WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Report First Draft March 2010 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Jerry McCarthy, ATS Teri Cannon, WASC.
Advertisements

Bobby Nelson CSC N March Table Of Contents CCSU SCSU WCSU ECSU Enrollment Admissions Cost Cohort Default Rates Recommendation.
Enrollment Management and Student Affairs at Portland State University Enrollment Management and Student Affairs is a student-centered organization, dedicated.
Accrediting Commission for Schools Western Association of Schools and Colleges ACS WASC Postsecondary Visiting Committee Final Presentation Accrediting.
WASC Report Board of Trustees February 2010 Diane Jonte-Pace Vice Provost Chair, Re-accreditation Self Study.
Center for Diversity and Social Justice "Once social change begins it can not be reversed. You can not un- educate the person that has learned to read.
Educational Effectiveness Review (EER) September 14 – 16, 2011.
Five Guiding Themes Provide Civic Leadership through Partnerships --Lead as a civic partner, deepen our engagement as a critical community asset, demonstrate.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?
Faculty Development. Committee’s Charge Summarize literature Identify existing campus resources Identify successful practices Indicate elements located.
WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Report First Draft March
Strategic Planning Definitions Tennessee Board of Regents.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
UNIVERSITY OF FORT HARE PRESENTATION ON THE ORGANISATION AND OFFERINGS OF THE CURRENT AND FUTURE FACULTY OF EDUCATION Pinkie Mdaka and Lulu Kahla.
STRATEGIC PLANNING STATUS AND DIRECTION Report to the PPPC September 16, 2013 Michael Berman VP for Technology & Communication.
Student Success Factors Faculty In-Service Program Tuesday, August 25.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
Report to Professional Council June 4, 2009 By Carla Boone Planning Council: A New Way of Doing Business at COM.
Implementation and its Correspondence to the Strategic Map ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIOS AND STETSON UNIVERSITY.
TODAY AND TOMORROW University of Houston- Downtown Strategic Plan Highlights.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Strategic Planning Strategic planning follows "the five question logic” ("Who are we? Where are we now? Where do we want to be? How do we get there? How.
Reaccreditation by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges How can Counseling Psychology and Pastoral Ministries help? September 16, 2008.
Re-envisioning Teacher Preparation: Stage II September 16, 2011.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Revisiting Foothill’s Vision, Values and Institutional Goals Wednesday, February 5, 2014 PaRC Meeting E. Kuo.
Higher Learning Commission North Central Association Accreditation Visit April 2016.
Serving: What does the learner demand of us? Process: What processes do we need to master in order to serve our population? Development: What competencies.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report January 2009 WASC Accreditation.
The Nature of Business McGraw-Hill  The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2001.
SNU HLC/NCA Accreditation Update SNU Graduate & Professional Studies Fall Meeting October 24, 2008.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
WASC Orientation and Discussion September 2, 2009 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
For Strategic Planning. Today: Mission Future: 5-year Vision.
David J. Lanoue Dean August 11, 2010 (Does not include budget information that is now obsolete.)
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
University Strategic Plan
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
WASC Self Study: A First Look
University Community Briefing
February 21-22, 2018.
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
CSUN Re-Accreditation
A Workshop for New Academic Administrators
Presentation transcript:

WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Report First Draft March

WASC Self-Study Process  Western Association of Schools and Colleges  Accreditation Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities  Promotes the development of sustainable effective educational programs  Assures that the institution has met high standards of quality and effectiveness  Accreditation is required to qualify for financial aid for students 2

Outline of Process WASC Proposal submitted June 2006 C&PR Report submittedJuly 2008 C&PR VisitcompletedOctober 2008 EER Report due for submissionJuly 2010 EER Visit scheduled forOctober

Educational Effectiveness Review Focus is on the extent to which CPP fulfills its core commitment to educational effectiveness.  Clear and appropriate educational objectives  Processes of Review  Delivery of programs and learner accomplishments at the appropriate level 4

Educational Effectiveness Review Theme Based Approach Theme 1: Institutional Excellence Theme 2: Teacher-Scholar Model Theme 3: Student Success 5

Theme 1: Institutional Excellence Demonstrating our Growth as an Outstanding Learning Institution in an Urban Environment that Serves a Multitude of Student Needs 6

Theme 1: Institutional Excellence  A Learning-Centered University  Programs of Distinction Defined as programs that support engaged and effective learning experiences that fulfill university’s stated mission, values, and vision.  Crafting the University Strategic Plan  Academic Master Plan  University Strategic Plan 7

Theme 1: Institutional Excellence  Creating a Sense of Community  Community Building - Students, Staff and Faculty  Our Presence in the Surrounding Community  Communicating our Mission  Ensuring the Availability of Resources  Success in Telling our Story to Attract Resources 8

Theme 2: Teacher-Scholar Model  Integrating the Delivery of Instruction and Research, Scholarship and Creative Activities into one Setting  Fostering the Synergy between Teaching, Scholarship, Professional Development and Practice 9

Theme 2: Teacher-Scholar Model  Evolution of the Teacher-Scholar Model  To some extent CPP’s path mirrors that of the CSU  Development of Teacher-Scholar Definition at CPP  Definition created by the Teacher-Scholar Task Force 10

Theme 2: Teacher-Scholar Model  Teacher-Scholar Model - Analysis and Assessment of the Trends  In Teaching Innovation & Excellence  In Scholarship  In Integration of Teaching and Scholarship  Sustainability of Teacher-Scholar Model 11

Theme 3: Student Success Propelling a Diverse Group of Learners toward Extraordinary Life Achievements 12

Theme 3: Student Success  Facilitating Retention and Graduation  Orientation  Academic Advising  Development and Impact of the First Year Experience  Closing the Achievement Gap  Retention and Graduation Rates at CPP 13

Theme 3: Student Success  Achieving Academic Success  Assessment of University Learning Outcomes  Co-curricular Program Review  Academic Program Review and Assessment  Redesigning Assessment of General Education 14

Theme 3: Student Success  Student Engagement  Serving the Multiple Needs of Our Student Body Creating a Challenging Environment for our High Achieving Students Creating a Nurturing Environment Supporting our Under-represented Student Groups 15

Theme 3: Student Success  Creating Future Success  Preparing Students for Careers Linking Theory and Practice  Preparing Students for Post-Baccalaureate Work  Fostering Leaders and Engaged Citizens 16

Conclusion Chapter  Is an integrative chapter  Will address common issues and insights that emerged from the three themes and the self-study 17 To be completed with input from campus community

Comments  Full draft report available at   We seek your comments and input on  the content of the report  points to be made in the conclusion chapter 18