NATO-CCMS, 128 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Control of landfill leachates contaminated groundwater by a MULTIBARRIER approach L. Diels, J. Dries, L. Bastiaens.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 20 – Organic Pollutants
Advertisements

Redox Tech, LLC Fundamentals of In-Situ Remediation
NATO-CCMS, IMS-Antwerp-TG, 1Ottawa, October 11, 2014 confidential – © 2005, VITO NV – all rights reserved WELCOME: Integrated Management System for Antwerp.
Greenwich Peninsula.
LEACHATE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT
TRP Chapter Chapter 6.3 Biological treatment.
Herwig Goldemund, Ph.D. Geosyntec Consultants Atlanta Regional Office
Web-based Class Project on Geoenvironmental Remediation Report prepared as part of course CEE 549: Geoenvironmental Engineering Winter 2013 Semester Instructor:
BIOREMEDIATION Jiří Mikeš.
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
Treatment of Arsenic in Groundwater EAST HELENA D.W.A.S.W.Daladawatta Dawoud.
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
NATO-CCMS, MULTIBARRIER, 1Ottawa, May 5, 2015 confidential – © 2005, VITO NV – all rights reserved Update on MULTIBARRIER wall for acid mine drainage at.
Environmental Geosciences Human Interactions with the Environment Andrea Koschinsky Organics.
Environmental Geotechnology Presentation Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida.
Pump and Treat Permeable Reactive Barrier Former Intersil, Inc. Site Sunnyvale, California Presented by Daniel Cheung.
Biodegradation of btex
Contaminant Fate and Transport Processes Philip B. Bedient Environmental Science and Engineering Rice University, Houston, TX.
Contaminated Landfill Area - Norman Landfill in U.S. Yolanda Ho Chung Yin Ryan Wong Cheuk Pong.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Permeable Reactive Barriers for Inorganic Contaminants and Treatment of Acid Rock Drainage USEPA Scientist - to - Scientist Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada June.
1 Kent S. Sorenson, Jr. Ryan A. Wymore Enhanced Bioremediation for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent Residual Source Areas – Case Study and Implications.
4A10 Construction Research & Innovation BioGeoChemistry Professor Mark Dyer TrinityHaus.
Fate and Transport of Chemicals A Presentation by Terrie Boguski Technical Outreach Services for Communities (TOSC) Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Hazardous.
Jae K. (Jim) Park Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison 1.
Solution Provider bij bodemsanering Leading in soil and groundwater remediation Solution Provider for soil & groundwater remediation Leading in soil and.
New Nuclear Power and Climate Change: Issues and Opportunities Student Presentation Ashish K Sahu and Sarina J. Ergas University of Massachusetts - Amherst.
4A10 Construction Research & Innovation BioGeoChemistry Professor Mark Dyer TrinityHaus.
BIOCYANIDE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Activity III ; Project 5.
Formation and Treatment
Reductive Bio-Modification of Sediment Contaminants: An In Situ, Molecular Hydrogen Formation Approach. NATO/CCMS Pilot Study Prevention and Remediation.
Biodegradation of MTBE and BTEX in a Full-Scale Reactor down to ppb Levels after Inoculation with a MTBE Degrading Culture Erik Arvin, DTU Environment.
NATO-CCMS, Belgium, 1Ottawa, October 10, 2015 confidential – © 2005, VITO NV – all rights reserved Tour de table Belgium: state of the art of soil remediation.
1 Rapid & Complete In Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents Using Enhanced Anaerobic Dechlorination (EAD)
Ministry of Environment and Energy Danish EPA Ad Hoc International Working Group on Contaminated Land ”Natural attenuation in Denmark” by Kim Dahlstrøm,
Bioremediation-From the Lab to the Field
Bioremediation (Biological Remediation Technologies) Overview and Principles Bioremediation Technologies Ex Situ Biopiles Landfarming Bioslurry Reactors.
Bioremediation Definition: Use of living organisms to transform, destroy or immobilize contaminants Goal: Detoxification of the parent compound(s) and.
1 Groundwater Pollution Using the characteristics of living things as tools for environmental improvement - exercises & case studies.
Evaluation of Intrinsic Biodegradation and Amendments to Support Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery of Sediments Tom Krug and David Himmelheber, Geosyntec.
Groundwater Pollution
Two Union Square Union Street, Suite 601 Seattle, WA (206) Field testing and modeling of in situ groundwater.
TCE and 1,2-DCE Biotransformation Inside a Biologically Active Zone Anthony W. Holder, Philip B. Bedient, and Joseph B. Hughes Environmental Science and.
August 27, 2008 Treatment of Heavy Metals and Elimination of Sulfur with a Novel Sulfate Reducing Permeable Reactive Barrier Containing ZVI Dr. Jim Field.
Donald Pope| IPEC 2015 Conference
Bioremediation and Bionanotechnology
DeNovo Constructors, Inc.
By: Pimluck Kijjanapanich. I Introduction O Objectives S Scope of Study L Literature Review マスタ タイトルの書式設定 M Methodology マスタ タイトルの書式設定 R1R1 Results and.
Bioremediation and Bionanotechnology Part 2 Dr Russell Thomas, Parsons Brinckerhoff 19 th May 2010.
Biological Treatment of Residual DNAPL
Cost-Effective Bioremediation of Perchlorate in Soil & Groundwater Soil & Groundwater Evan Cox - GeoSyntec Consultants Elizabeth Edwards - University of.
In Situ Perchlorate Bioremediation for Soil and Groundwater Dan Cowan 5th Annual Joint Services Pollution Prevention and Hazardous Waste Management Conference.
VERSITy 16. OCTOBER 2012 UNI PEDER MARIBO GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION AND TREATMENT.
B1 Fe(0) and Coke as “Active” Cap Media for PCB Destruction/Sequestration Gregory V. Lowry Kathleen M. Johnson Paul J. Murphy Meghan L. Smith EPA-TIO Anacostia.
Welcome to ITRC’s Internet-based Training Program
Bedrock Aquifer Workshop Providence, RI November 2000 John E. Vidumsky, P.E. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group.
Microbial Anoxic Oxidation of Arsenite Lily Milner Chemical and Environmental Engineering, The University of Arizona 4/19/08 Acknowledgements: Dr. Reyes.
Groundwater Polllution GW 15 Biodegradation Bioremediation 1.
INTEGRATED SITE REMEDIATION Targeting Contaminants in Soil, Groundwater, and Vapor.
Groundwater Pollution
Benefits of Laboratory Treatability Studies in Support of Full-Scale Design for In Situ Remedies Michaye McMaster Geosyntec Consultants Sandra Dworatzek.
Use of a Vadose Zone Biobarrier for Removal of Nitrate from Percolating Groundwater Jim Hunter, USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, Colorado
Chapter 20 – Organic Pollutants
Limits to Petroleum Degradation
BIOREMEDIATION Of HEAVY METALS (Copper; Cu)
Nenad Marić, Zoran Nikić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry
Vít Matějů, Robin Kyclt, Alena Polenková* ENVISAN-GEM, a.s.
Environmental Biotechnology
Department of Environmental Technology
Web-based Class Project on Geoenvironmental Remediation
Presentation transcript:

NATO-CCMS, 128 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Control of landfill leachates contaminated groundwater by a MULTIBARRIER approach L. Diels, J. Dries, L. Bastiaens Flemish institute for technological research, Vito Mol, Belgium NATO-CCMS Pilot Study Prevention and Remediation in Selected Industrial Sectors: Rehabilitation of old landfills Cardiff, May 23 – 26, 2004 No measures

NATO-CCMS, 228 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Landfill leakage: Multifunctional treatment zone or Multibarrier for removal of mixed pollutants Evaluation of several combinations –Chemical transformation (Fe°), –Biotransformation (aerobic/anaerobic), –Bioprecipitation –Sorption Two solutions: -Installation of a new landfill (20 – 40 million EURO) -Installation of a MULTIBARRIER (2 - 4 million EURO) Groundwater flow GW level

NATO-CCMS, 328 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 EU-project MULTIBARRIER PARTNERS: Vito, Mol University of Wageningen University of Innsbruck TUniversity of Munchen IBA, Heiligenstadt BIOTECs, Berlin University of Prague DEC, Zwijndrecht University of Latvia, Riga Univesity of Mining, Sofia, Bulgaria ENDORSERS: Montgomery Watson Harza, Brussels Intercommunale Hooge Maey, Antwerp Microorganisms bacteria, fungi Carrier material Fe 0, Carbon, Sand Growth additives Nutrients, ORC, compost Mixed pollution heavy metals VOCls aromatics

NATO-CCMS, 428 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Mixed contamination plumes Mixed contamination plumes require: –a combination of different pollutant removal processes (biotic & physico-chemical) –a combination of barrier types = MULTIBARRIER Design and optimisation of multibarriers is more complex than single- barriers –Concept: sequential or mixed multibarrier? –Effect of the pollutants on the removal process (inhibition, stimulation or no effect)? –Effect of one pollutant removal process on an other one?

NATO-CCMS, 528 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 MULTIBARRIER Key-components Groundwater: 0.5 mM NaHCO mM KHCO mM CaCl 2.2H 2 O 0.5 mM MgCl 2.6H 2 O + growth supporting additives (Nutrients, O 2, compost,..) Carrier materials: Filter sand (1-2 mm) Zerovalent iron FeA4 (0.3-2 mm) Activated carbon GAC F400 GAC Ind. React. (landfills) (Aquifer material) Metasorb Zeolites Wood chips Mixed pollution: VOCls:2 mg/l PCE 5 mg/l TCE Metals:5 mg/l Zn as ZnCl mg/l As(V) as Na 2 HAsO 4 BTEX:2 mg/l benzene 2 mg/l toluene 2 mg/l m-xylene Extra: AOX (LFU) DCM, 11 DCA (UW) Ni, Cr (Vito) o-xylene, p-xylene, Ethylbenzene (Vito) Micro-organisms: Aquifer material Enrichment cultures Axenic strains

NATO-CCMS, 628 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Filtersand Specific surface [m 2 /g] (measured) Filtersand Everzit Metasorb GAC F400 Zerovalent Iron 1,9 294,1 3,0 764,4 1,0 Everzit Metasorb GAC F400 magnitude: 500x Zero Valent Iron Filtersand MULTIBARRIER materials + Aquifer as source of micro-organisms

NATO-CCMS, 728 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Different multibarrier concepts: Concept = Site specific and depending on the pollutants present Sorption barrier = polishing step Design of multibarriers SorptionBiodegradation Reduction - Fe 0 Mixed pollution g Sorption Biodegradation Reduction - Fe 0... Mixed multibarrier

NATO-CCMS, 828 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 MULTIBARRIER concepts: Sequential vs mixed BIO Fe 0 Bio/Fe 0

NATO-CCMS, 928 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 System A (O 2 ) & System B (NO 3 ) Bio columns Iron columns Influent PCETCE Mixing vessel N2N2 B T m-X Aerobic/anoxic medium A B C 2134

NATO-CCMS, 1028 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Benzene removal in a denitrifying sequential system PCE+TCE metals BTX 1,2-cisDCE BTX NO 3 - (1 mM) BIO Fe 0

NATO-CCMS, 1128 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Systems D & E: Strictly anaerobic systems 1234 Bio + Fe SR: 0.5 mM SO 4 2- IR: 2.5 mM Fe(III)EDTA

NATO-CCMS, 1228 juni 2015, Cardiff Bio + Fe System D: PCE & TCE degradation (SR columns)  initial sorption  incomplete PCE degradation  complete TCE degradation

NATO-CCMS, 1328 juni 2015, Cardiff Bio + Fe System D & E: Benzene removal  SR: no degradation  IR: - all MB - not in C2aq SR IR

NATO-CCMS, 1428 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 System C: Partially mixed MB system Columns (L = 50 cm) K1: test column K2: abiotic control Layers: L1: FS/Aq/Fe0 = 60/20/20 (W) L2:FS/Aq = 78/22 (W) Monitoring: chemical analyses microbial ecology

NATO-CCMS, 1528 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Partially mixed MULTIBARRIER: results

NATO-CCMS, 1628 juni 2015, Cardiff % 50% 10% 0% System 1-5: Results DCM &11DCA No and 50% (2 nd ) No 50% No >50% Complete No Fe(0) redox conditioning electron donor

NATO-CCMS, 1728 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Results (% removal) Column trains Characteristics (TEA)Acro-nymPCETCEBenzeneToluenem-xylene System A: Zerovalent iron wall followed by a micro-aerobic biobarrier 1 A11 – Fe(0)columnA NA 2 – Bio column (O 2 )A > 90 System B: Zerovalent iron wall followed by a denitrifying biobarrier 1 B11 – Fe(0)columnB NA 2 – Bio column (NO 3 - )B > 90 System C: Partially mixed Fe(0)/biowall followed by anaerobic biowall 2, 1 C11 – mixed zoneC – bio zoneC System D: sequential and mixed barriers under sulfate reducing conditions 1 D11 – Bio column (SO 4 2- )D NA D21 – Fe(0)columnD NA 2 – Bio column (SO 4 2- )D < 25 D41 – Mixed column (SO 4 2- )D > 90 System E: sequential and mixed barriers under iron reducing conditions 1 E11 – bio column (Fe 3+ )E NA E21 – Fe(0)columnE NA 2 – Bio column (Fe 3+ )E > 90 E41 – Mixed column (Fe 3+ )E > 90

NATO-CCMS, 1828 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Conclusions Mixed contamination plumes are omnipresent. Remediation of mixed contamination plumes using barriers  MULTIBARRIERs are required Fungi do not play a big role in a Multibarrier In lab-scale columns different Multibarrier-concepts have been shown to be effective for the remediation of a mixed plume (PCE, TCE, BTmX, Zn, As). Behaviour of AOX in a Multibarrier is under study No toxicity detected in effluent (toxicity reduction) The design and optimisation of multibarriers is more complex in comparison with ‘single barriers’  Many influencing parameters have to be taken into account  Mixed Multibarrier under iron or sulfate reducing conditions

NATO-CCMS, 1928 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Sequential Multibarrier: ZVI + Micro-aerofilic biobarrier –PCE, TCE dehalogenation in ZVI –Zn, As removal in ZVI –BTX degradation in biobarrier –No degradation of cDCE Sequential Multibarrier: ZVI + Anaerobic biobarrier (denitrifying) –PCE, TCE dehalogenation in ZVI –Zn, As removal in ZVI –T, X degradation in biobarrier –B partially degraded in biobarrier –No degradation of cDCE Mixed Multibarrier: filtersand, aquifer materiaal, ZVI + Anaerobic biobarrier in aquifer –PCE, TCE dehalogenation –Zn, As removal in ZVI –BTX degradation in mixed zone –No formation of cDCE or VC Conclusions

NATO-CCMS, 2028 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Upscaling promising multibarrier concept Aquifer Reactive materials Groundwater Closed system Pollutant-mixing& monitoring unitPosttreatment A: coarse zone (25 cm) B: Aquifer material C: mixed Bio/Fe 0 barrier : FeA4/Aq/HM = 30/60/10 D: Biobarrier Aq/ HM (90/10) E: Biobarrier Aq E: coarse zone (25 cm) F: Sorption barrier 0.5 m 1 m 3 m BIO Fe 0 / BIO PCE, TCE, Zn, As, BTEX Polishing BTEX? A B C D E F G

NATO-CCMS, 2128 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Set-up of MB on pilot scale

NATO-CCMS, 2228 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004

NATO-CCMS, 2328 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 MULTIBARRIER Monitoring System (MMS) On-line measuring and logging system pH, T, ORP, conductivity, O 2 and pressure : –Tested in the pilot system –Focus on EC-measurement in-well mixing system has been tested: –Works very well

NATO-CCMS, 2428 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Pilot MULTIBARRIER system: First experiment Monitoring strategy: cm bgs cm bgs cm bgs cm bgs cm bgs EC-measurements Stirred electrode set Non-stirred electrode set

NATO-CCMS, 2528 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Monitoring of PRBs A B B B C C C D E E E F G G Plume Gravel Reactive material Monitoring well 100 m - UK guidelines - US EPA guidelines - Flanders (OVAM) guidelines - Germany (in preparation?)

NATO-CCMS, 2628 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 In situ mesocosm-systems Monitoring of microbiology (molecular biology)

NATO-CCMS, 2728 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 WP3: HM + Mesocosms container

NATO-CCMS, 2828 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 MULTIBARRIER Modelling System: salt injection

NATO-CCMS, 2928 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Modelled salt-peaks Permeability: m/dag Dispersivity: 0.3 m Monitoring wells: filter 100 cm bgs, Result: migration of pollutant initally faster, afterwards slower in comparsion with measured values Time (days) Conc %

NATO-CCMS, 3028 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Pilot scale Multibarrier: Curilo deposit

NATO-CCMS, 3128 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Installation at Curilo deposit

NATO-CCMS, 3228 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Curilo deposit: constructed wetland + Multibarrier

NATO-CCMS, 3328 juni 2015, Cardiff 2004 Thanks to all the partners and the European Commission QLK3-CT QLRT