City of West Covina Green Line Evaluation. Presented By Presented By Joanne Coletta Jim Jobst Leticia Llamas Kelly McDonald Ana Rosales Enrique Salgado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Advertisements

On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Business Statistics for Managerial Decision
Workforce Planning Training for Supervisors Presentation Subtitle/Description Presenter’s Name Date.
InMoSion: Science Shop for Innovative Mobility Solutions for Mobility Challenged Europeans 3rd INTERNATIONAL MEETING ANKARA, TURKEY Partnering: Civil Engineering.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
[9.4] Market Research Essential idea: Market research is any organized effort to gather information about markets or customers.
PROJECTED RIDERSHIP OF THE HOUSATONIC RAILROAD STUDY Presented by Julie Pokela, Ph.D. August, 2010.
“To link accessible responsive transportation with community needs” I&R In The World of Community-Based Transportation Cora Potter, Service Specialist.
Wasatch Mobility Management Foster, organize and guide local and regional coordination efforts that directly or indirectly improve access and mobility.
New Partners for Smart Growth 11th Annual Conference San Diego February 2, 2012 New Parking Standards for Affordable Housing.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.
An Analytical survey for improving the front desk Service of FHS Library: The Customer Relationship Environment Customers’ Feeling at the Counter 60 Upto.
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
The Role of ITS in Communicating with Transit Riders Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting June 5, 2007.
Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan Thursday July 20, 2006 GF City Hall Rm A102.
Results of the 2009 AGTA Operator Fees Survey Ray A. Mundy, Ph.D. AGTA New Orleans March 22-25, New Orleans, LA.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Arizona Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division November 2007.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
LIAA Community Center User’s Conference August 10, 2007 Traverse City, MI NMRide.net A web-based tool for connecting carpoolers Janie McNabb, Community.
EVALUATION 101: HOW CAN WE DEMONSTRATE PROGRAM RESULTS? Jon E. Burkhardt, Westat Dr. David J. Bernstein, Westat Prepared for the National Center on Senior.
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Early findings in the Helena’s Planning Process Lisa Ballard, P.E. November 28, 2012.
NIH ACSI Meeting Oct. 4, Evaluation of NIH ACSI Website Project: Highlights of the Final Report Jennifer Crafts, Ph.D. Westat.
Evaluating a Research Report
On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP
Night Ride Update Industry Meeting June 28, 2012.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
2012 CITY OF MIDDLETON SATISFACTION SURVEY WORKING DRAFT - PROPOSAL.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Butte Silver Bow Transportation Development Plan Update Lisa Ballard, P.E. Barb Beck Kimberly Brown 1.
FEST Finans Energi Samferdsel Telekom BEST Survey 2008 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Market Research and Testing The Key To Business Success Revised June 2010.
Per Gellert /Barcelona Quality for Passengers.
Implementing Quality and Efficiency in Transit Planning Mike Summerlin Former Chairperson Raleigh Transit Authority.
PRIMARY MARKET RESEARCH Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Technology Transfer Training Module #4.
1 TPB Access for All Committee’s Recommendations on Transit Services for People with Disabilities John Hudson TPB Access for All Advisory Committee Presentation.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city.
Regional On-Board Bus Survey Proposal Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services Director October 5, 2007.
Fueled by Technology – Powered by People. Review of Project Approach Who We Are What We’re Doing How We’re Doing it.
FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009FTA Workshop on Travel Forecasting for New Starts1March 2009 Charlotte South Corridor LRT Bill.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Siskiyou County Short Range Transit Plan Draft Final Report Presentation to the Steering Committee LSC Transportation Consultants.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 600 interviews in Vienna city.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Report Copenhagen BEST 2007 BEST Survey Contents About the survey Participants Sample Method How to read the graphs Overall.
© Federal Statistical Office of Germany In-depth review on Time use surveys Presentation by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany Bernd Stoertzbach,
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2008 Survey.
Quality indicators impact on overall citizen satisfaction BEST Survey 2014.
Writing Frame for Critically Evaluating a Report.
Click to edit Master subtitle style KEY DRIVERS OF CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY: PILOT REPORT 2009/2010 Presentation to the Portfolio.
2011 RTD Customer Satisfaction Research Results: Executive Summary – Ops Committee March 2013.
The Marketing Plan. Executive Summary  This is at the beginning of the marketing plan and is an overview of the entire marketing plan  It briefly addresses.
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) Collier Area Transit February 8, 2012 Report Findings and Recommendation s.
Chapter 29 Conducting Market Research. Objectives  Explain the steps in designing and conducting market research  Compare primary and secondary data.
ITNTwinCities: Innovative Senior Transportation. © Copyright 2013 ITNTwinCities Welcome and Introductions Presenting today: – Liz Hagstrom – Joelyn Malone.
E XPANDING M OBILITY O PTIONS IN M ARIN Marin Transit’s Paratransit and Mobility Management Programs 1.
WIS DOT MCLARY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT.
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Flagler County Fixed Route Transit Operation Plan
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 8. Routine monitoring.
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Presentation transcript:

City of West Covina Green Line Evaluation

Presented By Presented By Joanne Coletta Jim Jobst Leticia Llamas Kelly McDonald Ana Rosales Enrique Salgado Shannon Williams Alicia Velazquez California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Graduate Students Dr. Sandra Emerson

Background & Context Presented by: Joanne Coletta

Needs to Be Met By the Program Green Line Evaluation

Project Description Target Population Program History, Funding & Issues Program Implementation & Rationale Green Line Evaluation

Project Description Green Line Evaluation

Project Description Program History Funding Issues Green Line Evaluation

Program Implementation & Rationale Green Line Evaluation

Presented by: Leticia Llamas

Study Questions What is the one thing we should know about the city & Green Line? What is the one thing you would like to know by the end of the project? What are important criteria & what kind of evidence do you need?

Criteria Impact of Service on Business Diversity Shift in Patron Needs Quality and Viability Impact on Quality of Life

Study Designs & Methods Records Analysis Ridership Survey Field Observation

Study Designs & Methods Records Analysis Data Reports from Contractor Budget & Expenditure Reports from City

Study Designs & Methods Ridership Survey Demographics Purpose of Travel Satisfaction with Service Areas for Improvement

Study Designs & Methods Field Observation Activity Within The Bus Bus Stop Conditions

Records Analysis Presented by: Enrique Salgado

Green Line Evaluation Cost Comparison

Green Line Evaluation Red/Blue Ridership Trend

Green Line Evaluation Green Ridership Trend

Field Observations and Quality of Service Findings Presented by: Alicia Velazquez

Green Line Evaluation Research Questions Bus users Schedule Drivers Bus Condition

Green Line Evaluation Description of Findings (Users) On Average: 10 users per bus ride (Adults: 2, Youth: 7, Seniors: 1, Disabled: 0)

Green Line Evaluation Description of Findings (Schedule) 31 Trips: 54% = on schedule, 45% = off schedule (2 min)

Green Line Evaluation Description of Findings (Conditions) 1 No Problem 23 Limited Problem 45 Widespread Problem Bus stop Conditions Bus Conditions Bus Safety Bus Noise

Green Line Evaluation Explanation of Findings (Bus Stop Conditions) Lark Ellen/ Francisquito max rating: 4 Shadow Oaks/ Nogales max rating: 5 Sentous/ Valley max rating: 5

Green Line Evaluation Description of Findings Courtesy of Drivers 1 Rude/ Sullen 23 Civil/ Polite 45 Friendly/ Helpful * 3 – Does Not Necessarily Denote a Problem.

Field Observations Presented by: Enrique Salgado

Green Line Evaluation Field Observations Rider Traffic Weekday Weekend 147% more

Green Line Evaluation Field Observations MorningMid DayAfternoon and Evening Noise Levels

Green Line Evaluation Field Observations MorningMid DayAfternoon and Evening Driver Courtesy

Customer Survey Presented by: Kelly McDonald

Green Line Evaluation The Survey Interviews with Staff Review of Records Field Observations Focus Group With Commission Subcommittees Customer Survey Development

The Survey Green Line Evaluation Two Surveys – User & Non-User Demographics (Ranges) Purpose of Trip – Spending (Ranges) Satisfaction & Alternatives or Why Not Using

Implementation Green Line Evaluation Implementation Conduct the Survey The Bait Data Analysis

Customer Satisfaction Green Line Evaluation

Suggested Improvements Green Line Evaluation 31.3 % Bus Schedule 7.8 % Stop Locations 7.8 % Transfers 6.3 % Driver Courtesy 39.1 % No Comment

Where Are Riders Going? Green Line Evaluation 32.6 % Senior Center

Where Are Riders Going? Green Line Evaluation 34.2 % Shopping 15.9 % Westfield, Eastland, & Fashion Square

Data Suggests Budget Project Boarding - Departure Estimated Spending Transfer to Other Lines Incidental shopping at South-end outlets Green Line Evaluation

Summary Budget Project Achieving Objectives Some Improvements - High Satisfaction As Defined - Highly Effective Service Green Line Evaluation

Respondent Description & Inferences Presented by: Shannon Williams

Green Line Evaluation Description of Customer Survey Respondents 102 Respondents Mix of Youth, Adults, & Seniors

Green Line Evaluation Characteristics of Customer Survey Respondents Customer Survey Respondents by Age Categories

Green Line Evaluation Customer Survey Respondents by Gender

Green Line Evaluation Customer Survey Respondents by Income Groups

Green Line Evaluation Respondent’s Use of West Covina Transit System

Green Line Evaluation Customer Survey Inferences Satisfaction regarding bus safety differences by age categories

Green Line Evaluation Satisfaction with bus schedule differences by age categories

Green Line Evaluation Open-Ended Survey Bus ScheduleBus Stops Politeness More often Coordinate with FHT Information on connections Transfer Travel in both directions More stops Shelters Visible bus signs Slowing down at stops & waiting Suggestions for Improvements

Green Line Evaluation Alternative transportation if no transit by age groups

Green Line Evaluation Association of transfer satisfaction with schedule satisfaction

Green Line Evaluation Conclusion Overall Satisfaction is high Serves the South-end Seniors are critical of bus safety & bus schedule Users are concerned with transfers to other systems

Conclusions & Recommendations Presented by: Ana Rosales

Conclusions Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Customers Receptive and Satisfied. 25% of respondents did not know what they would do for transportation. Others would walk, Foothill Transit, friends, relatives, or taxi.

Productivity Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Green Line has 10 persons per ride Favorable Comparison

Problems with Bus Schedule Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Persons transferring to other bus lines are more positive. Strained communication between driver and seniors.

Recommendations Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Bus Stop Visibility Bus Driver Interaction With Riders Web Site Accessibility Increase Ridership Improved Data Accuracy “Let West Covina Take You For A Ride.”

Bus Stop Visibility Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Bus stop schedule should contain all stops being made. Bus stops should be identified on all stops with reflective paint.

Driver Interaction with Riders Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Train Drivers to interact with riders in effort to increase patronage

Increase Ridership Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Increase Ridership by promoting a “Let West Covina take You For a Ride”

Web Site Accessibility Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Include southbound, northbound, weekend and weekday bus stop schedule on web site on one page. Direct hyperlink of Bus stop schedule via internet should be accessible on West Covina Home page.

Improved Data Accuracy Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Data gathering mechanism be reviewed and monitored to assure information is reliable. Random sampling methods of reports be reviewed during the year to assure accuracy of data.

Budget ProjectGreen Line Evaluation Thank You for Your Attention