1 Functional languages (e.g. Scheme, ML) Scheme is a functional language. Scheme is based on lambda calculus. lambda abstraction = function definition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Programming Languages (CS 550) Mini Language Interpreter Jeremy R. Johnson.
Advertisements

Scheme in Scheme. Why implement Scheme in Scheme  Implementing a language is a good way to learn more about programming languages  Interpreters are.
CSE 3341/655; Part 4 55 A functional program: Collection of functions A function just computes and returns a value No side-effects In fact: No program.
1 Programming Languages (CS 550) Lecture Summary Functional Programming and Operational Semantics for Scheme Jeremy R. Johnson.
CSE341: Programming Languages Lecture 16 Datatype-Style Programming With Lists or Structs Dan Grossman Winter 2013.
Getting started with ML ML is a functional programming language. ML is statically typed: The types of literals, values, expressions and functions in a.
Functional Programming. Pure Functional Programming Computation is largely performed by applying functions to values. The value of an expression depends.
Chapter 3 Functional Programming. Outline Introduction to functional programming Scheme: an untyped functional programming language.
CS 355 – PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES Dr. X. Apply-to-all A functional form that takes a single function as a parameter and yields a list of values obtained.
1-1 An Introduction to Scheme March Introduction A mid-1970s dialect of LISP, designed to be a cleaner, more modern, and simpler version than.
1 Functional programming Languages And a brief introduction to Lisp and Scheme.
1 Scheme Scheme is a functional language. Scheme is based on lambda calculus. lambda abstraction = function definition In Scheme, a function is defined.
ML: a quasi-functional language with strong typing Conventional syntax: - val x = 5; (*user input *) val x = 5: int (*system response*) - fun len lis =
מבוא מורחב - שיעור 10 1 Symbols Manipulating lists and trees of symbols: symbolic differentiation Lecture 10.
Functional programming: LISP Originally developed for symbolic computing Main motivation: include recursion (see McCarthy biographical excerpt on web site).
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages Mathematical Functions Fundamentals of Functional Programming Languages Introduction to.
1 Scheme Although Scheme is syntactically a simple language, it supports sophisticated modeling: higher-order functions are a powerful tool in describing.
Functional programming: LISP Originally developed for symbolic computing First interactive, interpreted language Dynamic typing: values have types, variables.
Structuring data So far we’ve seen two types of values that we can bind to names: –numbers –Functions Today we will see two more: –symbols –pairs.
SchemeCOP Introduction to Scheme. SchemeCOP Scheme Meta-language for coding interpreters –“ clean ” semantics Scheme = LISP + ALGOL –simple.
1 Course progression Parallels between languages, including –sequencing, selection and repetition –abstraction mechanisms behavioral abstraction (e.g.
Scheme in Scheme 1. Why implement Scheme in Scheme  Implementing a language is a good way to learn more about programming languages  Interpreters are.
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages.
Functional Programming in Scheme and Lisp. Overview In a functional programming language, functions are first class objects. You can create them, put.
CS 330 Programming Languages 11 / 21 / 2006 Instructor: Michael Eckmann.
Principles of Programming Languages Lecture 1 Slides by Daniel Deutch, based on lecture notes by Prof. Mira Balaban.
CS 326 Programming Languages, Concepts and Implementation Instructor: Mircea Nicolescu Lecture 7.
Patterns in OCaml functions. Formal vs. actual parameters Here's a function definition (in C): –int add (int x, int y) { return x + y; } –x and y are.
מבוא מורחב 1 Review: scheme language things that make up scheme programs: self-evaluating 23, "hello", #t names +, pi combinations (+ 2 3) (* pi 4) special.
Introduction to Scheme CS 480/680 – Comparative Languages “And now for something completely different…” – Monty Python “And now for something completely.
Functional Programming and Lisp. Overview In a functional programming language, functions are first class objects. In a functional programming language,
Functional Programming Universitatea Politehnica Bucuresti Adina Magda Florea
Interpretation Environments and Evaluation. CS 354 Spring Translation Stages Lexical analysis (scanning) Parsing –Recognizing –Building parse tree.
SICP Interpretation Parts of an interpreter Arithmetic calculator Names Conditionals and if Storing procedures in the environment Environment as.
CS 363 Comparative Programming Languages Functional Languages: Scheme.
A Third Look At ML Chapter NineModern Programming Languages, 2nd ed.1.
18-October-2002cse Symbols © 2002 University of Washington1 Symbols CSE 413, Autumn 2002 Programming Languages
ISBN Chapter 15 Functional Programming Languages.
Principles of Programming Languages Lecture 1 Slides by Yaron Gonen, based on slides by Daniel Deutch and lecture notes by Prof. Mira Balaban.
Milos Hauskrecht (PDF) Hieu D. Vu (PPT) LISP PROGARMMING LANGUAGE.
Basic Scheme February 8, 2007 Compound expressions Rules of evaluation Creating procedures by capturing common patterns.
1/33 Basic Scheme February 8, 2007 Compound expressions Rules of evaluation Creating procedures by capturing common patterns.
Fall 2008Programming Development Techniques 1 Topic 17 Assignment, Local State, and the Environment Model of Evaluation Section 3.1 & 3.2.
1 Programming Languages (CS 550) Lecture 2 Summary Mini Language Interpreter Jeremy R. Johnson.
1 FP Foundations, Scheme In Text: Chapter Chapter 14: FP Foundations, Scheme Mathematical Functions Def: A mathematical function is a mapping of.
CSE 425: Functional Programming I Programs as Functions Some programs act like mathematical functions –Associate a set of input values from the function’s.
1 Vectors, binary search, and sorting. 2 We know about lists O(n) time to get the n-th item. Consecutive cons cell are not necessarily consecutive in.
Functional Programming
Lecture 4: Metacircles Eval Apply David Evans
Functional Programming
Functional Programming
Basic Scheme February 8, 2007 Compound expressions Rules of evaluation
6.001 SICP Variations on a Scheme
Introduction to Scheme
6.001: Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
September 4, 1997 Programming Languages (CS 550) Lecture 6 Summary Operational Semantics of Scheme using Substitution Jeremy R. Johnson TexPoint fonts.
Original material by Eric Grimson
Introduction to Functional Programming in Racket
6.001 SICP Data abstractions
Mini Language Interpreter Programming Languages (CS 550)
The Metacircular Evaluator
FP Foundations, Scheme In Text: Chapter 14.
Dynamic Scoping Lazy Evaluation
The Metacircular Evaluator
The Metacircular Evaluator (Continued)
6.001 SICP Further Variations on a Scheme
Streams, Delayed Evaluation and a Normal Order Interpreter
6.001 SICP Variations on a Scheme
Introduction to Functional Programming in Racket
6.001 SICP Interpretation Parts of an interpreter
Presentation transcript:

1 Functional languages (e.g. Scheme, ML) Scheme is a functional language. Scheme is based on lambda calculus. lambda abstraction = function definition In Scheme, a function is defined using the keyword lambda: (lambda ( ) ) Syntax of Scheme is very simple: primitive expressions numbers, such as 17 symbols, such as ’fred names, such as fred complex expressions function applications, such as (+ 3 2) or (addOne x), consist of a function and arguments for the function. special forms, such as (define x y), are evaluated in special ways. ML is a functional language. ML is based on lambda calculus. lambda abstraction = function definition In ML, a function is (typically) defined using the fun keyword: fun = Syntax of ML is familiar: block-structured syntax infix operators for +, *, etc function names appear before argument lists, not inside parentheses

2 Evaluation (Scheme and ML share model – focus on Scheme) Numbers are interpreted in base 10. Names are looked up in an environment, starting with the current environment, following static links, until the name is found. If it is not found, an error occurs. (define ) is evaluated by first evaluating, and binding, in the current environment, the name to that value. (lambda …) is evaluated by creating an appropriate closure (sometimes called a procedure). The closure’s environment link refers to the environment which was active when the closure was created. All members of an application are evaluated, after which the first is applied to the rest. A procedure application is evaluated by creating an environment to bind the parameters of the procedure to its arguments, and then evaluating the body relative to this new environment. The static link of the environment refers to the same environment as the closure, whereas the dynamic link refers to the environment that was active when the procedure was applied.

3 Examples > > (define x 12) > x 12 > (define addOne (lambda (x) (+ x 1))) > (addOne x) 13 > (define add (lambda (x y) (+ x y))) > (add 3 x) 15 > (define adder (lambda (x) (lambda (y) (+ x y)))) > (define add3 (adder 3)) > (add3 x) 15 > (define add7 (adder 7)) > (add7 x) val it=12:int - val x=12; val x=12:int - x val it=12:int - fun addOne x = x+1; val addOne=fn:int->int - addOne x val it=13:int - fun add (x,y) = x+y; val add=fn:int*int->int; - add(3,x); val it=15:int - fun adder x y = x+y; val adder=fn:int->int->int - val add3 = adder 3; val add3=fn:int->int - add3 x; val it=15:int; - val add7 = adder 7; val add7=fn:int->int - add7 x; val it=19:int;

4 Scheme Although Scheme is syntactically a simple language, it supports sophisticated modeling: higher-order functions are a powerful tool in describing problems. Many ideas in design patterns have their roots in functional programming (e.g. strategy allows us to treat methods as first-class, a decorator acts like a function which maps a function to a function – think of the stream decorators in Java). With mutation (the ability to change a name-value binding in an environment) sophisticated systems can be built quite compactly.

5 Review of evaluation model Numbers evaluation to “themselves” (a character string representing a number evaluates to its base 10 numeric representation). For example: > 213 if you ask Scheme to evaluate a number 213 you get the number as a result

6 Evaluating names A name is evaluated by looking it up. Lookup starts in the current environment, and continues along the chain of statically-linked environments until either a binding is found (in which case the corresponding value is returned) or it isn’t (in which case an error occurs). For example (assuming no binding for x exists yet): > x Error: reference to undefined identifier: x > (define x 12) > x 12 >

7 Primitives Primitives, such as + and -, are ordinary names with name-value bindings established at start-up in the primitive environment, the base environment for evaluation (base in the sense that it’s static link is null). We can use + wherever we need a function. For example: > (define applyOperator (lambda (op) (op 3 4))) > (applyOperator +) 7 > (applyOperator -) > We can also rebind the names of primitives (not a good idea in general, but this shows that primitives are not treated differently from other names in the language). > (+ 3 4) name “+” refers to addition function 7 > (define + -) name “+” now refers to subtraction function > (+ 3 4)

8 lambda forms A lambda form (lambda abstraction) defines a function in Scheme. Informally, the syntax is: (lambda ( ) ) When a lambda form is evaluated a closure results (which is printed as # ). For example: > (define addOne (lambda (p) (+ p 1))) > addOne # >

9 Function applications A function application is evaluated by first evaluating each expression inside the application, then applying the function to its arguments. This is accomplished by first creating a new environment in which the function’s parameters are bound to its arguments, and then evaluating the function’s body with respect to the new environment (which is now the current environment).

10 Evaluating (addOne 4) + addOne primitive env user env - cons … p (+ p 1) p4

11 Local bindings In a language like C or Java we can create local bindings inside a function/method by defining local variables: int mystery(int x, int y, int z) { int a = func1(x,y); int b = func2(y,z); } Local bindings can be created using a let-form: (define mystery (lambda (x y z) (let ((a (func1 x y)) (b (func2 y z))) ) Let-form is just syntactic sugar for a procedure application; the above let-form is equivalent to: ((lambda (a b) ) (func1 x y) (func2 y z))

12 Evaluating (define foo (let ((a 1) (b 2)) (lambda (c) (+ a b c)))) + addOne foo primitive env user env - cons … a b (lambda (c) (+ a b c)) a1 b2 (lambda (c) (+ a b c)) c (+ a b c)

13 Mutation set! allows an existing name-value binding to be changed.

14 Structuring data So far we’ve seen two types of values that we can bind to names: –numbers –functions two others are: –symbols –pairs

15 Symbols A symbol is an unevaluated name. Consider the following interaction: > (define x 12) > x 12 The x in the define is not evaluated. It is a symbol. The x in the second line is evaluated by looking up the value it is bound to in the current environment.

16 Using symbols We can bind a name to a symbolic value by quoting the symbol – quoting prevents evaluation: > (define fifi 'poodle) > fifi poodle The quote mark (') is syntactic sugar for the form (quote …); the above is equivalent to: > (define fifi (quote poodle))

17 Pairs cons is a primitive function which builds a pair. A pair has two members. (cons 'a 'b) builds a pair –whose first member is the symbol a –whose second member is the symbol b cons is therefore a pair constructor. Graphically: ba

18 accessors car returns the first member of a pair cdr returns the second member of a pair > (define myPair (cons 'a 'b)) > (car myPair) a > (cdr myPair) b

19 How is a pair displayed? > (define myPair (cons 'a 'b)) > myPair (a. b) Pairs are printed with a dot (.) separating the first (left) and second (right) components.

20 The REPL When interacting with a Scheme system, a Read-Eval-Print Loop (REPL) reads what you type, evaluates it, prints the resulting value, and loops back to repeat. The reader and printer parts of the REPL handle syntactic sugar (like converting 'a into (quote a)) and also printing things like lists.

21 Lists What is a list? A recursive definition: –the empty list () is a list –a pair whose cdr is a list is a list We can build a list using cons and (): > (define myList (cons 'a '())) > myList (a)

22 Wait a minute!! > (define myPair (cons 'a 'b)) > myPair (a. b) > (define myList (cons 'a '()) > myList (a)

23 What's going on? Why did myList print as (a) rather than as (a. ())? In fact, they are entirely equivalent: the REPL strikes again. The printer formats pairs which cdr is a pair in a special way to make lists easier to read.

24 Printing lists (a. (b. (c. (d. ())))) is printed as (a b c d) Graphically the structure is: This structure can be built in a variety of ways, some of which are shown on the next slide. abcd

25 Choices…choices (cons 'a (cons 'b (cons 'c (cons 'd '())))) (list 'a 'b 'c 'd) '(a b c d) '(a. (b c d)) (cons 'a (list 'b 'c 'd)) and so on!

26 Association lists An association list is a list of pairs. Used to implement a look-up table of key- value pairs. The primitive assoc is used to search an association list, given a key. Example on next slide.

27 > (define aList '((fifi. poodle) (fido. bulldog) (clifford. bigRed) (lassie. collie))) > (assoc 'fido aList) (fido. bulldog) > (assoc 'rufus aList) #f

28 Mutating pair components set-car! mutates the value of the car of a pair set-cdr! mutates the value of the cdr of a pair > (define myPair (cons 'a 'b)) > myPair (a. b) > (set-car! myPair 'fred) > myPair (fred. b) > (set-cdr! myPair 'wilma) > myPair (fred. wilma)

29 Lists in other languages Lists in ML Lists in Prolog

30 Homework issues What is basic algorithm?

31 Homework issues What is basic algorithm? –while file is not empty read in a line if the line is an odd line, –then write line to output file –else don’t