Forms of Supporting Arguments: Values. Values… A guiding influence made of our life experiences and truths A guiding influence made of our life experiences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Family Beliefs and Ideologies Marriage and Family Interaction HPERF258.
Advertisements

THINKING. Critical Thinking
Using Mathematical Practices to Promote Productive Disposition
1 Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Carl G. Jung’s theory of psychological types Differences between normal healthy people Source of misunderstanding and miscommunication.
Critical Thinking.
TACKLING POVERTY TOGETHER Youth Contributing to Poverty Reduction.
Argumentation Day 1 June 23, 2014 What is it???. Standards of Mathematical Practice 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason.
What is a Debate? an argument with rules
Media Influence in Politics? Myth or Reality? March 23, 2004.
July 2001Mara Alagic: "Science for All Americans" 1 Principles of Learning and Teaching Effective Learning.
CHAPTER 2. Enforcing Promises: Bases of Legal Obligation 1.Classical" Contract Law. The decisions of common law judges, the refinement and restatement.
By: Konley Gill, Ashley Maxwell
The role of theory in research
Uses of research connecting with readers 1 Researchers and Readers.
Interactionist perspective – Various Perspectives.
2-1 Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Argumentation Day 1 June 23, 2014 What is it???. ARGUMENTATION PRE-WRITE (~15 MINS) When done, please make sure your name is on it and put into the Table.
China Debate Education Network: Constructing Arguments Presented by Li Yong, Guangxi University Chen Ying, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
STRUCTURE OF TOK Working guide to terms, concepts, etc.
Writing for National Board Certification
Three Methods for Building Arguments
The 7 C’s of Argumentation. Consider the Situation  What is the topic?  What is my purpose?  Who is my audience?  What action do I want my audience.
China Debate Education Network: Elements of Arguments: Linking Evidence to Claims.
Child Self-Esteem Training by Neil Callahan 4-H Extension Agent.
We do not search for the meanings of things in the things themselves. Rather, we find meaning in the way we can relate things together, either through.
UNIT 6.1 DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION: PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION ( ). Simon Ellis and Janet Tod.
Overview of CCSS Statistics and Probability Math Alliance September 2011.
Lincoln Douglas Debate RJ Pellicciotta, Cary Academy Dogwood Speech & Debate League.
BY CHANISE FIRST CONSTRUCTIVE. GENERAL Gain as much offense as possible to use to win the round Beware of holes in your case and try to cover them This.
T HE C HARACTERISTICS OF A RGUMENT Things to think about when writing your persuasive essay.
Aristotlean Rhetorical Analysis English 102: Introduction to Argumentation Framework Purpose Pathos Audience Logos Stance Ethos Stasis Kairos.
Debate Lesson Do Now Watch the following clip: x2YSnpkhttps:// x2YSnpk Write.
20 th Century History Essay Writing guide. Structure Format is similar to an English essay - Introduction - Body Paragraphs Offer Historical evidence.
Welcome to Solihull! & Values and SMSC
Alice price rushmore.  Learn about your personality traits  Explore the different personalities  Discover your personal communication style.
 Attitudes are evaluative statements – either favorable or unfavorable about objects, people or events.  They reflect how we feel about something.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 7 Understanding Theory and Research Frameworks.
Module C: Representation and Text Elective 2: History and Memory Prescribed Text: Fiftieth Gate.
Elements of Debate Hence, for all practical purposes, the term proof means those items of evidence and reasoning which tend to make an audience agree with.
What do we mean by the “logical structure” of an argument? PART ONE.
Critical Reading and Literature Reviews LSES Faculty Induction Day 2 Prof. Jannette Elwood Graduate School of Education.
Thesis Statements Because of X, we need to do Y..
Shakespeare and Anti-Semitism Shylock and the Merchant of Venice.
Do Now Take the “Current Event Assignment Directions” and begin looking over directions *You may write on these/keep them.
 College requires critical reading and writing skills. This tutorial is designed to get you started by teaching you to attend to critical features of.
Who are your Stakeholders Participants/Learners Facilitator/Trainer Other Service Suppliers Training Manager (and training team) Sponsor/Champion/Influencers.
Our Need for Direction March 13. Remember the time … What was it like when you were in a situation where you suddenly had no source of light? Today we.
China Debate Education Network: Structure of Argument.
The Open Prompt: Timing 1-3 minutes reading and working the prompt. 3 minutes deciding on a position minutes planning the support of your position.
Lincoln- Douglas. Building your arguments.  Each argument makes a statement of a possible truth  Gives support for that argument in terms of some reason.
Effective Stakeholder Engagement in Resource Management Author: Dr. Jonathan Rosenberg Delivered by: Jim Powell.
COMPLEX CLAIMS PART TWO. Complex Claim Review  Identify the five essential parts of a complex claim: Evidence Stakes Roadmap Claim Concession/Counterargument.
 ASSESSMENT  By viewing and analyzing selected presidential campaign advertisements, students will develop criteria for evaluating what makes an effective.
Developing an Argument for Essays or Speeches TOULMIN SYSTEM.
 Find the directives and circle them (specific directional words)  Draw an arrow to the action (who or what)  List the complete directive/s that need.
Co-Curricular Experiences = Student Success? Prove It! Kent Sumner, Oregon State University Kurt Moderson, MAP-Works.
Its about the plan – advantages/disadvantages/solving a problem Example: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially increase.
Understanding Theory and Research Frameworks
Reading and Writing Arguments
Three Methods for Building Arguments
SOAPSTone Analytical Tool.
Logic Lines and Toulmin Model
RES 728 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
Self-Critical Writing:
Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches
Knowledge Questions.
SEP S.1A.7 Construct and analyze scientific arguments to support claims, explanations, or designs using evidence from observations, data, or informational.
Or how to prove others wrong
Presentation transcript:

Forms of Supporting Arguments: Values

Values… A guiding influence made of our life experiences and truths A guiding influence made of our life experiences and truths All argumentation uses values in its development All argumentation uses values in its development Provide grounds and warrants by which decision-makers judge arguments Provide grounds and warrants by which decision-makers judge arguments Claims themselves may be values Claims themselves may be values

What am I trying to convey in my overall argument? What am I trying to convey in my overall argument? What kind of warrants am I stressing in my overall argument? What kind of warrants am I stressing in my overall argument? What different values can I use to help construct my overall argument? What different values can I use to help construct my overall argument?

Forms of Values Stated and Implied Stated and Implied Positive and Negative Positive and Negative Terminal and Instrumental Terminal and Instrumental Abstract and Concrete Abstract and Concrete

Stated and Implied Values Stated values can encompass multiple meanings and variations based on the situation Stated values can encompass multiple meanings and variations based on the situation Values are often implied in belief statements Values are often implied in belief statements The more clearly stated your value claims, the more intensive the impact of the values. The more clearly stated your value claims, the more intensive the impact of the values.

Positive and Negative Values For every positive, there must be a negative For every positive, there must be a negative Values do not stay positive or negative; they can be reversed based on the direction of the argument Values do not stay positive or negative; they can be reversed based on the direction of the argument –Ex: using inexperience as a positive for unbiased nature

Terminal and Instrumental Values Values can reflect the end (terminal) and the means to an end (instrumental). Values can reflect the end (terminal) and the means to an end (instrumental). Instrumental values are process oriented; terminal are product oriented. Instrumental values are process oriented; terminal are product oriented. Instrumental values can become terminal values. Instrumental values can become terminal values.

Abstract and Concrete Values Abstract and concrete work together as value concepts Abstract and concrete work together as value concepts Concrete values are representations of abstract values Concrete values are representations of abstract values –Ex: Freedom and the flag

Using values in argument Values appear in systems- they work together in linked claims Values appear in systems- they work together in linked claims Always position one value as the center value in the argument Always position one value as the center value in the argument Know what your audience’s values are/might be Know what your audience’s values are/might be

Principles of Using Values in Your Argument Recognize the limits of value change Recognize the limits of value change Find the best point of attack on values Find the best point of attack on values Relate your values to decision makers Relate your values to decision makers Use evidence and argument to develop values Use evidence and argument to develop values

Principles of Critiquing Values Values can be found anywhere in the argument Values can be found anywhere in the argument Recognize values in warrants Recognize values in warrants Find the values in the arguments of others Find the values in the arguments of others