Systems Thinking and Decision Making Models Mediated Modeling 1/30/07.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regions for Economic Change: Networking for Results LMP Workshop 3C: When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform.
Advertisements

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Systems Thinking Part 2 Louis Rowitz, PhD
Ecosystem Approaches To Conservation Photo from Wikimedia Commons.
OPEN:EU Initial Seminar Scenarios and Policy Analysis Katy Roelich - Stockholm Environment Institute Doris Knoblauch - Ecologic Institute.
Main recommendations for Mauritius and way forward.
Building the GCOOS Ecosystem Integration & Assessment: Priorities for Managing Ecosystem Data Ann Jochens.
Systems Thinking and Decision Making Models Mediated Modeling 1/23/07.
Systems Thinking and Decision Making Models Mediated Modeling 2/6/07.
Landscape functions and people Bangkok, October 2010 Ten principles for a Adaptive Landscape Approach.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Systems Thinking and Decision Making Models Mediated Modeling 1/16/07.
Orientation to the Health and Career Education K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
Human Resource Management
MONITORING PROJECTS: QUALITY AND RESULTS. DAY ONE ASSESSMENT DAY TWO DESIGN DAY THREE MONITORING MORNING Intro. Training Intro. Assessment Intro. DesignIntro.
© Business & Legal Reports, Inc Alabama Retail is committed to partnering with our members to create and keep safe workplaces. Be sure to check out.
1 Introduction to State Logic Models and Related Planning Stephanie Lampron, NDTAC.
What is advocacy?. Session objectives Distinguish advocacy from other activities Work with participants to recognise opportunities for advocacy in our.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Workshop Notes Course development: Free and Open Software Development.
9-2  Problem: a discrepancy between the current state – what actually is happening – and a desired goal – what should be happening  Undesirable situation.
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Stakeholder Analysis.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.
Assessment/Evaluation 1) Determine Desired Outcomes 2) Determine Activities to achieve outcome 3) Determine Indicators to measure whether you are making.
Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.
TOPIC 12 STAKEHOLDERS AND SUSTAINABILITY. Introduction to Agenda 21 The Earth Summit held in Rio De Janerio, Brazil was attended by 178 country leaders.
Objectives 1. A definition of the term group as used in the context of management 2. A thorough understanding of the difference between formal and informal.
VISIONING IN YOUR COMMUNITY Remember: unique needs capabilities of YOUR community Stick to the budget and listen to community residents.
Project Management Concepts By: Sohaib Ejaz Lecturer,UoS.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
THE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER for Central and Eastern Europe Integrated planning and Assessment of National Development Plan of the Czech Republic.
Monitoring and Evaluation
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Food Security Response Analysis: Definitions, Tools and Potentials Overview FSNWG workshop Nairobi 29 April – May
Department of Public Welfare – Business Review Board Project/System Name Date.
Logic Models: Laying the Groundwork for a Comprehensive Evaluation Office of Special Education Programs Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Center for Evaluation & Education.
Livia Bizikova and Laszlo Pinter
© 2005, CARE USA. All rights reserved. CARE Rwanda’s Experience on MSC Re-visioning & CO business plan workshop March 15.
TRTFN - BC Framework Agreement Planning Process Fred Oliemans, ILMB Bryan Evans, TRTFN Presentation to Public Workshop, Atlin, BC June 13, 2008.
Using indicators for program management and program assessment Draft framework with examples Donna Podger (916)
SO – What is CRM ? Stakeholder consensus decision-making process. Stakeholders are any interest with a stake in the consequences of the decision. The.
Part 2: Range Wildlife Mgt. & Future of Range Mgt. 5/9/16 Unit 12 Mrs. Smith.
Quick Instruction Guide Developing an Airport Performance-Measurement System ACRP Report 19: Developing an Airport Performance-Measurement System Performance.
1 Health Needs Assessment Workshop Sue Cavanagh Keith Chadwick.
Associate Professor Cathy Gunn The University of Auckland, NZ Learning analytics down under.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Outline Structure of Action Research Project Trudy Corrigan October 2008.
1 Balanced Scorecard Philosophy, Basics, Fundamentals, and Functions.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Title of presentation Copyright IDS and MeTA 2010
Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
FLR Hierarchical Logic
Introduction to Program Evaluation
DAVIS COLLABORATIVE LEARNING TEAMS
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Program Design in Population, Health and Environment
Societal resilience analysis
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Problem solving and decision making
Strengthening the Role of EQAVET National Reference Points
Slide Deck 9: Objectives and Results
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
Eutrophication activity
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
2019 Scorecard September 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Systems Thinking and Decision Making Models Mediated Modeling 1/30/07

To accomplish Introduction Workshop guidelines Goal STELLA software Pre-model Questions model should address Conceptual model building Students ask clarifying questions Process requests/suggestions from participants 7 PM Closing

Example Goal To develop viable recommendations toward the prevention of shoreline degradation in VT. Recommendations can be developed in the form of information requirements or policy suggestions.

esult: Consensus on both problems/goals and process - leading to effective and implementable policies Degree of Consensus among Stakeholders

Listening cycle Source: Conklin, 2006

Linear thinking Example?

Systems Thinking Example?

Events Patterns Structure What When, where How, why

Levels of Understanding ActionTime Orientation Way of Perceiving EVENTSReactPresentWitness PATTERNSAdaptMeasure or track events STRUCTURECreate Change FutureCausal loops diagrams & SD tools

Questions you would ask EVENTSWhat is the fastest way to react to this event now? PATTERNSWhat kinds of trends or patterns of events seem to be recurring? STRUCTUREWhat structures are in place that are causing these patterns?

Example of “questions the model aims to address”: 1.How is shoreline degradation/protection monitored and measured? 2.What are the most important human activities causing shoreline degradation? 3.How do the long-term consequences present themselves ecologically and economically over time? How are they linked? 4.Based on the system discussed and modeled, what are viable recommendations to achieve a mutually desired outcome?