WAWC´2005 Conceptualization of User-Centric Personalization Management Kari Heikkinen and Riku Suomela Kari Heikkinen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wintouch eCRM A Customer Relationship Management Solution designed specifically for AS/400 or iSeries Users.
Advertisements

Requirements gathering
Corporate Administration Management System CAMS-ITech: Vertical CRM for the Administration/Finance Area CAMS-iTech™ is the technological answer developed.
Chapter Five Users, Groups, Profiles, and Policies.
The design process IACT 403 IACT 931 CSCI 324 Human Computer Interface Lecturer:Gene Awyzio Room:3.117 Phone:
Sagecrm.com/7.2 Introducing Sage CRM 7.2 Mark Green Business Consultant Pinnacle.
Unit 7: Store and Retrieve it Database Management Systems (DBMS)
© 2007, PETER-SERVICE© 2009, PETER-SERVICE Using GUP server to facilitate fast implementation of Value-Added Services Maxim Samsonov Telecom World Russia.
Public Budget As Decision- Making Process  Decision - Making Models:  Incremental Change Model  Satisfying Model  Ideal Rational Model  Stages of.
Human Computer Interaction G52HCI
Inspection Methods. Inspection methods Heuristic evaluation Guidelines review Consistency inspections Standards inspections Features inspection Cognitive.
17:610:551:01 Where Should the Person Stop and the Information Search Interface Start? Marcia Bates Presented by Albena Stoyanova-Tzankova March 2004.
Hands-On Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Administration Chapter 5 Administering File Resources.
LOTUS NOTES 8.5. Ease of Filtering/Message Organization: Sort by Who.
© Lethbridge/Laganière 2001 Chapter 7: Focusing on Users and Their Tasks1 7.1 User Centred Design (UCD) Software development should focus on the needs.
1 Computer Systems & Architecture Lesson 1 1. The Architecture Business Cycle.
Enabling Flexible Integration of Business and Technology Using Service-based Processes Jelena Zdravkovic, University of Gävle/Royal Institute of Technology.
Cloud Usability Framework
User Centered Design Lecture # 5 Gabriel Spitz.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
New “Collaborate” Button Integrate UI directly into the browser. Preferred target: Firefox Easiest browser to extend in terms of UI.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation.
SOA – Development Organization Yogish Pai. 2 IT organization are structured to meet the business needs LOB-IT Aligned to a particular business unit for.
A Survey on Context-Aware Computing Center for E-Business Technology Seoul National University Seoul, Korea 이상근, 이동주, 강승석, Babar Tareen Intelligent Database.
Staff Development and the Change Process
© Grant Thornton | | | | | Guidance on Monitoring Internal Control Systems COSO Monitoring Project Update FEI - CFIT Meeting September 25, 2008.
2. Introduction to the Visual Studio.NET IDE. Chapter Outline Overview of the Visual Studio.NET IDE Overview of the Visual Studio.NET IDE Menu Bar and.
Margherita Forcolin (Insiel S.p.A.) Thessaloniki, 13 October 2011.
1 Integrated Services Program The Virginia Metadata Training Workshop Summer, 2006 Lyle Hornbaker Integrated Services Program
Cohesive Design of Personalized Web Applications Presented by Yinghua Hu Schwabe, D. Mattos Guimaraes, R. Rossi, G. Pontificia Univ. Catolica do Rio de.
Drexel University CS 451 Software Engineering Winter Yuanfang Cai Room 104, University Crossings
The Grid System Design Liu Xiangrui Beijing Institute of Technology.
© 2012 xtUML.org Bill Chown – Mentor Graphics Model Driven Engineering.
SharePoint Portal Server Office XP Launch Tour Breakout Presentation nametitle Microsoft Corporation.
Context Awareness: From Dream to Reality Norman M. Sadeh School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Research Sponsors: DARPA/DAML, IBM, Boeing,
Modeling and Simulation of Cloud Computing:A Review Wei Zhao, Yong Peng, Feng Xie, Zhonghua Dai 報告者 : 饒展榕.
Guide to MCSE , Second Edition, Enhanced1 The Windows XP Security Model User must logon with: Valid user ID Password User receives access token Access.
1 Human Computer Interaction Week 7 Prototyping. 2 Introduction Prototyping is a design technique where users can be involved in testing design ideas.
Designing viable business models for context-aware mobile services. (by Mark de Reuver & Timber Haaker) Presented by: Farhan Ali Khan. To: Prof.Dr.Eduard.
Semantic Gadgets Pervasive Computing Meets the Semantic Web Reza Zakeri Sharif University of Technology.
META-ANALYSIS, RESEARCH SYNTHESES AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
Design and Implementation of a Rationale-Based Analysis Tool (RAT) Diploma thesis from Timo Wolf Design and Realization of a Tool for Linking Source Code.
8 February 2008 DVTk – IHE Actor Simulation Rick Busbridge Agfa Healthcare.
© 2006, National Research Council Canada © 2006, IBM Corporation Solving performance issues in OTS-based systems Erik Putrycz Software Engineering Group.
CPSC 873 John D. McGregor Session 9 Testing Vocabulary.
Use of Agents in ECommerce Product Search/Identification (eg “Eyes” by amazon) Information Brokering Automated Negotiation Web Marketing.
Lecture 13.  Failure mode: when team understands requirements but is unable to meet them.  To ensure that you are building the right system Continually.
The Structure of the User Interface Lecture # 8 1 Gabriel Spitz.
User Modeling and Recommender Systems: Introduction to recommender systems Adolfo Ruiz Calleja 06/09/2014.
A user interface framework for Grid-based computational steering and visualization. Jason Wood*, Mark Riding and Ken Brodlie.
UI's for inputting and presenting the metadata of hypermedia documents Kai Kuikkaniemi HUT T
CPSC 871 John D. McGregor Module 8 Session 1 Testing.
1 CBSE Process: issues and Challenges From CBSE Landscape document chapter From.
User Modeling for the Mars Medical Assistant MCS Project By Mihir Kulkarni.
Introduction Web analysis includes the study of users’ behavior on the web Traffic analysis – Usage analysis Behavior at particular website or across.
Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation. What do we mean by choosing questions? Evaluation questions are the questions your evaluation is meant.
Project Undertaken By, Anita.K Subalakshmi.S Suseela.J.S Guide: Mrs.M.J.Jeyasheela Rakkini AP/CSE Third Review.
Integrated Modeling Environment System Engineering Seminar Johnny Medina / Code 531 Chris Stone / Code 531 / Constellation Software Engineering.
Experiment Support CERN IT Department CH-1211 Geneva 23 Switzerland t DBES Author etc Alarm framework requirements Andrea Sciabà Tony Wildish.
 A life cycle of product development is commonly referred as the “model”  A simple model contains five phases  Requirement analysis  Design  Development.
Some Great Open Source Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs)
John D. McGregor Session 9 Testing Vocabulary
Data and Applications Security Developments and Directions
IBM Tivoli Provisioning Manager 7.1 Initial Discovery and Inventory
MICROSOFT OUTLOOK and Outlook service Provider
Final Presentation Jolie Chen Kristine Delossantos Muel Kiel
John D. McGregor Session 9 Testing Vocabulary
John D. McGregor Session 9 Testing Vocabulary
TestLog.verdict should be extracted into a dedicated ArbitrationResult concept Issue# UMLTP2-22 Related issues # UMLTP2-24 „Explicit arbitration specification.
REAL-TIME, INTERACTIVE DOCUMENT AUTOMATION
Presentation transcript:

WAWC´2005 Conceptualization of User-Centric Personalization Management Kari Heikkinen and Riku Suomela Kari Heikkinen

Objectives to identify both user demand and user requirements for personalization management to apply personal information is both user centric personalization management and personalized service provisioning to build a conceptualization for personalization management to be implemented so that it supports user centricness

What is User Centricity? Trying to Understand the users ! Beginning from finding out the real user demand and user requirements Ending to developing technology in a manner it would serve the individual user in a best manner

Basic UCD Research process Information Gathering Design / Implementation Evaluation Focus Groups Other Information Gathering Conceptualization Prototypes (high + low fidelity) Simulation Iterative Prototype Development Subjective Evaluation

Attribute (Personal Information) Classification User Attribute Contact Information Calendar Information List of Point of Interests Personal Service Information Emergency Data History / Log file Miscellanous Networking Attribute Network Performance Service Execution Device Capabilities Community Attribute Single Community Grouped Community Buddylist Servicelist History / Log file Miscellanous General Attribute Privacy Trust Personalization Customization Security Classification based on FG1

Human Experience People do not want to personalize ? TRUE ! Majority of users use the default choices or change only little i.e. the layout of the web-page Personalization may restrict the extent and the variety of information we receive TRUE ! Indeed only getting certain kind of information could limit i.e. the decision-making and biased behaviour People do not have well-defined preferences TRUE ! In reality the choice of the user might be highly context or situation dependent and thus against any profile

People might be reluctant to give information about them TRUE ! Privacy concerns are very high. On the other hand in some cases personal information is easily handed over. Personalization is a black box solution to the users and the users do not usually know all details of the personalization and this could lead to the distrust of technology TRUE ! The users wants to control own information and by doing so can trust the system more Human Experience

What is Personalization Management? Personalization can be seen as a toolbox (or capability) that contains a set of technologies that enable the meeting of personal needs, requirements, preferences etc. of an individual user Personalization can be divided into explicit and implicit personalization –implicit personalization is guided/managed solely by the personalization system (server) –explicit personalization is user-defined and managed by the user (or system, or device)

What is Personalization Management? Personalization Management is often associated to an implicit system that guides, controls and maintains the whole personalization process In this thesis the notion ’personalization management’ is extended to explicit personalization in a manner the user can also guide, control and maintain the process

Conceptualization of Personalization Management User Interfaces Attribute Management Service Discovery Attribute Exchange Management Messages Personalization Reference Point PIMS MA MPs PALPAL Lectio Praecursoria

Conceptualization of Personalization Management INSIDE PFU User Profile Service Profile Situated User Profile Personalization Manager Context Manager Local Activity Environment Data System Messages (MFU, NFU) Intelligence

UI Prototype examples Form UI (main) Canvas UI (main) Form UI (customization) Form UI (search of a product based on a criteria) Form UI (function menu of a person service)

Conclusions An User-Centric Approach to Personalization Management and Service Provisioning –enables user-driven management of personal information –applies both explicit and implicit personalization –integrates contextual and situation-dependant information to personal information management and service provisioning Is a complete personalization scheme, built on user demand and on user requirements, taking account also the different parameters of network performance Provides a basis for faster adoption of personalization technologies and new services