Astrometry for NGAO Brian Cameron, Matthew Britton, Jessica Lu, Andrea Ghez, Rich Dekany, Claire Max, and Chris Neyman NGAO Meeting #6 April 25, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSMT Control Workshop Tucson, September 11-12, 2001 Pointing Control for a giant segmented mirror telescope Patrick Wallace Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Advertisements

Error budget for the PRIMA conceptual design review Bob Tubbs, Richard Mathar, Murakawa Koji, Rudolf Le Poole, Jeff Meisner and Eric Bakker Leiden University.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
Deriving the true mass of an unresolved BD companion by AO aided astrometry Eva Meyer MPIA, Heidelberg Supervisor: Martin Kürster New Technologies for.
NGAO Systems Engineering Status Team Meeting #3 (Video) R. Dekany 13 December 2006.
Science Group: Status, Plans, and Issues Claire Max Liz McGrath August 19, 2008.
Chapitre 3- Astrometry PHY6795O – Chapitres Choisis en Astrophysique Naines Brunes et Exoplanètes.
AO4ELT3 May 28, 2013 On-Sky Tests of Sparse-Field Astrometry with GEMS and a 1-meter Telescope S. Mark Ammons Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Olivier.
Towards Creation of a JWST Astrometric Reference Field: Calibration of HST/ACS Absolute Scale and Rotation Roeland van der Marel Jay Anderson, Colin Cox,
W. M. Keck Observatory Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Irvine Meeting September 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
Current astrometric error is as low as 0.25 mas. Galactic Center observed with NIRC2 on Keck astrometric accuracy is a function of atmospheric conditions.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Future Opportunities for Adaptive Optics Galactic Science Andrea Ghez University of California Los Angeles.
Science Team Management Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
The Need for Contiguous Fields NGAO Team Meeting, Waimea January 22, 2007 Claire Max.
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics Matthew Britton.
A Short Introduction to Adaptive Optics Presentation for NGAO Controls Team Erik Johansson August 28, 2008.
NGAO Astrometric Science and Performance Astrometric Performance Budget Team: Brian Cameron, Jessica Lu, Matthew Britton, Andrea Ghez, Rich Dekany, Claire.
Basic Astrometric Methods William van Altena Yale University Basic Astrometric Methods Yale University July 18-22, 2005.
Astrometry with the TMT S. R. Kulkarni California Institute of Technology Interdisciplinary Scientist Space Interferometry Mission.
Tracking using the Kalman Filter. Point Tracking Estimate the location of a given point along a sequence of images. (x 0,y 0 ) (x n,y n )
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
1 Keck NGAO Project Replan: Science Cases and Requirements Claire Max NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 25, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
Pan-STARRS Seminar: IPPEugene Magnier Pan-STARRS Image Processing Pipeline Astrometry and Photometry IFA Pan-STARRS Seminar 735 October 14, 2004.
Robo-AO First Science Workshop May 20, The Demo Period Robo-AO Science Workshop Agenda.
High Redshift Galaxies: Encircled energy performance budget and IFU spectroscopy Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
PALM-3000 Systems Engineering R. Dekany, A. Bouchez 9/22/10 Integration & Testing Review.
Black Holes in Nearby Galaxies Claire Max NGAO Team Meeting March 7, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
NGAO Wavefront Error Performance Budgets R. Dekany 13 May 2010.
2002 January 28 AURA Software Workshop The MATPHOT Algorithm for Digital Point Spread Function CCD Stellar Photometry Kenneth J. Mighell National.
Measuring Seeing, The Differential Image Motion Monitor (DIMM)
Developing Performance Estimates for High Precision Astrometry with TMT Matthias Schoeck, Tuan Do, Brent Ellerbroek, Gilles Luc, Glen Herriot, Leo Meyer,
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
Distortion in the WFC Jay Anderson Rice University
1 A. Boccaletti Pasadena, Sept th Imaging EGPs with JWST/MIRI and VLT/SPHERE valuable experiences for TPF-C A. Boccaletti, P. Baudoz D. Rouan + coronagraphic.
Lyot Stop Focal Plane Mask OAP3 Out of plane spherical mirror.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
High Precision Astrometry and Parallax from Spatial Scanning Part 2 Adam Riess and Stefano Casertano.
ACS Drizzling Overview J. Mack; DA Training 10/5/07 Distortion Dither Strategies MultiDrizzle ‘Fine-tuning’ Data Quality Photometry.
Improved Tilt Sensing in an LGS-based Tomographic AO System Based on Instantaneous PSF Estimation Jean-Pierre Véran AO4ELT3, May 2013.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
A new geometric distortion solution for the STIS NUV MAMA Jesús Maíz-Apellániz Leonardo Úbeda TIPS 17 July 2003.
Science with AO A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team. Topics Sample scientific programs. Observing strategies. Technical issues. Keck AO, K'
4-PARAMETER TRANSFORMATION OF DIGITIZED ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES Yavor Chapanov 1 1 – National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Bulgarian Academy.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Modeling and Correcting the Time- Dependent ACS PSF for Weak Lensing Jason Rhodes, JPL With: Justin Albert (Caltech) Richard Massey (Caltech) HST Calibration.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
HST ACS data LSST: ~40 galaxies per sq.arcmin. LSST CD-1 Review SLAC, Menlo Park, CA November 1 - 3, LSST will achieve percent level statistical.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Eva Meyer MPIA-Student-Workshop, Italy Various information from different detection methods.
Part 2: Phase structure function, spatial coherence and r 0.
Calibration for WFPC2 Vera Platais Astrometric X g =a 1 +a 2 X+a 3 Y+a 4 X 2 +a 5 XY+a 6 Y 2 +a 7 X 3 +a 8 X 2 Y+a 9 XY 2 +a 10 Y 3 Y g =b 1 +b 2 X+b.
The prospects of probing relativity in the Galactic Center with Adaptive Optics Observations Tobias Fritz, Stefan Gillessen, Hendrik Bartko, Katie Dodds-Eden,
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Innovations Foresight Astronomical Seeing The Astro-Imaging Channel Dr. Gaston Baudat Innovations Foresight, LLC 1(c) Innovations Foresight Dr.
26th October 2005 HST Calibration Workshop 1 The New GSC-II and it’s Use for HST Brian McLean Archive Sciences Branch.
Photometry and Astrometry: Bright Point Sources May 16, 2006 Cullen Blake.
Improved ACS Geometrical Distortion Correction Richard Hook TIPS Meeting, STScI, 18th December 2003.
Astrometry with Schmidt Plates Difficulty in attaining highly accurate positions -Bending of plates as they are placed in plate holder -Characteristics.
An Unexpected Hysteresis Effect Seen in Hawaii-2RG Detectors
J. Cohen, Concepcion, Feb 2006 Part 1 – the very young GCs in M31,
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Presentation transcript:

Astrometry for NGAO Brian Cameron, Matthew Britton, Jessica Lu, Andrea Ghez, Rich Dekany, Claire Max, and Chris Neyman NGAO Meeting #6 April 25, 2007

2/14 The Limits… In Principle Photon Noise –AO helps with SNR and achieving  D Confusion –Important for densest fields

3/14 The Limits… In Practice Systematics… Physical optics –Geometric distortions An atmosphere –Refraction –Anisoplanatism All are ~10 mas, but can be reduced

4/14 Geometrical Distortion: Pin Hole Mask NIRC2 suffers from distortion. Characterize with pin hole slit mask –Polynomial fit –Residuals ~0.1 pixels (1-4 mas) Stable within the errors over the last ~6 months. Don’t dither! –Doesn’t help for heterogeneous data sets

5/14 State of the Art: HST Distortion from huge, well- dithered, rotated data set Understood at <0.01 pixel (<0.3 mas) –Both WFPC2 and ACS Key’s to success –PSF modeling –Stability On-sky experiment planned for summer 2007 Anderson & King 2003

6/14 Differential Tilt Stars separated by some angle sample different turbulence. Elongation of the PSF toward the TT reference.  DT ~ 20 mas (  /20”)(5m/D) 6/7 Averaged down by integration.

7/14 Differential Tilt Vector separation between 21” binary –100s of 1.4 sec exposures RMS ~20 mas –anisotropic Uses a PSF prediction technique –OTF measured from guide star –Propagated off-axis with ATF (calculated with help of DIMM/MASS) Britton 2006

8/14 Differential Atmospheric Refraction DAR contributes ~5 mas every 10” at transit. Can we detect? –Sort of…

9/14 Differential Atmospheric Refraction 12 zenith angle of 45 degrees, separation of 30” and  T ~ 5000 K Noise from correction: –Model Uncertainties –Uncertainties in 7 parameters. ParameterUncertaintyNoise (uas) Ground Temp. 3 K50 Pressure8 mb50 Zenith Angle 36”10 Separation30 mas10 Relative Humidity 10%-- Relative Stellar Temp K10 Gubler & Tytler 1998

10/14 Confusion Inner few mas of the Galaxy is limited by confusion –Goal < 0.1 mas Trade study (although noisy) shows ~140nm WFE required.

11/14 Scientific Applications Galactic Center –GR, young stars, high velocity stars ‘Isolated’ point sources –Galactic Plane targets Proper Motions

12/14 Distortion Corrected Compute Allan variance for diagnostics –variance after averaging over various timescales Recover ~ 1/sqrt(t) dependence until the next floor –~1 mas for isolated point source data.

13/14 GC Astrometric Precision

14/14 Recommendations Turbulence monitoring PSF monitoring camera Distortion solutions and monitoring Atmospheric dispersion corrector (?) System with < 170nm WFE to mitigate GC confusion

15/14 More DAR

16/14 Field Dependent Errors