Supporting Teachers to Learn the Practice of Ambitious Mathematics Teaching Summer Learning Institute Teacher Education Workshop July 17, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Era of the Common Core Standards Network Meeting, January 11, 2012 Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Assessment for Learning.
Advertisements

Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Common Core Mathematical Practices. People who are good in math… Make sense of problems.
Math Extension Activity JCPS Analytical and Applied Sciences.
Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
Bringing it all together!
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Measured Progress ©2012 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom Practices ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session One February.
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Preparing Teachers to Enact Ambitious Teaching Practices during Secondary Preservice Teacher Education: Challenges and Successes Rebekah Elliott Ron Gray.
K–12 Session 4.3 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 3: Looking for the Practices through Observation Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core.
What Happened? In your group, discuss what happened in your district regarding SB 1 after our last meeting. Each group will share (1)one positive outcome.
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice as a Natural part of Teaching Through Whole Class Mathematics Discussions. Teruni Lamberg, Ph.D. University.
1 Exploring Rigor in the 2011 MA Curriculum Framework for Mathematics Exploration Activity : Connecting the Standards for Mathematical Practice to the.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Investigations in Number, Data, and Space: Teaching Philosophy.
Number Talks Math Institute Summer Activating Strategy Discussion: Which common errors would you expect to see? =
The Common Core State Standards Initiative  Who’s behind it?  What’s it all about? 
Literacy in the Mathematics Classroom District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Exploring the Normal Distribution Rick Luttrell James Price South Iredell High School.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
Common Core Mathematics, Common Core English/Language Arts, and Next Generation Science Standards. What’s the common thread?
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
Strategies for Teaching, Supporting and Assessing Students’ Understanding and Development of Algebra and Function Concepts, Operations and Skills Leading.
1 National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Illustrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice: Getting Started with the Practices Investigations.
Magdalene Lampert, Univ of Michigan UCLA, UW, University of Michigan
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
K-1 TIPM3 Dr. Monica Hartman Cathy Melody and Gwen Mitchell November 2, 2011.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Kindergarten through Grade Twelve Standards for Mathematical.
Elementary Math: 2 nd Grade Professional Development January 2012.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
K–12 Session 4.2 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 2: Student Dispositions & Teacher Actions Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards.
+ Is your School's Instructional Program Ready for Common Core? Reach Institute for School Leadership.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Which of the following items must you consider when planning instruction in your class? Place a dot next to each item. UbD IFL/POL IEP/504/UDL ESL/SIOP.
Measuring What Matters: Technology & the Assessment of all Students Jim Pellegrino.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Mrs. Charlena Lynn Welteroth Language Arts 8 Mrs. Elizabeth Dietrich Algebra & Geometry PA Core Standards.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. 1.How many vertices are on a cube? 2.Subtract ½ from half a baker’s dozen. 3.How many prime numbers are between.
Professional Growth Systems And Nevada Academic Content Standards Strengthening teacher capacity through powerful feedback March 20, 2015.
T 3 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP Make sense of problems & persevere in solving them Reason abstractly & quantitatively Construct viable arguments.
SOUTH DAKOTA COUNTS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE Brookings, SD
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Next Generation Science Standards “Taking the Steps to Implement NGSS” March 29, 2013 TEEAM Conference.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
509A UNIT 1-WEEK2 Dr. Hasan Fall Classroom Observation Unit 1 In your small groups, reflect on your observation of the classroom video lesson using.
Fostering Vocabulary Development and Deeper Conceptual Understanding in the Mathematics Classroom Melissa Christie September 16, 2013.
Writing in Math Presented by: Robyn Albaeck and Cathy Tabor Holmes Middle School.
PUTTING THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS INTO ACTION Sandy Christie Craig Bowman 2012.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
REFLECTION ON TEACHING THROUGH VIDEO ANALYSIS. UNDERGRADUATE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM.
Using the CLASS tool to Improve Instructional Practices in Early Childhood Tracie Dow and Felicia Owo.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
ELEM 525.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Presentation transcript:

Supporting Teachers to Learn the Practice of Ambitious Mathematics Teaching Summer Learning Institute Teacher Education Workshop July 17, 2011

Megan Franke & Angela Chan, UCLA Hala Ghousseini, University of Wisconsin Elham Kazemi, University of Washington Magdalene Lampert & Heather Beasley, University of Michigan

What do we mean by ambitious mathematics teaching? Mathematics teaching which aims to produce competent performance in complex domains for all students

Ambitious Mathematics Teaching Teaching which aims to produce – Competent performance Acquire Understand And be able to use knowledge – In complex domains Communication Providing evidence for conclusions Connected structures – For all students Attention to differences in what students bring Teaching is continuously calibrated to learning What do we mean by ambitious mathematics teaching?

Literacy and Mathematics TeacherK-12 students The social and institutional context of schools and classrooms The work of Teaching is in structuring relationships

What do we mean by the PRACTICE of ambitious mathematics teaching? Practice 1 – doing, thoughtful doing – not the opposite of theory but the use of theory in action in a particular context Practice 2 – “high leverage” practices – things that teachers do regularly to support learning Practice 3 – deliberate repeating of an action with feedback until you get good at it – integration of routines with good judgment about when and how to use them Practice 4 – collective activity expresses shared commitments – using common tools and common language – commitment to common principles

Why might it be important to support teachers on all of these fronts at once? TURN AND TALK Share with whole group TURN AND TALK Share with whole group Practice 1 – doing, thoughtful doing – not the opposite of theory but the use of theory in action in a particular context Practice 2 – “high leverage” practices – things that teachers do regularly to support learning Practice 3 – deliberate repeating of an action with feedback until you get good at it – integration of routines with good judgment about when and how to use them Practice 4 – collective activity expresses shared commitments – using common tools and common language – commitment to common principles

The practice of teaching Teacher educatorsNovice teachers The social and institutional context for learning teaching The work of Teacher Education is in structuring relationships

How can we design teacher education to structure the relationships among teacher educators, novice teachers, and teaching practice so that novice teachers are likely to develop competence and identities as ambitious teachers?

Designed Settings Cycles of Enactment and Investigation Common Instructional Activities Coaching through Rehearsals

Instructional activities can be crafted to enable children to learn important mathematics enable novices to learn Routine practices Enactment of principles Use of knowledge in action enable teacher educators to learn “responsive” coaching Hypothesis #1:

Instructional Activities are designed to be “containers” for knowledge, principles and practices underlying ambitious teaching PRINCIPLES KNOWLEDGE PRACTICES

Practices the IAs enable coach to work on Launching/beginning an activity Managing space Managing time/pacing Using body and voice Managing student engagement Eliciting and responding to student contributions Orienting students to one another Attending to student thinking Attending to student errors Assessing student understanding Closing an activity

Principles the IAs enable the coach to work on Children are sensemakers. Teachers must design instruction for all children to do rigorous academic work in school and to have equitable access to learning. Ambitious instruction requires clear instructional goals. Teachers must know their students as individuals and as learners. Teachers must be responsive to the requirements of the school environment.

The coach is also engaging teachers in learning mathematics for teaching Mathematical processes, e.g. – Making sense of problems – Reasoning quantitatively – Constructing viable arguments – Looking for and expressing regularity – Etc. Mathematical content, e.g. – Operations on whole numbers, fractions – Understanding and using place value – Understanding, comparing, and representing fractions – Representing and solving problems with operations – Etc.

Where does coaching fit in relation to enactment? Cycles of Enactment and Investigation Common Instructional Activities Coaching through Rehearsals

Hypothesis #2 Instructional activities can be used most effectively and efficiently to support teachers in cycles of observations and enactment in designed (“applied”) settings Professional education is immediately responsive to actual problems of practice Formative assessment can occur throughout the cycle and in repeated cycles and development can be responsive to what teachers need to learn 17

NEXT CYCLE Enact the Activity and record teaching & learning Collective analysis of teaching & learning CYCLES of ENACTMENT and INVESTIGATION SAME ACTIVITY ACROSS MULTIPLE TEACHERS AND SETTINGS SAME ACTIVITY ACROSS MULTIPLE TEACHERS AND SETTINGS Coaching through Rehearsals Observing an Instructional Activity Collective analysis of math and teaching Prepare to teach an Instructional Activity

Designed Settings Cycles of Enactment and Investigation Common Instructional Activities Coaching through Rehearsals Where/How/When can all of this happen?

Hypothesis #3 We need to design (new) settings for Teacher Education to happen – Places where the cycle can happen – Places where there are more capable and articulate colleagues to identify with – Time for teachers to watch each other – Technology for collecting records of practice and making them available –?–?