Research Computing Services Needs Survey Created for the Faculty Senate by the Computers Users Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Advertisements

Strategic Plan for Information Technology Goal of IT Planning 2. Organization 3. Process 4. Executive Summary 5. Timeline for Completion.
The Academic Computing Assessment Data Repository: A New (Free) Tool for Program Assessment Heather Stewart, Director, Institute for Technology Development,
LIBRARY AND INFORMATION USE PATTERNS BY ENGINEERING FACULTY AND STUDENTS Lisha Li William Baer June 2009.
Methods to weigh the outcome of the use of electronic resources Highlights of two studies among Doctoral Candidates and PhDs worldwide Mr. Boe Horton Senior.
Reference Competencies from the Practitioner’s Perspective: An International Comparison Laura Saunders Mary Wilkins Jordan Simmons College ALISE conference.
Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.
Who are young librarians? Millennials as academic librarians Jenny Emanuel Taylor Digital Resources & Reference Librarian; Reference, Research, and Scholarly.
CANADA’S ENGAGED UNIVERSITY: STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS FOR YORK UNIVERSITY PATRICK MONAHAN, VICE-PRESIDENT ACADEMIC & PROVOST ACADEMIC PLANNING FORUMS.
 Tina Neville, University of South Florida St. Petersburg LINCC User Meeting: Region 4, April 5, 2012.
Academic Work Environment Survey 2004 Barbara Silver, ADVANCE Program Director Presented at the ADVANCE National Conference, G-Tech, Atlanta, Georgia April.
Faculty Rights and Other Scholarly Communication Practices Denise Troll Covey Principal Librarian for Special Projects Carnegie Mellon DLF Forum – Boston,
IT Student Survey 2009 Your name here. Overview Over 1,400 responses were received. Students across all faculties, nationalities and years were represented.
Julia Bauder, Grinnell College & Jenny Emanuel, University of Illinois Be Where our Faculty Are: Emerging Technology Use and Faculty Information Seeking.
The Harold Schiffman Music Library Team 4 Needs Assessment David Covert, Mia Jordan, Rachel Koury, Lara Patterson, Savannah Whitaker.
Institutional Learning Outcomes: Assessing Personal and Professional Development FLEX – Spring 2015 College of the Redwoods Angelina Hill.
Academic Affairs Dr. Chula King Provost & VP Academic Affairs 26 May 2010.
Company LOGO Angel Almanzar Sharon Brown Rebecca Harris-Smith Use of Clickers in Education.
Introduction Methodology Results This study aims to explore the current progress of using different types of software with various autism conditions. One.
TEACHERS APPROACH TO ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RESOURCES Dr. G.SIVAPRASAD Lecturer in Library Science, MVGRR Degree college, Bhattiprolu Guntur (Dt.) B. DHANA.
State of the Faculty Survey Philip C. Wander President of the Faculty Senate LMU March
What Counts for Tenure? Preliminary Survey Results Kathleen A. Terry-Sharp Director of Academic Relations American Anthropological Association Analysis.
Fielding Graduate University Library Locating Tests and Measures.
University of Arkansas Faculty Senate Task Force on Grades Preliminary Report April 19, 2005.
Center for Information and Communication Studies Measuring and Applying Data about Users in the Seton Hall Library Carol Tenopir Rachel Volentine Lisa.
BI’s via LibGuides: All your eggs in one basket Susan Whitmer Reference Specialist University of North Texas September
2015 Governance Survey Results Planning and Resource Council (PaRC) June 17, 2015 E. Kuo & J. Marino-Iacieri FH IR&P.
An Orientation of the Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum Ohio ELL Project Carolyn Karatzas Technical Assistance Provider SEC ELL Grant.
Who wants to be a professor? Cesar D. Guerrero Computer Science and Engineering.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate June 12, 2014.
EGS Research & Consulting BASELINE SURVEYS OF MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT CHAIR PERSONS, MATHEMATICS FACULTY AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY.
Columbia University :: Office of the Provost :: Planning and Institutional Research NRC Assessment of Research-Doctoral Programs October 27,
Faculty Information Needs: Online Survey at UCSF Gail Persily Janice Contini CNI, April 2007.
The Impact of Scholarly Communication on LIS Education Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
USER ISSUES / EXPECTATIONS REGARDING E-JOURNALS: A STUDY OF USER EXPERIENCES AT UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING COLLEGE JNTU KAKINADA Dr. B.R. Doraswamy Naick Assistant.
IEEE Computer Society Report of an Online Survey of Current and Non-Renewing Members May 2012 – version 3.0 EDITED June 20, JMS Prepared by: Robin.
Information Literacy Progress & Best Practice Richard Sweeney /16/2009 Agenda – 10 minutes –Institute IL Plan (8 Standards)
Qualifications a Bachelor’s degree in Science or Engineering with GPA at least 3.25, or a Masters’ degree in Science or Engineering having GPA no less.
Small business owners Research April 5 – April 12, 2012 Total Respondents: 500 Research powered by:
Students’ and Faculty’s Perceptions of Assessment at Qassim College of Medicine Abdullah Alghasham - M. Nour-El-Din – Issam Barrimah Acknowledgment: This.
Learning and Engagement in Library Spaces Suzanne E. Thorin Ruth Lilly University Dean of University Libraries and Associate Vice President for Digital.
Technologies for Teaching and Learning: Janice Fournier, PhD, Research Scientist Cara Lane, PhD, Research Scientist Learning & Scholarly Technologies What.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Some Select Findings for Vice Provosts to Pique Curiosity in What the Data Can Tell Us Presentation for Vice Provosts.
Measuring the impact of Technology on Quality of Services and Operations in an Academic Library Ashok Kumar Sahu Senior Librarian, IIMT Gulam Rasul Asst.
User Needs Assessment to Support Collection Management Decisions Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries For ALCTS-CMDS.
Research productivity and citation patterns of librarians in Tanzania: A scientometric analysis Edda Tandi Lwoga (PhD) Senior Librarian, Muhimbili University.
Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator Georgia Tech ADVANCE Conference March 2005 NSF ADVANCE Research Program.
University as Entrepreneur Results of Surveys of ASU Faculty, Students and Staff Spring 2007 Surveys conducted by the Institute for Social Science Research.
Learning with smartphones: a Hong Kong experience INFuture2015 Zvjezdana Dukic The University of Hong Kong
Measuring Outcomes of Doctoral Programs: Alumni and Exit Surveys at Western University CAGS October 2015.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure & Post-Tenure Review Presentation for NC State Faculty Senate February 27, 2007 Nancy.
STEM MI Champions SURVEYS OF ENACTED CURRICULUM Teacher Orientation Gary Money August 2 and 3, 2011.
Regional Cyberinfrastructure Planning Great Plains Network Greg Monaco, Ph.D. Director for Research and Cyberinfrastructure Initiatives
COLLEGE OF APPLIED MEDICAL SCIENCES “CAMS” NOVEMBER 2015 Vice -Deanship for Development and Quality November 2015.
Information Technology Planning Provost Hinshaw’s memo to John Bruno Review budget reduction plans and report on short-term information technology impacts.
Support for Scholarly Research in Florida Academic Libraries Tina Neville and Deborah Henry USF Libraries Annual Meeting December 15, 2006.
Post Graduation Plans Questionnaire Responses by Selected Majors SL, Academic Planning and Analysis, August 2011.
Georgia Tech NSF ADVANCE Research Program Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator NSF ADVANCE Site Visit June 2004.
HELP WANTED? Job prospects for CS Compensation (show me the money) Career networking.
AAPA Research – 2318 Mill Road, Suite 1300, Alexandria VA, AAPA Member Satisfaction 2014 Results.
Www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de Institute of Computer Science Chair of Communication Networks Prof. Dr.-Ing. P. Tran-Gia Modeling User Activity and Network.
SUCCESSFUL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING INVENTORY NAME: PRISHEELA MUNIANDY Prof. Dr. MOHAMED AMIN BIN EMBI.
“Data from national surveys: access, analysis, and sharing”
Ithaka S+R Graduate Student Survey
Achieving Carnegie Highest Research Activity Classification VPR & COGS
Method.
American Society for Engineering Education
How to build faculty capacity in research & teaching
Job Aids and Technology Helps
Administrative Review Committee
Presentation transcript:

Research Computing Services Needs Survey Created for the Faculty Senate by the Computers Users Committee

Rationale UMass Dartmouth: – Carnegie Doctoral status by 2012 – Emphasis on faculty research – New junior faculty on the tenure track – New graduate level programs – Increasing numbers of graduate students – Limited resources in support of research computing

Understanding Research Computing Needs Request from Vice Chancellor Green for information on research computing needs CUC/CITS collaborated on survey design

Purpose “to assess the computer services needs of faculty related to research” 1 To provide a basic understanding of research computing needs – Not intended to be a comprehensive analysis 1 CUC Minutes, April 8, 2005

Methodology Online survey consisting of multiple choice and open ended questions Participation solicited by to all faculty and librarians

Survey - Part One Demographic information about respondents including academic council, years at UMassD, academic rank, and description of current scholarly activity

Survey - Part Two Questions regarding the following: 1) The Importance of Collaboration Tools 2) Data Sets 3) High Performance Computing 4) Methodological & Statistical Support Services 5) Survey Tools and Support Services 6) Research Software 7) Data Storage 8) Research Lab Computing Support 9) Advanced Research Wide Area Networking 10) Software Development 11) Other Research Computing Service Needs

SURVEY ANSWER SCALE NI = NOT IMPORTANT SI = SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT MI = MODERATELY IMPORTANT VI = VERY IMPORTANT CI = CRITICALLY IMPORTANT NA = NO ANSWER

Results: Nursing “High Performance Computing” is important. “Methodological and Statistical Support Services” is important.

Results: Social Sciences Respondents expressed a need for “Data Sets” such as ICPSR. Social Sciences find it important to have “Survey Tools and Support Services”. 55% of Social Science faculty state that “Research Lab Computing Support” is very important or critically important.

Results: Science and Engineering “Data Storage and Retrieval Services” are very important for Engineering faculty. 53% of Science faculty find “Research Lab Computing Support” is at least very important. 73% of respondents said “Research Software” is very important or critically important. The highest demand (53%) for “Software Development” is from Science faculty.

Results: Business Demand for “Data Sets” and “Research Software” such as Matlab, SPSS, STATA and ICPSR, SDC Platinum Need for “Methodological and Statistical Support Services”

Results: CVPA Some respondents expressed a need for “High Performance Computing” as well as “Research Laboratory Computing Support.” There is a need for photo editing software such as Photoshop

Results: Humanities “Data Storage and Retrieval Services” is very important to some Humanities’ faculty. Some faculty expressed a need for full-text online journals.

Results: General Finding The highest demand is for “Research Software.” More than 50% of respondents indicated that this was either very important or critically important. For example, respondents listed math and statistical software such as Matlab, SPSS and Stata.

Conclusions One size doesn’t fit all. Research computing needs vary among academic councils. Actively inform faculty about the available licensed and open source software. Examine aspirant institutions and determine how they meet research computing needs.