March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Beamline Performance with New Magnet Descriptions Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

Hall C SHMS Fringe Field Analysis Michael Moore Hall C Winter Meeting
January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
Akihisa TOYODA, KEK. Outline g-2/EDM beamline Final Focus(FF) optimization Requirements Option 1: 1-Solenoid case Option 2: 3-Quads case Option 3: 1-Solenoid.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
Estimation of the Force on the Syringe Tie-Rods from Fringing Magnetic Fields Steve Kahn 5 April 2006.
Lecture 17-The Magnetic Field Chapter 24 Friday, March 6.
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006V. Palladino Plans for MICE PI detectors & Shielding MICE CM16, RAL Oct 11, 2006 V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli for the small.
Paul drumm, mutac jan MICE Beamline Optics Design Kevin Tilley, RAL, 12th June MICE Needs Generic Solution Pion Injection & Decay Section (a) Inputs.
March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Upstream Particle Identification Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.
Slide 1 MICE Beamline Design and Commissioning Review 16 th Nov 2007 Simulation comparison / tools / issues Henry Nebrensky Brunel University There are.
TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.
1 PID status MICE Analysis phone conference Rikard Sandström.
TJR 10/30/031 MICE Beam rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 10/30/03.
June 13, Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology June13, 2003.
11-FEB-2004 TJR1 MICE Beamline TOF Analysis Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Techology February 11, 2004.
Beam line summary paul drumm for beam line group.
March 31, Status of the TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detector Packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Laboratory Mice Collaboration Meeting March.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Status report about the e-  identifier Study of shielding against the stray magnetic field at the downstream end of the spectrometer F. Huveneers, Gh.
1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.
TJR August 2, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis1 MICE Beamline Analysis JUNE04 Including a proposal for a JUNE04A Configuration Tom Roberts Illinois Institute.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
TJR 11/03/2003Slide 1 g4beamline A “Swiss Army Knife” for Geant4 Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology.
MOM Report. Shield Wall – Gone Before During After 2.
TJR 9/24/031 Update: Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline – Absolute Normalization Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 9/24/03 (With thanks.
Paul drumm, mutac jan K. Tilley, MICE-VC, 10/05/07 Status of Beamline Design / Commissioning MICE-VC.
Realistic Model of the Solenoid Magnetic Field Paul S Miyagawa, Steve Snow University of Manchester Objectives Closed-loop model Field calculation corrections.
TJR 7/30/031 Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 7/30/03.
Solenoid Magnetic Field Measurement. MICE solenoid includes 5 coils First solenoid expected at FNAL for magnetic field measurements in April Measurements.
1 Status of infrastructure MICE Video Conference, August 17, 2005 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department.
June 22, 2004 TJR1 MICE Beamline Rate Dependency on Pi+ Momentum, and Downstream PiD Distributions Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology June 22,
4th April MICE – Magnetic Shield Configuration H Witte, J Cobb Oxford University University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford,
MICE BL meeting 11/12/08 Agenda This weekend (12 or 13/12/08): a)beam emittance measurement (Mark-next talk) b)TOF0/1 characterisation (TbC – comments.
May 12, 2004 TJR1 Effects of Downstream Iron Shield Position on MICE Good- Mu+ Rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology May 12, 2004.
May 12, 2004 TJR1 Effects of Upstream ParticleID Counters on MICE Good-Mu+ Rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology May 12, 2004.
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
Robin Wines. Verbal agreement with BNL to acquire 48D48 magnet Contact at BNL indicates 4 of these magnets in storage BNL agrees to disassemble magnet.
Energy deposition for intense muon sources (chicane + the rest of the front end) Pavel Snopok Illinois Institute of Technology and Fermilab December 4,
Hall C Meeting SHMS Magnets and Support Structure Design and Procurement Status Paul Brindza January 26, 2009.
Some considerations and back-of-the-envelope computations on the multipole correctors Giovanni Volpini, CERN, 7 March 2013.
1 BetaFunction Void DoIntegration Double GetBeta Double GetAlpha Double GetEmittance Double GetPz Void Print Void AddMaterial Void AddQuadrupole Void AddSolenoid.
Beam line commissioning Preparations for Phase1 Kevin Tilley For Paul Drumm & the beam line group.
Status of the MICE Project & Dashboard MICE Project Board 14 th November 2013 Roy Preece.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
Update Chris Rogers, Analysis PC, 13/07/06. State of the “Accelerator” Simulation Field model now fully implemented in revised MICE scheme Sanity checking.
18 December, 2007 Analysis PC 18 Dec PIDer’s Question of Friday 14 Dec: Dear John and Marco, would you be able to give us a first preliminary ball-park.
Paul drumm, mutac jan Precursor: - Resources since cm16. Beamline Review Response. Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status.
TJR August 2, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis1 MICE Beamline Analysis JUNE04 Including a proposal for a JUNE04A Configuration Update – August 03, 2004 (new.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
BL1U at TRIUMF UCN Beamline Septum & Dipole Magnets (April 12, 2010)
3 June 2009J. H. Cobb 1 ANALYSIS SUMMARY CM24 Agenda for Analysis parallel session at CM Sunday 31 May 14:00.
Consolidation of the Booster Injection Quadrupole Magnets (part 2) A. Aloev 14 th February 2013.
1 Beamline Session Talk #TimePresenterTalk Title 19:00C. BoothMICE Target Development Status 29:15T.J.RobertsTarget Source Calculations 39:30P.SolerParticle.
1 Beamline Work. Optics:- Simulation debugging (then redesign..) Commissioning Hardware:- Dipole B1 beampipe installation issue Further magnet measurements.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Muons, Inc. 14 Jan 2010 S. Kahn--IR Quads 1 IR Quadrupoles with Exotic Materials Steve Kahn, Muons Inc. Bob Palmer, BNL Don Summers, Ole Miss.
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd magnetic fields due to currents Long straight wire Circular coil Long solenoid.
Paul drumm, mutac jan Status of Muon Beamline design work Kevin Tilley, RAL, 9th Feb Including Beamline Materials in new revision Reference ('True')
1 1 Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status - G4BL/TTL Simulation comparisons - Beam steering/correction -Collimation d/stream &
One plane dipole corrector for the CLIC MBQ TYPE 1
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
2016/9/30 Yasuhiro Infra/CFS mini-ws
Alexander Kalimov, State Polytechnic University, St.-Petersburg
Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology
How to turn on MICE Step IV
HRS at small angles for e+/ e- pair for APEX
BEAMLINE MAGNETS FOR ALPHA-G
FIG. 1. Schematic of the triple modulation setup, which includes a linear polarizer, Helmholtz coils with an applied sinusoidal magnetic field, PEM, second.
Measurement and Characterization of a 5T Solenoid Field
Presentation transcript:

March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Beamline Performance with New Magnet Descriptions Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004

March 30, 2004 TJR2 Progression of Magnet Descriptions JAN04 was designed using block fields, except for the DecaySolenoid which used the coil field (no iron) In the New York Meeting I applied a simple Laplace solution for the fringe fields of B1 and B2; since then I have implemented COSY-style fringe fields for bends and quads Full “rounded +” apertures in the muon quads Q4-Q9 (Q1-Q3 have circular apertures) Good magnetic map of the DecaySolenoid, including its iron Good magnetic map of the upstream and downstream magnetic shields

March 30, 2004 TJR3 Comparison of Laplace to COSY-style fringe fields All computations have the same integral By dz.

March 30, 2004 TJR4 Decay Solenoid Magnetic Map Even without the Iron, the fringe field extends only ~20-30 cm along the axis (r and z scales are quite different)

March 30, 2004 TJR5 Downstream Magnetic Shield (r and z scales are different)

March 30, 2004 TJR6 Effects of the Improved Descriptions DescriptionFactorCumulative JAN04 (block fields)1.00 Full apertures in the muon quads Q4-Q COSY-style fringe fields in Bends and Quads Iron in DecaySolenoid Magnetic shielding upstream and downstream Factor is from the good-mu+ rate.