Jared A. Gross, Christopher S. Stuetzle, Zhongxian Chen, Barbara Cutler, W. Randolph Franklin, and Thomas F. Zimmie Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cellular Automaton Wave Propagation Models of Water Transport Phenomena in Hydrology Robert N. Eli Associate Professor Department of Civil and Environmental.
Advertisements

A mathematical model of steady-state cavitation in Diesel injectors S. Martynov, D. Mason, M. Heikal, S. Sazhin Internal Engine Combustion Group School.
IMPACT ~ Breach Physical Modelling Review of Modelling Work Undertaken So Far...
Assessment of Shear Band Characteristics in Cohesive Soils using Digital Image Analysis Technique for Plane Strain Tests - Concept & Evaluation of accuracy.
Conductivity Testing of Unsaturated Soils A Presentation to the Case Western Reserve University May 6, 2004 By Andrew G. Heydinger Department of Civil.
Impacts of Seismic Stress on Pore Water Pressure in Clayey Soil By: Qazi Umar Farooq Lecturer Civil Engineering Dept Univ of Engg & Tech Taxila.
Chapter (1) Geotechnical Properties of Soil
The effect of raindrop impacted flow on sediment composition.
Some concepts relevant to rainfall erosion research and models Peter Kinnell University of Canberra Australia EGU2014.
Sediment Movement after Dam Removal
Effect of Microtopography on Spatial and Temporal Rill Initiation using Close Range Photogrammetry at Angereb Watershed North of Lake Tana, Ethiopia Introduction.
K. Nazridoust, G. Ahmadi, and D. H
A Lagrangian approach to droplet condensation in turbulent clouds Rutger IJzermans, Michael W. Reeks School of Mechanical & Systems Engineering Newcastle.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
Modeling Fluid Phenomena -Vinay Bondhugula (25 th & 27 th April 2006)
DETAILED TURBULENCE CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN CHANNEL FLOW
“Research in dam breaching" Sílvia Amaral PhD Student (1 st year) December, 14 th 2009.
Texas A&M University, Department of Civil Engineering CVEN 689 Applications of GIS in Civil Engineering Professor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Student: Brad.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES (CE1203)
GI Systems and Science January 23, Points to Cover  What is spatial data modeling?  Entity definition  Topology  Spatial data models Raster.
7. Soil Compaction (Das, chapter 6)
What is compaction? A simple ground improvement technique, where the soil is densified through external compactive effort. + water = Compactive effort.
Suspended Load Above certain critical shear stress conditions, sediment particles are maintained in suspension by the exchange of momentum from the fluid.
Understanding martian gullies Howe, K. L. 1,2, Coleman, K. S. A. 2,3, Dixon, J.C 2,3 1 Department of Geological Sciences, State University of New York.
1 Interpretation and Visualization of Model Test Data for Slope Failure in Liquefying Soil Bruce L. Kutter Erik J. Malvick R. Kulasingam Ross Boulanger.
Lecture Objectives Discuss specific class of problems
Sediment Retention model
BREACH FORMATION A Review of State-of-the-Art Mark Morris HR Wallingford IMPACT Project Workshop Wallingford, 16/17 May 2002.
Methods A predictive method will be developed from NBSS measurements and vegetation/channel properties from the flume data. The predictive method will.
Timothy Reeves: Presenter Marisa Orr, Sherrill Biggers Evaluation of the Holistic Method to Size a 3-D Wheel/Soil Model.
A Novel Wave-Propagation Approach For Fully Conservative Eulerian Multi-Material Simulation K. Nordin-Bates Lab. for Scientific Computing, Cavendish Lab.,
9. Seepage (Das, chapter 8) Sections: All except 8.2, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9.
The modeling of the channel deformations in the rivers flowing into permafrost with an increase in ambient temperature E. Debolskaya, E. Zamjatina, I.Gritsuk.
Modelling Tsunami Waves using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) R.A. DALRYMPLE and B.D. ROGERS Department of Civil Engineering, Johns Hopkins University.
Formulation of a New Breach Model for Embankments IMPACT Project Workshop, Wallingford 2002 Breach Formation Theme.
Software for the Games Industry 9 November 2004 Fluid Gaming: Particle Methods for Fluid Mechanics and Visualisation Graham Wynn James Gray Richard West.
Geometry Group Summer 08 Series Toon Lenaerts, Bart Adams, and Philip Dutre Presented by Michael Su May
Gesa-Partner 8 East-Macedonia Thrace – Participants: Prof N Kotsovinos, Prof. C Koutitas,, Prof. V Hrissanthou, and the M.Sci. Eng. A. Georgoulas,A Samaras,
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume.
EROSI. Types of Erosion 1.Water Erosion 2.Wind Erosion 3.Gravitical erosion 4.Frozen melt Erosion.
Jet With No Cross Flow RANS Simulations of Unstart Due to Mass Injection J. Fike, K. Duraisamy, J. Alonso Acknowledgments This work was supported by the.
EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 WP4.4 A Rapid Embankment Breach Assessment (AREBA) Myron van Damme Sept 2011.
Erosion and Sedimentation Erosion – Detachment, movement and deposition of soil by water, wind, ice or gravity. Sediment – Particles derived from inorganic.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Density Currents Over Smooth and Rough Surfaces Nic Johnson/Environmental Science/Senior/Local Utilities, Sustainable Development using GIS Dr. Kiran Bhaganagar,
Interill Erosion. Interill Detachment and Sediment Delivery to Rills.
1 INTRODUCTION TO “Stratigrafia” The code in the workbook “stratigrafia” computes - longitudinal profiles; - water surface elevation; - sediment transport.
Learning objectives To understand why the Hjulstrom curve is a logarithmic graph To interpret the Hjulstrom curve.
Environmental Hydrodynamics Lab. Yonsei University, KOREA RCEM D finite element modeling of bed elevation change in a curved channel S.-U. Choi,
 Process of where soil particles are displaced  Wind Erosion.
A Fully Conservative 2D Model over Evolving Geometries Ricardo Canelas Master degree student IST Teton Dam 1976.
Efficient Simulation of Large Bodies of Water by Coupling Two and Three Dimensional Techniques SIGGRAPH 2006 Geoffrey Irving Eran Guendelman Frank Losasso.
Sedimentology Flow and Sediment Transport (1) Reading Assignment: Boggs, Chapter 2.
SOIL MECHANICS AND CLASSIFICATION. FACTORS WHICH HOLD SOIL TOGETHER o Cohesion  Internal Friction.
International Levee Handbook Overview of the handbook Chapter 8 Physical processes and tools for levee assessment and design.
CVE 308 SOIL MECHANICS ENGR S.O ODUNFA DEPT. OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA.
SOIL EROSION ASSESSMENT Measurement of Water Erosion Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) - predict annual soil loss by water – Wischmeier and Mannering,
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
FE: Geotechnical Engineering
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC
Range Image Segmentation for Modeling and Object Detection in Urban Scenes Cecilia Chen & Ioannis Stamos Computer Science Department Graduate Center, Hunter.
Results and Discussion
Exercise 1: Fenton River Floodplain Exercise
Design of Stable Channels CH-4
SOIL PERMEABILITY AND FLOW
Stability analysis of embankment dams
Presentation transcript:

Jared A. Gross, Christopher S. Stuetzle, Zhongxian Chen, Barbara Cutler, W. Randolph Franklin, and Thomas F. Zimmie Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY ICSE-5 San Francisco November, 2010

 Motivation  Background ◦ Related Research  Multidisciplinary Research Team  Experimental Setup  Experimental Procedure ◦ Data Collection ◦ Visualization  Findings  Conclusions and Future Considerations  Acknowledgement

 Past failures have prompted the study of erosion on earthen embankments ◦ Teton Dam (1976) ◦ New Orleans’ Levees after Hurricane Katrina (2005)  Determine time required for erosion processes to occur  Understand rill and gully initiation and propagation  Visualize using software  Create digital simulations  Increase estimation capabilities

 Levees are designed to protect areas adjacent to bodies of water from flooding  Poor design/construction can lead to disasters  Multiple failure mechanisms when subjected to water loading ◦ Overtopping ◦ Surface Erosion ◦ Internal Erosion ◦ Instabilities within embankment or foundation soils

 Uncontrolled flow of water over or around an embankment  Flowing water will erode soil on landside slope

 Briaud (2008); extensive research on erosion characteristics of different soils  Use of Erodibility Function Apparatus A v 1 mm

 Soil Erodibility ◦ Relationship between water velocity and rate of erosion experienced by soil  Cohesive: Low Erodibility  Granular: High Erodibility

 Soil erodibility is more accurately plotted versus hydraulic shear stress Prone to failure by overtopping

 Three departments are involved with the levee erosion research: ◦ Civil & Environmental Engineering ◦ Computer Science ◦ Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering  Each member has unique roles that partially overlap with roles of other members ◦ Produces new insights into previously studied areas

Physical model, post-laboratory erosion simulation 3D Laser Range Scanner +

 Purpose: validation  On a small-scale levee  Scans  Videos

 Model levees were constructed in an aluminum box (36” L x 24” W x 14” H)  Slopes were 1V:5H  Different soils have been tested ◦ Medium-well graded sand ◦ Nevada 90 sand ◦ Nevada 90 sand – Kaolin clay mixture  Testing performed with and without low- permeability core  Water supply on waterside, drain on landside of model

Supply Drain

 Laser beam emitted, scanner rotates and scans model at incremental rotations  Collects “slices” of elevation data from model  Data collected as a “point cloud”  Data is then aligned to an X-Y plane  A grid where each cell contains an array of soil layers with heights and depths results

 Segmented Height Field Multiple layers Robust Supports overhangs and air pockets From [Stuetzle et al., 2009]

 Data from scanner is loaded into data structure  Developed the Segmented Height Field data structure  Calculation of eroded volumes, channel widths, channel depths, etc.

 Terrain represented by height fields  Soil and water motion calculated by terrain gradient First Erosion Simulation Technique From [Musgrave et al., 1989]

 Fluid and erosion simulation coupled on a 3D grid  Sediment transported based on fluid simulation results  Low efficiency From [Benes et al., 2006]

 Marker-And-Cell (MAC) method  Navier-Stokes equations on a grid  Each cell with physical fields  Massless marker particles From Foster and Metaxas, 1996

 State of the system represented by particles  Based on interpolation theory  Handles objects with large deformation or mixed by different materials  Save memory on void regions  SPH particles  Carriers of physical information  Trackers of fluid surface

 Terrain modeled as height field  Fluid simulated by SPH  Terrain surface is modeled as a triangular mesh From [Kristof et al, 2009]

From [Kristof et al., 2009]  Erosion rate ε is calculated by ε= K ε (τ- τ c ), where is K ε is erosion strength, τ is shear stress and τ c is critical shear stress.  Two-step terrain modification: 1. Erosion and deposition mass on each boundary particle is calculated 2. The height change of a triangle is calculated by the total mass change of all particles in its area

 Kernel approximation: f is a field function defined in Ω, x is a point in Ω, W is a kernel function and h is the smoothing length.  Particle Approximation: where x is the position of a point, X j (j=1,2…,n) are positions of the particles neighboring X, m j is the mass and ρ j is the density. From [Muller et al., 2003]

 Difference of our method from method of Kristof et al.: Segmented height field Terrain represented by particles Erosion model by Briaud & Chen [Briaud&Chen, 2006] From [Briaud and Chen, 2006]

 Spatial resolution:  Soil particle spacing: 0.003m (2,500,000 particles)  Water particle spacing: 0.004m (450,000 particles)  Smoothing length: 0.008m  Time step size: seconds  Time of running a 10-minute simulation: more than a week (depending on the machine)

 Computer simulation  Pros: Various scales Whole process Details of gully  Difficulty: Accuracy Efficiency

2 mins 5 mins 10 mins Little Erosion Much Erosion

 Sediment transportation and deposition  Deposition cannot be ignored in small- scale experiments  The method in [Kristof et al., 2009] as starting point s canned result simulation results

Comparison and Validation

 Models using a core did not fully breach unless a very low Q was used ◦ Flow rate impacts rill characteristics  Sand models eroded grain-by-grain  Sand-clay models eroded in larger clumped masses  Models with a core saturated more slowly, eroded more slowly  Clay content effects erosion and breach failure times

 Continued sand-clay mixture testing  Centrifuge testing  Flume testing  Different soils  Reinforcement/armoring  Changes in levee geometry  Digital simulation

 Reverse engineering  Helpful for people to look at the erosion process  Not possible to record the process  Our goal is to reversely simulate the erosion process based on the shape of the eroded levee

 This research is supported by the National Science Foundation grant CMMI

Questions?