Self-Protective Memory of Interpersonal Events Margaret Wile, Angela Neal, Christine Coyne, and Edward Lemay Department of Psychology, University of New.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project VIABLE: Behavioral Specificity and Wording Impact on DBR Accuracy Teresa J. LeBel 1, Amy M. Briesch 1, Stephen P. Kilgus 1, T. Chris Riley-Tillman.
Advertisements

Method Participants 184 five-year-old (M age=5.63, SD=0.22) kindergarten students from 30 classrooms in central Illinois Teacher ratings The second edition.
Remembering Can Cause Forgetting – but Not in Negative Moods Psychological Science – 2007 Karl-Heinz Bauml and Christof Kuhbandner Presented by Tachelle.
METHOD PARTICIPANTS 393 undergraduates completed the study, (M age = 20; 75% female; 50% Asian, 21% Caucasian). MATERIALS AND PROCEDURE All subjects completed.
Anxiety Increases Age Differences in Memory Jane Student and Dr. Julie Earles Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Why do people forget?
The Profile of a Fifth Grader Today As compared to a study by Arnold Gesell By Jamie Gammel.
O Children exposed to higher levels of interparental conflict appear to be more sensitive to later parental disagreements o They report greater threat,
Samantha Nicholas & Khrys Nugent Hanover College
Both self-esteem and co-rumination have been shown to influence an individual’s psychological well-being. Rose (2002) defined co- rumination as “excessively.
Validity In our last class, we began to discuss some of the ways in which we can assess the quality of our measurements. We discussed the concept of reliability.
Chapter 6: Correlational Research Examine whether variables are related to one another (whether they vary together). Correlation coefficient: statistic.
METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY Finding a Research Idea Lawrence R. Gordon.
Effects of Marital Satisfaction & Personality Grace White, B.S.
The Effects of Empathy & Social Exclusion PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND Individuals’ willingness to engage in prosocial behavior is a popular topic in social.
Brooke Bussone Dylan Antovich. The Evolutionary Theory of Romantic Jealousy Jealousy is an adapted function designed to increase fitness Two factors in.
Study 1: Method Demographics 346 men and 299 women 41.1% Dating, 18.2% Cohabiting, 4.2% Engaged or 18.9 Married Mean age of sample was 31.7 years Procedure.
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502) Lecture-8. Summary of Lecture-7.
Lecture Outline Stereotypes Part 2 Stereotype change Stereotype maintenance Stereotypes & self-fulfilling prophecies Feedback on Exam 2.
Method Introduction Results Discussion The Effect of Self-Esteem, Marital Status, and Gender on Trait Anxiety and Stress Emily B Gale University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
 The misinformation effect refers to incorrect recall or source attribution of an item presented after a to-be-remembered event as having been presented.
Self-perception, Self-esteem and Relationship Behaviour
Romantic desirability, self-esteem and relationship behaviour in women Dr Chris Bale Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences University of Huddersfield.
Chapter 2 The Research Enterprise in Psychology. n Basic assumption: events are governed by some lawful order  Goals: Measurement and description Understanding.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: om Sex Differences in Associations between Fear of Negative Evaluation (FNE) and Substance Use Lesley A.
The Psychology of the Person Chapter 2 Research Naomi Wagner, Ph.D Lecture Outlines Based on Burger, 8 th edition.
Self-Esteem and Problem Drinking Among Male & Female College Students William R. Corbin, Lily D. McNair, James Carter University of Georgia Journal of.
Self Competence and Depressive Symptoms in Ethnic Minority Students: The Role of Ethnic Identity and School Belonging Praveena Gummadam and Laura D. Pittman.
Effect of Stress and Glucose on Self-Control Mary Redding and H. Anna Han, PhD Department of Psychology, St. Mary’s College of Maryland References Conclusions.
Ch 4 Outline Attributions –Types –Factors that influence –Biases –In Intimate Relationships Self fulfilling prophecy Inaccuracies and Illusions in Judgments.
Results show that participants favored females in fields of surgeons and corporate setting jobs than males. They also showed preference for males in the.
Individual Preferences for Uncertainty: An Ironically Pleasurable Stimulus Bankert, M., VanNess, K., Hord, E., Pena, S., Keith, V., Urecki, C., & Buchholz,
Introduction Method Implications Educational training programs regarding self-injury have potential to improve professionals’ attitudes towards and comfort.
Gender Differences In Relational Versus Achievement Influences On Self-esteem Rick L. Payne, B.A., B.S. Department of Psychology, University of Dayton.
Problem-Solving Abilities and Feelings of Control: A Work in Progress Emily M. Kaiser, Department of Communication Studies, College of Arts and Sciences.
Self-serving Bias
 Are false memories more likely to develop when people are motivated to believe in the false event?  Sharman and Calacouris (2010)
INTRODUCTION Early after injury, persons with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been shown to experience physical, cognitive, and emotional difficulties.
Observational Research in the Laboratory Pros: Controlled environment Can control for extraneous variables (random assignment) Cons: Not realistic.
Introduction Disordered eating continues to be a significant health concern for college women. Recent research shows it is on the rise among men. Media.
Caritas Francis Hsu College General Education PHI1011 Individual and Society Lecture 2: Self 1.
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Yu, Dr. Bateman, and Professor Szabo for allowing us to conduct this study during their class time. We especially thank the.
1 Dealing With Threats to The Self: Part One. 2 What is a Self-Threat? “when favorable views about oneself are questioned, contradicted, impugned, mocked,
ATTRACTION 1. 2 INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION The desire to approach other people.
Gender Differences in Buffering Stress Responses in Same-Sex Friend Dyads Sydney N. Pauling, Jenalee R. Doom, & Megan R. Gunnar Institute of Child Development,
Two Factor EFA Solution SOCIAL INTIMACY r r r r r r r r r
REFERENCES Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Troetschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit.
Reactions to Humorous Comments and Implicit Theories of Humor Styles Nicholas A. Kuiper, Gillian A. Kirsh, and Catherine Leite Presented by Willie Hallford.
Adaptive Memory: Survival Processing Enhances Retention. Nairne, J., Thompson, S. & Pandeirada, J. (2007). Adaptive Memory: Survival Processing Enhances.
Studies that Illustrate Errors in Attributions IB Psychology I (1A)
Ease of Retrieval Effects on Estimates of Predicted Alcohol Use Joshua A. Hicks University of Missouri-Columbia and the Midwest Alcoholism Research Center.
Repeated questions in police interviews with young children alleging abuse Sarah Krähenbühl.
Perceived Risk and Emergency Preparedness: The Role of Self-Efficacy Jennifer E. Marceron, Cynthia A. Rohrbeck Department of Psychology, The George Washington.
Recent research has shown that some rejected individuals will try to forge social connections with new individuals, which may serve to replenish a sense.
John G. Conway, University of Florida Kate A. Ratliff, University of Florida Implicit Associations Between The Elderly and Warmth Moderate the Effect of.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com”   Ideals: mental constructs that represent an idea of traits we are attracted to in potential partners (Fletcher.
Selfishness and Self-Mattering: Do I Fit In? Leah Burke Advisors: Ellen Cohn, Ph.D. & Alexander Blandina, M.A. The University of New Hampshire INTRODUCTION.
Measure of internal validity
Method Participants. Two hundred forty-four introductory psychology students at Montana State University participated in this experiment in exchange for.
How Does Multiple Group Membership Affect Face Recognition in Asian Participants? Sarah Pearson, Jane Farrell, Christopher Poirier, and Lincoln Craton.
The Role of Arousal in Mood Mediation: A Closer Look at Mood Congruent Memory Ben Fox, Janna Kost, Sabette Thompson, Michelle Fung, Dawn Macaulay, Eric.
Better to Give or to Receive?: The Role of Dispositional Gratitude
Effects of Self-Monitoring on Perceived Authenticity in Dyads
Stephanie J. Tobin1, Sarah McDermott2, and Luke French2
Entitlement Behaviors
Friendship Quality as a Moderator
Cooperation within Groups
Randolph-Macon Woman’s College
Thinking of Safety Through a Different Lens
Direct and Generative Construction of Future thoughts:
Conclusions Method Results Introduction References Hypotheses
Presentation transcript:

Self-Protective Memory of Interpersonal Events Margaret Wile, Angela Neal, Christine Coyne, and Edward Lemay Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire Method 175 males 257 female college students completed the study for course credit. Average age was 19.9 years old. Procedure Random assignment to one of three conditions: High care: Think of someone about whom you care strongly Low care: Think of someone who you do not particularly care for Stranger: Think of this person named “Chris” who you have never met before Each person was then: Shown a series of behaviors and asked to imagine that this partner performed each behavior. Given a filler task for 5 minutes (list names of states) Asked to recall as many of the behaviors that were shown to them previously. Method 175 males 257 female college students completed the study for course credit. Average age was 19.9 years old. Procedure Random assignment to one of three conditions: High care: Think of someone about whom you care strongly Low care: Think of someone who you do not particularly care for Stranger: Think of this person named “Chris” who you have never met before Each person was then: Shown a series of behaviors and asked to imagine that this partner performed each behavior. Given a filler task for 5 minutes (list names of states) Asked to recall as many of the behaviors that were shown to them previously. Introduction Prior research suggests that people want and expect to feel cared for by relationship partners about whom they care (Baumeister & Leary, 1995; Lemay & Clark, 2007) The current research tested the prediction that memory of interpersonal events often serves the function of maintaining a sense of security that valued partners reciprocate one’s interpersonal sentiments. Prior work suggests that people are more likely to remember negative events relative to positive events (Baumeister et al. 2001) but that this is not the case when the event is threatening to self-esteem. People are especially unlikely to remember these threatening events (Sedikies et al, 2000). In the current research, we test the related hypothesis that people are especially unlikely to remember events that threaten the sense that valued relationship partners care for the self. Such a pattern would suggest that our memory functions to protect interpersonal security. Introduction Prior research suggests that people want and expect to feel cared for by relationship partners about whom they care (Baumeister & Leary, 1995; Lemay & Clark, 2007) The current research tested the prediction that memory of interpersonal events often serves the function of maintaining a sense of security that valued partners reciprocate one’s interpersonal sentiments. Prior work suggests that people are more likely to remember negative events relative to positive events (Baumeister et al. 2001) but that this is not the case when the event is threatening to self-esteem. People are especially unlikely to remember these threatening events (Sedikies et al, 2000). In the current research, we test the related hypothesis that people are especially unlikely to remember events that threaten the sense that valued relationship partners care for the self. Such a pattern would suggest that our memory functions to protect interpersonal security. Types of Behaviors Presented Behaviors varied in terms of whether they were relevant to how much the person values the relationship with the self (high/low relevance) and valence (positive/negative) High Relevance- Negative ”Ridiculed you when you exposed a weakness or flaw” Low Relevance- Negative “Forgot to do the dishes” High Relevance- Positive “Showed sympathy when you were feeling down” Low Relevance-Positive “Was in a cheerful mood” Types of Behaviors Presented Behaviors varied in terms of whether they were relevant to how much the person values the relationship with the self (high/low relevance) and valence (positive/negative) High Relevance- Negative ”Ridiculed you when you exposed a weakness or flaw” Low Relevance- Negative “Forgot to do the dishes” High Relevance- Positive “Showed sympathy when you were feeling down” Low Relevance-Positive “Was in a cheerful mood” Results Significant three-way interaction – between condition (relationship type), relevance (high-low), and valence (positive-negative) predicting proportion of behavior recalled (of all behaviors presented in that category), p <.05. Negative events were remembered more than positive events in low care or stranger relationship types, regardless of relevance of the event. Negative events also were significantly remembered more than positive events in high care relationships if the event was irrelevant to how the partner feels about the self. The one exception was that negative events were not remembered more than positive events for high relevant behaviors performed by a partner that one cares for. Results Significant three-way interaction – between condition (relationship type), relevance (high-low), and valence (positive-negative) predicting proportion of behavior recalled (of all behaviors presented in that category), p <.05. Negative events were remembered more than positive events in low care or stranger relationship types, regardless of relevance of the event. Negative events also were significantly remembered more than positive events in high care relationships if the event was irrelevant to how the partner feels about the self. The one exception was that negative events were not remembered more than positive events for high relevant behaviors performed by a partner that one cares for. Discussion / Implications This experiment provides evidence that people have self-protective memory of interpersonal events. Although negative behaviors were remembered more than positive behaviors in all of the other cells, this was not the case with regard to behaviors that are relevant to how a valued partner feels about the self. These results may be due to the fact that people very much want to have partners care for them when they care for those partners. These results may reflect the influence of “wishful thinking” on memory. Apparently, such “wishful thinking” can overcome the typical tendency for people to remember negative information more than positive information. Discussion / Implications This experiment provides evidence that people have self-protective memory of interpersonal events. Although negative behaviors were remembered more than positive behaviors in all of the other cells, this was not the case with regard to behaviors that are relevant to how a valued partner feels about the self. These results may be due to the fact that people very much want to have partners care for them when they care for those partners. These results may reflect the influence of “wishful thinking” on memory. Apparently, such “wishful thinking” can overcome the typical tendency for people to remember negative information more than positive information. References Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5 (4), Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, Lemay, E. P., Jr., Clark, M. S., & Feeney, B. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, Sedikides, C., & Green, J. (2000). On self-protective nature of inconsistency-negativity management: Using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), References Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5 (4), Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, Lemay, E. P., Jr., Clark, M. S., & Feeney, B. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, Sedikides, C., & Green, J. (2000). On self-protective nature of inconsistency-negativity management: Using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), Coding of Behavior Two judges who were unaware of the experimental conditions coded the behaviors using a “gist” criterion (Sedikides & Green, 2000). That is, judges classified a memory as belonging to one of the four cells if the meaning was largely consistent with the original behavior. The two judges exhibited substantial agreement (Cohen’s Kappa =.85), and discussed and resolved their disagreements. Consistent with prior work (Sedikides & Green, 2000), we calculated intrusions as writing the same behavior twice or recalling a behavior that was not presented. Intrusions comprised 2.7% of the recalled behaviors, and they did not significantly vary across experimental conditions, p >.82. We removed intrusions from data analysis. Coding of Behavior Two judges who were unaware of the experimental conditions coded the behaviors using a “gist” criterion (Sedikides & Green, 2000). That is, judges classified a memory as belonging to one of the four cells if the meaning was largely consistent with the original behavior. The two judges exhibited substantial agreement (Cohen’s Kappa =.85), and discussed and resolved their disagreements. Consistent with prior work (Sedikides & Green, 2000), we calculated intrusions as writing the same behavior twice or recalling a behavior that was not presented. Intrusions comprised 2.7% of the recalled behaviors, and they did not significantly vary across experimental conditions, p >.82. We removed intrusions from data analysis.