Progress on Photon Beam and Simulation Part 1: active collimator Part 2: physics simulations Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the GlueX Tagger and Photon Beamline..
Advertisements

Polarized Photon Beam Instrumentation for GlueX Part 1: active collimation Part 2: polarimetry Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration.
Collimation and tagging instrumentation for the GlueX photon beamline Richard Jones Igor Senderovich, Anne-Marie Carroll University of Connecticut APS/DNP.
Beam test of the microscope prototype and active collimator preliminary report on the parasitic beam tests in Hall B April 2011 Richard Jones, Igor Senderovich,
1/22 MOLLER Juliette M. Mammei. 2/22 Working Groups Polarized Source Hydrogen Target Spectrometer Integrating Detectors Tracking Detectors Polarized Beam.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
James M c Intyre University of Connecticut GlueX Collaboration Meeting JLab, Feb. 2-4, 2011.
Active Collimator Test in Hall B Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting September ,
Beam Position Stabilization Using an Active Collimator in Hall D at Jefferson Lab Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration.
Simulation of electron beam halo in the Hall D tagger Richard Jones University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration meeting, Newport News, March 29-31, 2007.
EPAC June 2003 The EPAC June 2003 Questions 1. Clarify the Motivation for the Proposal. 2. How to ensure the e+ polarimeter works right away? 3. What is.
Electron Beam Simulation for GlueX Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration meeting April 27-29, 2006 presented by.
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
The Hall D Photon Beam Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Photon Beamline-Tagger ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
Photon Tagging in the Hall D Beamline James McIntyre University of Connecticut 13 May GlueX Graduate Student Workshop Newport News, VA.
GlueX Luminosity Limits Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, May 8-10, Design luminosity 2.Physics.
GlueX Simulations Status Report on CD3 geometry Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, January 10-12, 2008.
The GlueX Photon Beam Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Photon Beamline-Tagger ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, October 25-27, 2007 GlueX Simulations Status Report Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News,
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Polarized Photons for GlueX Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Photon Beamline-Tagger ReviewNov , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Tagging Near the End-Point Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, May 8-10, Current design capabilities.
Experimenting with Quarks Prof. Richard Jones University of Connecticut, Storrs Science Symposium, Darien High School, May 28, 2008.
Tagging spectrometer and photon beamline Review January 23-24, Response to Questions Bremsstrahlung Tagging Spectrometer and Photon Beam Review.
An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
We are Here! Gluex Collaboration Meeting May Engineering Status - Presented by Tim Whitlatch1.
The Hall D Photon Beam Overview Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagged Photon Beam ReviewNov , 2008, Newport News presented by GlueX.
The GlueX Experiment Curtis A. Meyer Carnegie Mellon University The GlueX Collaboration 8/23/10 1 GlueX Experiment 12 GeV electrons 40% lin. Pol. Uncollimated.
20 October, 2004GlueX Detector Review 1 The GlueX Detector Curtis A. Meyer This talk Next talk.
Integration GlueX Detector Integration Mission: To ensure systems meet or exceed physics driven goals To ensure that detectors are designed in a sensible.
Software Overview David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 26, 2007 David Lawrence, JLab Oct. 26, 2007.
SoLID EC Update Zhiwen Zhao 2012/05/22. Beam test update Coverage for PVDIS Road map.
Elton S. Smith Tagger and Photon Beam Dry Runs Nov 14, Tagger and Photon Beamline Review and goals for today.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
R.T. Jones, Newport News, May The GlueX Simulation Framework GEANT4 Tutorial Workshop Newport News, May 22-26, 2006 R.T. Jones, UConn Monte Carlo.
Diamond Radiator Fabrication & Assessment Update Brendan Pratt Richard Jones University of Connecticut.
Malte Hildebrandt, PSIMEG - Review Meeting / 1   e  Drift Chambers Charge Division Test Chamber Testsetup for Cosmics Chamber Construction.
Hall D Design Status GlueX Collaboration Meeting JLab, Ravi Anumagalla.
Hall D Design Status GlueX Collaboration Meeting JLab, December 11-13, 2003 Ravi Anumagalla.
Curtis A. Meyer 20 May, 2004 GlueX Detector Infrastructure The issue of infrastructure includes details of how we assemble the detector as a whole. How.
1 HBD update Itzhak Tserruya DC Upgrades meeting, January 14, 2005 NIM paper II: Generic R&D ~ completed Full scale prototype construction Pending issues.
Overview of the GlueX Tagger and Photon Beamline..
GlueX collaboration meeting, Bloomington, May 9-11, Task list for UConn construction contract 1.order clear light guide fibers from Saint Gobain.
Tsukuba-hall webcam 1 Beam Pipe and Vertex Detector extraction: on Nov. 10, 2010 Belle Detector Roll-out: Dec. 9, 2010 End-caps, CDC, B-ACC, TOF extraction:
October 2005 Qweak Collaboration Meeting Detailed Design of Shield House and Collimators wrt Backgrounds Yongguang Liang Just getting started – will probably.
9 September 2004The Straw Tube Chamber1 The CDC Curtis A. Meyer Carnegie Mellon University Physics Requirements and Specifications Prototype Construction.
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Pre-CM33 schedule planning SuperMICO meeting, June 6th Motivation: For all of us to understand the main drivers behind the top-level MICE schedule So that.
1 Integration and Milestones Elton Smith Hall D Detector Review October 20-22, 2004.
Hall D infrastructure and integration Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting September 9-11, 2004.
BENE MECC detector Pasquale Migliozzi INFN – Napoli.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Budget Status and FY04 Requests Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting Dec 11-13, 2003.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
CLAS12 Beamline Configurations
Collimation and tagging instrumentation
PANDA Yoke of the Magnet
Polarimetry Ken Livingston Sept 2012
Status Report on E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons K.T. McDonald Princeton University EPAC Meeting SLAC, November 15, 2003.
Polarized Internal Gas Target in a Strong Toroidal Magnetic Field
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
Tagger Microscope Detector & Electronics Status
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Presentation transcript:

Progress on Photon Beam and Simulation Part 1: active collimator Part 2: physics simulations Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration meetingMay 20-22, 2004, Bloomington

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, Photon Beam: open issues for the TDR  photon source deformation of thin crystals improved mounting technique  tagging spectrometer conceptual design under revision [talk by J. Kellie] detailed field calculations available [P. Brindza] possible advance-purchase item  photon tagger instrumentation tagging microscope  photon beam instrumentation beam line shielding  beam position control photon beam polarimetry

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, I. Active collimator prototype  Tungsten pin-cushion detector used on SLAC coherent bremsstrahlung beam line in 1970’s technology developed at SLAC through several iterations, refined construction method reference Miller and Walz, NIM 117 (1974) SLAC experiment E-160 (ca. 2002, Bosted et.al.) still uses them, required building new ones performance is known

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, Design was part of the senior project of Connecticut undergraduate Chris Gauthier

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, Basic design: tungten pins on tungsten wedges 12 cm5 cm

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, Manufacturing challenge: cutting the pins  challenges to overcome choice of material  too soft, pins bend and break during tool extraction  too hard, pins are brittle and break off how to mount pins in base plate  tungsten wire forced into holes – SLAC method 1  machined out of one piece using EDM – SLAC method 2  to the rescue: FSU physics machine shop have their own in-house EDM machine willing to try new things, come up with their own ideas based on drawings from Connecticut, built 2 wedges  raw tungsten – too brittle, pins too fragile  machinable tungsten (95%W, 5%Ni+Cu) – excellent result!

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, Courtesy of P. Eugenio

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, Prototype status and plans  Parts for a working prototype are assembled aluminum housing made in Connecticut machine shop one tunsten pin quadrant delivered by FSU data acquisition computer electronics purchased by Jlab and delivered to Connecticut  8-channel sampling ADC card (pci)  special preamplifier with pA sensitivity (2 channels)  Still needed to complete project tungsten pins to instrument opposing quadrant (from FSU) boron nitride insulating support (ordered by Jlab, expected 7/04) software to read out currents and filter noise (student project 7/04) couple days of parasitic time in Hall B during photon running

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, II. Physics simulations  Hardware development built and commissioned new GlueX simulations cluster at UConn  Software development (more about this on Friday) upgraded XML geometry database tools to Apache XERCES 2 worked with Curtis to update geometry description of CDC new tools to support use of XML schemas in place of DTD’s  Background studies prior background studies have focused on region upstream of target new information needed to assess design choices for vertex counter geometry for simulations proposed by Werner new results as of this week – more about this from Werner

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, GlueX simulation cluster  parts purchased by Jlab (GlueX R&D funds) 16 AMD processors 8 AMD 64-bit opteron processors 1 GB ram per node 20 GB local disk storage per node 5 TB of shared disk storage $28K total cost (incl. rack + UPS)  collaboration access uses web interface (no logins) uses certificates for security browse results with paw ROOT support coming

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, Electromagnetic background study: preliminary results photon beam

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, background study: preliminary results photon beam

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, background study: impact profile

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, background study: origin of charges hitting vtx cylinder inner surface impactsouter surface impacts

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, background study: preliminary endcap impactsall charged hits over 1 MeV

Richard Jones, GlueX meeting, Bloomington, May 20-22, background study: preliminary  Latest results are new still have to be carefully checked removed vacuum pipe from region downstream of target accidentally the air that replaced it has no magnetic field!  Rates are very high downstream of target most important around hole in FDC, Cerenkov, TOF and LGD will set an upper limit on the attainable beam intensity rates far downstream of target sensitive to magnetic field, but Werner’s result is probably accurate for the vertex counter  Backgrounds in each forward detector must be checked important information for the TDR may affect design choices in VTX, FDC and Cerenkov