Monitoring and Evaluation for TB Programs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Advertisements

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Overview of the Global Fund: Guiding Principles Grant Cycle / Processes & Role of Public Private Partnerships Johannesburg, South Africa Tatjana Peterson,
Early lessons learned and promising practices: Supporting Provincial Health Departments and Districts in Mozambique Dr. Antonio Mussa 8th Annual Track.
Selecting the Right Evaluation Method. Objectives Why should we evaluate? Which activities should we evaluate? When should we evaluate? How should we.
PROPOSED ACTIVITIES Nutrition STRATEGIC Area 4 Information/Knowledge Management (includes monitoring & assessment) GLOBAL NUTRITION CLUSTER VISION:
MEASURE Evaluation M&E and Advocacy Tools in the response to the Emergency Declaration.
Progress to date on Contraceptive Security in Latin America Anabella Sánchez, Manager for LAC CS Regional Initiative Nora Quesada, Manager for LAC country.
Compendium of Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluating National Tuberculosis Programs Using the Compendium to Plan for Monitoring and Evaluation of NTPs.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Compendium of Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluating National Tuberculosis Programs.
Indicators, Data Sources, and Data Quality for TB M&E
Monitoring and Evaluation for TB Programs Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Charlotte Colvin 2 February 2006 New Delhi, India.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Key Terms for Monitoring and Evaluation. Objectives Explain the difference between monitoring and evaluation. Introduce the most common M&E terms. Review.
USAID TB Technical Assistance Model June 19, 2014.
1 TB/HIV Project in the Philippines Yumiko Yanase.
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
Advocacy.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
Understanding Project Management. Project attributes  The project has a purpose  Project has a life cycle like an organic entity  Project has clearly.
THE ROLE OF STOP TB GHANA PARTNERSHIP Chief Austin A. Obiefuna National Coordinator SECRETARIAT CO-HOSTED BY AFRO GLOBAL ALLIANCE (GH) & GHANA SOCIETY.
Development of National Tuberculosis Communication Strategies in Central Asia Jamilya Ismoilova, Kayt Erdahl, Gulnora Rasulova, Saodat Koymova Project.
Monitoring and Evaluation Module 12 – March 2010.
SEILA Program and the Role of Commune Database Information System (CDIS) Poverty and Economic Policy (PEP) Research Network Meeting June 2004, Dakar,
1. IASC Operational Guidance on Coordinated Assessments (session 05) Information in Disasters Workshop Tanoa Plaza Hotel, Suva, Fiji June
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
CONNECTICUT HEALTH FOUNDATION: Update on Evaluation Planning for the Strategic Plan.
Overview of Advocacy, Communication, and Social Mobilization.
Introduction to Evaluation. Objectives Introduce the five categories of evaluation that can be used to plan and assess ACSM activities. Demonstrate how.
U pdates on the development of the NTP National Strategic Plan GC National TB Conference Pokhara, July 14-15, 2014 Giampaolo Mezzabotta Medical.
African Business Leaders on Health: GBC Conference on TB, HIV-TB Co-infection & Global Fund Partnership Johannesburg, October 11, 2010 The state of Global.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Public Health Advocacy in Low Income Settings: Views and Experiences on Effective Strategies and Evaluation of Health Advocates in Malawi IFGH Conference:
EU Funding opportunities : Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme Justice Programme Jose Ortega European Commission DG Justice.
Indicators for ACSM.
Learning Lessons from Experience: good practice case studies Inclusive Education Title: Inclusive education planning in school and local authority levels.
CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.
TB/HIV COLLABORATION IN GHANA Dr. Nii Nortey Hanson – Nortey National TB Control Programme Accra.
December_2009 Partnership building. December_2009 Partnership building within the partnering process COREGROUPCOREGROUP FORMAL LAUNCH $ $ $ $ $ cost centre.
Roma Inclusion pilot project: Information and awareness raising DG REGIO conference “Monitoring and Evaluation of Roma projects and policies” 30 November.
Measuring Risk, Vulnerability and Impact in Conflict: Doing Better Through Data Collaboration What is DFID doing in Afghanistan?
The P Process Strategic Design
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP RIGHT AND CITIZENSHIP
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
By: Albert Byamugisha, PhD Commissioner, Monitoring and Evaluation Office of the Prime Minister – Uganda Presented at the Evaluation Capacity Development.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Policies and strategies to expand ECCE: what makes a difference in countries Input from UNGEI technical meeting.
Nigeria’s Advocacy, Communication and Social Mobilization Branch Itohowo Uko AD, Head, ACSM, National Malaria Elimination Programme-Nigeria International.
Comprehensive M&E Systems: Identifying Resources to Support M&E Plans for National TB Programs Lisa V. Adams, MD E&E Regional Workshop Kiev, Ukraine May.
1 Implementation. 2 ‘It ain’t over till it’s over’ … and even then, it’s not over either! Implementation is  the realisation of the stated objectives.
ACSM at Country Level Sub Group Meeting
GNC Blanket Supplementary Feeding Programming (BSFP) Ali Maclaine Senior Humanitarian Nutrition Advisor January 2013.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Compendium of Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluating National Tuberculosis Programs.
DHPI Approach at a Glance Facilitators’ Workshop on District Health Performance Improvement Lilongwe, 25 th – 27 th March 2015.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
12. Role of national and international technical and funding partners in the implementation of aDSM Multi-partner training package on active TB drug safety.
Find and Treat All Missing Persons with TB
Monitoring and Evaluation for TB Programs
Objectives of Session Provide an overview of the development of Compendium Explain the organization of the Compendium and how indicators are used Provide.
How to make Better power point presentations
Monitoring and Evaluation for TB Programs
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Indicator: % of population in an area of BMU implementing DOTS
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and Evaluation for TB Programs Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Synthesize everything that we have learned earlier this week– logic frameworks, indicator selection, data sources, etc… – end product is to draft an M&E plan for your country

Key M&E Plan Principles M&E Plan complements NTP M&E system The main purpose of the plan is to measure implementation, progress, and results/impact Plan is implemented by many actors It is usually a NATIONAL plan There are many ways to organize and implement plan We will talk about M&E systems later on today

Stepwise Approach to TB M&E Plan Clear Goals and Objectives Development of Interventions Selection of Appropriate Indicators Data Collection, Analysis and Use Data Dissemination 1st, understand the rationale, key elements and steps required in developing an M&E plan. Apply program goals and objectives in developing an M&E plan Develop and select program monitoring and eval questions and indicators and review the issues related to program evaluation. Determine M&E methods, including identifying indicators, data source plan for analysis.

Model Plan OBJECTIVE ACTIVITIES INDICATOR MEASUREMENT SOURCE (existing or new) RESPONSIBLE Increase DOTS coverage Expand DOTS to from 50 to 100% of the country % of the BMU implementing the DOTS strategy Annual NTP budget allocated to implement DOTS as required by MDP Numerator: # of BMUs implementing DOTS Denominator: Total # of BMUs Numerator:Total # of funds allocated for DOTS-based TB control in the previous year’s NTP budget Demoninator: Total amount of funds for DOTS-based TB control in the previous year’s annual budget NTP MOH Annual NTP work plan and budget, MDP Increase awareness of TB in the community Organize educational awareness activities: theater, musical concert, films, sports events # and type of TB activity organized in the district % of population in the district that know TB is curable Numerator: # of people who know TB is curable Denominator: Total # of people surveyed Program Reports Community Survey NGOs Consider using one of the group’s goals/objectives from Day One. We’ve seen this before but to reiterate, this is what we want as a final product

Elements of the Plan Source of data Person or entity who is responsible Refer to system checklist – can be useful to identify sources of data and resources for reporting Already covered first three columns during last two days, need to fill out the rest. Need to be as specific as possible – for individual NTP, often useful to put the person’s name. Comprehensive M&E plans should include: Overall goals and objectives Specific M&E questions Methods Designs to be used What data will be collected and how Who will implement various parts of the plan Timeline of the plan

Key Data Use and Dissemination Questions Who are the potential audiences or users of results of our M&E plan? Which particular findings will be of most interest to each potential audience or use? What are the best channels to reach each potential audience or user? What info should be distributed? Who need the info? Who does the info get distributed? The dissemination of evaluation findings can support the usefulness of evaluation and future activities. As well as reduce the duplication and evaluation efforts. Furthermore, disseminating results enables us to teach others that M&E is indeed a tool for improving programs. For this reason a plan for how to disseminate the evaluation finding is crucial to your plan.

Using Data for Decision-Making Improve performance and programming Advocate for policy changes Sustain resources for TB control Increase public awareness about TB Encourage communities to support TB patients Improve coordination among partners Provide lessons learned for in-country and international programs

Data Dissemination Develop a strategy early Answer the 3 questions (in previous slide) Use as many media channels as appropriate Be creative and innovative

Conclusion Wealth of TB data exists at district/facility Standardized tools available for data collection Compendium is a reference for standardized indicators Ensure strategy for analyzing, using and disseminating data Another slide? Key questions to ask in determining if an M&E plan is working: Are the M&E activities progressing as planned? Are the M&E questions being covered sufficiently? Is other data needed? Should th questions be reframed? Is there other questions that should be asked? Are there any methodological or valuation designs issues that need to be addressed? Are there changes in the M&E plan needed at this time? Are appropriate staff and funding still available to complete the evaluation plan? How are the findings of the M&E activities contributing?