Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Shashi K. Gupta, Paul W. Stackhouse Jr.*, Taiping Zhang, and J. Colleen Mikovitz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outline Approach Data sets PAR fPAR C4/C3 LUE optimization.
Advertisements

James Dewar presenting liquid hydrogen: Physics Today, March 2008.
An Evaluation of the Surface Radiation Budget Over North America for a Suite of Regional Climate Models Student: Marko Markovic Director: Colin Jones Université.
ISCCP/GISS ISCCP/UMD UMD/MODIS July 2001 Zonal Mean all-sky surface SW down W/m 2 ) Figure 1.
TOA radiative flux diurnal cycle variability Patrick Taylor NASA Langley Research Center Climate Science Branch NEWS PI Meeting.
Surface Skin/Air Temperature and LW Flux Calculation Y-C. Zhang and W.B. Rossow LandFlux Conference CNES/CESBIO, Toulouse, France May 28 – 31, 2007.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Some Approaches and Issues related to ISCCP-based Land Fluxes Eric F Wood Princeton University.
Earth System Data Record (ESDR) for Global Evapotranspiration. Eric Wood Princeton University ©Princeton University.
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu Department of Atmospheric Science University of Washington.
Surface Albedo and SW Flux Calculation Y-C. Zhang and W.B. Rossow LandFlux Conference CNES/CESBIO, Toulouse, France May 28 – 31, 2007.
NASA Derived and Validated Climate Data For RETScreen Use: Description and Access Paul Stackhouse NASA Langley Research Center Charles Whitlock, Bill Chandler,
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu 1 Thomas Ackerman 1,2, Sally McFarlane 2, Jim Mather 2, University.
Land Surface Fluxes in Coupled Land/Atmosphere Analysis Systems Michael Bosilovich, NASA GSFC And Collaborators.
Surface Atmospheric Radiation Budget (SARB) working group update Seiji Kato 1, Fred Rose 2, David Rutan 2, Alexander Radkevich 2, Tom Caldwell 2, David.
GIST 23, DWD Offenbach, April 2005 Diurnal Cycle of Surface Radiation Budget G. L. Smith, P. E. Mlynczak, S. K. Gupta and P. W. Stackhouse.
An assessment of data products for studies of clouds and radiation (INVITED) Ehrhard Raschke University of Hamburg, Germany William R. Rossow, Yuan-Chong.
Surface Radiative Fluxes over the Pan-Arctic Land Region: Variability and Trends Xiaogang Shi 1, Martin Wild 2, and Dennis P. Lettenmaier 1 1 Department.
Evaluation of CMIP5 Simulated Clouds and TOA Radiation Budgets in the SMLs Using NASA Satellite Observations Erica K. Dolinar Xiquan Dong and Baike Xi.
Radiation Group 3: Manabe and Wetherald (1975) and Trenberth and Fasullo (2009) – What is the energy balance of the climate system? How is it altered by.
Synoptic variability of cloud and TOA radiative flux diurnal cycles Patrick Taylor NASA Langley Research Center Climate Science Branch
Long-term analyses of surface shortwave irradiance, clouds and aerosols over China T. Hayasaka 1, K. Kawamoto 1, and G.Y. Shi 2 1.Research Institute for.
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
1 CERES Results Norman Loeb and the CERES Science Team NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Reception NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD.
1st Progress meeting ELDAS The ELDORADO surface radiation system Bart vd Hurk & Dirk Meetschen et al (see ELDAS web-page)
AGU 2002 Fall Meeting NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Validation of GOES-8 Derived Cloud Properties Over the Southeastern Pacific J.
Clouds in the Southern midlatitude oceans Catherine Naud and Yonghua Chen (Columbia Univ) Anthony Del Genio (NASA-GISS)
Some Experiences and Recent Advances in Surface Radiation Measurements Ellsworth G. Dutton NOAA ESRL Global Monitoring Division Boulder, Colo
Clear sky Net Surface Radiative Fluxes over Rugged Terrain from Satellite Measurements Tianxing Wang Guangjian Yan
JCSDA Summer Colloquium Erica Dolinar 4 August 2015.
Christian Kummerow Colorado State University Chair, GEWEX Radiation Panel Fourth WCRP Observations and Assimilation Panel (WOAP) Meeting Date: March.
Why We Care or Why We Go to Sea.
ISCCP at its 30 th (New York, 22 – 25 April, 2013) Congratulations to the “Core Team” and to “Patient Outside-Supporters”: Our best wishes for a perspective.
The GEWEX Radiative Flux Assessment Project The GEWEX Radiative Flux Assessment Project 5 th International GEWEX Conference June , 2004 Atsumu Ohmura.
3rd Indo-French Workshop on Megha-Tropiques under ISRO-CNES Programme on Atmosphere, Climate and Oceanography, Ahmedabad, India October 17-20, Convection,
ISCCP at 30, April 2013 Backup Slides. ISCCP at 30, April 2013 NVAP-M Climate Monthly Average TPW Animation Less data before 1993.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
Large Eddy Simulation of Low Cloud Feedback to a 2-K SST Increase Anning Cheng 1, and Kuan-Man Xu 2 1. AS&M, Inc., 2. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton,
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
Clouds & Radiation: Climate data vs. model results A tribute to ISCCP Ehrhard Raschke, University of Hamburg Stefan Kinne, MPI-Meteorology Hamburg 25 years.
GIST 21 st, Boulder The Surface Radiation Budget within the Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM-SAF) Rainer Hollmann.
ASIC 3 May Broadband Breakout Group Recommendations Big 3 Crosscutting Earth Radiation Budget.
09-Nov-2004Brussels, 09-Nov CM-SAF Surface Radiation Budget: First Results and Plans R. Hollmann, A. Gratzki, R. Mueller O. Sievers Deutscher Wetterdienst.
Ocean Surface heat fluxes Lisan Yu and Robert Weller
Representation of Subgrid Cloud-Radiation Interaction and its Impact on Global Climate Simulations Xinzhong Liang (Illinois State Water Survey, UIUC )
Ocean Surface heat fluxes
ISCCP SO FAR (at 30) GOALS ►Facilitate "climate" research ►Determine cloud effects on radiation exchanges ►Determine cloud role in global water cycle ▬
Evaluation of radiative properties of low and high clouds in different regimes using satellite measurements Bing Lin 1, Pat Minnis 1, and Tai-Fang Fan.
Lazaros Oreopoulos (NASA-GSFC)
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Initial Results from the Diurnal Land/Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (DICE) Weizhong Zheng, Michael Ek, Ruiyu Sun, Jongil Han, Jiarui Dong and Helin Wei.
MODIS Science Team Meeting, Land Discipline (Jan. 27, 2010) Land Surface Radiation Budgets from Model Simulations and Remote Sensing Shunlin Liang, Ph.D.
Estimation of Potential Evapotranspiration from Merged CERES and MODIS Observations Anand Inamdar & A. French Arid Land Agricultural Research Center (ALARC/ARS/USDA)
March 12, 2002 Eric A. Smith 1 ISLSCP II Data Intercomparison Workshop Eric A. Smith; NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD [tel: ;
Significance of ISCCP to Realistic Estimates of Global Radiation Profiles Yuanchong Zhang 1 and William B. Rossow 2 1 Columbia University at NASA GISS,
MPI Metorology comparing ISCCP and GEWEX products Madison, July 2006 Stefan Kinne Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg, Germany Ehrhard Raschke.
© Crown copyright Met Office Southern Ocean surface flux biases in GCMs Keith Williams, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo & Patrick Hyder SOCRATES workshop 18/03/14.
Consistent Earth System Data Records for Climate Research: Focus on Shortwave and Longwave Radiative Fluxes Rachel T. Pinker, Yingtao Ma and Eric Nussbaumer.
Variability of Arctic Cloudiness from Satellite and Surface Data Sets University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory Polar Science Center Axel J.
Do ISCCP & SRB Radiation Products Show Effects of Anomalies in Ancillary Data ? Ehrhard Raschke (Hamburg) Stefan Kinne (Hamburg) Ely Duenas (GISS, NY)
NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences CERES Instantaneous Clear-sky and Monthly Averaged Radiance and Flux Product Overview David Young NASA.
Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Comparison of Radiation Schemes Using a Single Colum Model Joonsuk Lee Jung-Yoon.
A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017, Pasadena, CA
TOA Radiative Flux Estimation From CERES Angular Distribution Models
Xiquan Dong, Baike Xi, Erica Dolinar, and Ryan Stanfield
Entrapment An important mechanism for shortwave 3D cloud radiative effects and its inclusion in the SPARTACUS radiative transfer model Robin Hogan, Mark.
GEWEX Radiation Panel Report
+ = Climate Responses to Biomass Burning Aerosols over South Africa
Aaron Kennedy, Xiquan Dong, and Baike Xi University of North Dakota
Ming-Dah Chou Department of Atmospheric Sciences
Presentation transcript:

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Shashi K. Gupta, Paul W. Stackhouse Jr.*, Taiping Zhang, and J. Colleen Mikovitz Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) Hampton, Virginia *PI: NASA/GEWEX Surface Radiation Budget (SRB) Project Computation of Surface Longwave Fluxes Effect of Skin-Air Temperature Differences LANDFLUX Assessment and Organization Workshop Toulouse, France May 2007

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center The NASA/GEWEX SRB Dataset A 22-year (Jul1983-Jun2005) dataset produced at LaRC Monthly, Daily, Monthly/3-Hourly, and 3-Hourly at 1°x1° Algorithms: Primary and Quality-Check - SW and LW Input Data: Cloud Properties Derived from ISCCP-DX Meteorological Profiles from GEOS-4 Column Ozone: TOMS and TOVS Archives Validation Data: BSRN, WRDC, and GEBA Archives Submitted to GEWEX Radiative Flux Assessment Dataset and ancillary information will be available at:

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center 22-Year Average Surface Radiative Fluxes PR QC SWLW

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Multi-Year Global Averages * Normalized to S 0 = 1367 W m -2 ; (F 0 = S 0 /4) Parameter Ohmura & Gilgen (1993) GEBA Surf. Obs. Kiehl and Trenberth (1997) ERBE/ CCM3 Zhang & Rossow (2004) 21-Year Mean ( ) NASA/GEWEX SRB Release 2.5/2.81* (NASA LaRC) 22-Year Mean (July June 2005) SW, LWSW, LW QC Flux% F 0 Flux% F 0 Flux% F 0 Flux% F 0 Flux% F 0 SW Down SW Net LW Down LW Net Total Net SW CRF LW CRF Total CRF

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Introduction SRB Longwave Algorithms: 1.GEWEX LW (Fu/Stackhouse): CERES 2/4-Stream LW model (Fu et al., 1997), maximum-random cloud overlap, CERES spectral surface emissivity. Results: TOA and Surface, 3-Hourly, Daily, Monthly/3-Hourly, and Monthly data products. 2.GEWEX LW QC (Gupta et al., 1989, 1992): RT based parameterizations for clear/cloudy downward LW fluxes, CERES broadband surface emissivity. Results: Surface 3-Hourly, Daily, Monthly/3-Hourly, and Monthly data products. Both models overestimate DLF for some regions at the high end of DLF range. Determine the cause, assess the magnitude, and develop a remedy for this overestimation.

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Comparison of 3-Hourly Fluxes With BSRN Data PrimaryQuality-Check Investigate the cause focussing on the quality-check model

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center WHAT IS CAUSING IT AND WHERE? Effective Emitting Temperature: T eff = 0.60 T s T T 2 T s - Surface skin temperature T 1 - Average temperature for Sfc mb layer T 2 - Average temperature for mb layer Works well when T s, T 1, and T 2 conform to nominal lapse rate requirements. When T s >> T 1 (and T 2 ), it results in overestimation of DLF. Mostly over dry/arid regions during hot times of day.

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Weighting Function for DLF Reaching the Surface (U.S. Standard Atmosphere - 50 mb Layers)

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Methodology Selected two sites for study: Alice Springs, Australia - Dry/Arid Goodwin Creek, MS (USA) - Moderate/Humid Performed flux computations using a stand-alone version of the quality-check model on a 3-hourly time resolution for all months of Compared model-derived DLF with ground-based observations for the above sites obtained from BSRN.

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Analysis of Alice Springs Overestimation Points with overestimation of > 100 Wm points during the year (16 in Jan; 20 in DJF) Mean = 120 Wm -2 ; Range: Wm -2 T s : Mean = K; Range: K P s : Mean = 939 mb; Range: mb T 800 : Mean = K; Range: K T s - T 800 : Mean = 32.2 K; Range: K T s - T 800 should be about 10 K, but no more than 15 K Decided that lapse rates > 10K/100mb in the lower layer are too steep, and need to be adjusted. Adjusted skin temperature to not exceed 10K/100mb limit.

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Results From the Modified Computation Alice SpringsGoodwin Creek Bias for Alice Springs - reduced greatly; Change for Goodwin Creek - minimal

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Monthly Temperature Adjustment and Frequency Temperature AdjustmentAdjustment Frequency Jan Jul

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Model-Derived vs. Ground-Measured BSRN DLF (Primary Model) Alice Springs Goodwin Creek Alice Springs: Slight overestimation at the high end; small negative bias overall.

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Model-Derived vs. Ground-Measured DLF (Primary Model) Alice Springs Some overestimation at the high end during DJF; underestimation during JJA

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Summary and Future Work Determined the cause of DLF overestimation: Occurs when skin temperature (T s ) is much higher than atmospheric temperatures. Instantaneous overestimation can be 100 Wm -2 or even more. Developed a method for detecting this condition and constraining T s prior to using it in DLF computation, largely eliminating the bias. Constrained T s is not used for upward flux computation. Tested method with quality-check model for all months of Similar analysis is underway for the primary LW algorithm. Results of analysis to be applied in the next round of processing.

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Back-up Slides

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Model-Derived vs. Ground-Measured BSRN DLF (Quality-Check Model) Alice Springs Goodwin Creek Significant overestimation over Alice Springs; almost none over Goodwin Creek

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Model-Derived vs. Ground-Measured DLF (Quality-Check Model) Alice Springs Severe overestimation during DJF; slight underestimation during JJA

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Comparison of Daily Averages With BSRN Data PrimaryQuality-Check Overestimation not so apparent after diurnal averaging

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Monthly Temperature Adjustment and Frequency

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Surface and Atmospheric Temperatures Over Sea of Japan - January 2000

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Surface Skin Temperature From Different Datasets Jan2000Jul2000 GEOS-4 ISCCP Primary LW

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Surface Skin Temperatures From Different Datasets