Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO Workshop ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EFFECTIVE TRADE FACILITATION TASK FORCE Terms of Reference and Objective Setting World Trade Organisation (Geneva) Stephen.
Advertisements

Japan Audit & Supervisory Board Members Association (JASBA) Explanatory Memorandum on the Audit & Supervisory Board Members (The companies with Audit &
Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler.
Mandate of Parameter and Lay out Committee (PLC) of the HL-LHC project L. Rossi HL-LHC PC.
CHURCH GOVERNANCE SYSTEM MEETING & MEETING PROCEDURES CHURCH GOVERNANCE SEMINAR PRESENTED BY M GWALA.
1 Future of NamGIS Johan van Rensburg Polytech 14 October 2005.
Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.
Calice Meeting DESY 13/2/07David Ward Guidelines for CALICE presentations Recently approved by the Steering Committee.
02/07/2015 MUNICIPAL FINANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME 1 FINANCE CHAIRPERSONS’ FORUM TYPES OF COMMITTEES.
BASICS OF DISTRICT BOARD MEETINGS. PURPOSES OF MEETINGS Meetings are fundamental to conducting conservation district business. Meetings are fundamental.
Oficina AproTECH de AETIC: Información y asesoramiento en la preparación de propuestas de I+D+I FP7: Project Management issues, Roles and.
School Council Roles and Responsibilities Michele Giroux and Susan Klimchuk 05 October 2013.
INDIANA UNIVERSITY Graduate and Professional Student Organization Elected Officers.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Statutes of SER-Europe Overview and implications.
CBM Constitution (By-law) Mihai Petrovici, CBM-Meeting, GSI-Darmstadt, October 5-7, Short history - Why do we need a Constitution ? - Present draft.
 Management Structure  Roles & Responsibilities  Rules  AGM  Elections/Appointments I.A.W.P Governance.
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION COMMITTEE. 2 Group carried over from ECAR, MAAC, & MAIN workgroups that were assembled to address 1200 Urgent Action.
Marin Lutheran Church Constitution Task Force Forum 3: Proposed Structure.
Cultural Heritage and Global Change: a new challenge for Europe Working for strengthening the European Research Area Towards Joint Programming in Research.
1 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 11-13, 2012 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 2012 Governance Document.
Report to the collaboration Yifang Wang IHEP Progress of the construction –SSM: Valve box successful, magnet cool down in mid June –Mechanical structure.
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FACULTY SENATE SHARED GOVERNANCE OVERVIEW.
Virginia Athletic Trainers’ Association State Leadership Matrix Jay Sedory MEd, ATC, EMT-T; Certified Athletic Trainer United States Marine Corps, Quantico,
Air Cadet League of Canada British Columbia Provincial Committee SSC Roles and Responsibilities.
SuperB. SuperB has been approved as the first in a list of 14 “flagship” projects within the new national research plan. The national research plan has.
1 Project Management Framework Revision of the SEEA.
Discussion on HTASC Future Tobias Haas XV HTASC 3 October, 2003 CERN.
Organizational Structure Organizational Structure House of Delegates is comprised of 116 delegates Currently, there are 58 Chapters (one at each.
1 Organisational Changes following TM Trieste Decisions J. Poole.
CJK9, Zhangjiajie, China 1/14 Discussion: [Drafted] 3GPPs works in CJK Cooperation CJK 9, Zhangjiajie, China April 8-10,2009 Changho RYOO
ITWG Topical Workshop Management of Instrumentation Projects 19 to 21 May 2014 Rolf Lindner.
Faculty Senate Proposal Ad Hoc Committee on College Rules.
Division for Policy Administration 321 North Clark Street 21st Floor Chicago, IL (312) Fax: (312)
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
Faculty Governance Origins, Development, and Current Structure.
Discussion session José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg, Germany March 20 – 22, 2013.
Few ideas for the future of the collaboration I.laktineh.
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
INKOMATI CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AGENCY PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL WATER ACT Presented by Adv Johan Boshoff 22 October 2008.
Welcome and the ATF2 international collaboration in future 1.Introduction 2.Mission of ATF/ATF2 3.Organization of ATF/ATF2 4.International Collaboration.
AFSA Chapter Officer Training Module 1 Officer Roles and Responsibilities.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 A New Governance for IHE-Europe David Monteau, INRIA IHE-International Meeting, Nov
1 Mandate and governance of the New United Nations Committee of Experts.
Parish Education Commissions and Responsibilities Diocese of Madison Office of Catholic Schools Adapted for St. Peter Catholic School Education Commission.
JPI “More Years, Better Lives: The Potential and Challenges of Demographic Change” 1 Meeting , Berlin Joint Programming Initiative “More Years,
Discussion 5: Selecting Spokespeople Stefan Söldner-Rembold and Chang Kee Jung September 24, 2014 Fermilab, iiEB meeting.
Student Representative Council
Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees
MADMAX draft MoU preamble:
WP1 - Consortium coordination and management
Governance and Collaboration By-Laws
Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC
Seventh RD51 CB – 14/4/2011 AGENDA Approval of the agenda
INAS GOVERNANCE CONSULTATION September 2016
S4 will be a “big” Collaboration:
Jeff Marr, PMP Nikki Van Ingen, MSA, MT (ASCP)
Nominations Needed for the Ballot
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Alamo Chapter Air Force Association
SMSA Policy and Planning Committee
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
Movement for One Democratic State in Palestine
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
IEEE 802 2nd Vice Chair last name at ieee dot org
Roles and Responsibilities
Position descriptions
LHC Computing, RRB; H F Hoffmann
Presentation transcript:

Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 2 A Draft Document was circulated at yesterday’s Collaboration Board meeting to promote discussion Outline the main points Welcome feedback over the next month A final document for approval will be prepared for the next Collaboration meeting

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 3 Basic Structure

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 4 Overview The Collaboration Board : This is the body which has the ultimate power within the MICE collaboration. It represents the interests of the Institutes. All positions are to be approved by the Collaboration Board. It elects the spokesperson and approves the deputy and has the power to dismiss any of the main officers of the collaboration. The Collaboration Board can also modify the constitution. The Executive Board : This provides the management of the MICE Collaboration. It has overall responsibility for managing the finances and the detector construction, installation, operation and analysis. It also represents the Collaboration in its relations with outside bodies. The Technical Board : The Technical Board oversees all aspects of detector design, time schedules, construction, cost, installation and computing matters. It serves as an advisory body for the Executive Board. The Oversight Board : The Oversight Board is to monitor the project on behalf of the funding bodies.

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 5 The Spokesperson MICE has one Spokesperson who is the leader of the collaboration.. Election The Spokesperson is nominated by members of the Collaboration Board and is elected by a vote of the Collaboration Board. The election of the first Spokesperson will be performed within a month after the acceptance of the proposal by RAL. The Spokesperson can be dismissed by a 2/3 rd vote of the Collaboration Board Tenure The term of office is nominally three years with the possibility of re-election. The second person will retain the position for the lifetime of MICE if the following tenure is likely to be less than one year.

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 6 The Deputy Spokesperson Either the Spokesperson or Deputy must be resident at/close to RAL during the main period of the experiment The Deputy Spokesperson is to have delegated authority to make decisions in the absence of the Spokesperson. Appointment The choice of Deputy Spokesperson is proposed by the Spokesperson and approved by the Collaboration Board. It would be expected that this person would not be from the same region as the Spokesperson

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 7 The Chairperson of the Collaboration Board The Chairperson organises meetings of the Collaboration Board and represents the interests of the Institutes within the management Appointment The Chairperson is nominated and elected by the Collaboration Board. The period of office is two years with no re-election. The Technical Coordinator The Technical Coordinator is responsible for coordinating all technical and financial activities. Appointment The Technical Coordinator is chosen by the Executive Board in collaboration with RAL and the appointment is to be approved by the Collaboration Board

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 8 The Collaboration Board The Collaboration Board represents the ultimate authority in the MICE organisation. It is the body through which all major decisions of the MICE Collaboration management are to be endorsed. In the Collaboration Board, the interests of all collaborating institutes are represented It makes all major decisions on Collaboration policies and procedures. All Managerial appointments can be terminated at any time by a 2/3rd majority vote of all voting members of the Collaboration Board. Voting in the Collaboration Board - For Discussion The Collaboration Board shall always strive to reach consensus In Elections - only Institute Representatives Vote howeverMinimum No. of People or Minimal Contribution for an Institute to become a ‘Voting Institute’? and then One vote per Voting Institute? or Weighted voting? - by numbers or financial contribution?

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 9 The Executive Board The Executive Board has the executive power within the Collaboration and is the effective day-by-day power in the collaboration. It is an advisory body for the spokesperson who makes the final decisions. ChairSpokesperson Membership Deputy Spokesperson Technical Coordinator Collaboration Board Chair Software Coordinator Eight Regional Representatives –Two from each of Continental Europe, Japan, UK, USA? RAL(ISIS) representative Others by invitation At a later stage it will be appropriate to add an analysis coordinator.

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 10 The Technical Board and Subsystem Groups The MICE Technical Board monitors all technical aspects of the MICE detector hardware and software and serves as an advisory body for the Executive Board.. ChairTechnical Coordinator Membership Heads of all Technical subprojects RAL infrastructure representative Spokesperson Deputy Spokesperson Chair, Collaboration Board The Technical Coordinator can invite additional experts to attend a Technical Board meeting if required Working Procedures Technical decisions shall be taken in the subsystem groups wherever possible.

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 11 The Subsystem and Task Force Coordinators The Coordinators of major subsystems are the formal contact persons for communication, via the Technical Board, between the management and the people working on a given subsystem. They have the responsibility and authority to direct the work on that subsystem. The Software Group Software is a subsystem and reports to the Technical Board, however, in view of the different nature, the software coordinator is also a member of the Executive Board. Analysis Group An Analysis Coordinator should be appointed ~one year after the experiment is approved. The appointment will be made in the same way as all other sub-component appointments. The Analysis Coordinator will report directly to the Executive Board

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 12 The Oversight Committee The purpose of the Oversight Committee is to liase with the funding agencies and RAL and give an independent assessment of the project’s progress and satisfy them that the project is keeping to financial and technical schedules. Minutes of the Oversight Committee will be produced and made available to the management and the Collaboration Board. This proposal is tentative and the exact form of such a committee will depend upon negotiations with RAL and the funding agencies. Chair An outside accelerator physicist, to be appointed by discussion between the MICE management and the funding agencies Membership Two senior scientists, one particle physicist, one accelerator physicist from outside the collaboration Representatives of all funding agencies, DoE, NSF, Japan, PPARC, RAL, INFN etc. An RAL representative, who will act as Secretary. Spokesperson Deputy Spokesperson Chair of Collaboration Board Meets Twice per year

27 Mar 2003 P Dornan MICE Meeting 13 Other Bodies The following bodies advise the Spokesperson and report to the Collaboration Board. Editorial Board This body approves publications from the Collaboration. Two types of publications are foreseen. Collaboration Publications These publications are issued as ‘MICE Collaboration’ publications and it is expected that all active members of the collaboration will sign. These must be approved by the Editorial Board. Limited Publications Publications by a limited number of members of the collaboration concerning e.g. the construction and performance of specific subcomponents of the experiment. The Editorial Board should be advised of these Speakers Bureau The Speakers Bureau establishes at which conferences, workshops etc. talks about MICE would be relevant. It maintains a list of collaboration members who are appropriate and willing to give talks and nominates speakers for collaboration talks