April 2005RPT Workshop1 Preparing a Successful RPT Application Gail M. Dummer, KIN Suzanne Wilson, TE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What You Need to Know About Tenure and Promotion BEFORE Applying for a Job Henry (Rique) Campa, III, Ph.D. Assistant Dean, The Graduate School and Professor.
Advertisements

Choosing a Journal APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Librarians Promotion & Tenure Workshop 2012 The Dossier.
Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Agricultural and Biological Engineering 1 March 25, 2014.
Tenure and Promotion for Extension Faculty: Tips for the Evaluated and the Evaluators Larry Smith Executive Senior Vice Provost Utah State University Annual.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Leonie Gordon TEACHING PORTFOLIO- DOCUMENTING YOUR EXPERTISE IN TEACHING.
Building a Tenure Portfolio Sean Ellermeyer Professor of Mathematics and Interim Chair Presentation for Project NExT Fellows Joint Mathematics Meetings.
Promotion & Tenure Workshop The Dossier. What the Committee Looks for: I nnovation I nitiative I mpact.
Tenure and Promotion The Process: –Outlined in Article 15 of the FTCA. When you are granted tenure, you are also promoted to Associate (15.7.6). One application.
+ PTR at UCONN: Promotion, Tenure and Reappointment of our Faculty Sally M. Reis Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor.
Promotion and Ten ure October 21, 2014 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.
Teaching Materials for the Academic Job Search. Job Ad Jargon Statement of Teaching Philosophy, Statement of Teaching Interests, Teaching Statement Evidence.
Publishing your paper. Learning About You What journals do you have access to? Which do you read regularly? Which journals do you aspire to publish in.
Creating a Teaching/Professional Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator
Joi Patterson, PhD VPAA/COO Tenure Track Process.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
OCN 750 Class #5: Feb 18 Announcements Resume & CV Writing Upcoming classes & assignments Questions or Comments? Michele?
How to Succeed on the Poster Project (title font size = 24 pt) How to Succeed on the Poster Project (title font size = 24 pt) Sarah Vonhof, Marisa Murdock,
Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.
Promotion and Ten ure October 15, 2013 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
1 2. Curriculum Vitae includes: education and employment history academic and professional experience research activities professional memberships list.
The P&T Process Roles of the Candidate, Supervisor and P&T Committee.
PIF Workshop College of Humanities April 19, 2012 Ian Barnard, English Tim Black, Philosophy Yreina Cervantez, Chicano/a Studies.
February 28, 2008The Teaching Center, Washington University The Teaching Citation Program & Creating a Teaching Portfolio Beth Fisher, Ph.D. Assistant.
Faculty Evaluation Committee Workshop. Overview Evaluation Timeline Portfolio as a Whole Portfolio Organization –Teaching –Service (Students, College,
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #4 June 23, 2015  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.
College of Liberal Arts Tenure and Promotion workshop: PROCEDURES AND POLICIES 17 October 2014.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
How to develop an independent research plan – review literature with an eye for problem, approach, solution, new ideas – review objectives of funding programs.
Georgia Institute of Technology Publish or Perish Gilda Barabino, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Academic Diversity Professor and Associate Chair for Graduate.
Changes in the Faculty Review Process for United Academics Faculty Presenter: Patricia Linton, College of Arts & Sciences.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
Promotion to Full Professor Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty & Academic Affairs.
Promotion and Ten ure October 2015 Alyssa Panitch Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs PURDUE FACULTY.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #2 June 9  Review “Who am I”, CV, External Reviewers  Levels of Review  Dossier Sections  Statement of.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL EDUCATORS Laura Lamps, M.D. Stacy Rudnicki, M.D.
Mentoring and Teaching Pat Rogers, Associate Vice President: Teaching and Learning Wilfrid Laurier University Annual Academic Administrators Workshop Balsillie.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.
Preparing a Written Report Prepared by: R Bortolussi MD FRCPC and Noni MacDonald MD FRCPC.
Promotions on the Physician Scientist/Basic Science Investigator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #2 June 10  Review “Who am I”, CV, External Reviewers  Getting Started  Putting Together the Dossier:
Overview of Policies and Procedures University of Missouri-Kansas City.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
Tenure and Promotion at University of Toledo
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM
Promotion: Policy and Procedures for COM Faculty in State College
The Academic Promotions Process
Elisabeth Lonergan, PhD Professor – Animal Science
Faculty mentoring in Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences
Janet Kistner VP Faculty Development & Advancement April 2018
Elizabeth Lord Vice Provost for Academic Personnel
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
TENURE AND PROMOTION IN ECAS
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line
Presentation transcript:

April 2005RPT Workshop1 Preparing a Successful RPT Application Gail M. Dummer, KIN Suzanne Wilson, TE

April 2005RPT Workshop2 Hitting a Home Run: Submitting a Successful RPT Application  1 st base: do the work  2 nd base: write the RPT narrative & compile related evidence  3 rd base: proof-read, get feedback, and edit  Home run: successful RPT application

April 2005RPT Workshop3 Do the Work: Job Description  Know your job description Load assignment Specific responsibilities  Fulfill your job description Do the work you were hired to do Balance your actual contributions with your load assignment

April 2005RPT Workshop4 Do the Work: Research  Establish a trajectory of contribution and excellence in your line of research  Questions: What counts as a data point? How many data points are needed to establish a trajectory? Over how many years? To what extent do multiple lines of research confuse the question of trajectory?

April 2005RPT Workshop5 Do the Work: Teaching  Establish a trajectory of increased quality of instruction  Develop a teaching philosophy and use it  Use effective pedagogical methods  Use educational technology effectively  Assess student learning and modify instruction appropriately  Follow the MSU Code of Teaching Responsibility

April 2005RPT Workshop6 Do the Work: Service  Nature of service contributions University, professional, and community service Local, regional, national, international  Quality of service Contributions are valued by department, college, and university Service is integrated with teaching and research Evidence of impact

April 2005RPT Workshop7 Do the Work: Citizenship  Collegiality Positive interactions with students, colleagues, and administrators Effective ways of sharing different perspectives and developing consensus  Contributions Value added to the department, college, and university Contributions made within the parameters of institutional guidelines, policies, and procedures

April 2005RPT Workshop8 Do the Work: Reminders  Maintain a balance of research, teaching, and service contributions – make wise choices about uses of your time and resources  More is not always better – a few significant, frequently cited scholarly works may have more value than a greater number of less significant works  Always compile evidence of the effectiveness of your work

April 2005RPT Workshop9 Do the Work: Record-Keeping  Organize your CV with categories that correspond with categories from the RPT application form – then keep your CV up- to-date  Create file folders with evidence related to research, teaching, and service contributions so that information is at your fingertips when you need it  Prepare comprehensive reports of scholarly activity as part of departmental annual reviews – then use these documents as source material for your RPT application

April 2005RPT Workshop10 Writing the RPT Narrative  Describe your academic background and positions, starting with your Ph.D. degree  Describe your trajectory toward becoming a nationally or internationally respected scholar Reveal your line of research Provide evidence of past research productivity and funding – use reference citations – include journal reputation or impact factors Describe current and future work related to your line of research  Provide an overview of your scholarly contributions Describe the integration of your research, teaching, and service efforts Describe any philosophies or perspectives that inform your work, especially your teaching philosophy Explain how you are becoming increasingly effective in these roles

April 2005RPT Workshop11 Writing the RPT Narrative (continued)  Organize the narrative effectively There is no one correct way Consider using a small set of questions or substantive interests to organize the content as a means of presenting a coherent narrative Consider a chronological organization of content  Write for a diverse set of reviewers Reviewers represent different disciplines within and outside the College of Education Don’t assume that reviewers know the relevance and significance of your work within your field – situate your work and explain your contributions

April 2005RPT Workshop12 Writing the RPT Narrative (continued)  Be persuasive  Provide evidence (reference citations)  Follow the directions (page limits, margins, font size, etc.)  Use technology (e.g., digital photos, charts, tables)  Be concise – avoid redundancy  Most of all …….. Start Early! Use your annual review narratives as a trial run for the RPT narrative

April 2005RPT Workshop13 Writing the RPT Narrative (continued)  Do not write your narrative in diary format – reviewers expect a narrative essay in which you skillfully describe your scholarly contributions and future  Do not provide lists of scholarly activities – reviewers expect analysis and synthesis  Do not describe every small detail of your scholarly activities – focus on the most important aspects of your work

April 2005RPT Workshop14 Writing the RPT Narrative (continued) Writing is a form of thinking. Use the RPT narrative (and your annual review narratives) as a way to reflect on your past contributions and make good decisions about your future work as a professor.

April 2005RPT Workshop15 Proof-read, Get Feedback, and Edit  Proof-read the narrative for: Content accuracy Internal consistency Compliance with instructions Spelling, grammar, etc.  Get feedback from: Your mentor(s) Your toughest critics inside or outside the department A diverse group of colleagues  Edit and revise the narrative  Most of all …….. Start Early!

April 2005RPT Workshop16 Compiling the RPT Evidence Files  Follow the instructions:  Choose evidence carefully Be selective – present the work that makes the best case for your RPT application Follow the instructions about the number of scholarly products to include  There are practical limitations in the amount of material that reviewers can read carefully  Consider presenting one chapter and table of contents from a book rather than the entire book Explain your contribution to multi-authored works

April 2005RPT Workshop17 Compiling the RPT Evidence Files  Submit materials on a CD in pdf format  Label each file carefully using: (a) your name; (b) the content of the file; and (c) other identifiers required by the College of Education  Proof-read the CD to make certain that all requested materials are included and easily identified by reviewers Consider a table of contents linking file names to content Make sure all pages of double-sided copy are included Make sure pages are scanned in page-number order  Ask your department chairperson or delegate to proof-read the CD to make certain that all added materials (e.g., chairperson’s evaluation, external letters) are included

April 2005RPT Workshop18 Final Advice  Ask questions – although preparation of the RPT narrative and evidence file is your responsibility, help is available  Start early – everything about the RPT process tends to take more time than you think!  Think ahead If you are now seeking reappointment, think ahead to the requirements for tenure and promotion If you are now seeking tenure and promotion, think ahead to the requirements for promotion to full professor