NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ying Tung, PhD Candidate
Advertisements

ME 450 Group Adrian Conrad Chris Cook Thomas Hylton Nathan Wagers High Pressure Water Fixture Conceptual Design Analysis December 10, 2007.
NSTX Thomson Scattering and NB Analysis Update: Maxwell Generated EM Loads and ANSYS WB Static Stresses
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Beams and Frames.
1 TYPICAL ELEMENTS Triangular shell element 6 D.O.F. per node Tetrahedral solid element 3 D.O.F. per node First order elements Linear displacement distribution.
Finite Element Model Generation Model size Element class – Element type, Number of dimensions, Size – Plane stress & Plane strain – Higher order elements.
Mesh, Loads & Boundary conditions CAD Course © Dr Moudar Zgoul,
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements Practical considerations in FEM modeling Prof. Suvranu De.
NUMERICAL METHODS THAT CAN BE USED IN BIOMECHANICS 1)Mechanics of Materials Approach (A) Complex Beam Theory (i) Straight Beam (ii) Curved Beam (iii)
Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method
Finite Element Primer for Engineers: Part 2
Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Matrix Methods (Notes Only)
The problem to be solved is specified in a) the physical domain and b) the discretized domain used by FEA Governing principle law :
FEA Simulations Usually based on energy minimum or virtual work Component of interest is divided into small parts – 1D elements for beam or truss structures.
Copyright © 2002J. E. Akin Rice University, MEMS Dept. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress.
Seal Analysis Jeremy Osguthorpe Mitchell Woolf Jon Blotter 7 / 12 / 2007.
Theory of Elasticity Theory of elasticity governs response – Symmetric stress & strain components Governing equations – Equilibrium equations (3) – Strain-displacement.
Status of Coil Structural Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: ORNL: D. Williamson UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray.
Introduction to Finite Element Analysis for Structure Design Dr. A. Sherif El-Gizawy.
CHAP 6 FINITE ELEMENTS FOR PLANE SOLIDS
Workshop A12-2 Fatigue: Strain-Life.
CST ELEMENT STIFFNESS MATRIX
FE Modeling Strategy Decide on details from design Find smallest dimension of interest Pick element types – 1D Beams – 2D Plate or.
CHAP 4 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS AND FRAMES
Nonlinear Thermal/Structural Analysis of Hypersonic Vehicle Hot Structures NASA Workshop on Innovative Finite Element Solutions to Challenging Problems.
1 THERMAL & MECHANICAL PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ELM COIL ALTERNATE DESIGN Interim Review July 26-28, 2010 In-Vessel Coil System Interim Review – July 26-28,
ITER-D-3G3SQN v1.1 1 THERMAL & MECHANICAL PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ELM COIL ALTERNATE DESIGN Interim Review July 26-28, 2010 In-Vessel Coil System Interim.
The Finite Element Method
Finite Element Modeling and Analysis with a Biomechanical Application Alexandra Schönning, Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering University of North Florida ASME.
Plate and shell elements All the following elements enable to create FE mesh of a thin-walled body, with the thickness being one of the important input.
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
1 sphere_derror.sldprt at 100MPa pressure Should be zero Should be 78540N Should be zero Should be 78540N.
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus October Aluminum Block Analyses.
Features: 1. 2D structural analysis (plane stress) 2. Static analysis 3. Quarter symmetric 4. SI units 5. Only the yoke is modeled 6. Material properties.
Stress constrained optimization using X-FEM and Level Set Description
Vacuum Vessel lateral loading (Neutral beam port only)
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders A Brooks July 27, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_353BL2.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
WS-1 WORKSHOP Define Equivalent Section Plate Properties NAS121, Workshop, May 6, 2002.
Finite Element Analysis of the18 Turn Beam H. F. Fan November 5, 2004.
1 HOW MANY ELEMENTS? How to choose element size? –Critically important in obtaining good results –Mesh refinement improves solution accuracy. –How small.
Two loading Conditions
BoltJoin ppt P. Rogoff 3/24/2011. NSTX Supported by P. R. 3/9/2011 Update Ring Bolted Joint Design and Recommend the Joint Geometry using bolts.
General Analysis Procedure Chapter 4. Training Manual October 30, 2001 Inventory # Chapter 4 - General Analysis Procedure Overview The objective.
NSTX Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus Sept 1, 2010 Status of Disruption Simulations.
Nonlinear Analyses of Modular Coils and Shell structure for Coil Cool-down and EM Loads Part 1 – Results of Shell Structure and Modular Coils H.M. Fan.
Figure 1 – NSTX Upper Umbrella Assembly Upgrade Design: Version 4
Finite-Element Analysis
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
Mode Superposition Module 7. Training Manual January 30, 2001 Inventory # Module 7 Mode Superposition A. Define mode superposition. B. Learn.
TORSION OF A SHAFT WITH A SHOULDER FILLET
Disruption Analysis of PP, VV, and Components. Opera 3D Model – Transient ELEKTRA Solver Fast mid-plane centered disruption 2 MA/ms Back ground field.
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
CHAP 7 FINITE ELEMENT PROCEDURE AND MODELING
POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
Date of download: 12/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
STUDIES TOWARDS TARGET-HORN INTEGRATION Institute of Applied Mechanics
FEA convergence requirements.
Stress Analysis of Universal Tilt Kit Attachment Points
FEA Simulations Boundary conditions are applied
POSTPROCESSING Review analysis results and evaluate the performance
Nastran FEA Frequency Response Function for Base Input Revision B
Presentation transcript:

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 OBJECTIVES Develop the Finite Element Model for The Armor Eddy Current Analysis –Show Mesh Density and Boundary Conditions Apply Disruption Case of Magnetic Vector Potential from Opera Data Tables –Data tables (provided by others) are contoured as inputs to this analysis. –Magnetic Flux B Field is contoured on the FE model –The Magnetic Vector Potential is contoured on the FE model as an input to this analysis. Provide Magnetic Results for: –Current Density at five discrete locations as a function of time. Trend identifies the critical time step during the disruption event –Current Density as a Vector Plot. This result shows directional trends of current during the disruption Develop the Finite Element Model for Transient Structural Results –Show the mesh and Structural Boundary Conditions Provide Transient Structural results for: –Max Displacement at highest current and final load step –Contour results for von Mises stress –Preliminary Reaction Load Magnitudes Provide Conclusions and Planned Recommendations

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 ASSUMPTIONS Magnetic Vector Potential Data Tables: – 2-D Opera Results uniformly expanded into 3-D as provided by Ron Hatcher through Srinivas Avasarala dated –Opera Data encompasses Max disruption load case All Components are Merged Integral Solids from Pro-Engineer –No gaps or other nonlinear material properties Note: This will effect how load distributes through the structure. –Welded Reaction Points are Rigid fixed in all DOF Note: This artificially adds strength to the structure that does not in reality exist. –All Support Structure Braces are Merged Solids Note: Reaction Loads and moments are only approximate – not for final design –Transient Dynamic Analysis assumes 0.5% structural damping Single Uniform Material Property : 625 Inconel

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 MAGNETIC VECTOR POTENTIAL ELEMENT MESH THE ELEMENT MESH DENSITY Element Type node brick Limited Type node tetrahedral

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Opera Program Magnetic Vector Potential Sum THE SPECIFIED INPUT ASSUMPTIONS FOR VECTOR POTENTIAL AT MAX TIME STEP THE SPECIFIED INPUT ASSUMPTIONS FOR VECTOR POTENTIAL AT MAX TIME STEP

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Voltage Contour VOLTAGE DISTRIBUTION AT MAX TIME STEP All welds set to zero voltage

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 CURRENT DENSITY Four Discrete Locations Vs TIME THE MAX CURRENT DENSITY OCCURS AT TIME = Sec 4,788 E4 Amps/ M**2

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 CURRENT DENSITY VECTORS At Max TIME Step CURRENT DENSITY VECTOR AT MAX TIME STEP Currents move to ground voltage as specified in boundary conditions. Higher concentrated values at sharp corners adjacent to welds.

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Opera Program Flux Field at Max Time Step THE SPECIFIED INPUT ASSUMPTIONS FOR FLUX FIELD AT MAX TIME STEP THE SPECIFIED INPUT ASSUMPTIONS FOR FLUX FIELD AT MAX TIME STEP

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Opera Program Flux Field at Time = Sec THE SPECIFIED INPUT ASSUMPTIONS FOR FLUX FIELD AT TIME STEP = THE SPECIFIED INPUT ASSUMPTIONS FOR FLUX FIELD AT TIME STEP = 0.007

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 STRUCTURAL MODEL

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Structural Transient Boundary Conditions The Structural Boundary Conditions Are Defined All welds are rigidly constrained Symmetric Boundary

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Transient Max Displacement Max Transient Displacement Trends During Disruption Occurs at Seconds after Initiation Max Transient Displacement Trends During Disruption Occurs at Seconds after Initiation Time = Sec

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Structural Transient Boundary Conditions The Displacement Results at Max Current Time Step is defined Note: The assumed rigid structural deflections will be larger on actual model Units are Meters.

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Transient Max Displacement Typical Transient Stress Trends During Disruption Time = Sec

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Von Mises Stress at Max Current The Transient Equivalent Stress at Max Current is Low Based on the assumptions of zero voltage at the Welds The Transient Equivalent Stress at Max Current is Low Based on the assumptions of zero voltage at the Welds Max Stress = 1.6e7 Pa = 2,320 psi

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 Von Mises Stress at Max Current The Transient Equivalent Stress at Max Current is Low Based on the assumptions of zero voltage at the Welds The Transient Equivalent Stress at Max Current is Low Based on the assumptions of zero voltage at the Welds Max Stress = 1.6e7 Pa = 2,320 psi Max Bounded Stress = 6.2e7 Pa = 9,065 psi FX = N FY = N FZ = N MX = NM MY = NM MZ = NM

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 CONCLUSIONS The Preliminary Armor Electromagnetic and a Transient Dynamic Structural analysis is complete based on the best OPERA information available as of today. The Electromagnetic Analysis based on the disruption data from Ron Hatcher is complete, however, this data may not represent the actual max values. A revision for this region is pending completion before March 1, The max current density (4,788 E4 Amps /M^2) occurs seconds into the disruption event The max stress (9,065 psi) and X displacement (2.96 Mils) occurs at seconds into the disruption event. The max reaction load occurs at seconds near the center port welds is a total of 11,790 N (2,651 lbs). The stresses from these loads are minimal and well within the material capacity of 625 Inconel. Inclusion of the Reactor Vessel is required to fully capture the current share in these structures since the assumption of ground voltage at the weld locations may not be adequate.

NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 RECOMMENDATIONS Initiate addition of new solid models from design to include the NSTX reactor vessels. Continue to refine analysis technique to facilitate the analysis of these models. Rerun all of the analysis when the refined Opera data becomes available for the max disruption event adjacent to the Armor Structure. Expand the structure runs to include sub models on the weld attachment points and bolts. Evaluate reductions in the stiffness on this structure by extracting the supports from the assumed rigid boundary. Initiate the Transient thermal analysis models for the Armor Tiles