Fourier Modeling of DEM Distributions Henry (Trae) Winter Piet Martens Jonathan Cirtain (http://solar.physics.montana.edu)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Experiments Lecture I
Advertisements

SEM PURPOSE Model phenomena from observed or theoretical stances
Experiments and Variables
Lecture 15 Orthogonal Functions Fourier Series. LGA mean daily temperature time series is there a global warming signal?
CmpE 104 SOFTWARE STATISTICAL TOOLS & METHODS MEASURING & ESTIMATING SOFTWARE SIZE AND RESOURCE & SCHEDULE ESTIMATING.
FTP Biostatistics II Model parameter estimations: Confronting models with measurements.
The synthetic emission spectra for the electron non-thermal distributions by using CHIANTI Elena Dzifčáková Department of Astronomy, Physics of the Earth.
P. Venkataraman Mechanical Engineering P. Venkataraman Rochester Institute of Technology DETC2011 –47658 Determining ODE from Noisy Data 31 th CIE, Washington.
Chapter 3 Steady-State Conduction Multiple Dimensions
X-Ray Observation and Analysis of a M1.7 Class Flare Courtney Peck Advisors: Jiong Qiu and Wenjuan Liu.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB)
Quiescent Loop Heating Profiles with AIA Henry (Trae) Winter, Kerry Neal, Jenna Rettenmayer, & Piet Martens Montana State University--Bozeman.
RHESSI/GOES Xray Analysis using Multitemeprature plus Power law Spectra. J.McTiernan (SSL/UCB) ABSTRACT: We present spectral fits for RHESSI and GOES solar.
08__050610_SCIP/SEB_PSR_Delivery.1 Temperature and Density Diagnostics with SECCHI EUVI J.S. Newmark Naval Research Laboratory (202)
Predicting Coronal Emissions with Multiple Heating Rates Loraine Lundquist George Fisher Tom Metcalf K.D. Leka Jim McTiernan AGU 2005.
Modelling X-ray Bright Points on the Quiet Sun. Parameter fitting to a Coronal Heating solution. Matthew Chantry Mentor: Aad van Ballegooijen University.
Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists, by Walpole, Myers, Myers & Ye ~ Chapter 11 Notes Class notes for ISE 201 San Jose State University.
Part III: Inference Topic 6 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
Thermal Diagnostics of Elementary and Composite Coronal Loops with AIA Markus J. Aschwanden & Richard W. Nightingale (LMSAL) AIA/HMI Science Teams Meeting,
1 Adjoint Method in Network Analysis Dr. Janusz A. Starzyk.
Multi-Instrument DEM (RHESSI – GOES) Calculations J.McTiernan 5 th General RHESSI Workshop 8-June-2005.
Simple Linear Regression. Introduction In Chapters 17 to 19, we examine the relationship between interval variables via a mathematical equation. The motivation.
1 Mixers  Mixers plays an important role in both the transmitter and the receiver  Mixers are used for down frequency conversion in the receiver  Mixers.
Calibration & Curve Fitting
Objectives of Multiple Regression
METHOD OF DEM ESTIMATION 1.Generating “true” model observations. We start with the XRT temperature response functions R c (T) and a coronal emission model.
LINEAR PROGRAMMING SIMPLEX METHOD.
Least-Squares Regression
1. An Overview of the Data Analysis and Probability Standard for School Mathematics? 2.
Physics 114: Lecture 15 Probability Tests & Linear Fitting Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
Machine Learning CUNY Graduate Center Lecture 3: Linear Regression.
Graphical Analysis. Why Graph Data? Graphical methods Require very little training Easy to use Massive amounts of data can be presented more readily Can.
Oceanography 569 Oceanographic Data Analysis Laboratory Kathie Kelly Applied Physics Laboratory 515 Ben Hall IR Bldg class web site: faculty.washington.edu/kellyapl/classes/ocean569_.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Part 4 Curve Fitting.
A physical basis of GOES SST retrieval Prabhat Koner Andy Harris Jon Mittaz Eileen Maturi.
Model Construction: interpolation techniques 1392.
The Influence of the Return Current and Electron Beam on the EUV and X-Ray Flare Emission E. Dzifčáková, M. Karlický Astronomical Institute of the Academy.
3/2003 Rev 1 II.3.15b – slide 1 of 19 IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation Protection and Safe Use of Radiation Sources Part IIQuantities and.
Modelling the radiative signature of turbulent heating in coronal loops. S. Parenti 1, E. Buchlin 2, S. Galtier 1 and J-C. Vial 1, P. J. Cargill 3 1. IAS,
Research Seminars in IT in Education (MIT6003) Quantitative Educational Research Design 2 Dr Jacky Pow.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
“ HINODE workshop” Zhanle Du & Huaning Wang 杜占乐 王华宁 中科院国家天文台 (NAOC) December 9, 2007 Problem of coronal temperature diagnostics 2007 年 12 月 8-10 日北京九华山庄.
Chapter 7 The Laplace Transform
Flare Prediction and the Background Corona Coronal Diagnostic Spectrometer Wolter-Schwarzschild Type 2 telescope Two separate spectrometers- the Normal.
Using Forward Folding of SERTS and Yohkoh Data to Estimate the Electron Densities of Coronal Plasma J.T. Schmelz & H.D. Winter III Presented by Henry (Trae)
ChE 452 Lecture 07 Statistical Tests Of Rate Equations 1.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Automatic Generation of Parameter Inputs and Visualization of Model Outputs for AGNPS using GIS.
Dr. Tamer Samy Gaafar Lec. 2 Transfer Functions & Block Diagrams.
CS654: Digital Image Analysis Lecture 22: Image Restoration.
Spectrogram 2-40 A for varying temperature. Spectra this is how we find out what everything is made of Vinay Kashyap Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
EXCEL DECISION MAKING TOOLS AND CHARTS BASIC FORMULAE - REGRESSION - GOAL SEEK - SOLVER.
ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/ Dr Akmal Hadi Ma’ Radzi School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis.
THE ROLE OF STATISTICS IN RESEARCH. Reading APPENDIX A: Statistics pp
ChE 551 Lecture 04 Statistical Tests Of Rate Equations 1.
Linear Programming McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes 17 ECE Microwave Engineering Multistage Transformers
Complex Numbers and Equation Solving 1. Simple Equations 2. Compound Equations 3. Systems of Equations 4. Quadratic Equations 5. Determining Quadratic.
Chapter 4: Basic Estimation Techniques
Physics 114: Lecture 13 Probability Tests & Linear Fitting
Chapter 4 Basic Estimation Techniques
Linear Regression.
Basic Estimation Techniques
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Basic Estimation Techniques
Registered Electrical & Mechanical Engineer
UNIT II RECIPROCAL EQUATIONS
Definition of logarithm
Lesson Graphing & Solving Inequalities
Presentation transcript:

Fourier Modeling of DEM Distributions Henry (Trae) Winter Piet Martens Jonathan Cirtain (

Outline of Talk I.DEM Techniques A.Limitations of filter ratios B.DEM curve limitations II.Fourier Coefficient Method A.Representing a DEM curve as a Fourier expansion B.Definition of error bars III.Examples and Proof of Concept A.Can this method solve for a “Standard” input DEM B.SEMAST vs. Forward Modeling IV.Results From The 18_sep_2001 Loop Analysis A.Lines used B.SEMAST vs. CHIANTI IV.Conclusions

DEM Techniques Limitations of Filter Ratios  Assumes an isothermal distribution automatically  “The Inadequacy of Temperature Measurements in the Solar Corona through Narrowband Filter and Line Ratios”, Martens, P. C. H., Cirtain, J. W., Schmelz, J. T. 2002, ApJ., 577, 2, pp. L115-L117  Different coronal assumptions give you different answers!

TRACE 171 Temp. Response Under Different Coronal Assumptions

DEM Techniques DEM Curve Limitations  DEM solutions are ill-posed Fredholm Equations of the First Kind (notoriously hard to solve)  Have to make assumptions about the solutions: continuous, non_negative, etc.  Smoothness of DEM??? Quantify please??? Physical Source of Smoothness??? Or just Mathematics?  Different coronal assumptions give you different answers, still!!!

Representing a DEM curve as a Fourier expansion f(t)=a 0 + a 1 sin(1*t) +… + b 1 cos(1*t) +…  All inversion techniques have to solve for some set of parameters to represent the DEM curve. The fewer the better (Hopefully n-1 at least!!! Forward modeling often violates this statistical rule.)  By using Fourier expansions one can describe a complex curve using only a few coefficients. (Well within n-1)  Continuous smooth functions are assured since it just a superposition of sines and cosines without artificial smoothing, just a finite number of coefficients.

Highest Frequency Term of an Expansion Containing 11 Spectral Lines

Solving for a DEM Curve as a Fourier Expansion This is the process used by the Solar Emission Measure Analysis Software Toolkit (SEMAST) in order to solve for DEM curves  Apply proper background subtraction to observed intensities  Generate G of T functions for the observed lines under varying coronal conditions using the CHIANTI atomic physics database. (ADAS and APEC can also be used.)  Assumptions/Constraints on DEM curve Enforce the DEM curve to be positive or zero Assume that the DEM  0 as Temp  0 Assume that the DEM  0 as Temp  log 10 K  Use a minimization engine (such as AMOEBA) to solve for Fourier coefficients that describe a DEM curve that yields the best reduced χ 2 fit for observed vs. theoretical intensities.  Apply Error Bars!!!

Definition of Error Bars  Most published DEM curves do not have error bars despite the fact that these solutions have a tendency to be numerically unstable  Simple definition of an error bar: Vary the EM in a temperature bin by δ. Fold this new DEM curve through the response functions. Compare the reduced χ 2 of this solution to previous. If the reduced χ 2 changes by one or greater then stop.

Can This Method Match an Input DEM  Fake DEM curve (solid, red) was folded through spectral line functions to produce theoretical intensities.  The SEMAST Fourier DEM solver then solved for the DEM (dashed, blue)

SEMAST vs. Forward Modeling SEMAST χ 2 = Forward Modeling χ 2 =

18 September 2001 Loop Analysis Ionλ O III O IV O V Fe X Mg IX Mg X Si IX Si X Si X Fe XIV Si XII Fe XVI CDS lines used

18 September 2001 Loop Analysis G of T Functions

SEMAST vs. CHIANTI CHIANTI χ 2 = SEMAST χ 2 =

SEMAST vs. CHIANTI CHIANTI χ 2 = -NaN SEMAST χ 2 =

Conclusions  Error bars are needed on any computation of DEM  SEMAST Fourier DEM Solver is an effective tool in the calculation of DEM curves that eliminates what may be artificial smoothness constraints.  By proper background subtraction and eliminating biases on DEM curve shape, the initial results indicate that the 18_Sep_2001 loop analyzed is composed of multiple isothermal strands. This result would not have been possible with either Filter Ratio or standard DEM methods