Vanessa Stelzenmüller 1, Janette Lee 2, Eva Garnacho 2 & Stuart Rogers 2 1) vTI - Institute of Sea Fisheries, Hamburg, Germany 2) Centre for Environment,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An introduction to climate change vulnerability assessments Stuart Butchart, BirdLife International
Advertisements

MARINE SCOTLAND Directorate of Scottish Government: Marine policy
BMT Cordah Limited 1 Offshore Wind Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Phase 1 “Progress and Lessons” Mark Jennison and Trevor Baker BMT Cordah.
Parameterising Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in Ecological Risk Assessment Carmel A. Pollino Water Studies Centre Monash University Owen Woodberry, Ann.
Shetland – Marine Spatial Planning in Practice Local Advisory Group: Local Advisory Group: Shetland Islands Council, Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish.
Paul Eastwood, Stuart Rogers, Carla Houghton, Craig Mills, and John Aldridge Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas) Lowestoft,
Conclusions, planning and prospects Follow-up committee meeting 6 October, Leuven.
Spatial planning in the marine environment Gillian Glegg and Jonathan Richards.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Consultation on Good Environmental Status Descriptor 7 – Hydrographical Conditions Dr Alejandro Gallego Marine Scotland.
Marcel Kok PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Methods to quantify human effects on marine ecosystems
Monitoring by NGOs for marine conservation management – examples from Indonesia “The big Grouper in the room”
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies
Using VMS data to predict fishing effort Dr Janette Lee 7 January 2009.
Implementation of the Water Framework Directive - Uncertainty issues - Michiel Blind, RWS-RIZA.
TECHNOLOGY FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN COASTAL ZONES Richard J.T. Klein 1,2 1. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany 2. Stockholm.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) WP4: Transnational MSP Governance – dialogue and institutional building Palanga,
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Developing a Socio-Economic Dataframe AIM: Construct, test and refine a framework for the collection and management of socio- economic fisheries data Make.
Application of GLOBIO3 Biodiversity Modelling to KENYA 2 ND JANUARY 2007 MOSES MALOBA.
AdriaMed Expert Consultation Interactions between capture fisheries and aquaculture Rome, Italy November st Coordination Committee (2000)
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
HELCOM as an International Tool of Environmental Protection of the Baltic Sea Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Chairman, Helsinki.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Pan-Baltic stakeholders’ dialogue on MSP: Synthesis report Anda Ruskule, BEF Berlin,
Space, Relativity, and Uncertainty in Ecosystem Assessment of Everglades Restoration Scenarios Michael M. Fuller, Louis J. Gross, Scott M. Duke-Sylvester,
MESH UK Workshop 19 October 2006 Introduction Dr Paul Gilliland Marine Policy Adviser and MESH Partner Lead Natural England.
C r e a t I n g s u s t a I n a b l e s o l u t I o n s I n t h e m a r I n e e n v I r o n m e n t Potentially Polluting Wrecks (PPW) UK Risk Database.
1 The IMAGE project I ndicators for fisheries MA naGement in E urope A specific targeted research project under the European Commission 6 th framework.
1 Policy Analysis for RISPO II National Workshop XXXXX 2006.
Regular process for global reporting and assessment of the state of the marine environment, including socio-economic aspects Chile Workshop 13 – 15 September.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Policy drivers for seabed mapping Evanthia Karpouzli Marine Ecological Adviser Scottish Executive.
Richard J.T. Klein Stockholm Environment Institute and Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research, Linköping University Strategies for the effective.
Components of the Global Climate Change Process IPCC AR4.
Visualising spatial data for ESV using GIS Charly Griffiths (MBA)
Marine Planning update Steve Brooker Head of Marine Planning.
Water Framework Directive and the SRDP Jannette MacDonald Land Unit, SEPA.
Ecosystem approach to fisheries (western Channel and Celtic Sea) Simon Jennings, Cefas, UK.
Tana Worcester Centre for Science Advice Maritimes Region, Canada Ecosystem-Based Management on the Eastern Scotian Shelf. ESSIM.
WP220 – Marine ecosystems and fisheries Tony Beeching Cefas.
Climate Change – Defra’s Strategy & Priorities Dr Steven Hill Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs 22 nd May 2007 FLOODING DESTRUCTION AT.
Implementation of critical studies necessary to promote better planning and efficient management of hydropower projects in an Int’l River Basin context.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
NATIONAL RESEARCH FLAGSHIPS Sustainable Australian Fisheries and Ecosystems Future Directions - Science Tony Smith Geelong Revisited.
Marine Strategy Framework Directive Consultation on Good Environmental Status How the Impact Assessment was developed Kevin Brady Marine Analytical Unit,
Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) Bob O’Boyle & Tana Worcester Bedford Institute of Oceanography Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
© Natural Resources Institute Finland Heini Ahtiainen Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) HOLAS II Workshop, 30 September.
Planning Scotland’s Seas consultation Seas Consultation 2013.
Marine Planning since 2011 Linda Rosborough – Director of Marine Scotland.
Introduction to Environment. Environment : from the French word ‘environner ‘- to encircle or surround Whatever is around us constitutes our Environment.
How changing human lifestyles are shaping Europe’s regional seas Laurence Mee, Coordinator.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Spatial models (meta-population models). Readings Hilborn R et al. (2004) When can marine reserves improve fisheries management? Ocean and Coastal Management.
Linking Threats to Assets in Complex Ecological and Socio-Economic Systems: Qualitative Modelling for Tourism Development in North Western Australia Jeffrey.
Coastal Vulnerability Assessment Robert J. Nicholls University of Southampton and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, UK.
Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) for California Fisheries
How do we work… Samuli Korpinen, Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre HELCOM BalticBOOST WS on Physical loss and damage to the seafloor.
Tools for Infrastructure System Resilience Evaluation
COSA Committee Meeting
EU FP7 BENTHIS & EU-HELCOM BalticBOOST
Cumulative Effects Assessment and Marine Spatial Planning
Masters Module PLANNING AND MANAGING THE USE OF SPACE FOR AQUACULTURE
Plan4Blue project work on cumulative impacts
UK Marine Planning and the Ecosystem Based Approach
Marine Strategy Framework Directive & Aquaculture
Cumulative effects assessment
Presentation to the 2nd MSFD Descriptor 3+ Meeting
Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Luc Feyen
Presentation transcript:

Vanessa Stelzenmüller 1, Janette Lee 2, Eva Garnacho 2 & Stuart Rogers 2 1) vTI - Institute of Sea Fisheries, Hamburg, Germany 2) Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft, UK Practical tools, methods and approaches to support marine planning

Outline 1.Why do we need marine planning? 2.Practical tools, methods and approaches to support marine planning Example 1: Mapping human activities and human pressures Example 2: A geospatial modeling framework to quantify the risk of cumulative impacts of human activities Example 3: BN-GIS framework to assess marine planning opinions

Multiple human uses of the sea lead to two types of conflicts: 1) uses and environment and 2) between uses Potential conflicts should be solved by a more strategic ecosystem approach to marine management A tool to implement an ecosystem approach to marine management is marine planning (MP) Marine planning (MP) manages the spatial and temporal distribution of human activities to achieve ecological, economic, and social objectives Practical (spatial explicit) tools and methods are required to support the implementation of MP 1. Introduction – Why do we need marine planning?

Example 1: Mapping of human activities and human pressures 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 1

How many activities ? Where are the busiest areas? 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 1 GIS tool to count the number of activities

2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 1 From human activities to human pressures - how to convert fishing activity with physical impact on the seabed in fishing pressure maps ? Time series of VMS data ( ) of UK and non-UK fishing vessels ≥ 15 m using beam trawls, scallop dredges and otter trawls Conversion of VMS pings to fishing pressure layers More details on the method in Eastwood et al. (2007), Mills et al. (2007), and Stelzenmüller et al. (2008)

2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 1 Annual aggregated fishing pressure as proportion of cell (2 x 2 nm) fished Stelzenmüller et al. (2008). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: 1081–1091.

2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 1 Average proportion of UK marine landscapes fished Stelzenmüller et al. (2008). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: 1081–1091.

Example 2: A geospatial modelling framework to quantify the risk of cumulative impacts Ecosystem approach to marine management such as marine planning (MP) needs to consider a range of human activities Human activities vary in their intensities, footprints and impacts on the marine environment MP requires an evaluation of the risk of cumulative and interactive effects of numerous human activities 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

Human activities exert pressures Human activity 1 Human activity 2 Human activity 3 Human activity 4 Pressure A Pressure B 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

Ecosystem components are sensitive to different pressures Impact = Pressure * Sensitivity Cumulative impacts = combined impacts 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

Mapping of human pressures A Activity 1: footprint and intensity Fuzzyfication of pressure layers Selection of human activities Sensitivity scores of ecosystem components … Activity 2: footprint and intensity Activity 3: footprint and intensity Mapping of human pressures B … CI scenario 1 Mapping ecosystem components Scenario evaluation Impact maps GIS – Multi-criteria-analysis CI scenario 2 CI scenario 3 CI scenario 4 Stelzenmüller et al (2010). MEPS 398: 19– Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

Selection of human activities Fishing (bottom trawling) Wind farm (licence areas and application area) Oil and gas (well heads and platforms) Cables Pipelines Aggregates (licence area and application area) Disposal Other constraining activities (e.g. wrecks, obstructions) Human uses geodata - available for UK&W waters 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

Habitat map for sensitivity scores ……… Sensitivity scores of ecosystem components Taken from DEFRA (2007) Cost impact of marine biodiversity policies on business – the marine bill, London. Conner et al (2006) 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

Sensitivity Score ABR Impact ABR Impact maps Stelzenmüller et al (2008). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

GIS Multi-criteria-analysis (GIS - MCA) Pressure ranked by likelihood of recovery Scenario 1: Equal weights Scenario 2: Linear weights Scenario 3: Logistic weights Scenario 4: Simulated stakeholder consultation 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

Scenario 1: Equal weights Scenario 3: Logistic weights 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

Testing the sensitivity of predicted cumulative impacts by randomising pressure ranking 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 2 Scenario evaluation

Conclusions Model outputs depend on input data quality Uncertainty is partly captured by fuzzyfication of pressure layers - uncertainty remains for sensitivity measures Risk assessment framework highlights both range of possible modelled scenarios and range of uncertainty For decision making in the case of remaining uncertainty models with less strong assumptions should be used 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 2

Example 3: Bayesian Belief networks (BN)-GIS framework to assess marine planning options Visualisation of relationships between sensitive marine landscapes, human activities, cumulative pressures and landscape vulnerability Spatial assessment of uncertainty of marine planning options Baseline scenario – Current status on UK continental shelf Scenario 1 – What are the mitigation measures under a given marine planning objective ? Scenario 2 – How does the vulnerability state change after the implementation of a spatial management measure? 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3

CP EC = Σ 1-N Intensity HA1 +.. Intensity HAN Conner et al (2006) 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3

Sensitivity EC = Σ 1-N Sensitivity HA1 +..Sensitivity HAN Vulnerability EC = CP EC * Sensitivity EC 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3

BBNs represent probabilistic correlative and causal relationships BBNs specify joint and conditional relationships, and express uncertainty Conditional probability tables are populated from GIS data GIS: Quantitative, qualitative, and categorical data BN 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3 Stelzenmüller et al (submitted). Marine Pollution Bulletin.

Probabilities of the parent nodes reflected the proportion of grid cells in the respective state or category 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3 Baseline scenario UKCS

Scenario 1: What are the necessary management measures to achieve a planning objective on cumulative pressure ? 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3

Human activities related to the oil and gas industry and demersal fishing need to be regulated most Oil and gas infrastructure Aggregate extraction Fishing pressure State %+ 1.2 %- 5 % State 2+ 6 %- 0.3 % % State %- 0.5 %- 5 % State %- 0.4 %- 2.5 % Scenario 1 outcomes in relation to baseline scenario (current state): 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3

Scenario 2: How does the vulnerability state change in the planning area after the relocation of fishing pressure ? 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3

Before the implementation: Northern offshore area showed a reduced probability of being in vulnerability state 1 and 2 Southward shift of increased vulnerability, but “pristine” areas experienced increase in fishing pressure and showed increased vulnerability After the implementation: 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3

Northern offshore area showed a reduced probability of being in vulnerability state 3 and 4 Overall decrease of surface area being in vulnerability state 4 Before the implementation:After the implementation: 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3

is constrained by the available geodata, and in this case does not reflect a comprehensive assessment of vulnerability can be applied at any spatial scale and adapted to any relationships when data becomes available can be used to address a wide range of questions and decisions, with their potential consequences allowed to examine the spatial pattern of uncertainty related to planning targets Our BN-GIS framework…. 2. Tools to support marine planning – Example 3

Future work Future work requires …. the inclusion of more ecosystem components the consideration of socio-economic planning objectives to promote an integrated approach for the development of marine plans the development of planning tools that consider environmental change

Thank you for your attention !