Value-added Instructional Supervision Pennsylvania’s Urban Leadership Academy Kenneth D. Jenkins June 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collegial Coaching Rebecca Derenge Title I, Reading Coordinator Teamwork Collegial.doc.
Advertisements


A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Purpose of Instruction
PORTFOLIO.
Elementary School Counselor
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
You Are The Essential Piece Professional Learning Community From Vision to Reality.
LCAP Update, Feedback, & Input Vision Quality Indicator 5: Professional Learning For All December 9, 2014.
Managing Change Principal Leadership Academy November 2012.
Illinois Principal Preparation Program Internship Assessment Rubric
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Overview  Continuing the Journey to 85:5/16  Celebrating Accomplishments  Invitational Education  Culture & Diversity  Teacher & Principal Evaluation.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Creating High-Performing Public Schools Joseph F. Johnson, Jr., Ph.D. Special Assistant to the State Superintendent Ohio Department of Education
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
The Heart of Improvement: Leadership. The Story of Thomasville City Schools…
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Using the Nine Characteristics to Test Assumptions in School Improvement G. Sue Shannon OSPI Senior Researcher WERA/OSPI Assessment Conference December.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 4 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
CLINTON HIGH SCHOOL OUR STORY… RTI Success in a REAL Comprehensive High School John Jorgensen, Curriculum Director Karinne Tharaldson Jones, Principal.
Why Collaborate?. “Why do we have to collaborate? I know my job. If I do my job and everybody else does his, we will be fine. The teachers I work with.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
NC Professional Teaching Standards. North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
SACS Governance & Leadership Committee September 26, 2012.
Culture Snapshot Card Sort Analysis Video Questions.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
So, What is Teacher Leadership?
CRPUSD Instructional Update
Purposeful Literacy Leadership for Administrators: Start a Movement
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School
“Laying Foundations for the Future!”
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
“Pop” in to Find Out What’s New in Kindergarten
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Presentation transcript:

Value-added Instructional Supervision Pennsylvania’s Urban Leadership Academy Kenneth D. Jenkins June 2004

First thing… Change your mindset about doing performance evaluations. If you see it as a chore, those you supervise will see your efforts in the same light. Few will take this process seriously if the principal does not take it seriously. Like students, teachers will rise or lower their performance to meet the principal’s expectations.

Why should you do this? Helps you in aligning the taught curriculum with the learned curriculum. There are few achievement downsides to higher alignment between these two curriculums. You can’t lead improvements over stuff you don’t understand.

Second, change your focus Alter your observational attention from teaching to learning. What are the kids doing? What evidences of THEIR learning can you observe? Takes a little of the inspection mentality away from the process. Backward map from the observations on learning to the teaching that generated it. The feedback is more teacher- driven than principal-driven.

What does this require of you? Understanding the work students are doing? Understanding the instructional approaches the teacher is applying to the curriculum Understanding the curriculum Resisting the occasional urges to succumb to a “gotcha” mindset.

OK! So what’s next? Working on the Work In the teaching – learning process, we focus a lot on inputs (teaching) and outputs (test scores), but we spend little time really looking hard at the stuff that transitions teaching into learning. The assignments teachers design for kids to do in the name of learning can have as much to do with learning success as quality teaching. The things that most engage students in classrooms is a competent and caring teacher who assigns work they find interesting and enjoyable.

What do I have to do? Talk about the work, using actual artifacts the teacher uses. How well does the work align? How well did it engage learners? Will students know what they’ve learned after they finish the work?

Whew! Is there anything else? Of course! You can use observation data as a source for small group conversations. Gather a small group with some common discretionary time for a minute professional conversation. Provide appropriate snacks and beverages. Start with an instructional highlight you saw and ask the teacher to talk about it to his/her peers. Invite others to describe successful lessons they accomplished recently. Thank them!

What do I have to do to make that happen? Get a PDA with a digital camera. In your walkthroughs, scribble notes and take digital images. Use those for feedback purposes as well as graphic images of what you observed.

Ok, that’s enough for me right now! Nice try, but there’s one more thing you might do. When’s the last time you looked at your own teaching with an honest and critical eye? I’m talking about how we structure the professional meetings we conduct and control.

What are you talking about? 3:30 -- Administrative Action items 3:40 -- Report from Leadership Team re: school-based staff development options for the summer, some with compensation., 3:50 -- Presentation by (grade level, department, team, etc.) on their progress in meeting a priority school improvement goal 4:05 -- Preparation for improving reading scores -- an examination of student work on teacher-made reading tests aimed at improving reading comprehension 4:20 -- Stories of successful interventions with at-risk students. 4:30 Adjourn

Does this stuff really work? Here’s a true, true story!

A Research Study by the NC Principals’ Executive Program Find places serving a high poverty, high minority student populations who were doing well on accountability tests. Identify what factors (teachers, leaders, community, etc.) contributed to the school’s academic and social success Use findings to help school leaders in the state

School A Demographic Profile Located in the Northwestern part of North Carolina 48% of student body is minority 35% of parents did not graduate from high school 13% of students have limited English proficiency 25% of students are exceptional 64% of students live in poverty Academic Profile 1996 Overall Rank 1213(1603) 1997 Composite Composite 76.3 Exemplary Growth in 1997 & 1998 School of Excellence in 2003.

School B Demographic Profile Located in the Southeastern part of North Carolina 72% of student body is minority 12% of parents did not graduate from high school 11% of students are exceptional 62% of students live in poverty Academic Profile 1996 Overall Rank 408(1603) 1997 Composite Composite 66.7 Exemplary Growth in 1997 & 1998 School of Distinction in 2003.

School C Demographic Profile Located in the Southeastern part of North Carolina 49% of student body is minority 29% of parents did not graduate from high school 17% of students are exceptional 81% of students live in poverty Academic Profile 1996 Overall Rank 1163(1603) 1997 Composite Composite 72.1 Exemplary Growth in 1997 & 1998 School of Excellence in 2003

School D Demographic Profile Located in the Central part of North Carolina 62% of student body is minority 42% of parents did not graduate from high school 38%of students are limited English proficient 16% of students are exceptional 81% of students live in poverty Academic Profile 1996 Overall Rank 184(1603) 1997 Composite Composite 70.8 Exemplary Growth in 1997 & 1998 School of Progress in 2003.

School E Demographic Profile Located in the Southeastern part of North Carolina 46% of student body is minority 16% of parents did not graduate from high school 12% of students are exceptional 53% of students live in poverty Academic Profile 1996 Overall Rank 783(1603) 1997 Composite Composite 82.4 Exemplary Growth in 1997 & 1998 School of Distinction in 2003.

Study Findings Professional Relationships School Factors Teachers Leadership

Professional Relationships School Relationships were based on trust, mutual across job descriptions. Colleagues were willing to work together. Collaboration was neither forced nor contrived. Teachers were a genuine part of the decision- making at the school. School Leader recognized that a teacher’s time was valuable; they didn’t waste it.

School Factors A deep knowledge of the curriculum, both above, below, and within their grade level. Leadership visibility A relationship with parents that reached into the community Caring school environment; every student had line-of-sight to at least one adult in the school.

Findings-About Teachers Teachers felt responsible for every student in their school...not just those in their classroom! Teachers used multiple sources of data to determine what was taught and how Teachers believed a “genuine caring about all students” is the most important factor in being a good teacher Teachers described themselves as relentless in their efforts to motivate students to meet high expectations.

Findings-Teachers Teachers in all five schools describe themselves as equally relentless in their efforts to involve parents in the academic lives of their children. Teachers work together by grade level and as a faculty to improve the learning experiences of all students. Teachers share what is working in their classrooms with their colleagues.

Findings-About Leadership Teachers attribute a great deal of their effectiveness to the school leadership. Distributive leadership was evident. Membership on the school improvement team was respected and sought after. The school principals demonstrated a deep understanding of the standard course of study at each grade level. The school principals were thoughtful and protective of teachers non-instructional duties and planning time

Findings-About Leadership The school principals made spending time in classrooms a priority Principals encouraged teacher innovativeness and created a culture that was supportive of teacher risk taking Teachers trusted their principals The school principals had a great deal of trust in their teachers

Steps to Turnaround Find out who you serve Clean it up and make it inviting Focus on management to create an orderly and disciplined environment Focus on instruction Focus on professional development Celebrate success…even small accomplishments.