Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Characterization of the LIGO 40m Lab Mode Cleaner Digital Suspensions. 2002 Summer Project by Ilya Berdnikov Mentors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulink/Front Model & MEDM Screen Mods from ECR E (For SUS’ in BSC Chambers) J. Kissel for the SUS and ISC Team G v3 1.
Advertisements

Vibration Isolation Group R. Takahashi (ICRR)Chief T. Uchiyama (ICRR)Payload design H. Ishizaki (NAOJ)Prototype test R. DeSalvo (Caltech)SAS design A.
8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford 1 Length and angular control loops in LIGO Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Hanford.
Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
Global longitudinal quad damping vs. local damping Brett Shapiro Stanford University 1/32G v13 LIGO.
One Arm Cavity M0 L1 L2 TM M0 L1 L2 TRIPLE QUAD 16m R = 20m, T=1% R = ∞, T=1%  Optimally coupled cavity (no mode matched light reflected back)  Finesse.
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Update: the View from Caltech Phil Willems LIGO/Caltech Livingston LSC Meeting March 17-20, 2003.
Payload design methods versus modeling E. Majorana.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
Initial Work on Suspension Diagonalisation – August 2004 Bryan W Barr.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Introduction Dennis Coyne April 12, 2002.
40m Suspension Electronics Benjamin Abbott California Institute of Technology 10/18/01 G R.
Angular Noise in a Suspended Interferometer with DC Readout Royal Reinecke Co-Mentors: Alan Weinstein and Rana Adhikari.
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
Measurement of the laser beam profile at PSL to Mode Cleaner interface for the 40 Meter Prototype Interferometer A table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory1 Characterization of LIGO Input Optics University of Florida Thomas Delker Guido Mueller Malik Rakhmanov.
LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
LIGO-G Z1 E2e modeling of violin mode S. Yoshida Southeastern Louisiana University V. Sannibale M. Barton, and H. Yamamoto Caltech LIGO NSF: PHYS
Thermal noise issues Chinyere Ifeoma Nwabugwu Louisiana State University August 05, 2005 Eric Black, Akira Villar, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, Kate Dooley, Royal.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Prototype Test of Vibration Isolation System Current Status & Schedule
Takanori Sekiguchi Anual Meeting of Physics Society of Japan Sep. 22nd, 2013) Prototype Test of Vibration Isolation System Current Status & Schedule 1.
Takanori Sekiguchi ALPS Report, Dec. 26th, 2013 Prototype Test of Type-B 1 Takanori Sekiguchi KAGRA F2F MEETING Feb
1 1.ISC scope and activities 2.Initial Virgo status 3.Design requirements 4.Reference solution and design status 5.Plans toward completion 6.Technical.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
Takanori Sekiguchi External Review Alignment control servo for type-B/type-Bp (OpLev/WFS) 1 T. Sekiguchi.
Takanori Sekiguchi External Review Control and tuning of suspension 1 T. Sekiguchi KAGRA 4th External Review.
SUSPENSIONS Pisa S.Braccini C.Bradaschia R.Cavalieri G.Cella V.Dattilo A.Di Virgilio F.Fidecaro F.Frasconi A.Gennai G.Gennaro A.Giazotto L.Holloway F.Paoletti.
G R LIGO R&D1 Wireless optical controls of LIGO static suspensions actuators Maria Paola Clarizia University of Sannio Mentor: Riccardo De Salvo.
G D LSC Changes in Preparation of High Power Operations Commissioning Meeting, May 5, 2003 Peter Fritschel, Daniel Sigg, Matt Evans.
Cavity Work at LASTI LSC-VIRGO Meeting, Hannover - 24 th October 2007 Lisa Barsotti and Matthew Evans for the LASTI group G D.
LIGO-G D Commissioning, Part II PAC 12, June 2002 Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT.
LIGO-G D LIGO II1 AUX OPTICS SUPPORT Michael Smith, 6/11/03 STRAY LIGHT CONTROL ACTIVE OPTICS COMPENSATION OUTPUT MODE CLEANER PO MIRROR AND PO.
Global longitudinal quad damping vs. local damping Brett Shapiro Stanford University 1/36 LIGO G v15.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/021 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Dennis Ugolini, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R.
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 LIGO Laboratory1 Designing a frequency offset locking loop for the 40m prototype Arm Length Stabilization System Sai.
Understanding Cabling Noise in LIGO Chihyu Chen Lafayette College Mentors: Mark Barton Norna Robertson Helpful Researcher:Calum Torrie Co-SURF:Julian Freed-Brown.
LIGO- G R 40mAdvLIGO R&D program, 10/8/ Meter Lab program for AdvLIGO R&D Alan Weinstein, Caltech AdvLIGO R&D Technical Review, 10/8/02.
Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.
Modeling the Input Optics with e2e T. Findley, S. Yoshida, D. Dubois, N. Jamal, and R. Dodda Southeastern Louisiana University LIGO-G D.
G Z Test Mass Butterfly Modes and Alignment Amber Bullington, Stanford University Warren Johnson, Louisiana State University LIGO Livingston Detector.
MODELING THE CALIBRATED RESPONSE OF THE ADVANCED LIGO DETECTORS Luke Burks 2013 LIGO Caltech SURF Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jameson Rollins Final Presentation.
Modeling of the Effects of Beam Fluctuations from LIGO’s Input Optics Nafis Jamal Shivanand Sanichiro Yoshida Biplab Bhawal LSC Conference Aug ’05 LIGO-G Z.
The VIRGO Suspensions Control System Alberto Gennai The VIRGO Collaboration.
LIGO-G W LIGO Detector Commissioning Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg Paul Schwinberg.
The Effect of Transverse Shifts on the LIGO Interferometer Doug Fettig - Oregon State University Mentor: Biplab Bhawal.
Torsion Pendulum Dual Oscillator (TorPeDO) David McManus, Min Jet Yap, Robert Ward, Bram Slagmolen, Daniel Shaddock, David McClelland.
Elba Gravitational Wave Adv. Detector Workshop1May 22, 2002 Simulation of LIGO Interferometers 1. End to End simulation 2. Lock acquisition 3. Noise.
1 Frequency Noise in Virgo by Matt Evans. 2 The Actors  Noise Sources  Input Mode Cleaner length noise  Sensing noise on IMC lock  Frequency Servo.
Advanced LIGO UK 1 LIGO-G K OSEM Development UK Advanced LIGO project Stuart Aston University of Birmingham for the UK Advanced LIGO Team LSC.
LIGO-G Z LIGO’s Thermal Noise Interferometer Progress and Status Eric D. Black, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, and Shanti Rao (Caltech) Seiji Kawamura.
LIGO-G Z Report on E3/E4 Lock Losses K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Report on E3/E4 Lock Losses David Chin, Dick Gustafson Keith.
Filter #7 control April 18, 2016 –, Cascina Paolo Ruggi.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Type-A SAS Local Control Simulation (Current Status)
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
Outline ideas/status K.A. Strain
Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory, Caltech 26 Aug 2017
Vibration Isolation Systems
The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Frequency Noise in Virgo
Lock Acquisition Real and Simulated
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Detector Characterization Session
Simulating the Advanced LIGO Interferometer Using the Real Control Code Juan F. Castillo.
Presentation transcript:

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Characterization of the LIGO 40m Lab Mode Cleaner Digital Suspensions Summer Project by Ilya Berdnikov Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Dennis Ugolini, and Ben Abbott

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Project Goals 1.Understand the Mode Cleaner (MC) digital suspensions. 2.Diagonalize the suspensions. 3.Measure the damping Q. 4.Calibrate the suspensions. 5.Measure suspension noise. 6.What’s left.

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Understanding Suspensions Suspensions Optical Sensors Electro- Magnetic Actuators (OSEMs) –Problems with OSEMs. Damping. Digital is GOOD.

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Suspension Controllers

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. EPICS screen

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Diagonalizing Suspensions Why diagonalize? –Position-Pitch coupling –Position-Yaw coupling Diagonalization –Sensing (input) matrix –Actuation (output) matrix

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Sensing matrix diagonalization “Suspension Controller Tuning Procedure” LIGO-T A MATLAB code –Modification Gathering data –Undamp, excite optic. MC2ULLLURLR Pos Pit Yaw

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Output matrix diagonalization Drive the optic –0.2Hz, 0.1Vpp Vary the matrix –Pitch (LL, LR) –Yaw (UL, LL) Look on QPD. Results: –Input = 900 DAQ counts –Pitch = 2 counts (<1.5%) –Yaw = 0.4 counts (<0.05%) MC1 doesn’t diagonalize. Problems with lower OSEMs.

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Collect data –Fit damped sinusoid, get . – Results: Measuring damping Q Quality of Damping Excite the optic –Undamp the optic –Drive it 1Hz, 30mVpp MC1MC2MC3

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Calibrating Suspensions Sensor and coil voltage to microns of magnet motion. Move optic through one FSR –FSR =  m/2 –Compute  V/532 nm for each OSEM and coil. –Needs locked mode cleaner Calibrated pitch/yaw sliders –Sliders calibrated to give mrad/V. –Use of geometry of mirror, arm lengths. –Less precise. Scan across a distant optic –Use the geometry, arm lengths. Eyeballing distances – ok for order of magnitude result.

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Measure suspension noise Power spectra of sensors gives noise. Nominal noise in design spec: Measured noise is in –Calibration will provide the conversion factor of to compare the data with the spec. Is it good enough?

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. What’s left Fix MC1 lower OSEMs, diagonalize MC1. Calibrate suspension motion. –Use either of the methods After calibration, compare actual suspension noise with with design. Improve damping (?)

Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Acknowledgements I would like to thank my mentor Dr. Alan Weinstein for making this summer possible. I would also be completely helpless without Ben Abbott and Dennis Ugolini. Great thanks to them.