CSC Digi/RecHit Validation Calibrations & Crosstalk.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
Advertisements

Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
November 3rd, 2006 CALICE-UK, Manchester - A.-M. Magnan - 1 Noise studies DESY + CERN TB overview Anne-Marie Magnan Imperial College London.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
ECAL and HCAL Simulation Status Rick Wilkinson Fabio Cossutti.
US Beam Test Results and ORCA validation for CMS EMU CSC front-end electronics N. Terentiev Carnegie Mellon University CMS EMU Meeting, CERN June 18, 2005.
HO SiPM Simulation Rick Wilkinson, Jake Anderson 1.
CSC Simulated Charge Tim Cox, Jay Hauser, Greg Rakness, Rick Wilkinson CSC Charge Simulation1.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
GLAST LAT Project I&T Meeting – Jan 20,2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EM1 Data Analysis and Calibration Summary Report Eduardo.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
Rick Wilkinson New CSC Geometry u GEANT Simulation uses DDD Geometry è Uses active gas volumes u Digitization/Reconstruction adds a C++ geometry è Adds.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
ECAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson May 25, ECAL Digitization CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) EcalElectronicsSim EBDataFrame EEDataFrame.
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting The Ohio State University April 16 – 17, 2004.
CSC Digitization Rick Wilkinson 1. CSC design and readout Large chambers Wires groups:5 cm wide Cathode strips: 8-16 mm wide 3.3 m wire-group hits every.
ECAL Digitization in CMSSW: Philosophy  Try to reuse code as much as possible between systems  ECAL, HCAL, Preshower? CASTOR?  Keep things as simple.
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. Program Flow CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) HcalElectronicsSim HBHEDataFrame (or HF, or HO) SimHits DetId= ,
HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson 1. CMSSW HCAL Simulation Three gains are used as input –Calibration (GeV/fC) From DB gain, by channel –Electronics (fC/photoelectron)
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting The Ohio State University April 16 – 17, 2004.
Angular orientation reconstruction of the Hall sensor calibration setup By Zdenko van Kesteren Supervisor: prof. dr. Frank Linde.
1 COROT: Scientific comity Sept Calibrations during the commissioning and before the first run. Calibrations cover closed Calibrations cover open.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
By Grégory Brillant Background calibration techniques for multistage pipelined ADCs with digital redundancy.
1 SSD status report – 16 July 2004 Jerome Baudot, Strasbourg STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL, 16 July 2004 Silicon Strip Detector status report  Report.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
MPPC Measurements at LSU Brandon Hartfiel LSU Hardware Group Thomas Kutter, Jessica Brinson, Jason Goon, Jinmeng Liu, Jaroslaw Nowak Sam Reid January 2009.
Simonetta Gentile, LCWS10, March 2010, Beijing,China. G-APD Photon detection efficiency Simonetta Gentile 1 F.Meddi 1 E.Kuznetsova 2 [1]Università.
G4 Validation meeting (5/11/2003) S.VIRET LPSC Grenoble Photon testbeam Data/G4 comparison  Motivation  Testbeam setup & simulation  Analysis & results.
3rd December 2003James Loken – Oxford University1 SCT X-ray Alignment Software A First Update.
SIAM M. Despeisse / 29 th January Toward a Gigatracker Front-end - Performance of the NINO LCO and HCO Matthieu Despeisse F. Osmic, S. Tiuraniemi,
Forward Pixel Beamtest Analysis Carsten Rott Purdue University Januar 24, 2001.
Michele de Gruttola 2008 Report: Online to Offline tool for non event data data transferring using database.
Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here.
3-Stage Low Noise Amplifier Design at 12Ghz
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
Experimental Methods for Determining Photodetector Working Points By: Victor Rykalin Mike Smith Jim Maloney.
4 Jun 2008Paul Dauncey1 Crosstalk and laser results Paul Dauncey, Anne-Marie Magnan, Matt Noy.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting– Feb 28, 2006 Tsunefumi Mizuno TowerTrend_ ppt 1 Tracker Parameters Trending Monitor GLAST I and.
Chaouki Boulahouache 01/20, 2010 Slide 1 Static Vs. Dynamic Pedestals Chaouki Boulahouache Rice University DPG Meeting  What are the effects of the static.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
December, Calibration of electromagnetic calorimeter of Hall A DVCS experiment Eric FUCHEY Ph.D Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire.
SiW ECAL Marcel Reinhard LLR – École polytechnique LCWS ‘08, Chicago.
BMN Run owerview D.Vishnevskiy Mar23,2015. Run summary information NameFromToRuns Run1Feb 22Feb Run2Mar 5Mar Run3Mar 11Mar
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.
Analysis for Soft-Spectrum Sources Gary Walker Los Alamos National Laboratory.
1 HcalAlCaRecoProducers : Producer for HO calibration Outer hadron calorimeter is expected to improve jet energy resolution Due to different sampling/passive.
1 First look on the experimental threshold effects Straw WG meeting Dmitry Madigozhin, JINR.
Comparison of algorithms for hit reconstruction in the DTs: Test of calibration procedures for t trig and drift velocity on Test Beam data Test of calibration.
gamma ray polarisation measurement
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
Online Monitoring : Detector and Performance check
Future Physics at HERMES
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Muon DPG 2012 Camilo Carrillo (INFN Napoli) Tim Cox (UC Davis)
CSC Digi & RecHit Validation
Alon Attal Martin von der Mey Jay Hauser Mike Lindgren
The Ohio State University CSC Detector Performance Group
CSC Simulation Status Trigger very sensitive to wire timing!
FFT analysis Goal : Energy calibration ( systematic error estimation)
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
USING CALIBRATIONS IN CSC SIMULATION
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
CAL crosstalk issues and their implications
Presentation transcript:

CSC Digi/RecHit Validation Calibrations & Crosstalk

Rick Wilkinson Effects Fetched From Calibrations u Gains u Pedestal u Pedestal Width u Correlated Noise u Crosstalk

Rick Wilkinson Crosstalk CSC strips have capacitance Crosstalk behaves like a differentiator circuit u 5-10% effect u proportional to slope

Rick Wilkinson RecHit r-  Resolution RMS resolution, in  m u CSCRecHit : doesn’t use calibrations u CSCRecHitB: uses calibrations Crosstalk can double or triple resolution u Even though it’s a 5-10% effect! u Pulls the fit towards the second-highest strip ME1/1ME1/2ME1/3ME2/1ME2/2ME3/1ME3/2ME4/1CSCRecHit Sim w/ DB CSCRecHitB CSCRecHit Sim no DB CSCRecHitB CSCRecHit no DB, xtalk

Rick Wilkinson Conclusions u Validation done for Digis & RecHits under 140 and 150pre3, with and without calibrations database u Crosstalk has a surprisingly big effect on resolution è Even though it’s not a random effect! u Need to study è How to simulate it è How accurate and stable calibrations are è How to best correct for it in reconstruction