Residual Background events after Rejection Cuts 119.6 M total background events (GlastReleasev3r3p7) 344 residual events after Bill's rejection cuts. 342.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise Find out what happens in proton-proton collisions at the LHC as seen by the ATLAS.
Advertisements

Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise Identify electrons, muons, neutrinos in the ATLAS detector Types of Events (particles.
EXAMPLE DATA: Beam: K - ; E = 4,2 GeV ; m K =m p /2 Target: Hydrogen atoms; R nucleus =10 -5 R atom me = mp/2000.
Lauri A. Wendland: Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle flow algorithm at CMS, cHarged08, Hadronic tau jet reconstruction with particle.
April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
Back Entering e+ - soft shower into Tracker from below Albedo Gamma (rocking)?
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
SVAC/ISOCInstrument Analysis Workshop, February 27, 2006 Anders W. Borgland 1 Overview Of LAT Data Taking Anders W. Borgland Science Verification, Analysis.
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Apr. 3, 2006 GLAST 1 Pass 4 and Preparing for the LAT Handoff to NASA Why we can't go with the DC2 Analysis (Pass 3) 1) Background.
S. Ritz1 Checking Out What is Checked In  Need to optimize balance of checking between users and developers. –infuse more of a culture of detailed checking.
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan. 30, 2006 GLAST 1 Closer to Reality From Last Talk ( 7-Jan-06) – things seemed Great! However... 1) In estimating the SRD.
David WrenDC1 Closeout, 13 February OnboardFilter Update Work done by: Navid Golpayegani J.J. Russell David Wren Data Challenge I Closeout Meeting,
GLAST Rate Calculations Toby Burnett 12 Jan Jan 2000T. Burnett GLAST rate calculations2 Components used to measure rates Source model –Geomagnetic.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectCalibration and Analysis group meeting, April, 3, 2006 CAL on-orbit calibration with protons. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU.
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Dec., 2003 GLAST 1 DC1 Instrument Response Agenda Where are we? V3R3P7 Classification Trees Covariance Scaled PSF Pair Energies.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA CD3-Critical Design Review, May 12, 2003 S. Ritz Document: LAT-PR Section 03 Science Requirements and Instrument Design.
Onboard Filter Update Performance after updated cuts David Wren 26 January 2004.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, DC2 Closeout, May 31, 2006 GLAST 1 Bill Atwood & Friends.
1 ACD studies: 1. Light Yield Determination for top ACD Tiles 2. Looking for holes (screws) in the ACD data Instrument Analysis Workshop VI Luis C. Reyes.
Background runs at the UW “farm” A little background: we have installed the GRID-standard condor from the other UW in Madison. –Currently 6 CPUs available,
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Oct, 2005 GLAST 1 Back Ground Rejection Status for DC2 a la Ins. Miner Analysis.
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, Jan., 2006 GLAST 1 The 3 rd Pass Back Rejection Analysis using V7R3P4 (repo) 1)Training sample: Bkg: Runs (SLAC) v7r3p4.
November 6, 2004Carl Bromberg, FNAL LAr Exp. Workshop Nov. 4-6, Particle ID, energy resolution, neutrino flavor tagging, efficiencies, backgrounds,
1 A ROOT Tool for 3D Event Visualization in ATLAS Calorimeters Luciano Andrade José de Seixas Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/COPPE.
MINERVA Identifying Particle Tracks nneLynne Long University of Birmingham With thanks to Tom McLaughlan & Hardeep Bansil An exercise for students in the.
Pass 6: GR V13R9 Muons, All Gammas, & Backgrounds Muons, All Gammas, & Backgrounds Data Sets: Muons: allMuon-GR-v13r9 (14- Jan-2008) AG: allGamma-GR-v13r9.
T. Burnett1 GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Baseline-Preliminary Design Review, January 9, 2002 SAS Software: Sources Detector geometry model Simulation Event.
Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise  Identify electrons (e), muons (  ), neutrinos( ) in the ATLAS detector  Types.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Gamma Ray Large Area Space Telescope Balloon Flight: Data Handling Overview E. do Couto e Silva, R. Dubois, D. Flath, I. Gable,T. Kamae, A. Kavelaars,
Geant4 for GLAST BFEM -Comparison with Distributions in BFEM Data – T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima, S. Ogata, Y. Fukazawa (Hiroshima/SLAC) M. Roterman, P. Valtersson.
Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise  Identify electrons, muons, neutrinos in the ATLAS detector  Types of Events.
The method of the low-energy antiproton identification by stopping in the coordinate- sensitive PAMELA calorimeter 1 Svetlana Rodenko (MEPhI) Moscow International.
Study of hadron interactions in OPERA-like bricks Aim: background study of   h, hhh decays 4 th September 2012 H. Shibuya, H. Ishida, T. Matsuo, T. Fukuda,
Bill Atwood, 6-Feb-2008 Pass 6: GR V13R9 Muons, All Gammas, & Backgrounds Muons, All Gammas, & Backgrounds Overview Overview Data Sets: Muons: allMuon-GR-v13r9.
Throttle Studies David Wren Analysis Group Meeting 22 March 2004.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
1 Study of Data from the GLAST Balloon Prototype Based on a Geant4 Simulator Tsunefumi Mizuno February 22, Geant4 Work Shop The GLAST Satellite.
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope -France -Germany -Italy -Japan -Sweden -USA Energy Range 10 keV-300 GeV. GLAST : - An imaging gamma-ray telescope.
After integration and test at SLAC and GSFC, BFEM was shipped to the National Scientific Balloon Facility (NSBF) at Palestine, Texas. The experiment was.
Simulation Tools for Test Beam
MINERVA.
MINERVA Z Mass Exercise
Introduction to hands-on Exercise
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope ACD Final Performance
Comparison of GAMMA-400 and Fermi-LAT telescopes
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Monte Carlo studies of the configuration of the charge identifier
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Overview Goal Study GEM variables in SVAC ntuple
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Imaging crystals with TKR
Tower A: A First Look Finding the Data: Login: THIS ONE! user: glast
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
CR Photon Working Group
A. Menegolli, University of Pavia and INFN Pavia
Eduardo do Couto e Silva Feb 28, 2006
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
G. Battistoni, R. Brunetti, K. Cieślik, A. Dąbrowska, R. Dolfini,
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
Overview of Beam Test Benoit, Ronaldo and Eduardo Nov 8 , 2005 thanks to Steve and Bill for helping to consolidate all the information.
Presentation transcript:

Residual Background events after Rejection Cuts M total background events (GlastReleasev3r3p7) 344 residual events after Bill's rejection cuts. 342 events were studied using the gui, MeritTuple and Mc Root Data. (The other 2 events are missing because the corresponding root files are corrupt). Luis Reyes

Surprise... (~36 events like this one) Preliminary analysis indicates that displayed primary particle is not consistent with McXDir, McYDir, McZDir from ntuple.

From Mc Root File: (this is the complete Mc tree, no “pruning” was done, Heather made a special run of this event) Lines are drawn using the initial and final position from Mc File Dashed line is based on initial momentum from Mc File. Consistent with McXDir,... Red=Proton Yellow=gamma Blue=electron Black box is an approx. of the volume of the LAT.

The bug is not always senseless... ` Conclusions: The algorithm to write the final position is messing up (~85 events) when the primary particle is interacting but not losing its identity. It's not a good idea to draw the primary particle using the final position only, the particle can be scattering in between. This is actually the final Position Wrong Trajectory Red=Proton Gray=neutron Blue=electron (Right trajectory shown by green arrows)

Calculating the Background Rate A background average rate of 4.2 Khz/m^2 was assumed. 4.2 KHz / m^2 * 6 m^2 = 25.2 KHz picked up by Glast 119.6M events correspond to an elapsed time of s 344 events / s = Hz

Interactions in the Blanket e +   p Protons scatter inelastically from the blanket. We get backgrounds when the particles thrown in the tracker direction are neutral and there no ACD hits. 50 events (15%) Positrons with energies around 150 MeV annihilate producing two gammas. 39 events (11%) Hz Hz

Hadron Showers p->X in spacecraft or Cal No clear MIP signature.  + 70 events (20%) Same as above but either the primary particle or one of the daughters leaves a MIP signature in the CAL. 64 events (19%) Hz Hz Extra activity in Tkr may be useful. CAL pattern?

e interactions + e + Take place at the spacecraft or CAL 33 events (10%) Albedo Gammas 35 events (10%) Hz Hz

Tkr1SSDVeto Criteria Events where the ACD was fired up are allowed with the condition that Tkr1SSDVeto>2 (so that backsplash gammas are kept). However, the track might be pointing to the wrong tile. Tkr1SSDVeto≡ # of live SSD back along trajectory from start of first track to ACD 22 events (6%) Hz Tkr1SSDVeto = 6 E=513.2 MeV

ACD Cracks e + 10 events are protons (3%) Hz 19 events are e, (6%) Hz e + In some occasions a tile is marginally hit in the gui but no ActDist is calculated. Reducing the threshold may get some of these events rejected.

Summary Table Blanket (p) 15 % Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz Hz 11 % 20 % 19 % 10 % 6 % 3 % 6 % 10 % Blanket (e) Hadron Shower Hadron Shower with MIP e Interactions TkrSSDVeto Criteria Acd Crack (p) Acd Crack (e) Albedo Gamma Type Percentage out of 342 Bgnd Rate