1 Supporting Effective Child Welfare Supervision #2: Moving Forward Teleconference Presentation June 16, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resources for Improving Outcomes for Children and Families Through Caseload/Workload Reductions Webinar Presentation to State Liaison Officers July 17,
Advertisements

On The Right Track Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model 1, 2008.
From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
The Continuous Quality Improvement Process Empowering staff to develop local level solutions.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
702: Leading Those Who Engage Incarcerated Parents.
Purpose of Project  To assess the state of oral health within Douglas County  To develop a strategic plan, utilizing the data obtained from the assessment,
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
Katie A. Implementation Progress & Hurdles: Child & Family Team Component Donna Ewing-Marto, Executive Family Partner, Family & Youth Roundtable Sarah.
The Kansas Child Welfare Workforce Profile SSWR 2011 Annual Conference January 14, 2010 Alice Lieberman, Ph.D. and Michelle Levy, A.M.
1 Learning Lab Workshop Missouri Children’s Division Family Facets.
St. Louis County Public Health and Human Services Foster Care System Changes: Moving Into the Future.
Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.
State Program Improvement Planning Process and Expectations National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement A service of the Children’s.
Recruitment and Retention: A Project supported by the US Children’s Bureau Michigan State University School of Social Work.
Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model The North Carolina Foster and Adoptive Parent Association.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
1 Supporting Effective Child Welfare Supervision #2: Moving Forward Teleconference Presentation June 16, 2009.
Addressing Disproportionality in Texas A Committed Community Collaboration Presented by: Carolyne Rodriguez, Director of Texas State Strategy, Casey Family.
Partnering with Families for MRS/SOC Success!. North Carolina’s Family Support and Child Welfare System Family-centered practice and system of care principles.
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Evidence-based Strategies for Improving Child Welfare Performance, Staff Retention and Client Outcomes XIX ISPCAN International Congress on Child Abuse.
The New Mexico Experience Practice Model Peer Network Webinar September 10, 2012.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
Our three year strategy >Our vision >Children and young people in families and communities where they can be safe, strong and thrive. >Our mission >Embed.
ADVANCED LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR SUPERVISORS (ALDS) PROGRAM YEAR 1 IMPLEMENTATION MARCH 2010 – FEBRUARY 2011 PILOT PROGRAM.
Overview of the Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center.
NEXT STEPS AFTER CFS REVIEW HHS/ACF will issue final report on Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) Once final report is issued, it will be disseminated.
1 Understanding and Developing Child Welfare Practice Models Steven Preister, Associate Director National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Collaborative Model of Social Work Education with Strong University – Agency Partnerships Michael A. Patchner, Ph.D. Indiana University School of Social.
VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES
The Evolution of QI in North Carolina Denise Pavletic RD, MPH Greg Randolph MD, MPH 2010 MLC Grantee Meeting Kansas City, Missouri.
1 Strategic Planning Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center Tribal Convening August 27-28, 2009 Steven Preister National Child Welfare Resource Center.
Request for Applications for Child Welfare Implementation Projects.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
NATIONAL CHILD WELFARE RESOURCE CENTER FOR ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENT (NRCOI) AND NATIONAL RESOURCE CENTER FOR CHILD WELFARE DATA AND TECHNOLOGY (NRC-CWDT)
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
Community Partnerships to Protect Children: Challenges and Opportunities Deborah Daro.
Chittenden County, Vermont 1. Formal partners Local Education - 8 School Districts (41 schools) + 1 Advisory School District (9 schools) Local Mental.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Creating a Trauma - Informed Child Welfare System The Oklahoma Story Building Systems to Support Trauma-Informed Practice November 15, 2012 Annette Kirk.
1 VIRGINIA FIRE SERVICES BOARD A Report of Findings and Recommendations: County of Tazewell Fire and EMS Study February 5, 2012.
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
533: Building a Trauma-Informed Culture in Child Welfare.
CA COUNTY PEER QUALITY CASE REVIEW (Insert Review Week Dates)
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
P: F: West Main Street, New York, NY | GUIDE FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING CHILD WELFARE PRACTICE.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
ENHANCING POSITIVE WORKER INTERVENTIONS WITH CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES IN PROTECTION SERVICES: BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIRED SKILLS.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
A Presentation for the Annual Conference of the Missouri Community College Association November 6, 2003 Larry McDoniel Ann Campion Riley Assessment of.
Program Evaluation Key Informant Interview Themes Jack Thompson, Director Northwest Center for Public Health Practice University of Washington School of.
Welcome to ABC County DSS REAP Meeting MEETING DATE, 2012.
Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.
Statewide Scan of System of Care in North Carolina November 2013
Statewide Scan of System of Care in North Carolina November 2013
Supervisor Mentor Program
Lincoln County Social Services Organizational Effectiveness
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 Supporting Effective Child Welfare Supervision #2: Moving Forward Teleconference Presentation June 16, 2009

2 Purpose Today The role of supervisors is recognized as crucial in every Child Welfare system. Supervision has been empirically linked to organizational, worker and client outcomes – particularly staff recruitment and retention. Over 20 states included improving child welfare supervision as a key strategy in their Program Improvement Plans during the first round of the CFSR. We will present the experiences of two states – Missouri and North Carolina – with enhancing supervision by: We will present the experiences of two states – Missouri and North Carolina – with enhancing supervision by:  Explaining the PROCESS  Illustrating the PRODUCTS  Describing the EXPERIENCES

3  Process Work Group Representatives from Supervisors chosen by Mid-Level Management and Central Office (best of best) Central Office Representatives (e.g., PIP, QA and Training Coordinators) University Partners Staff/Consultants with NRCs

4 Process:  Meet with Leadership  Organize work group  Describe current culture of child welfare supervision  Describe current structure & practice of child welfare supervision  Describe purpose of supervision  Formulate recommendations  Construct strategic plan

5  PRODUCTS  Strategic Plan  Time and Activities Study

6  Product Strategic Plan (Handout) MissouriNorth Carolina Supervisor TrainingSupervisor Recruitment, Training and Professional Development Casework PracticeSupervision Practices Supervisor Support Management/Administrative Supervision, Communication and Community

7  Product Strategic Plan ( Handout) Action Steps Tasks / Time Frames Benchmarks Completion Dates Persons Responsible

8  Product Time and Activities Study (Handout) ActivitiesActivities  Identified by Work Group  Four categories: - Systemic (not case specific) - Personnel / Mgmt. (not case specific) - Case Specific / Clinical - Other Planned vs. UnplannedPlanned vs. Unplanned One week capturedOne week captured Automatic compilation of results (daily & weekly)Automatic compilation of results (daily & weekly)

9  Product Time and Activities Study Benefits to individual supervisors Captures how supervisor’s time is really spentCaptures how supervisor’s time is really spent Allows for supervisor’s comparison with othersAllows for supervisor’s comparison with others Provides basis for supervisor to determine desired changesProvides basis for supervisor to determine desired changes Benefits of aggregate data to Agency Depicts CW work and need for resourcesDepicts CW work and need for resources Useful in designing staff developmentUseful in designing staff development

10  Missouri’s Experience Missouri’s Child Welfare System Department of Social Services Divisions Children’s Division Division of Youth Services Family Support Division MoHealth Net Division Division of Legal Services

11  Missouri’s Experience Missouri’s Child Welfare System Children’s Division Structure 45 Judicial Circuits 114 Counties plus St. Louis City 5 Administrative Regions  St. Louis City  St. Louis County  Jackson County / Kansas City  Northern Region  Southern Region Approximately 1,375 Frontline staff Approximately 225 Supervisors

Continued Leadership Support COA Standards Research Based Philosophy Supervision Advisory Committee Clinical Supervision Training CFSR/PIP Enhancing Supervision in Missouri -The Perfect Storm- Supervision IMPROVED CLINICAL SUPERVISION

13  Missouri’s Experience Process  Convened Divisional Leadership  Organized work group – Best of the best supervisors  Group examined current culture, structure, purpose and practice of supervision  Workgroup formulated recommendations  Constructed strategic plan

Products  Strategic Plan  Time and Activities Study  Increased Supervision of Supervisors  Learning Labs  Charter for ongoing Supervision Advisory Committee  Missouri’s Experience

Barriers  Missouri’s Experience  Turnover – Leadership and supervisors  Middle Management buy-in

Impact  Ongoing dialog with Leadership  Support for pay increase  Survey of Organizational Excellence Scores  Elevated Supervision in Missouri  Culture change  Missouri’s Experience

17  North Carolina’s Experience North Carolina’s Child Welfare System System reform effort, MRS, is the practice model based on family centered practice applying a SOC approach 2007 CFSR findings demonstrated evidence of improved practice, so impetus for PIP was to strengthen reform effort

18  North Carolina’s Experience North Carolina’s Child Welfare System Accountability, a theme for PIP, noted supervision as an integral component to better agency, worker and client outcomes PIP included convening supervisors to develop a state strategic plan for CWS supervision

19  North Carolina’s experience Followed model described by NRCOI Strategic plan addresses 3 areas:  Recruitment, Training and Professional Development  Practices  Support

20  North Carolina’s Experience Struggles: Buy-in from directors Products: Time and Activities Strategic Plan First phase on practice Pilots testing structured supervision Impact: Strong commitment from directors to pilot

21 *Role of Leadership* Must set parameters for work:  Agency Mission  Agency Vision  Guiding Principles  Strategies  Themes  Minimum Products  Must evidence commitment – up-front, during, and upon completion of work – to act on resultant plan

Contacts Steve Preister, Associate Director NRCOI (202) Candice Britt, MSW CFSR Coordinator NC Division of Social Services (919) Joe Murray, Consultant NRC-CWDT (405) Susan Savage, MSW Acting Deputy Director (573)