1 Experimental Demonstration of a Squeezing-Enhanced Laser-Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Detector Keisuke Goda Quantum Measurement Group, LIGO Massachusetts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Hild for the GEO600 team October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling.
Advertisements

Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) HOMODYNE AND HETERODYNE READOUT OF A SIGNAL- RECYCLED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTOR.
G v1 H1 Squeezer Experiment Update L-V Meeting, Caltech, March 18, 2009 ANU, AEI, MIT, CIT and LHO Ping Koy Lam, Nergis Mavalvala, David McClelland,
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Jan 29, 2007 LIGO Excomm, G R 1 Goal: Experimental Demonstration of a Squeezing-Enhanced Laser-Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector in.
G v1 Squeezer Update Review August 25, 2009 H1 Squeezer Experiment ANU, AEI, MIT, CIT and LHO collaboration.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.
Jan 29, 2007 LIGO Excomm, G R 1 Status and Future of the Caltech 40m Lab Jan 29, 2007 the 40m team: Rana Adhikari, Ben Abbott, Rich Abbott, Rolf.
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
Quantum Noise Measurements at the ANU Sheon Chua, Michael Stefszky, Conor Mow-Lowry, Sheila Dwyer, Ben Buchler, Ping Koy Lam, Daniel Shaddock, and David.
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
Interferometer Topologies and Prepared States of Light – Quantum Noise and Squeezing Convenor: Roman Schnabel.
Experiments towards beating quantum limits Stefan Goßler for the experimental team of The ANU Centre of Gravitational Physics.
Experimental Characterization of Frequency Dependent Squeezed Light R. Schnabel, S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, and K. Danzmann.
Generation and Control of Squeezed Light Fields R. Schnabel  S.  Chelkowski  A.  Franzen  B.  Hage  H.  Vahlbruch  N. Lastzka  M.  Mehmet.
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
SPECTROSCOPY LABORATORY MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Application of LIGO Technology to Biomedical Optics Keisuke Goda Quantum Measurement Group.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Squeezed light and GEO600 Simon Chelkowski LSC Meeting, Hannover.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
1 Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Rodrigo Delgadillo, Guido Mueller, David Reitze, and David Tanner Noise associated with the EOM in Advanced LIGO.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
Variable reflectivity signal-recycling mirror and control Stefan Goßler for the experimental team of The ANU Centre of Gravitational Physics.
Eighth Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves Sheon Chua, Michael Stefszky, Conor Mow-Lowry, Daniel Shaddock, Ben Buchler, Kirk McKenzie, Sheila.
Frequency Dependent Squeezing Roadmap toward 10dB
AIC: Activity report K.A. Strain MIT July 2007 G R.
S. ChelkowskiSlide 1WG1 Meeting, Birmingham 07/2008.
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
LIGO- G R LSC meeting at LSU, August Caltech 40m Lab Update LSC meeting at LSU Aug 16, 2006 Robert Ward, Caltech and the 40m team: Rana.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
LIGO- G Z LSC meeting at Baton Rouge, March Caltech 40m Lab Update LSC Meeting Baton Rouge Mar 21, 2007 Robert Ward, Caltech and the 40m.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
GEO Status and Prospects Harald Lück ILIAS / ETmeeting Cascina November 2008.
Optomechanics Experiments
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
H1 Squeezing Experiment: the path to an Advanced Squeezer
Detuned Twin-Signal-Recycling
Squeezing in Gravitational Wave Detectors
Quantum noise reduction using squeezed states in LIGO
Demonstration of lock acquisition and optical response on
Quantum Opportunities in Gravitational Wave Detectors
The Quantum Limit and Beyond in Gravitational Wave Detectors
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
MIT Corbitt, Goda, Innerhofer, Mikhailov, Ottaway, Pelc, Wipf Caltech
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Quantum Noise in Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen February 2004
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005
Quantum Optics and Macroscopic Quantum Measurement
Squeezed states in GW interferometers
Quantum studies in LIGO Lab
Squeeze Amplitude Filters
Optical Squeezing For Next Generation Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors Michael Stefszky, Sheon Chua, Conor Mow-Lowry, Ben Buchler, Kirk McKenzie,
LIGO Quantum Schemes NSF Review, Oct
Nergis Mavalvala MIT December 2004
Squeezed Input Interferometer
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Presentation transcript:

1 Experimental Demonstration of a Squeezing-Enhanced Laser-Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Detector Keisuke Goda Quantum Measurement Group, LIGO Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT Quantum Measurement Group Christopher Wipf, Thomas Corbitt, David Ottaway, Stan Whitcomb, Nergis Mavalvala Collaborators  Osamu Miyakawa, Alan Weinstein California Institute of Technology  Eugeniy Mikhailov The College of William and Mary  Shailendhar Saraf Rochester Institute of Technology  Kirk McKenzie, Ping Koy Lam, Malcolm Gray, David McClelland Australian National University LSC Meeting March 22, 2007 LIGO MIT

2 Outline  Motivation and Goal  Squeezing Project at 40m  Experimental Apparatus  Results  Summary and Future Work

3 Quantum-Noise-Limited Detectors The sensitivity of the next generation GW detectors such as Advanced LIGO will be mostly limited by quantum noise in the GW band (10Hz – 10kHz). The sensitivity of the next generation GW detectors such as Advanced LIGO will be mostly limited by quantum noise in the GW band (10Hz – 10kHz). Quantum noise: Quantum noise: Shot Noise at high frequencies (above ~100Hz) Shot Noise at high frequencies (above ~100Hz) Radiation Pressure Noise at low frequencies (below ~100Hz) Radiation Pressure Noise at low frequencies (below ~100Hz) The sensitivity can be improved by the injection of squeezed states to the dark port with a proper squeeze angle. C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981) Radiation Pressure Noise Shot Noise ↓ 10 dB of Squeezing

4 Squeezing-Enhanced Table-Top Interferometers 1.Squeezing-Enhanced Mach-Zehnder Interferometer M. Xiao, L-A Wu, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 278 (1987)  First demonstration of squeezing-enhanced interferometry 2.Power-Recycled Michelson Interferometer K. McKenzie, B.C. Buchler, D.A. Shaddock, P.K. Lam, and D.E. McClelland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, (2002)  Demonstrated squeezing-enhancement at MHz and an increase in S/N  Used squeezed light 3.Dual-Recycled Michelson Interferometer H. Vahlbruch, S. Chelkowski, B. Hage, A. Franzen, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, (2005)  Demonstrated squeezing-enhancement at MHz and an increase in S/N  Implemented a filter cavity that rotates the squeeze angle at MHz  Used squeezed light

5 ULTIMATE GOAL Implementation of Squeezing-Enhancement in Laser- Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Detectors in the Advanced LIGO Configuration IMMEDIATE GOAL Demonstration of the technology necessary to reach the ultimate goal ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ Squeezing Caltech 40m Lab Proposed a few years ago Proposed a few years ago Started a year ago Started a year ago Initially without the output mode cleaner (OMC) Initially without the output mode cleaner (OMC) People involved: People involved: K. Goda, O. Miyakawa, E. E. Mikhailov, S. Saraf, A. Weinstein, and N. Mavalvala K. Goda, O. Miyakawa, E. E. Mikhailov, S. Saraf, A. Weinstein, and N. Mavalvala

6 40m Interferometer & Squeezer Interface PSL: pre-stabilized laser PSL: pre-stabilized laser MC: mode-cleaner MC: mode-cleaner IFO: interferometer IFO: interferometer SQZ: squeezer SQZ: squeezer PRM: power-recycling mirror PRM: power-recycling mirror SRM: signal-recycling mirror SRM: signal-recycling mirror SHG: second-harmonic generator SHG: second-harmonic generator OPO: optical parametric oscillator OPO: optical parametric oscillator

7 Second-Harmonic Generator (SHG)

8 The SHG is a cavity composed of a 5%MgO:LiNbO3 hemilithic crystal with ROC = 8mm and an output coupling mirror with ROC = 50mm. The SHG is a cavity composed of a 5%MgO:LiNbO3 hemilithic crystal with ROC = 8mm and an output coupling mirror with ROC = 50mm. Crystal dimensions: 5mm x 2.5mm x 7.5mm Crystal dimensions: 5mm x 2.5mm x 7.5mm The crystal is maintained at 114 deg C for phase-matching by temperature control. The crystal is maintained at 114 deg C for phase-matching by temperature control. Uses type I phase-matching in which the pump and SHG fields are orthogonally polarized (S at 1064nm, P at 532nm) Uses type I phase-matching in which the pump and SHG fields are orthogonally polarized (S at 1064nm, P at 532nm) The SHG conversion efficiency = 30% The SHG conversion efficiency = 30% PD 5%MgO:LiNbO3 95% at 1064nm 4% at 532nm 99.95% at both 1064nm and 532nm Dichroic Beamsplitter Role: to generate a second-harmonic field to pump the OPO cavity

9 Squeezer/Optical Parametric Oscillator (OPO)

10 Squeezer/Optical Parametric Oscillator (OPO) The OPO is a 2.2 cm long cavity composed of a periodically poled KTP (PPKTP) crystal with flat/flat AR/AR surfaces and two coupling mirrors (R in = 99.95% and R out = 92%/4% at 1064/532nm). The OPO is a 2.2 cm long cavity composed of a periodically poled KTP (PPKTP) crystal with flat/flat AR/AR surfaces and two coupling mirrors (R in = 99.95% and R out = 92%/4% at 1064/532nm). PPKTP offers the following advantages over LiNbO 3 PPKTP offers the following advantages over LiNbO 3 Higher nonlinearity: d = 10.8 pm/V Higher nonlinearity: d = 10.8 pm/V Higher laser damage threshold Higher laser damage threshold Higher resistance to photorefractive damage Higher resistance to photorefractive damage Lower susceptibility to thermal lensing Lower susceptibility to thermal lensing Input Coupler Output Coupler PPKTP Role: to generate a squeezed vacuum field by correlating the upper and lower quantum sidebands around the carrier frequency

11 Monitor Homodyne Detector before Injection

12 Monitor Homodyne Detector before Injection Homodyne detector to measure squeezing Homodyne detector to measure squeezing Composed of a 50/50 BS and a pair of home-made low-noise transimpedance photodetectors with high quantum efficiency photodiodes (JDS Uniphase ETX500T with QE = 93%) Composed of a 50/50 BS and a pair of home-made low-noise transimpedance photodetectors with high quantum efficiency photodiodes (JDS Uniphase ETX500T with QE = 93%) The difference photocurrent is measured to subtract uncorrelated noise and extract correlated noise The difference photocurrent is measured to subtract uncorrelated noise and extract correlated noise And then sent to a spectrum analyzer to observe the effect of squeezing on the local oscillator (LO) And then sent to a spectrum analyzer to observe the effect of squeezing on the local oscillator (LO) LO as a trigger to observe either squeezed or anti-squeezed quadrature variance LO as a trigger to observe either squeezed or anti-squeezed quadrature variance Mode-cleaning fiber to mode-match the LO to the squeezed vacuum Mode-cleaning fiber to mode-match the LO to the squeezed vacuum When the flipper mirror is up, the squeezed vacuum is monitored by the homodyne detector. When the flipper is down, the squeezed vacuum is injected into the interferometer. When the flipper mirror is up, the squeezed vacuum is monitored by the homodyne detector. When the flipper is down, the squeezed vacuum is injected into the interferometer. Homodyne visibility of 99% achieved Homodyne visibility of 99% achieved Role: to measure squeezing before injection to the interferometer

13 Squeezing from the OPO with PPKTP  Measured by the squeezing monitor homodyne detector  About 6.5 dB of scanned squeezing at MHz  About 4.0 dB of phase-locked squeezing at frequencies down to a few kHz  The squeeze angle is locked by the noise locking technique.  More than 15dB of squeezing is created by the OPO, but losses kill most of it. (a) Shot noise (b) Squeezed shot noise

14 Interferometer

15 Interferometer Configurations  Possible 40m Interferometer Configurations  Signal-Recycled Michelson (SRMI) with DC Readout with/without the OMC  Resonant Sideband Extraction (RSE) with DC Readout with/without the OMC  DC readout scheme: local oscillator (LO) field necessary to beat squeezing against  Important step toward squeezing-enhanced Advanced LIGO with the DC readout scheme DRMI Quantum Noise Budget Input Power to BS = 50mW Homodyne Angle = 0 Squeeze Angle = π/2 Initial Squeezing Level = 5dB Injection Loss = 10% Detection Loss = 10% RSE Quantum Noise Budget Input Power to BS = 700mW Homodyne Angle = 0 Squeeze Angle = π/2 Initial Squeezing Level = 5dB Injection Loss = 10% Detection Loss = 10%

16 SRMI Noise Floor  The carrier field on resonance in the SRC  Interferometer LO power from a Michelson offset: 100 μW (the lower, the better)  Ratio in power of the carrier to the 166MHz sidebands: at least 10 to 1  Mostly dominated by laser (intensity) and interferometer noise at low frequencies  Shot noise limited at frequencies above 40kHz

17 Verification of Shot Noise  Noise increase by 3dB at frequencies above 40kHz » Shot Noise  Noise increase by 6dB at frequencies below 10kHz » Laser (Intensity) Noise  Noise increase in between 10kHz and 40kHz » Interferometer Noise

18 Injection and Detection of Squeezing

19 Mode-matching and alignment of squeezed vacuum to the interferometer are done by a mode-matching telescope and steering mirrors. Mode-matching and alignment of squeezed vacuum to the interferometer are done by a mode-matching telescope and steering mirrors. Isolation of the squeezing-enhanced interferometer field from the injection of squeezing is done by Faraday isolation. Isolation of the squeezing-enhanced interferometer field from the injection of squeezing is done by Faraday isolation. An extra Faraday isolator is installed to further reject the LO light from going into the OPO. An extra Faraday isolator is installed to further reject the LO light from going into the OPO. Detection of the squeezing-enhanced interferometer field is done by a high transimpedance amplifier with a high quantum efficiency photodiode (JDS Uniphase ETX500T with QE: 93%) Detection of the squeezing-enhanced interferometer field is done by a high transimpedance amplifier with a high quantum efficiency photodiode (JDS Uniphase ETX500T with QE: 93%) Injection and Detection of Squeezing

20 Results

21 SRMI Noise Floor  The carrier field on resonance in the SRC  Interferometer LO power from a Michelson offset: 100 μW (the lower, the better)  Ratio in power of the carrier to the 166MHz sidebands: at least 10 to 1  Mostly dominated by laser (intensity) and interferometer noise at low frequencies  Shot noise limited at frequencies above 40kHz

22 Squeezing-Enhanced SRMI  Broadband reduction of shot noise by about 3dB at frequencies above 40kHz  No squeezing effect on the SRMI in the laser-noise-dominant frequency band  The squeeze angle is locked by the noise-locking technique with the modulation frequency at 18kHz.

23 Increase in S/N by Squeezing  Simulated GW Signal: Excitation of BS at 50kHz  The noisy peaks in the squeezing spectrum are due to the optical crosstalk between the interferometer and OPO (imperfect isolation of the interferometer LO field from going into the OPO in spite of two Faraday isolators).

24 Summary and Future Work  SUMMARY  We are developing techniques necessary for squeezing-enhanced laser- interferometric GW detectors  GW detector-compatible squeezer  Squeezing injection scheme  Squeeze angle locking scheme  Interferometer locking scheme with squeezing  With these techniques, we have demonstrated squeezing-enhancement (an increase in S/N) in the LIGO prototype interferometer by about 3dB in the shot-noise-limited frequency band (above 40kHz)  This squeezer is applicable to any interferometer configuration with DC readout.  FUTURE WORK  Squeezing-enhanced RSE (full Advanced LIGO configuration)  Squeezing with the OMC  Coherent control of squeezing  Doubly-resonant OPO in a ring cavity  Noise-hunting for squeezing-enhanced interferometry in the GW band  Installation into Enhanced LIGO and then Advanced LIGO?

25 Acknowledgements  We thank Caltech 40m Lab and MIT Quantum Measurement Group for invaluable support for the experiment  We also thank ANU for providing high quantum efficiency photodiodes  We gratefully acknowledge support from NSF