1 Keck NGAO Project Replan: Science Cases and Requirements Claire Max NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 25, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 KEPLER; Data Validation and Follow Up Observations CoRoT Symposium W.J. Borucki & the Kepler Team 5 February.
Advertisements

E-ELT VLT HARMONI – the first light integral field spectrograph for the E-ELT Niranjan Thatte On behalf of the HARMONI consortium Florence - 29 June 2013.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
NGAO Systems Engineering Status Team Meeting #3 (Video) R. Dekany 13 December 2006.
ENTRY TASK Get your notebooks Pencil Highlighter.
Science Group: Status, Plans, and Issues Claire Max Liz McGrath August 19, 2008.
W. M. Keck Observatory Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Irvine Meeting September 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
Current astrometric error is as low as 0.25 mas. Galactic Center observed with NIRC2 on Keck astrometric accuracy is a function of atmospheric conditions.
Planets around Low-Mass Stars and Brown Dwarfs Michael Liu Bruce Macintosh NGAO Workshop, Sept 2006.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Future Opportunities for Adaptive Optics Galactic Science Andrea Ghez University of California Los Angeles.
Keck NGAO Science Requirements Claire Max UC Santa Cruz Caltech NGAO Meeting November 14, 2006.
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting February 20, 2008.
Science Team Management Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Requirements Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
Extragalactic Science Case 1.People who worked on this study 2.Example science cases: – Low redshifts: black hole masses in nearby galaxies – Intermediate.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
The Need for Contiguous Fields NGAO Team Meeting, Waimea January 22, 2007 Claire Max.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. ~ March 20, 2009 February 5, 2009 DRAFT.
Observing Operations Concept Document Elizabeth McGrath NGAO PD Team Meeting #6 March 19, 2009.
NGAO Science Instrument Reuse Part 2: Update and required feedback NGAO IWG Anna Moore, Sean Adkins NGAO Team Meeting January 22, 2007.
Keck NGAO Science Case Requirements Claire Max and Liz McGrath NGAO Team Meeting 13 January 25, 2008.
ASTRO 2233 Fall 2010 Adaptive Optics, Interferometry and Planet Detection Lecture 16 Thursday October 21, 2010.
A Short Introduction to Adaptive Optics Presentation for NGAO Controls Team Erik Johansson August 28, 2008.
NGAO Astrometric Science and Performance Astrometric Performance Budget Team: Brian Cameron, Jessica Lu, Matthew Britton, Andrea Ghez, Rich Dekany, Claire.
Don Gavel: Keck NGAO meeting April 25, Some Comments on NGAO System Design and Specification Donald Gavel NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 25, 2007.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting April 3, 2007.
Basic Astrometric Methods William van Altena Yale University Basic Astrometric Methods Yale University July 18-22, 2005.
The Path to NGAO Core Science Requirements Claire Max and Liz McGrath NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
NGAO Science Instruments Build to Cost Status February 5, 2009 Sean Adkins.
Galactic Science: Star and Planet Formation
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Science Advisory Team: Introductions & NSAT Charge Taft Armandroff, Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Hilton Lewis June 11,
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO System Design Phase Management Report - Replan NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
Observing efficiency for NGAO 1.Definitions 2.Lessons learned a)Keck LGS AO “efficiency” b)Keck AO brute conclusion 3.Observing efficiency budget 4. Observing.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team (with input from Sean Adkins, Matthew Britton, Ralf.
Next Generation Adaptive Optics (NGAO) System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max Science Case Presenters: Brian Cameron,
The Future of AO at Keck Sept 2004 Mike Brown, for the AOWG and Keck AO team.
Astrometry for NGAO Brian Cameron, Matthew Britton, Jessica Lu, Andrea Ghez, Rich Dekany, Claire Max, and Chris Neyman NGAO Meeting #6 April 25, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
NGAO Build to Cost Summary Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max & the NGAO Team SSC Meeting April 14, 2009.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting January 24, 2007.
NGAO Instrumentation WBS Replan By Sean Adkins April 25, 2007.
Science Requirements Impacting AO Architecture Claire Max Architecture Meeting July
High Redshift Galaxies: Encircled energy performance budget and IFU spectroscopy Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
W. M. Keck Observatory’s Next Generation Adaptive Optics (NGAO) Facility Peter Wizinowich, Sean Adkins, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team:
1 NGAO Science Instrument Reuse Part 1: NIRC2 NGAO IWG December 12, 2006.
Black Holes in Nearby Galaxies Claire Max NGAO Team Meeting March 7, 2007.
Plan to develop system requirements through science cases Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
NGAO Wavefront Error Performance Budgets R. Dekany 13 May 2010.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
MAXAT-II Woods Hole September Overview Science Drivers Lessons of the past Focusing on Science and Innovation.
Characterising exoplanetary systems with space-based Bracewell interferometers ARC meeting Denis Defrère Liege, 19 February 2009.
th EVN Symposium 1 Parallax measurements of the Mira-type star UX Cygni with phase-referencing VLBI 8th European VLBI Network Symposium.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
AST101 Lecture 19 Discovery of the Galaxy. Northern Milky Way.
NGST/NEXUS Operations Jane Morrison October 19, 2000 Nexus NGST.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
2009/03/18-20 East Asia VLBI Workshop 1 Period-Luminosity Relation of Mira- Variables Revealed from VLBI --- Parallax Measurement Results around 500-Day.
Science Priorities and Implications of Potential Cost Savings Ideas
NGAO System Design Project Plans and Schedule
(AO) Observations of the Galactic Center
Presentation transcript:

1 Keck NGAO Project Replan: Science Cases and Requirements Claire Max NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 25, 2007

2

3 Not on this list Orion Initial Mass Function Orion Initial Mass Function Mira Variables Mira Variables T Tauri T Tauri

4 AO Roll-Up to date

5 Summary of rolled-up requirements Wavelength range  m Wavelength range  m Wavefront error: 140 nm Wavefront error: 140 nm – Tip-tilt blurring has not been thoroughly explored yet – 170 nm acceptable for some science cases Enclosed energy (high-z galaxies): 50% within 0.07 arc sec over >30% of sky Enclosed energy (high-z galaxies): 50% within 0.07 arc sec over >30% of sky Contrast: Contrast: –  I=5.5 at 0.5 arc sec sep'n –  H=53 at 1 arc sec sep'n

6 Rolled-up requirements, contd Photmetric accuracy: 5% Photmetric accuracy: 5% Astrometric accuracy: Astrometric accuracy: – Galactic Center 0.1 mas – Other science cases mas Added background due to AO system: Added background due to AO system: – Less than 30% above (sky + telescope) Radial velocity accuracy <10 km/s Galactic Ctr Radial velocity accuracy <10 km/s Galactic Ctr Time to switch between LGS targets < 10 min Time to switch between LGS targets < 10 min