Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May 2010 17 th Real-Time.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
LHC Experiments at Liverpool E2V Visit – Nov 2005 Introduction Si Technology Upgrade/Maintenance Summary.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
CMS Alignment and Calibration Yuriy Pakhotin on behalf of CMS Collaboration.
First year experience with the ATLAS online monitoring framework Alina Corso-Radu University of California Irvine on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ Collaboration.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
Alignment Strategy for ATLAS: Detector Description and Database Issues
The Region of Interest Strategy for the ATLAS Second Level Trigger
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
Performance of Track and Vertex Reconstruction and B-Tagging Studies with CMS in pp Collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV Boris Mangano University of California,
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
Primary Vertex Reconstruction in the ATLAS Experiment at LHC K. Prokofiev (University of Sheffield) (in part supported by EU FP6 Research Training Network.
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
G. Volpi - INFN Frascati ANIMMA Search for rare SM or predicted BSM processes push the colliders intensity to new frontiers Rare processes are overwhelmed.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
p-on-n Strip Detectors: ATLAS & CMS
1 The ATLAS SemiConductor Tracker commissioning at SR1 APS and JPS joint conference October 30, 2006 Ryuichi Takashima ( Kyoto Univ. of Education ) For.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
Charmonium Production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Interactions Presented by Wolfgang Gradl for the HERA-B
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
B-Tagging Algorithms at the CMS Experiment Gavril Giurgiu (for the CMS Collaboration) Johns Hopkins University DPF-APS Meeting, August 10, 2011 Brown University,
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
May/7/2008 SLAC ATLAS Forum Online Beam Spot in HLT Su Dong.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
More technical description:
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST
Why do we want a TPC? P. Colas, CEA Saclay
Presentation transcript:

Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May th Real-Time Conference Lisbon, Portugal 27 May, ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime 2010

The Inner Tracking Detectors ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 Silicon Strips –4 barrel layers + 2 x 9 end-cap disks –σ r ϕ ~ 17μm; σ Z ~580μm –6.3 million channels Silicon Pixels –3 barrel layers + 2 x 3 end-cap disks –σ r ϕ ~ 10μm; σ Z ~115μm –80 million channels Transition Radiation Drift Tubes –73 barrel straws + 2 x 160 end-cap disks –σ r ~ 130μm –350,000 channels TRT SCT PIX

The ATLAS Trigger System ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 Hardware Level ‐ 1 Trigger Calorimeter Muon System Hardware based Coarse granularity 2.5us Level ‐ 2 Trigger RoI e/γ, μ, jet,.. Full granularity in RoI ~ 500 PC (multi ‐ core) ~40ms Event Filter ~1800 PC (multi ‐ core) High bandwidth data network ~4s 3-level trigger system –L1: Hardware/firmware algorithms –L2: Software algos: regions of interest –L3 (EF): Software: full detector Access to inner tracking detectors –Level-2 is first opportunity to perform track reconstruction –Limited to 40ms per algorithm –Can pull data from nearly 90 million channels

The LHC Machine ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 Param900 GeV7 TeV14 TeV Spot size [μm]20774 / 3212 Length [cm] It is not enough to simply collect data, we have to collect good data –Measure and monitor the LHC beams inside of ATLAS every two minutes Optimal ATLAS and LHC performance depends on high beam quality and operational efficiency –Feedback information on beam quality within ATLAS to LHC operators

Introduction to the online beam spot measurement Motivation and Goals Measure and monitor the interaction point position (x, y, z) profile (σ x, σ y, σ z ) and tilt Communicate the “luminous region” parameters to the ATLAS and LHC control rooms Feedback to Level-2 (L2) algorithms (e.g. b-tag) for optimal performance Provide relative luminosity monitor via vertex counting Design and Constraints Robust L2 tracking algorithms with Silicon-based pattern recognition –Full Tracking: ~100s ms (subset of evts) Fast L2 vertexing using decorrelating transformation –Vertexing: ~0.2 ms (10 -2 of time budget) Expect ~kHz rates into L2, run also on rejected events: factor >10 more stats Gather (“pull”) and sum data from 1000’s of processor nodes ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 Estimate the vector R (vertex position) using the measurements at the reference surface

ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 The LHC came online in record time

ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 declare stable beams Before we can safely turn on the silicon tracking detectors to see beam, LHC operators must “ declare stable beams ”…we were very happy

First ATLAS Data with the HLT With first stable beams came the first opportunity to catch a glimpse of the LHC beams within ATLAS –Activate full HLT farm (= hundreds-thousands of nodes) –Pull data from Inner Detector read-out drivers –Perform full track pattern recognition and fitting –Use fast vertex-fitter to reconstruct individual event vertices All within the time budget of a ~40ms at L2 ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 See PDAQ-28 from I. Christidi See PDAQ-28 from I. Christidi

Routine online luminous region measurements Within days, the high-level trigger became a routine component of operations –Position measured every ~2 min. Online “beam spot” (luminous region) parameter determination based on massively parallel monitoring infrastructure ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010

Complementing the beam instrumentation By measuring the longitudinal vertex position we can compare to (and calibrate) the LHC beam instrumentation The BPTX sensors provide precise ToF measurements of the Z-position We calibrated the ToF (remove offsets) and provided feedback to the LHC operators on the positioning of the interaction point in ATLAS ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 BPTX: electrostatic sensors to provide time- of-flight measurements of the Z-position of individual proton bunches (See talk by J. Lundberg)

Bunch-to-bunch Measurements Ultimate LHC design: 2808 colliding bunches per orbit –Crucial to understand if all bunches “look the same” –Monitor the bunch-to-bunch positions and vertex count –Provides estimate of background i.e. “do we see vertices where we shouldn’t?” --- Answer today: No! ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 First LHC fill with > 4 colliding bunches Only find vertices in 9 colliding bunches

Online luminosity monitoring By continuously monitoring the vertex count we obtain a direct measure of the relative luminosity Comparison with “standard” luminosity detectors indicates excellent shape agreement over large range of luminosity –Orthogonal acceptance ranges –Implies very little background ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010

Measuring the luminous region at 7 TeV ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010

Luminous region tilt ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 “Real-time” interaction point characterization Bunch-to-bunch position Time evolution Independent track-only fitRelative Luminosity Beam instrumentation calibration

Full circle: feeding back measurements to the HLT Primary clients of online beam spot measurement: –Tracking (generally) –b-Tagging Precise knowledge of the LHC beams in ATLAS is crucial for optimal trigger performance But need to redistribute parameters determined in quasi-real time to thousands of running processes –Extremely challenging Real-time reconfiguration of HLT farm made possible via proxy-tree –~810 nodes, s MBs of configuration data –Configuration data cached in proxy tree ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 See PDAQ-15 for the details See PDAQ-15 for the details

Real-time configuration changes Must ensure consistent and reproducible configuration across the entire HLT farm… …without incurring deadtime or disrupting data-taking Each proxy caches the result of DB queries Client applications are “notified” of conditions update and read new beam spot information ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010 Gather data from nodes Gather data from nodes Process result (fit beamspot position, update DB) Process result (fit beamspot position, update DB) Feedback to L2 nodes and algos Feedback to L2 nodes and algos See PDAQ-15 for the details See PDAQ-15 for the details

Summary and Conclusions We have successfully deployed and utilized a set of algorithms for measuring and monitoring the LHC luminous region parameters in ATLAS in real-time Measurements at both 900 GeV and 7 TeV indicate that these algorithms are robust and crucial for optimal performance of L2 trigger algorithms The redistribution of these measurements to thousands of running processes within the L2 trigger farm has been successfully tested and will be used for real-time updates of the LHC parameters ATLAS Online Beam Parameter Measurment - RealTime May, 2010