Agust,heima,...january09/PPT ak.ppt

cm cm-1 F, v´= cm-1 Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

cm-1 Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

cm cm-1 g3S+(1), v´=0,J´=J´´= cm-1 Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

cm-1 Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

cm-1 Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

cm cm-1 g3S+(1), v´=0,J´=J´´= cm-1 Excitation from Cl Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

cm cm-1 g3S+(1), v´=0,J´=J´´=3 Excitation from Cl Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

cm cm-1 g3S+(1), v´=0,J´=J´´=3 Diff= cm-1 Excitation from Cl Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

Excitation from Cl* cm-1 g3S+(1), v´=0,J´=J´´=3 Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

Excitation from Cl* cm-1 g3S+(1), v´=0,J´=J´´=3 Agust,heima,..january09/PXP ak.pxp

3+3+ SO coupling; SO coupling; see Table 2 in Excample for gateway mechanism: g 3  + (1) v´=0 C 1  ; b 3  1); g 3  - (1) 1) 2) H + Cl* / H + Cl  E = 880cm-1 ( AK PhD Thesis (page 9-10, fig. 1.3) 2xh 3xh Cl** Cl + 3)

Conclusion: 1) Assuming Gateway mechanism to hold (see slide 12): 2h resonance excitation to g 3  + (1), v´=0 (and f 3  3,2,1, v´=0) followed by crossing over to a “Gateway Rydberg state” (C 1  ; b 3  1); g 3  - (1)) and dissociation to H + Cl or H+ Cl* followed by further photon exciation to form Cl+ will require = 5 photons 2) No clear resonance excitation via Cl* in step 3 (see slide 12) is to be found for (2+n) REMPI via J´=3 in g 3  + (1), v´=0 (see slides 9 &11, where enhanced I(35Cl+)/I(H35Cl+) value is observed (see NEW state paper)