Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 CQC, Cambridge Emergence of typical entanglement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improved Simulation of Stabilizer Circuits Scott Aaronson (UC Berkeley) Joint work with Daniel Gottesman (Perimeter)
Advertisements

Quantum t-designs: t-wise independence in the quantum world Andris Ambainis, Joseph Emerson IQC, University of Waterloo.
Strong Monogamy and Genuine Multipartite Entanglement Gerardo Adesso Informal Quantum Information Gathering 2007 The Gaussian Case Quantum Theory group.
Ulams Game and Universal Communications Using Feedback Ofer Shayevitz June 2006.
University of Queensland
Equilibration and Unitary k- Designs Fernando G.S.L. Brandão UCL Joint work with Aram Harrow and Michal Horodecki arXiv: IMS, September 2013.
Quantum Computing MAS 725 Hartmut Klauck NTU
Spin chains and channels with memory Martin Plenio (a) & Shashank Virmani (a,b) quant-ph/ , to appear prl (a)Institute for Mathematical Sciences.
UCL, 23 Feb 2006 UCL, 23 Feb 2006 Entanglement Probability Distribution of Random Stabilizer States Oscar C.O. Dahlsten Martin B. Plenio.
Chapter 7 Title and Outline 1 7 Sampling Distributions and Point Estimation of Parameters 7-1 Point Estimation 7-2 Sampling Distributions and the Central.
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing CS 467 / CS 667 Phys 467 / Phys 767 C&O 481 / C&O 681 Richard Cleve DC 3524 Course.
1 A class of Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets for the performance Evaluation of Mulitprocessor Systems By M. Almone, G. Conte Presented by Yinglei Song.
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 667 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871 Richard Cleve DC 2117 / RAC 2211 Lecture.
Quantum information as high-dimensional geometry Patrick Hayden McGill University Perspectives in High Dimensions, Cleveland, August 2010.
On Quantum Walks and Iterated Quantum Games G. Abal, R. Donangelo, H. Fort Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay UFRJ, RJ, Brazil.
Bell inequality & entanglement
Classical capacities of bidirectional channels Charles Bennett, IBM Aram Harrow, MIT/IBM, Debbie Leung, MSRI/IBM John Smolin,
Superdense coding. How much classical information in n qubits? Observe that 2 n  1 complex numbers apparently needed to describe an arbitrary n -qubit.
Gate robustness: How much noise will ruin a quantum gate? Aram Harrow and Michael Nielsen, quant-ph/0212???
Quantum Circuits for Clebsch- GordAn and Schur duality transformations D. Bacon (Caltech), I. Chuang (MIT) and A. Harrow (MIT) quant-ph/ more.
Quantum Circuits for Clebsch- Gordon and Schur duality transformations D. Bacon (Caltech), I. Chuang (MIT) and A. Harrow (MIT) quant-ph/
Oded Regev (Tel Aviv University) Ben Toner (CWI, Amsterdam) Simulating Quantum Correlations with Finite Communication.
“Both Toffoli and CNOT need little help to do universal QC” (following a paper by the same title by Yaoyun Shi) paper.
Quantum Algorithms I Andrew Chi-Chih Yao Tsinghua University & Chinese U. of Hong Kong.
ABCRandom GaussiansConclusion&OutlookIntroductionTypical entanglement IQC 27 June 2007 Randomization workshop, IQC Waterloo Typical entanglement and random.
Quantum Mechanics from Classical Statistics. what is an atom ? quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum field theory.
Coherent Classical Communication Aram Harrow (MIT) quant-ph/
An Arbitrary Two-qubit Computation in 23 Elementary Gates or Less Stephen S. Bullock and Igor L. Markov University of Michigan Departments of Mathematics.
Torun, 5 June Symposium on Mathematical Physics N.Copernicus University Efficient Generation of Generic Entanglement Oscar C.O. Dahlsten with Martin.
NO INPUT IS DETECTED ON RGB1. Quantum Circuits for Clebsch- Gordon and Schur duality transformations D. Bacon (Caltech), I. Chuang (MIT) and A. Harrow.
Erasing correlations, destroying entanglement and other new challenges for quantum information theory Aram Harrow, Bristol Peter Shor, MIT quant-ph/
EECS 598 Fall ’01 Quantum Cryptography Presentation By George Mathew.
Maximum likelihood (ML)
ROM-based computations: quantum versus classical B.C. Travaglione, M.A.Nielsen, H.M. Wiseman, and A. Ambainis.
School of Physics & Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL & PHYSICAL SCIENCE Parallel Transport & Entanglement Mark Williamson 1, Vlatko Vedral 1 and William.
The Erdös-Rényi models
Ch 8.1 Numerical Methods: The Euler or Tangent Line Method
Witnesses for quantum information resources Archan S. Majumdar S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Kolkata, India Collaborators: S. Adhikari,
Alice and Bob’s Excellent Adventure
Computing and Communicating Functions over Sensor Networks A.Giridhar and P. R. Kumar Presented by Srikanth Hariharan.
1 Introduction to Quantum Information Processing QIC 710 / CS 667 / PH 767 / CO 681 / AM 871 Richard Cleve DC 2117 Lecture 16 (2011)
ENTROPIC CHARACTERISTICS OF QUANTUM CHANNELS AND THE ADDITIVITY PROBLEM A. S. Holevo Steklov Mathematical Institute, Moscow.
Feynman Festival, Olomouc, June 2009 Antonio Acín N. Brunner, N. Gisin, Ll. Masanes, S. Massar, M. Navascués, S. Pironio, V. Scarani Quantum correlations.
Manipulating Continuous Variable Photonic Entanglement Martin Plenio Imperial College London Institute for Mathematical Sciences & Department of Physics.
QCCC07, Aschau, October 2007 Miguel Navascués Stefano Pironio Antonio Acín ICFO-Institut de Ciències Fotòniques (Barcelona) Cryptographic properties of.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Deterministic vs. Random Maximum A Posteriori Maximum Likelihood Minimum.
The private capacities of a secret shared reference frame Patrick Hayden (McGill) with: PRA 75: (2005) ??? Stephen Bartlett Robert Spekkens arXiv:quant-ph/
Quantum Teleportation and Bit Commitment Chi-Yee Cheung Chung Yuan Christian University June 9, 2009.
What is Qu antum In formation and T echnology? Prof. Ivan H. Deutsch Dept. of Physics and Astronomy University of New Mexico Second Biannual Student Summer.
Coherent Communication of Classical Messages Aram Harrow (MIT) quant-ph/
The Classically Enhanced Father Protocol
A Monomial matrix formalism to describe quantum many-body states Maarten Van den Nest Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics Montreal, October 19 th 2011.
Efficient measure of scalability Cecilia López, Benjamin Lévi, Joseph Emerson, David Cory Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering, Massachusetts Institute.
8.4.2 Quantum process tomography 8.5 Limitations of the quantum operations formalism 量子輪講 2003 年 10 月 16 日 担当:徳本 晋
Coherent Classical Communication Aram Harrow, MIT Quantum Computing Graduate Research Fellow Objective Objective ApproachStatus Determine.
DYNAMICS OF OPEN Q-SYSTES FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF QIT IMS, Imperial College, London, 18 January 2007 Vladimír Bužek Research Center for Quantum Information.
1 Conference key-agreement and secret sharing through noisy GHZ states Kai Chen and Hoi-Kwong Lo Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Dept.
When are Correlations Quantum?: Verification and Quantification of Entanglement with simple measurements Imperial College London Martin B Plenio Koenraad.
Multipartite Entanglement and its Role in Quantum Algorithms Special Seminar: Ph.D. Lecture by Yishai Shimoni.
Fidelity of a Quantum ARQ Protocol Alexei Ashikhmin Bell Labs  Classical Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) Protocol  Quantum Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ)
Quantum Cryptography Antonio Acín
Coherent Communication of Classical Messages Aram Harrow (MIT) quant-ph/
Channel Coding Theorem (The most famous in IT) Channel Capacity; Problem: finding the maximum number of distinguishable signals for n uses of a communication.
Debasis Sarkar * Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta *
A counterexample for the graph area law conjecture Dorit Aharonov Aram Harrow Zeph Landau Daniel Nagaj Mario Szegedy Umesh Vazirani arXiv:
Ground State Entanglement in 1-Dimensional Translationally-Invariant Quantum Systems Sandy Irani Computer Science Department University of California,
Simulation and Design of Stabilizer Quantum Circuits Scott Aaronson and Boriska Toth CS252 Project December 10, X X +Z Z +ZI +IX
Quantum Information Theory Introduction
Foundation of Video Coding Part II: Scalar and Vector Quantization
Sequential sharing of nonlocal correlations
Presentation transcript:

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 CQC, Cambridge Emergence of typical entanglement in random two-party processes. Oscar C.O. Dahlsten with Martin B. Plenio, Roberto Oliveira and Alessio Serafini

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 ‘Emergence of typical entanglement in random two-party processes’ By entanglement we mean, unless otherwise stated, that taken between two parties sharing a pure state. By typical/generic entanglement we mean the entanglement average over pure states picked from the uniform (Haar) distribution. [Hayden, Leung, Winter, Comm. Math.Phys. 2006] By two-party process we mean that there are only two-body (and thus local) interactions. By random two-party process we mean that the local interaction is picked at random (using classical probabilities).

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Aim of talk This talk aims to explain key points of a series of related papers: Efficient Generation of Generic Entanglement. [Oliveira, Dahlsten and Plenio, quant-ph/ ] Entanglement probability distribution of bipartite randomised stabilizer states. [Dahlsten and Plenio, Quant. Inf. Comp., 6 no.6 (2006)] Thermodynamical state space measure and typical entanglement of pure Gaussian states. [Serafini, Dahlsten and Plenio, quant-ph/ ] Emergence of typical entanglement in two-party random processes. [Dahlsten, Oliveira and Plenio, to appear on quant-ph]

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Talk Structure Part 1: Abstract mathematical results on typical entanglement. Known Theorems:Typical/Generic entanglement of general pure states. New Theorem: Typical entanglement of pure stabilizer states. New Theorem: Typical entanglement of pure Gaussian states. Part 2: Relating abstract results to random two-party process. New Theorem : Generic entanglement is generated efficiently New Numerical Observation: Generic entanglement is achieved at a particular instant. Conclusion and Outlook

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Part I: Typical entanglement- abstract view Restricting entanglement types to those that are typical/generic could give a simplified entanglement theory. [Hayden, Leung, Winter, Comm. Math.Phys. 2006] ‘Typical’ has been defined relative to a flat distribution on pure states, the unitarily invariant measure, where. For a single qubit this can be visualised as an even density on the Bloch sphere. If the associated entanglement probability distribution is concentrated around a value->typical entanglement.

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Most quantum states are maximally entangled Known result: The entanglement E between N A and N B qubits is expected to be nearly maximal. [Lubkin,,J. Math. Phys.1978][Lloyd, Pagels, Ann. of Phys. 1988][Page, PRL, 1993] [Foong, Kanno PRL, 1994] [Hayden, Leung, Winter, Comm. Math.Phys. 2006] The distribution concentrates around the average with increasing N-> the average Is the typical value. Entanglement E Prob(E ) Typical Entanglement

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Stabilizer, Gaussian states Can ask what the typical entanglement is of interesting subsets of states. We determined the typical entanglement of stabilizer states[Dahlsten&Plenio, QIC] and Gaussian states[Serafini, Dahlsten&Plenio]. -see also [Smith&Leung quant-ph/ ] Stabilizer states are a finite subset of general states, including the EPR and GHZ states. Gaussian states have analogous importance in the continuous variable setting. Here one considers entanglement between ‘modes’. We now briefly mention results on the typical entanglement of stabilizer states and Gaussian states.

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Most stabilizer states are maximally entangled New Theorem: exact probability distribution of entanglement P(E) of stabilizer states. E P(E) Distribution Concentrates

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Typical entanglement of Gaussian states Called ‘Gaussian’ since they are uniquely specified by (i) first moments (expectations)of pairs(modes) of canonical X, P operators (ii) a matrix,, giving the second moments of the operators’ expectations. The quantum correlations between modes depend only on. New Result: we construct a “Thermodynamical state space measure of Gaussian states” to pick in an unbiased manner. [Matlab code available at New Result: the typical entanglement is when and

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Part 1 conclusion Known result: Most (relative to flat distribution on pure states) pure states are maximally entangled New result: Most (relative to flat distribution) stabilizer states are maximally entangled. New result: Most(relative to a distribution we invented) Gaussian states have a typical entanglement. But are statements relative to the (flat) unitarily invariant measure physically relevant?

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Relating abstract results to random two- party processes Part II

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Part II: Motivation and Aim From part I: Entanglement is typically maximal. ‘Typical’ has been defined relative to a flat distribution on pure states. However exp(N=system size) two-qubit gates are necessary to get that flat distribution on states, so it seems not physically relevant. Aim: to investigate what entanglement emerges in poly(N) applications of two-qubit gates.

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Part 2: Overview Setting: The two-party random process(es). New Result (Theorem) : Generic entanglement is generated efficiently. New Result (Numerics): Generic entanglement is achieved at a particular instant.

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 The random process Consider random two-party interactions modelled as two- qubit gates: 1. Pick two single qubit unitaries, U and V, uniformly from the Bloch Sphere. 2. Choose a pair of qubits {c,d} without bias. 3. Apply U to c and V to d. 4. Apply a CNOT on c and d. U V … … … … Qubit 1 c d N

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Random process example U1U1 V1V1 U2U2 V2V2 V3V3 U3U3 V4V4 U4U4

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Entanglement after infinite time After infinite time(steps), the entanglement E is expected to be nearly maximal since get uniform distribution, [Lubkin,,J. Math. Phys.1978][Lloyd, Pagels, Ann. of Phys. 1988][Page, PRL, 1993][Foong, Kanno PRL, 1994] [Hayden, Leung, Winter, Comm. Math.Phys. 2006][Emerson, Livine, Lloyd, PRA 2005] But this average is only physical if it is reached in poly(N) steps. NANA NBNB U V … … … … Qubit 1 N

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Result: efficient generation Theorem: The average entanglement of the unitarily invariant measure is reached to a fixed arbitrary accuracy ε within O(N 3 ) steps. In other words the circuit is expected to make the input state maximally entangled in a physical number of steps. 3

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Efficient generation, exact statement Theorem: Let some arbitrary ε ∈ (0, 1) be given. Then for a number n of gates in the random circuit satisfying n ≥ 9N(N − 1)[(4 ln 2)N + ln ε −1 ]/4 we have and, for maximally entangled

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Efficient generation, proof outline The random circuit does a random walk on a massive state space. One could consider mapping the random walk onto an associated, faster converging, random walk on the entanglement state space. It is a bit more complicated though. In fact we map it onto a random walk relating to the purity. We then use known Markov Chain methods to bound the rate of convergence of this smaller walk. 0<E<1 E max -1<E<E max State Space

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Result: moment it becomes typical Numerical observation: can associate a specific time with achievement of generic entanglement. This figure shows the total variation, TV, distance to the asymptotic entanglement probability distribution. It tends to a step function with increasing N. For larger N we used stabilizer states and tools for efficient evaluation of their entanglement. [Gottesmann PhD] [Audenaert,Plenio, NJP 2005] We term this the variation cut-off moment after [Diaconis, Cut-off effect in Markov chains]

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Part II: Conclusion Result: Proof that generic entanglement is physical as it can be generated using poly(N) two-qubit gates. Implication: arguments and protocols assuming generic entanglement gain relevance. [Abeyesinghe,Hayden,Smith, Winter, quant-ph/ ][Harrow, Hayden, Leung, PRL 2004] Result: Numerical observation that generic entanglement is achieved at a particular instant.

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Summary Part 1: Abstract mathematical results on typical entanglement. Known Result (Theorem):Typical/Generic entanglement of general pure states is near maximal. New Result (Theorem): Typical entanglement of pure Stabilizer states is near maximal. New Result (Theorem): There is a typical entanglement of pure Gaussian states. Part 2: Relating abstract results to random two-party processes. New Result (Theorem) : Generic entanglement is generated efficiently New Result (Numerics): Generic entanglement is achieved at a particular instant.

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Outlook There are many waiting results in this area. Analytical proof of cut-off moment? Typical entanglement of naturally occurring systems? t=0t=1 Alice Bob

Abstract typical entanglement Emergence of typical entanglement ConclusionIntroduction CQC, 29 Sep 2006 Acknowledgements, References We acknowledge initial discussions with Jonathan Oppenheim, and later discussions with numerous people. Funding by The Leverhulme Trust, EPSRC QIP-IRC, EU Integrated Project QAP, EU Marie-Curie, the Royal Society, the NSA, the ARDA, Imperial’s Institute for Mathematical Sciences. Papers discussed here: Efficient Generation of Generic Entanglement. [Oliveira, Dahlsten and Plenio, quant-ph/ ] Entanglement probability distribution of bipartite randomised stabilizer states. [Dahlsten and Plenio, Quant. Inf. Comp., 6 no.6 (2006)] Thermodynamical state space measure and typical entanglement of pure Gaussian states. [Serafini, Dahlsten and Plenio, quant-ph/ ] Emergence of typical entanglement in a two-party random process. [Dahlsten, Oliveira and Plenio, to appear on quant-ph]