A RISK WORTH RUNNING Dan Galpern Western Environmental Law Center

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO Compatibility of «Green Border Taxes» Dr. Joëlle de Sépibus World Trade Institute, Bern.
Advertisements

Federalism Chapter 4. Why Federalism? Needed a government strong enough to meet the nation’s needs, but still preserve the existing states strength Maintain.
Federalism 4.1 The Division of Power.
Review of Legal Issues Related to Proposed Stop-leakage Mechanisms Workshop on Imports and Emissions Leakage In Support of the Regional Greenhouse Gas.
1 COPYRIGHT © 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and West Legal Studies in Business are trademarks.
Emerging Issues in Management (Mgmt 440) Regulation: Law, Economics and Politics (Chapter 10) Professor Charles H. Smith Fall 2011.
RGGI/ WCI Overview.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 4 Constitutional Law for Business and Online Commerce Chapter 4 Constitutional.
AN OVERVIEW By Tom Johnson
Constitutional Law for Business and Online Commerce.
Federalism Magruder Chapter Four. Federalism and the Division of Power Section One.
Government Chapter 4. Section 1 Federalism Federalism: system of government in which governmental powers are divided between the national and state governments.
United Haulers Association, Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority What Local Governments Can Do To Control Where Waste Is Disposed (or.
Unit: The Constitution Day 4
Chapter 14 (Civil Liberties) “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain.
Libertyville High School. Congressional Powers Express powers of Congress are found in Article I, Section 8 So... How do these powers work? Like a vacuum.
Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved Slides developed by Les Wiletzky PowerPoint Slides to Accompany ESSENTIALS OF BUSINESS AND.
American Constitutional Law LAW-210
© 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. C H A P T E R 4 Federalism.
Chapter 4: The Federal System
U1, C4: Federalism. National defense Gambling laws Public education Voter registration Foreign affairs Disaster relief Real Estate property Environmental.
SSCG5 Review. Concurrent powers Powers shared by the state and national government.
Interstate Relations. Section Summary Why do States make interstate compacts? What is the purpose of the Full Faith and Credit Clause? What is extradition,
CH. 3 Federalism. b/c it’s part of limited government, keeping it from getting too strong Why have division of power?
Constitutional Law Part 2: The Federal Legislative Power Lecture 6: Dormant Commerce Clause.
CHAPTER 5 CONSTITUTIONAL REGULATION OF BUSINESS DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8 th Ed.)
Presentation Pro © 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Magruder’s American Government C H A P T E R 4 Federalism.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Constitutional Law Spring 2008 Class 26: Dormant Commerce Clause II.
Stephen G. Harvey November 14, 2006 PAYDAY LOAN BAR ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE Constitutional Issues Raised.
2.1 Chapter 2 Constitutional Law We, the People © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
FEDERALISM Chapter 3. What is a federal system?  A system of government in which power is shared between the central government and state governments.
CHAPTER 4 SECTION 3 Interstate Relations. Objective Students will understand why State’s make interstate compacts; Students will understand the purpose.
Clark Snelson Assistant Attorney General State of Utah (With thanks and recognition to Ted Spangler, Assistant Attorney general, Idaho, retired) For presentation.
FEDERALISM. Questions to consider: In our federal system of government, what is the relationship between federal and state laws? Are there ever conflicts.
The Paralegal Professional ESSENTIALS, 2/e By Cheeseman and Goldman PRENTICE HALL ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 5:
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
What you should know about the compact clause. Clark L. Snelson Utah Assistant Attorney General San Antonio, October 6,
Powers Divided... Federalism One of the Basic Principles of the Constitution Chapter 4.
Constitutional Standards of Review under the Equal Protection Clause.
Dr. Roger Ward.  It is a source of Congressional power to regulate interstate commerce is the Commerce Clause in Article I, Section 8.  According to.
Chapter Key Points Government regulation used to compensate for failures Political reasons for regulation Primary constitutional foundation impacting.
Constitutional Law I Spring 2004Con Law I Privileges & Immunities April 29, 2004.
Constitutional Law I Dormant Commerce Clause II Nov. 17, 2004.
Constitutional Law I Market Participant Doctrine Nov. 22, 2004.
Constitutional Law I Dormant Commerce Clause I Nov. 15, 2004.
Constitutional Law I Spring 2004Con Law I Market Participant Doctrine April 27, 2004.
Constitutional Law I Dormant Commerce Clause March 15, 2006.
Constitutional Law I Privileges & Immunities Nov. 22, 2004.
Federalism November 1, U.S. v. Lopez (1995)
Chapter IV The Dormant Commerce Clause and Related Doctrines.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 26 Antitrust and Monopoly.
Equal Protection of the Law: Basic Principles & Analytical Model LEARNING THE LAW © 2015 Brendan Beery & Daniel Ray. All rights reserved.
Magruder’s American Government
FEDERALISM Magruder Chapter Four. FEDERALISM AND THE DIVISION OF POWER Section One.
Tues. Feb. 16. pleading and proving foreign law Fact approach to content of foreign law.
Chapter 4 Constitutional Law for Business and Online Commerce
How does this happen?. How does this happen? Why water?
Federalism The Division of Power between Who has the power?
Chapter 2 Constitutional Law for Business and E-Commerce
Fair Housing A housing provider violates the Fair Housing Act when the provider’s policy or practice has an unjustified discriminatory effect, even when.
Contemporary Federalism: The State and Federal Relationship
Federalism: Power Divided
6 Basic Principles of the Constitution 6 Principles
Chapter 4: The Federal System
Chapter 3 Federalism.
Slide Set Twenty-Three: Modern Challenges in Property Law – Land Use 3
Dormant Commerce Clause Is there state action (not Federal) action?
C H A P T E R 4 Federalism.
FEDERALISM STUDENT NOTES 2.
Presentation transcript:

A RISK WORTH RUNNING Dan Galpern Western Environmental Law Center

What is Minimally Necessary?

Compacts Clause 1 “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power....” U.S. Const., Art. I, § 10, cl. 3 (Compact Clause)

Compacts Clause 2 Functional Test “[W]hether the particular compact enhances state power quoad* the Federal Government.” U. S. Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax Commission, 434 U.S. 452 (1978). *with regard to

Compacts Clause 3 Categorical Test (1) Joint or regional organization to regulate (2) Actual cooperation between states (3) Action by one state is conditioned on action by other states (4) Relevant state statute’s require reciprocity by other participating states (5) A participating state is precluded or coerced from modifying or repealing its relevant statute Northeast Bancorp v. Federal Reserve, 472 US 159, 175 (1985)

Compacts Clause 4 Conclusion and Mild Caveat

From the “Compact” to State Statutes

Hard Hypo Greenhouse Gas Performance Standard CA SB 1368 (Chapter 598, 2006) and WA SB 6001 (Chapter 307, 2007)

Commerce 1 “The Congress shall have Power... To regulate Commerce... among the several States....” U.S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 3 (Commerce Clause)

Commerce 2 Purpose or effect of state statute deemed discriminatory  Presumed unconstitutional. Dean Milk Co. v. City of Madison, Wisconsin, 340 U.S. 349 (1951)

But, where: (1)a state regulates “evenhandedly to (2)effectuate a legitimate local public interest” and (3)its effects on ITSC are “only incidental” and (4)burden is not clearly excessive compared to the legitimate local objective  Valid under the Commerce Clause Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U.S. 137, 142 (1970)

Commerce 3 A good purpose is not enough. “Whatever [a state’s] ultimate purpose, it may not be accomplished by discriminating against articles of commerce coming from outside the State unless there is some reason, apart from their origin, to treat them differently.” One state may not “isolate itself in the stream of interstate commerce from a problem shared by all.” Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 US 617, (1978) (no basis to distinguish out of sate waste from domestic waste)

Commerce 4 Here: (1) Facial neutrality. (2) Imposition on in-state generators as well. (3) Burden on ITSC will be outweighed by benefits to each regulating state (3)(a) Winners and Losers: all out of state? “The Commerce clause protects the interstate market, not particular interstate firms.” Exxon Corp v Maryland, 437 US 117, (1978)

Commerce 5 What if, in fact, the State regulation favors in- state industry over out-of-state industry? Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery, 449 US 456, (1981) (a nondiscriminatory regulation serving substantial state purposes is not invalid simply because it causes some business to shift from a predominantly out-of-state industry to a predominantly in-state industry)

Conclusion: Risk is Moderate and Worth Running

Tell state leaders to take action NOW on climate change! A Message to Oregon’s State Leadership on Climate Change: –Press Hard, Right Now, for Real Reductions in Greenhouse Gas Emissions