RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall - 10-12dec2008 - UCSD Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU-PWI Taskforce EU PWI TF Meeting Nov. 4 – 6, 2009, Warsaw Summary of the PSI facility review meeting presented by R. Neu based on the Summary of the.
Advertisements

Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.
1 Summary Slides on FNST Top-level Technical Issues and on FNSF objectives, requirements and R&D Presented at FNST Meeting, UCLA August 18-20, 2009 Mohamed.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear.
FES International Collaboration Program: Vision and Budget Steve Eckstrand International Program Manager Office of Fusion Energy Sciences U.S. Department.
VLT Report the fusion trend line Stan Milora (ORNL) and Richard Nygren (SNL) FNST/PFC/MASCO Meeting Aug 2-6, UCLA.
EFDA Fusion Roadmap Status of implementation Francesco Romanelli EFDA Leader.
Implications of Plasma-Material Interactions Dennis Whyte, MIT PSFC & PSI Science Center With contributions from Jeff Brooks (Purdue), Russ Doerner (UCSD),
A Roadmap to the realization of fusion energy Francesco Romanelli European Fusion Development Agreement EFDA Leader and JET Leader 17 May 2013 Acknoledgments:
FNSF Blanket Testing Mission and Strategy Summary of previous workshops 1 Conclusions Derived Primarily from Previous FNST Workshop, August 12-14, 2008.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 8 th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology Heidelberg, Germany 01–
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
ARIES High Heat Flux Components Workshop UCSD December 2008 Summary of Session 1 Near term HHFC design and R&D (ITER) Session Coordinator Richard.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
FESAC Planning Panel Report to FPA: December 5, 2007 FESAC Planning Panel Final Report Excerpts from FPA Meeting presentation by Martin Greenwald Oak Ridge,
Burning Plasma Gap Between ITER and DEMO Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy US-Japan Workshop Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies.
March 3-4, 2008/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: TRL for Heat and Particle Flux Handling A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
Integrated Effects of Disruptions and ELMs on Divertor and Nearby Components Valeryi Sizyuk Ahmed Hassanein School of Nuclear Engineering Center for Materials.
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 9 th International Symposium on Fusion.
Thoughts on Fusion Nuclear Technology Development and the Role of ITER TBM Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
DEMO R&D needs M. Q. Tran based on the report by the CCE-Fu –F4E Working Group on DEMO: P. Batistoni, S. Clement Lorenzo, K. Kurzydlowski, D. Maisonnier,
1 "Magnetic Fusion: Issues, Metrics, Gaps and a Road Map to Energy " Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy® Princeton, NJ ARIES Project Meeting.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
Developing a Vendor Base for Fusion Commercialization Stan Milora, Director Fusion Energy Division Virtual Laboratory of Technology Martin Peng Fusion.
1 Greenwald FESAC, Aug. 07 Whyte First Wall Issues: ITER to DEMO D.G. Whyte, B. Lipschultz Plasma Science & Fusion Center, MIT, Cambridge USA Greenwald.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego US-Japan Workshop on Power Plants Study and Related Advanced Technologies with.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
FESAC Planning Panel Report to FPA: December 5, 2007 FESAC Planning Panel Final Report Presented by Martin Greenwald FPA Meeting Oak Ridge, 12/05/2007.
An Expanded View of RAMI Issues 02 March 2009 RAMI Panel Members: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Tom Burgess (ORNL), Lee Cadwallader (INL), Wayne Reiersen (PPPL),
An evaluation of fusion energy R&D gaps using Technology Readiness Levels M. S. Tillack and the ARIES Team International High Heat Flux Components Workshop.
* Backup materials can be found at
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
/RDS/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Overview of the Fusion Development Facility (FDF) Presented by R.D.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
Thoughts on Fusion Competitiveness Initiative Farrokh Najmabadi, George Tynan UC San Diego University Fusion Initiatives Meeting, MIT 14-15, February 2008.
1/18 RE Nygren ReNeW White Paper: Strong Sustained Integrated HHFC Modeling & Testing -- March 2009, UCLA Future Plasma Facing Components (PFCs) & In-vessel.
Work Plans for FY06 Sandia National Laboratories Michael Ulrickson Presented at PFC Technology Meeting May 9-11, 2005 At PPPL Sandia is a multiprogram.
1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.
Page 1 of 11 Progress developing an evaluation methodology for fusion R&D ARIES Project Meeting March 4, 2008 M. S. Tillack.
RAMI Requirements for DEMO, Gaps, and Thrusts 03 March 2009 RAMI Panel Members: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Tom Burgess (ORNL), Lee Cadwallader (INL), Wayne.
Page 1 of 16 ARIES Issues and R&D Needs – Technology Readiness for Fusion Energy – M. S. Tillack ARIES Project Meeting 28 May 2008.
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
KIT Objectives in Fusion by 2020 Workshop on the European Fusion Roadmap for FP8 and beyond April 13 – 14, 2011; IPP Garching.
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
Fusion Test Facilities Catalyzed D-D with T-removal John Sheffield ISSE - University of Tennessee ReNeW Meeting UCLA March 3, 2009 With thanks to Mohamed.
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Presentation to ARIES Program Peer Review August 29, 2013, Washington, DC.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
Robert Aymar’s 75th birthday celebration colloquium at CERN A. Grosman 1/ 25 1 Tore Supra : Physics, Technology… and Strategy André Grosman Institut de.
FIRE Engineering John A. Schmidt NSO PAC Meeting February 27, 2003.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
Assessment of Fusion Development Path: Initial Results of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego ANS 18 th Topical Meeting on the.
Approach for a High Performance Fusion Power Source Pathway Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy ARIES Team Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, San.
Comments on Fusion Development Strategy for the US S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory FPA Symposium.
Fuel Cycle Research Thrust Using A Full Fusion Nuclear Environment
1 Discussion with Drs. Kwon and Cho UCLA-NFRC Collaboration Mohamed Abdou March 27, 2006.
HARNESSING FUSION POWER POWER EXTRACTION Power Extraction Panel Preliminary Research Thrust Ideas Robust operation of blanket/firstwall and divertor systems.
US Participation in the
Debriefing/New Results of ReNeW Themes III/IV (HFP) Workshop
The European Power Plant Conceptual Study Overview
Status of the ARIES Program
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
TWG goals, approach and outputs
Presentation transcript:

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL General Comments on the Development of Future Fusion PFCs presented by Richard E. Nygren Sandia National Laboratories ARIES High Heat Flux Components Workshop UCSD December 2008

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Alternates Tokamak/AT Focus: 1. tokamak divertors 2. solid surface PFCs 3. present/ITER-DEMO gap Other:4. alternates 5. liquid surface 6. other fusion pathways BROAD SCOPE

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Alternates Tokamak/AT ITER divertor TFTR Tore Supra JT-60U DIII-D ASDEX-U JET TEXTOR Non-electric or hybrid applications Wendelstein LHD MAST W7X NSTX BROAD SCOPE C-MOD

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Tokamak/AT ??? Alternates DEMO-B divertor ITER divertor JT-60U DIII-D ASDEX-U JET TEXTOR DEMO-A divertor Non-electric of hybrid applications Wendelstein LHD MAST W7X NSTX ??? ?? primary alternate C-MOD TFTR Tore Supra ???/CTF BROAD SCOPE

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Tokamak/AT ??? Alternates DEMO-B divertor ITER divertor TFTR Tore Supra JT-60U DIII-D ASDEX-U JET TEXTOR DEMO-A divertor Non-electric of hybrid applications Wendelstein LHD MAST W7X NSTX ??? ?? primary alternate  ?liquid surface C-MOD  good efficiency  high availability  damage resistance  D/T plasma  solid surface  long pulse ???/CTF BROAD SCOPE

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Tokamak/AT ??? DEMO-B divertor ITER divertor TFTR Tore Supra JT-60U DIII-D ASDEX-U JET TEXTOR  good efficiency  high availability  damage resistance  D/T plasma  solid surface  long pulse DEMO-A divertor ???/CTF GAP 1 GAP 2 WORKSHOP SCOPE C-MOD  high temperature  high reliability  neutron damage  tritium retention  active cooling

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD  high temperature  high reliability  neutron damage  active cooling  tritium retention GAP 1 GAP 2 WORKSHOP SCOPE

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD GAP X GAP Y physics Tech. tokamak Alt’s.  high temperature  high reliability  neutron damage  active cooling  tritium retention GAP 1 GAP 2 OTHER SCOPE

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Tokamak/AT ??? DEMO-B divertor ITER divertor TFTR Tore Supra JT-60U DIII-D ASDEX-U JET TEXTOR DEMO-A divertor C-MOD D Maisonnier et al., DEMO and Fusion Power Plant Conceptual Studies in Europe Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007) ISFNT7 K. Lackner SOFT2006 G Federici et al., Key ITER plasma edge and plasma–material interaction issues, JNM 313–316 (2003) PSI J Linke et al., High heat flux testing of plasma facing materials …, JNM 367–370 (2007) V Philipps Plasma–wall interaction, a key issue on the way to a steady state burning fusion device, Phys. Scr. T123 (2006) SOURCES

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Tokamak/AT ??? DEMO-B divertor ITER divertor TFTR Tore Supra JT-60U DIII-D ASDEX-U JET TEXTOR DEMO-A divertor C-MOD D Maisonnier et al., DEMO and Fusion Power Plant Conceptual Studies in Europe Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007) ISFNT7 K Lackner SOFT2006 G Federici et al., Key ITER plasma edge and plasma–material interaction issues, JNM 313–316 (2003) PSI J Linke et al., High heat flux testing of plasma facing materials …, JNM 367–370 (2007) V Philipps Plasma–wall interaction, a key issue on the way to a steady state burning fusion device, Phys. Scr. T123 (2006) D Whyte The Challenges of Plasma-Surface Interactions for ITER & Beyond, to FESAC Nov 2008 “Greenwald” Panel Report Priorities, Gaps and Opportunities: Towards A Long-Range Strategic Plan For Magnetic Fusion Energy, FESAC Oct 2007 US ReNew Activity Sources

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD “The themes were defined in terms of knowledge required prior to Demo.... based on sound scientific principles and rigorously tested in the laboratory so that the step to a [DEMO].. taken with high confidence of success. “Greenwald” Panel Report

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Theme B. Taming the Plasma Material Interface:.. knowledge sufficient to design and build, with high confidence, 8. PWI: Understand and control of all processes that couple the plasma and nearby materials. 9. PFCs: Understand.. materials and processes that can be used to design replaceable components that can survive Other.. :.. necessary understanding of plasma interactions, neutron loading and materials to allow design of.. any other diagnostic equipment that can survive... “The themes were defined in terms of knowledge required prior to Demo.... based on sound scientific principles and rigorously tested in the laboratory so that the step to a [DEMO].. taken with high confidence of success. “Greenwald” Panel Report

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Theme C. Harnessing fusion power: knowledge.. sufficient to design and build, with high confidence, 11. Fuel Cycle:.. manage the flow of tritium Power:.. temperatures sufficiently high for efficient production of electricity or hydrogen. 13. Materials..: Understand the basic materials science for fusion breeding blankets, structural components, plasma diagnostics and heating components.. high neutron fluence Safety: Demonstrate.. safety …. minimize environmental burdens RAMI [Reliability, Availability, Maintainability & Inspectability] : Demonstrate.. productive capacity …. validate economic assumptions …. “Greenwald” Panel Report

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD “Greenwald” Panel Report Finding 6. Evaluation of current and planned programs and summary of gaps ….. The most significant gaps were: G1. …. G2. … G-5. Ability to predict and avoid, or detect and mitigate, off-normal plasma events … G-9. Sufficient understanding of all plasma-wall interactions …. The science underlying the interaction of plasma and material needs to be significantly strengthened to.. G-10. Understanding of the use of low activation solid and liquid materials, joining technologies and cooling strategies... G-11. Understanding.. the complete fuel cycle, particularly.. G-12. An engineering science base.. effective removal of heat... G-13. Understanding.. low activation materials.. G guarantee safety over the plant life cycle - including.. G efficient maintainability of in-vessel components..

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD “Greenwald” Panel Report Recommendation nine major initiatives. I-1... predictive plasma modeling and validation.., I-2. Extensions to ITER AT capabilities.. burning AT regimes I-3. Integrated advanced burning physics …facility.. dedicated I-4. Integrated experiment for PWI/PFCs.. steady-state.. non-DT I-5... disruption-free concepts.. performance extension device.. I-6... advanced computer modeling and laboratory testing.. single-effects science for major fusion technology issues, I-7. Materials qualification facility … (IFMIF). I-8. Component development/testing program … multi-effect issues in critical technology.. breeding/blanket.. first wall I-9. Component qualification facility.. high availability.. heat flux.. neutron fluence.. DT device.... (CTF).

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD D Whyte FESAC Presentation “The Challenges of PSI for ITER & Beyond” Nov 2008  Quiescent energy exhaust  Transient energy exhaust from plasma instabilities  Yearly neutron damage in plasma-facing materials  Max. gross material removal rate with 1% erosion yield  Tritium consumption Issue/Gap tokamaks ITERCTF DEMO now greatly increasing parameters

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD D Whyte FESAC Presentation “The Challenges of PSI for ITER & Beyond” Nov 2008 Lack basic understanding and diagnosis of PSI processes in fusion devices → Uncertain extrapolation Heat exhaust is primary design point for edge materials, since this Is directly related to fusion power density Thermal efficiency.. high ambient T → Fundamentally different Physical Chemistry.. completely unexplored in fusion devices Energy sustainment chasm to CTF & DEMO Rapid dissipation of plasma thermal energy poses major challenges in any Demo consequences of large particulate removal on.. plasma.. & safety Tokamak edge plasmas feature extreme spatial gradients and fluctuations levels,.. erosion prediction & control very difficult It is hard to overstate the importance of ambient temperature for fuel control & T retention 30+ years of experience.. we should be worried/excited.. in particular the effects of having “hot walls”

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Power plant conceptual studies in Europe D. Maisonnier, D. Campbell, I. Cook, Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007) 1524–1532 [ISFNT7]

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Power plant conceptual studies in Europe D. Maisonnier, D. Campbell, I. Cook, Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007) 1524–1532 [ISFNT7]

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Power plant conceptual studies in Europe D. Maisonnier, D. Campbell, I. Cook, Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007) 1524–1532 [ISFNT7]

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD Power plant conceptual studies in Europe D. Maisonnier, D. Campbell, I. Cook, Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007) 1524–1532 [ISFNT7]

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD High temperature He-cooled divertor Need for work on divertor systems

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD In contrast to the rest of the world, a typical preference of US technology people has been  one step to high tech DEMO (reactor prototype)  parallel R&D for materials and blankets (CTF) Whose DEMO?

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD In contrast to the rest of the world, a typical preference of US technology people has been  one step to high tech DEMO (reactor prototype)  parallel R&D for materials and blankets (CTF) Whose DEMO? We have a great challenge to develop the needed technology! ITER activity is a revealing as we observe the need for definition and integration in the design along with the need to move forward in building the machine!

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD J. Linke et al., JNM 367–370 (2007) 1422–1431 We develop PFCs using single effects tests

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD We are good at developing issues We tend to  be optimistic (we are in fusion after all)  enjoy identifying issues and pondering problems  look toward R&D programs Hey – nice issue Congratulations on your new issue. You rAPER Raised some important issues I We love issues

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD GAP 3: Technology Culture tests Material B Material A properties 2 joining properties mockupsprototypes tests prototypes rad effects testing PFC tests PWI tests Material A tokamak coupons lab tests test PFC design validation manufacturing development QA development scale up Vendor qual. manufacturing acceptance components PWI & PFC tests component dev./qual M a t ’l s d e v el o p m e n t We develop one-of-a kind units with anecdotal mockup tests.

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD A realistic “fully funded” technology program, will involve a strong winnowing of choices for PFC materials and divertor technology simply because of the time to develop and prove specific robust components for a DEMO. GAP 3: Technology Culture Configuration d e v e l o p m e n t PWI & PFC tests component dev./qual M a t ’l s d e v e l o p m e n t STs, others Ergodic div. Super-X div.Liquid PFCs

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD PROGRAM & DESIGN INTEGRATION knowledge.. sufficient to design and build, with high confidence, Recall some excerpts from the “Greenwald” panel report: 9. PFCs: Understand.. materials and processes … design replaceable components that can survive.. I-3. Integrated advanced burning physics …facility.. dedicated I-4. Integrated experiment for PWI/PFCs.. steady-state.. non-DT I-8. Component development/testing program … multi-effect issues in critical technology.. breeding/blanket.. first wall

RE Nygren, Sandia ARIES Town Hall dec UCSD E N D