Electronic Fare Collection CEE582. Vehicle-Based Systems (Fixed-Route) Exterior Route and Destination Announcements Electronic Destination Sign Vehicle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

Tucsons Seamless Regional Fare System. Smart Card System SunGO Smart Card Products Replace all Magnetics Individual, Organization, Administrative Websites.
Los Angeles Bus Rapid Transit Tour Lessons Learned.
Travel Training Program. Planning Your Trip [Insert Image]
GIS Data in Real-Time Transit Management Systems 2011 GIS in Public Transportation Conference St. Petersburg, FL, September 14, 2011.
T RANSPORTATION D ISADVANTAGED B EST P RACTICES & T RAINING W ORKSHOP “ Maximizing ITS investments to reduce operating costs and provide the best possible.
Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination System Regional Program Administrator Seattle, WA Cheryl Huston March 18, 2013.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
A Better & Safer US Highway 90 along the Mississippi Gulf Coast By Mike Stokes Intelligent Transportation Systems Manager MDOT – Traffic Engineering.
Effective Utilization of Advanced Public Transportation Systems (APTS) Technology 19th Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and Training.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference Implementing a BRT Project: The Preliminary Steps 8:30 – 9:50 a.m. Frank SpielbergBMI-SG Incoming Chair, TRB.
2013 Fare Collection Workshop/ TransITech Conference System Implementation & Transition Planning Michael Veltri Port Authority of Allegheny County Pittsburgh,
INNER CITY INVESTMENT SUMMIT TRANSPORT, INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Presenter: L N Mangcu SED: Transport and Roads Department.
Advanced Traveler Information System ATIS. What are Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ? The application of advanced sensor, computer, electronics,
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
Swift BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) ITS Washington November 12, 2008.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
TSP Must Fit Within An Overall Agency ITS Plan. Transit Priority Data Needs Vehicle Location –Speed Door & Lift Status –Predictions Passenger Counting.
Transit Traveler Information CEE582. Fixed-Route Central ControlCustomer Information Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission.
APTS – Fourth Day Miscellaneous Topics. Fleet Management Fixed Route versus Paratransit Operations versus Maintenance.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
ITS in Urban Transport Projects assisted by JASPERS Budapest – 17 June 2010.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Mitch Skyer President & Senior Transportation Consultant Solstice Transportation Group.
California Public Transit – Challenges and ITS Solutions ITS America Annual Meeting & Expo R ay Tellis, FTA Monday, June 4, 2007 Palm Springs, CA.
Lead the Way APTA Transit Standards Development “BUS RAPID TRANSIT”
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
[1] INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED COMPUTER AND RESEARCH TECHNICAL SEMINAR PRESENTED BY- A SEMINAR PRESENTATION ON AUTOMATIC VEHICLE LOCATER NIWEDITA BURNWAL.
Khaled Shammout 20 th Annual Transportation Disadvantaged July 31, 2012.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Project Update TAC - July 21, 2015 Nick Perfili, FCDOT Department of Transportation.
ORIENTATION AND MOBILITY USING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BROUGHT TO YOU BY MICHELLE, LAURA AND CARLA.
NESTS Transit Planning Project Facilities and Technology Briefing with CAST of Cornell University and Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
7 May 2015 Introduction to bus rapid transit. What is BRT? Enclosed and secure stations New, clean, high- capacity buses Pre-board payment with smart.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
February 2014 Bus Rapid Transit for Chennai. Chennai city bus service GOOD PATRONAGE  50 lakh daily passenger trips  3650 buses  Maximum flow of.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP): Deployment Issues and R&D Needs as Identified by Practitioners Hallie Smith Brendon Hemily.
PRTC Challenges, Opportunities, and Experience with a Regional Fare Collection System.
Shreya Gadepalli Regional Director (India) August 2015 The BRT Standard Bus Rapid Transit Best Practices.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference Implementing a BRT Project: The Preliminary Steps 8:30 – 9:50 a.m. Frank SpielbergBMI-SG Incoming Chair, TRB.
Bus Detection Device For The Passenger Using GPS And Gsm Application Student Name USN NO Guide Name H.O.D Name Name Of The College & Dept.
City of Phoenix Public Transit Department Phoenix Transit Technology September 21, 2007 City of Phoenix Public Transit Department Phoenix Transit Technology.
Section 3: New and Experimental Technologies
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Camden County Travel Management Coordination Center Project Update Camden County WIB Board Meeting – March 26, 2008.
T3 Webinar – April 26, 2012 Fare Integration A Regional Approach U.S. DOT Southern California Regional Rail Authority Orange County Transportation Authority.
BIC 2013 National Conference Presented By: Tim Quinn, Executive Vice President Date: 27 October, 2013 Time: 15:00 to 16:00 Social Media, Accelerating IT.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Charlottesville Area Transit ITSVA Annual Conference Omni Richmond Hotel May 19, 2016 John Jones, Transit Manager.
Transit Technology Hampton Roads Transit. Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) provides public transportation for six cities in the South Hampton Roads region:
T3 Webinar – April 26, 2012 Orange County Transportation Authority Fare Integration Project U.S. DOT Southern California Regional Rail Authority Orange.
Intelligent Transportation System
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Playing in Traffic: A New Look at Management and Operations
System Implementation & Transition Planning
Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination System
Automated Fare Collection 2.0 Next Generation MBTA Fare System
Erasmus Intensive Program
Presentation transcript:

Electronic Fare Collection CEE582

Vehicle-Based Systems (Fixed-Route) Exterior Route and Destination Announcements Electronic Destination Sign Vehicle Systems Sensors Next Stop Announcements Next Stop Displays GPS Receiver On-Board Automatic Vehicle Location and Mobile Processing Smart Card Reader and Processing Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission Automatic Passenger Counters Status Information for Transit Signal Priority Driver Interface and Display Digital Security Cameras Collision Avoidance Emergency Alarm Vehicle-Based Systems (Fixed-Route) Exterior Route and Destination Announcements Electronic Destination Sign Vehicle Systems Sensors Next Stop Announcements Next Stop Displays GPS Receiver On-Board Automatic Vehicle Location and Mobile Processing Smart Card Reader and Processing Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission Automatic Passenger Counters Status Information for Transit Signal Priority Driver Interface and Display Digital Security Cameras Collision Avoidance Emergency Alarm CEE582

Fare Collection Evolution Cash only Tickets and tokens Monthly pass Magnetic stripe pass Smart card CEE582 Electronic

Electronic Fare Collection Benefits “Seamless” regional travel Encourage ridership Faster boarding Regional revenue reconciliation Customer convenience & fare incentives Administrative & operational efficiencies Easier to track revenue and ridership –Route, Bus stop, Time of day CEE582

Smart Cards Plastic card with imbedded chip –Contact –Contactless –Combi Value options –Number of rides –Valid time period –Electronic purse (stored value) –Combination of the above CEE582

Smart Card Benefits Replaceable (if registered) New capabilities –Marketing incentives (eg. 10th ride free) –Distance-based fares –Multi-purpose Social services benefits CEE582

Smart Card Implementation Issues Limit fare media to just Smart Cards and cash? How to distribute How to check value How to add value Where is clearing house function for multi- agency cards? –Collecting and disbursing revenue CEE582

More Implementation Issues Privacy Transit-only or multi-use Contact, contactless or combi cards –Maintenance –Multi-purpose requirements Card longevity vs. cost Current lack of standards CEE582

Central Puget Sound Smart Card Project counties bus, rail & ferry agencies 3M pop/1.6M commuters 7-39% inter-county commuters 130M annual trips $160M annual revenue 3rd most congested US traffic 7 agency system cost estimate: $17M - $28M CEE582

Project Demonstration Equipment CEE582

Operating Concept Highlights One System: –Common fare collection system for bus, ferries and rail. One Fare Medium: –Smart card replaces 300 pass and ticket types and some cash and provides new fare incentives. One Service Contract: –Vendor provides 10 regionally consistent customer and clearinghouse services. CEE582

Operating Concept Highlights Three Primary System Functions: –On-board/terminal/station fare collection –Automatic fare vending and card revalue options –Regional revenue & data reconciliation Fare Policy: –Region-wide standard pass categories and transfer policies –Agency-specific fares and incentives. CEE582

Systems Integration Onboard Bus: smart card driver control unit with farebox, radio, AVL, destination signs Bus-to-Base: wireless data on/offload communications Security (potential): employee I.D., building/parking/computer access, other municipal uses CEE582

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) CEE582

Major Elements of BRT 1.Running Ways 2.Stations 3.Vehicles 4.Fare Collection 5.ITS 6.Operations Planning 7.Image/Identity/Branding CEE582

BRT Concepts Reducing Travel Times –Running Way Travel Time –Station Dwell Time –Wait Time –Transfer Time Making Travel Times More Reliable –Running Way Reliability –Station Dwell Reliability Improving the Image –Identity –Branding –Community Integration CEE582

More BRT Concepts Enhancing the Passenger Experience –Accessibility –Passenger Comfort –Passenger Safety –Passenger Security Making Systems More Efficient –High Capacity –Enhanced Revenue –Enhanced System Management CEE582

Ottawa, Ontario CEE582

Los Angeles, California CEE582

Boston, Massachusetts CEE582

Curitiba, Brazil CEE582

BRT ITS Elements Vehicle Prioritization –Signal Timing / Phasing –Station and Lane Access Control –Transit Signal Priority IVI Technology –Collision Avoidance –Collision Warning –Lane Assist –Precision Docking Technology CEE582

More BRT ITS Elements Fare Collection –Station-based Electronic Fare Payment –Vehicle-based Electronic Fare Payment Operations Management –Advanced Communication System –Automated Scheduling Dispatch System –Vehicle Mechanical Monitoring –Vehicle Tracking CEE582

And Still More BRT ITS Elements Passenger Information –Traveler Information at Station/Stop –Traveler Information on/for Person –Traveler Information on Vehicle –Trip Itinerary Planning Other Technology –Archived Data –Passenger Counter –Silent Alarms –Voice and Video Monitoring CEE582

BRT Results In one year Silver Line ridership increased 84% from 7,625 passengers a day to more than 14,000 Metro Rapid Demonstration Wilshire/Whittier Corridor Ventura Corridor Operating Speeds Up 29%Up 23% RidershipUp 32.6%Up 26.4% CEE582

Connection Protection CEE582

Transfer Point Coordination Transfers: –A necessary evil for fixed route service Transfers allow: –Access between more locations –More frequent service to all locations at the same cost –High volume movements to major points –Small vehicle service to low volume points CEE582

Transfer Point Coordination People don’t like to transfer –Takes too much time –Effected by the weather –Worried about missing connections Frequent headways help –For many locations, frequent headways are not possible “Connection Protection” facilitates transfers -- especially from frequent services to less frequent services CEE582

Salt Lake City, Utah Improve reliability of transfers from TRAX to selected connecting bus routes System constantly monitors train schedule adherence – looks at estimated arrival times at next 3 stations If the lateness of the train is within a pre-determined threshold, a “Hold” instruction is sent to connecting buses CEE582

Object Detection and Collision Avoidance CEE582

Frontal Collision Warning CEE582

Side Obstacle Detection Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Ultrasonic sensors CEE582

Paratransit Routing and Scheduling CEE582

Vehicle-Based Systems (Demand-Response) GPS Receiver Smart Card Reader and Processing Wireless Data On-Off Load Data Radio/ Message and AVL Transmission Driver Interface and Display Emergency Alarm Demand Response Routing and Scheduling Demand Response Trip Request Eligibility Confirmation Demand Response Performance Data Demand Response Service Dispatch and Vehicle Tracking Paratransit Fare Structure Demand-Response Central Control Demand-Response Revenue Data Internet-Based Demand-Response Service Status Customer Information CEE582

Transit Vehicle Communications Standards CEE582

Capabilities Collection of: –Automated vehicle location information –Operational data (e.g., automated passenger counts and electronic fare payment information) and maintenance data (e.g., vehicle status and operating parameters) Providing: –Transit vehicle driver with electronic dispatch and routing instructions –Traveler information to the vehicle, which in turn can provide it to the transit users. Support for emergency or "Mayday" alerts from the transit vehicle CEE582

Transit Communication Interface Protocols (TCIP) Spatial Representation Scheduling/Runcutting Passenger Information Onboard Integration Incident Management Fare Collection Control Center Rules for Standardizing Street Names and Route Ids Message Set and Data Dictionary for Advanced Traveler Information Systems CEE582