter Progress Report PDP Winter Progress Report  PDP Spring Progress Report PDP Spring Progress Report  Examples of goal setting as part of contractual agreement:  PDP PDP  PDP Winter Progress Report PDP Winter Progress Report  PDP Spring Progress Report PDP Spring Progress Report