1 Redefining America: Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey Luis R. Fraga Stanford University University of Washington John A. Garcia University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Redefining America: Key Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey.
Advertisements

Ajay Chaudry, The Urban Institute The Demographics of Children in Immigrant Families The Demographics of Children in Immigrant Families “Immigrant Children:
Trends in the Political Ideology of the Cuban-American Voter Evidence from the Cuba Poll
2008 Latino Voter Survey in Key Battleground States Produced by The NALEO Educational Fund and Latino Decisions, Sponsored by AARP October 23, 2008.
Change and Cuban American Politics Lisa García Bedolla University of California, Berkeley November 2013.
Colorado Data on Demographics of Potential Exchange Users Disclaimer: Dr. Jonathan Gruber will provide updated information in September. This is older.
Intra- and Inter-group Identity POL 168 Latino Politics Prof. B. Jones.
Estimates of Immigrant Civic Potential Prepared for Carnegie Corporation of New York June 2008.
Redefining America: Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey Luis R. Fraga Stanford University University of Washington John A. Garcia University.
Redefining America: Key Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey Luis Fraga Associate Professor of Political Science, Stanford University John Garcia.
Redefining America: Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey Luis R. Fraga University of Washington John A. Garcia University of Arizona Rodney E.
Fuerza Latina: A Paradox of Success and Hardship Phillip J. Bowman Lecture Institute for Research on Race and Public Policy Sylvia Puente Executive Director.
Raza Demographics Based on US Census 2000 Demographics Demographics is the study of populations Determining population trends is important to address.
The Present Hispanic Demographic Revolution Presented by: Harry P. Pachon, Ph.D. Professor of Public Policy University of Southern California, President,
Working with Latino Youth: Myths, Realities and Strategies Lynnette Aponte, Ed. S, Managing Director of Youth Programs Eliezer Velez, Director of Youth.
The State of the Hispanic Community in the U. S
Gender and Race/Ethnic Participation Political Science 61 / Chicano/Latino Studies 64 November 15, 2007.
TODOS General Meeting Steve Klass Salt Lake City, Utah, April 2008.
The National Ethnic Politics Study (NEPS): Ethnic Pluralism & Politics in the 21 st Century May 12, 2005 Vincent L. Hutchings, Cara J. Wong, Ron E. Brown,
Redefining America: Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey Luis R. Fraga Stanford University University of Washington John A. Garcia University.
Texas & San Antonio: Characteristics and Trends of the Hispanic Population KVDA Telemundo November 10, 2011 San Antonio, TX.
1 Redefining America: Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey Luis R. Fraga Stanford University University of Washington John A. Garcia University.
POL 168 Politics Professor Brad Jones Dept. of Political Science UC-Davis Winter 2008.
The National Politics Study (NPS): Ethnic Pluralism & Politics in the 21 st Century Study Overview.
LATINO NATIONAL SURVEY Luis R. Fraga, Stanford University John A. Garcia, University of Arizona Rodney E. Hero, University of Notre Dame Michael Jones-Correa,
Census Humor A person of Spanish ancestry, a person of Spanish origin,
1 Population in millions Hispanic Population in the United States: 1970 to 2050 *Projected Population as of July 1 Projections Census Source: U.S. Census.
Chuck Maxey - School of Business - California Lutheran University Ventura County Demographics A Presentation to the Ventura County Leadership Academy September.
The Gender Gap in Educational Attainment: Variation by Age, Race, Ethnicity, and Nativity in the United States Sarah R. Crissey, U.S. Census Bureau Nicole.
Minority Student Participation in International Programs: A Survey of Undergraduate Students Attending HBCUs Komanduri S. Murty & Jimmy D. McCamey, Jr.
Meet Your New Clients: Hispanics/Latinos
New York State’s Labor Force Drivers Presented by Kevin Jack, Statewide Labor Market Analyst August 2008.
A Brief Demography of California Hans Johnson Public Policy Institute of California November 30, 2010.
Latinos & Religion “Catholics were 81% of Latin America’s population in 1996, while Protestants made up only 4%. By 2010, protestants had jumped to 13%,
US Population.
1 Family Sociology Race, Ethnicity, & Families. 2 Race, Ethnicity & Families How do we define race? How do we define ethnicity?
Introduction to Family Studies
The Browning of America: The Growing Hispanic Presence in the U.S. Presidents Conference Council for Christian Colleges & Universities January 28, 2011.
PERCENTAGE OF CITIZENS AGE 18+ WHO VOTED IN THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MINNESOTA = 75.0 D. C. = 74.1 MAINE = 71.2 NEW HAMPSHIRE = 71.2 WISCONSIN =
Starting at the beginning Foundations of Citizenship Unit one A Portrait of Americans Chapter one American Society And its Values Chapter two The Meaning.
Latinos, Population Growth and American Politics Population Resource Center October 5, 2006 Rodolfo O. de la Garza Columbia University & Tomás Rivera Policy.
The Immigration Issue and the 2008 Presidential Election: Exit Poll of Hispanic Voters in Miami-Dade County, Florida and Los Angeles County, California.
Immigration. Immigration Today Our first wave of immigration early last century was mainly from European countries. New and increasing rates of immigration.
Consumer Market Chapter 6. Three Most Important Demographic Variables??? Ethnicity Income Age.
1 Population in millions Hispanic Population in the United States: 1970 to 2050 *Projected Population as of July 1 Projections Census Source: U.S. Census.
PERCENTAGE OF CITIZENS AGE 18+ WHO VOTED IN THE 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION MINNESOTA = 75.0 D. C. = 74.1 MAINE = 71.2 NEW HAMPSHIRE = 71.2 WISCONSIN =
Public Opinion and Political Action Chapter 6. Introduction Some Basics: Demography The science of population changes. Census A valuable tool for understanding.
Strangers to These Shores, Tenth Edition by Vincent N. Parrillo©2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reservedStrangers to These Shores, Tenth Edition.
Hispanic Ministry in the CNH. Key Terms / Phrases First-generation Latinos – Foreign-born Latinos – Immigrant generation Second-generation Latinos – U.S.-born.
1 National Hispanic Voter Study on Immigration Policy March 19, 2010.
1 Family Sociology Race, Ethnicity, & Families. 2 Race, Ethnicity & Families How do we define race? How do we define ethnicity?
1 National Hispanic Voter Study on Immigration Policy March 19, 2010.
Which is the largest minority group in the U.S.? African Americans, Hispanics, Asians Americans, Native American Indians, White Ethnics.
Hispanic Culture and Literature in the U.S. SPN400.
Support for Budget, Tax and Social Welfare Programs The Political Environment.
ADD SALSA WITHOUT LOSING YOUR UC FLAVOR How can we impact Latino student success?
Political Socialization. Political socialization – The process through which an individual acquires his or her particular political orientations, including.
Voter Turnout in Texas FEBRUARY 2, Not Everyone Votes.
American Citizens and Political Culture Chapter 1.
Latinos & Religion “Catholics were 81% of Latin America’s population in 1996, while Protestants made up only 4%. By 2010, protestants had jumped to 13%,
Culture & Demographics
Mexican American Electoral Participation: Opportunities and Limits
Community Building in Latino America
Salt Lake City, Utah, April 2008
Mexican American Community Attitudes
Latino Participation and Partisanship
How Hispanics Are Changing the Face of Nevada
Demographics Belief & Behaviors.
AGENDA: Tues 10/25 & Wed 10/26 Voter Behavior
Presentation transcript:

1 Redefining America: Findings from the 2006 Latino National Survey Luis R. Fraga Stanford University University of Washington John A. Garcia University of Arizona Rodney E. Hero University of Notre Dame Michael Jones-Correa Cornell University Valerie Martinez-Ebers Texas Christian University Gary M. Segura University of Washington

2

3 Sources of Funding Annie E. Casey Foundation Annie E. Casey Foundation Carnegie Corporation Carnegie Corporation Ford Foundation Ford Foundation Hewlett Foundation Hewlett Foundation Irvine Foundation Irvine Foundation Joyce Foundation Joyce Foundation Kellogg Foundation Kellogg Foundation National Science Foundation National Science Foundation Russell Sage Foundation Russell Sage Foundation Texas A&M University: MALRC, PERG Texas A&M University: MALRC, PERG

4 Percent Hispanic of U.S. Population, Source: Chapter 2. Multiple Origins, Uncertain Destinies. Adapted from Figure 2-2. Percent

5 Hispanic Births and Net Immigration by Decade: Source: Chapter 2. Multiple Origins, Uncertain Destinies. Adapted from Figure 2-1. Millions

6 Themes within the Survey Survey includes…many of the questions or topics you have grown to love from existing surveys, whenever possible to ensure comparability;Survey includes…many of the questions or topics you have grown to love from existing surveys, whenever possible to ensure comparability;  Questions submitted by various political scientists specifically targeted at states;  Questions suggested by the advisory board Beyond the standard, we focused on transnationalism, identity, inter-group and intra-group relations, gender, education, policy preferences, discrimination, mobilization and overall political orientationsBeyond the standard, we focused on transnationalism, identity, inter-group and intra-group relations, gender, education, policy preferences, discrimination, mobilization and overall political orientations Some questions specific to foreign born, non-citizens, registered voters, and residents of specific statesSome questions specific to foreign born, non-citizens, registered voters, and residents of specific states

7 What We Did A “national” telephone survey of 8600 Latino residents of the United States, seeking a broad understanding of the qualitative nature of Latino political and social life in America A “national” telephone survey of 8600 Latino residents of the United States, seeking a broad understanding of the qualitative nature of Latino political and social life in America State-stratified samples that reach approximately 90% coverage of the national Latino population State-stratified samples that reach approximately 90% coverage of the national Latino population Approximately 40 minutes (length and number of questions depends on split-samples, etc) Approximately 40 minutes (length and number of questions depends on split-samples, etc) English and Spanish English and Spanish Universe is all Latino adults, not citizens or voters Universe is all Latino adults, not citizens or voters

8 Stratified Structure The survey is stratified, that is, creates stand-alone samples in 15 states and the DC Metro area allowing us to speak to specific political contexts The survey is stratified, that is, creates stand-alone samples in 15 states and the DC Metro area allowing us to speak to specific political contexts  Arizona400  Arkansas400  California1200  Colorado400  DC-SMSA400  Florida800  Georgia400  Illinois600  Iowa400  Nevada400  New Jersey400  New Mexico400  New York800  North Carolina400  Texas800  Washington400

9 The Miracles of Sample Size Usable sub-samples for: National origin groups (7) National origin groups (7) Stand-alone State Analysis: Stand-alone State Analysis: 15 states + DC Metro 15 states + DC Metro Generations Generations  5717 Foreign born  936 US-born to FB parents  892 US-born to at least one US born parent  1047 US-born citizens of at least one US grandparent Includes 467 Island born Puerto Ricans and Includes 467 Island born Puerto Ricans and th generation US mainland born th generation US mainland born

10 More Miracles of Sample Size Sample Strata—Several states stratified within to ensure geographic dispersion and more usable subsamples: Sample Strata—Several states stratified within to ensure geographic dispersion and more usable subsamples:  e.g. California has six strata: L.A., Inland Empire, San Diego, Central Valley, San Francisco Bay Area, and the rest (including Sacramento);  Texas and Florida have multiple strata, and several states have two— usually a single metro area and the rest of the state (CO, GA, IL) Before and after Immigration Marches—creates a natural experiment: 3373 interviews before March 15, 708 from 3/15-5/1, 4553 after May 1 Before and after Immigration Marches—creates a natural experiment: 3373 interviews before March 15, 708 from 3/15-5/1, 4553 after May 1 Mexican State Analysis : 12 Mexican states with N’s greater than 100 respondents: Mexican State Analysis : 12 Mexican states with N’s greater than 100 respondents:  Chihuahua (353), DF (235), Durango (166), Guanajuato (327), Guerrero (192), Jalisco (419), Mexico (160), Michoacán (423), Puebla (133), SLP (98), Sonora (110), Veracruz (119), Zacatecas (169)

11 Unique Sub-Samples Available 841 Senior Citizens (65+) 841 Senior Citizens (65+) 1035 Union Members 1035 Union Members 997 with household incomes above $65k 997 with household incomes above $65k 1379 College graduates, 573 of which have advanced degrees 1379 College graduates, 573 of which have advanced degrees 964 self-identified Republicans and 1424 Independents 964 self-identified Republicans and 1424 Independents 71% Catholic, but 224 Jehovah’s Witnesses, 339 Pentecostals, 177 Southern Baptists, etc. 71% Catholic, but 224 Jehovah’s Witnesses, 339 Pentecostals, 177 Southern Baptists, etc (31%) report that they or a close family member served in the military 2671 (31%) report that they or a close family member served in the military Numbers reported are un-weighted Ns

12 Latino Diversity Census Bureau (American Community Survey, Released August 2006) Mexican 63.9% Puerto Rican 9% Cuban 3.5% Salvadoran 2.9% Dominican 2.7% Guatemalan 1.7% Colombian 1.8% ALL OTHERS 14.3% Native-born (not Island-born): 35.4% Foreign-born 61% Island-born PR 3.6% No high school diploma 43% College graduate 11.1% Latino National Survey (unweighted N) Summer 2006 *Mexican 66.1% (5704) *Puerto Rican 9.5% (822) *Cuban 4.9% (420) *Salvadoran 4.7% (407) *Dominican 3.9% (335) *Guatemalan 1.7% (149) *Colombian 1.6% (139) *All Others 7.6% *Native-born 28.4% (2450) *Foreign-born (adults) 66.2% (5717) *Island-born PR 5.4% (467) *No high school diploma 37% *College graduate 16.2% 44 million Latinos in the US

13 Assimilation, Values, and Identity

14 Language Proficiency across Generations 1 st Gen 2 nd Gen 3 rd Gen 4 th Gen Answered in English Answered in Spanish, Speak English Total Share with English Proficiency Retain Spanish Proficiency  Strong English dominance and nearly universal English proficiency among the first-generation of US born;  Generally strong Spanish retention, aided by refreshed populations of Spanish-speakers.

15 Importance of Learning English/ Retaining Spanish across Generations 1 st Gen 2 nd Gen 3 rd Gen 4 th Gen How important do you think it is that everyone in the United States learn English? Somewhat Very How important do you think it is for you or your family to maintain the ability to speak Spanish? Somewhat Very

16 Sense of American and Home-Country Identity Across Generations 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th How strongly do you think of yourself as “American”? Somewhat Strongly Very Strongly How strongly do you think of yourself as (Mexican, Cuban, etc)? Somewhat Strongly Very Strongly

17 A Multiplicity of Identities Simultaneous strong sense of pan-ethnic identity, national origin identity, and American- ness Simultaneous strong sense of pan-ethnic identity, national origin identity, and American- ness  Puerto Ricans illustrate best that identities are not mutually exclusive  Cuban pan-ethnicity surprisingly high  Mexican sense of American-ness high considering the share foreign born American National Origin Pan- Ethnic Mexican Cuban Puerto Rican All Cells are percent expressing “somewhat” or “very strongly”

18 Levels of Pan Ethnicity and Connectedness Of One’s Subgroup to Other Latinos  One-half of LNS Latinos perceive a lot of commonalities with one’s group and other Latinos  Stronger pan-ethnic identifiers are more inclined to see this connection.  Over three- fourths of the combined stronger pan- ethic identifiers see their own national origin group as having a similar fate with other Latinos

19 Selected Markers of Societal Assimilation 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th Roman Catholics Social Capital (Group Participation) Military Service, Self or Family Education < High School Household income <$35k Percent Marrying non- Latinos

20 Attention to US and “Home Country” Politics and Public Affairs Attention to US politics is strong, even among the foreign born, and approaches (and in some cases surpasses) levels for all other groups, among Latinos born in the US. Attention to US politics is strong, even among the foreign born, and approaches (and in some cases surpasses) levels for all other groups, among Latinos born in the US. While about 57% of foreign born respondents agree that they should be able to vote in home country elections, only about 4% have ever done so, and about 58% report paying little or no attention to politics back home. While about 57% of foreign born respondents agree that they should be able to vote in home country elections, only about 4% have ever done so, and about 58% report paying little or no attention to politics back home. 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th Attention to/Interest in US politics Somewhat or Very Interested Attention to/Interest in “Home-Country” politics Little or No Attention Paid

21 Preferences for Cultural Assimilation and Distinctness 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th Importance of Changing to Blend into Larger Society Somewhat Very Importance of Maintaining Distinct Culture Somewhat Very Support for blending into the larger culture and for maintaining a distinct culture are positively related (r=.1415): Support for blending into the larger culture and for maintaining a distinct culture are positively related (r=.1415): Not seen as an either/or proposition

22 Expressions of American Values 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 4 th Equality of Right, without regard to political beliefs Strongly agree Individual Responsibility, life outcomes not the fault of the “system” Somewhat agree Strongly agree Equality of Opportunity, uneven life chances are not a problem Somewhat or Strongly disagree

23 Civic and Political Participation

24 Latino Interest in Politics (in percentages) AllUS Born Naturalized Non- Respondents Citizens Citizens Citizens Respondents Citizens Citizens CitizensNot Interested Somewhat Interested Very Interested QUESTION: How interested are you in politics and public affairs? Would you say you are very interested, somewhat interested or not at all interested?

25 Civic Engagement Among Naturalized and Non- Citizens (in percentages) AllUS Born Naturalized Non- Respondents Citizens Citizens Citizens Respondents Citizens Citizens CitizensGroup participation Contacts officials Organizational problem-solving Multiple contacts w/ officials

Election Participation Among US Born and Naturalized Citizens US Born Naturalized US Born Naturalized % of eligible Respondents63%37% (n=5321) (n=5321) Asked to Vote/give$39%25% Registered81%73% Voted65%58% Voted for Kerry56%50% Voted for Bush38%46%  Almost twice as many US Born as Naturalized eligible to participate  Significantly more US Born than Naturalized asked to vote or contribute money to candidates or a political party, 14% difference!  More US Born registered and voted than Naturalized  Significantly more US Born voted for Kerry than Bush, 18% difference!  More Naturalized citizens also voted for Kerry, but the gap in those who voted for Kerry versus those who voted for Bush is much smaller, only 4%

27 Gender Differences in 2004 Election Participation Latino Latina % of eligible Respondents46%54% (n=5321) (n=5321) Asked to Vote/give$36%31% Registered77%80% Voted61%63% Voted for Kerry52%55% Voted for Bush43%39%  Latinas were a significantly larger share of the eligible participants  More Latino men asked to participate than Latinas YET, YET,  Latinas participated at higher rates than Latino men  Both Latinas and Latinos voted more for Kerry than Bush STILL,  Significantly more Latinas voted for Kerry than voted for Bush

28 Latinos and Partisanship

29 Patterns of Partisanship Overall U.S. Born Puerto Rico Born Outside U.S. Democrat Republican Independent Don’t Care Don’t Know

30 Partisanship Among Citizens U.S. Born Naturalized Registered Not Registered Democrat Republican Independent Don’t Care Don’t Know

31 Partisanship and Gender MaleFemale Democrat Republican Independent Don’t Care Don’t Know

32 Citizenship and Issue Positions: Problem Facing the Country CitizenNon-citizen CitizenNon-citizen Iraq War Economy Illegal Immigration Immigration Education/ Schools Schools Other “What do you think is THE one most important problem facing the country today?”

33 Partisanship and Issue Positions: Problem Facing the Country Democrat Republican Independent Democrat Republican Independent Iraq War Economy Illegal Immigration Immigration Education/ Schools Schools Other “What do you think is THE one most important problem facing the country today?”

34 Partisanship and Issue Positions: Preferred Party to Address Problem Facing Country Democrats Republicans Neither Don’t Know Democrats Republicans Neither Don’t Know Democrat Republican Independent Don’t Care Don’t Know “Which political party do you think has a better approach to address this problem?”

35 Citizenship and Issue Positions: Problem Facing Latinos CitizenNon-citizen CitizenNon-citizenIllegal Immigration Immigration Education/ Schools Schools Unemp/Jobs Iraq War Other “What do you think is THE one most important problem facing the country today?”

36 Partisanship and Issue Positions: Problem Facing Latinos Democrat Republican Independent Democrat Republican IndependentIllegal Immigration Immigration Education/ Schools Schools Unemp/Jobs Iraq War Other “What do you think is THE one most important problem facing the Latino community today?”

37 Partisanship and Issue Positions: Preferred Party to Address Problem Facing Latinos Democrats Republicans Neither Don’t Know Democrats Republicans Neither Don’t Know Democrat Republican Independent Don’t Care Don’t Know “Which political party do you think has a better approach to address this problem?”

38 Latino National Survey Executive Summary Demographic Tables Background Tables Questionnaire and Toplines Available at the website of the Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race, and Sexuality (WISER), University of Washington, Seattle: