1 The OBO Relation Ontology Genome Biology 2005, 6:R46 based on the fundamental distinction between instances and universals takes instances and time into.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relations in Anatomy and Image Ontologies Dirk Marwede Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science, Saarland University, Saarbruecken,
Advertisements

Anatomical boundaries and immaterial objects Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany)
Representing Part Relationships Between Developing Structures.
Lymphatic System ) 1.The lymphatic system has three main functions –Returns excess tissue fluid ( lymphocytes) to the blood –Absorbs fats and fat-soluble.
Earth to Major Tom Barry Smith
1 ANATOMY AND TIME Barry Smith. 2 SNAP AND SPAN 3 To understand relations between universals Reference to times and instances are important A derives.
The Relation Ontology Barry Smith 1. Concepts, Types and Frames ConceptsFrames Types Relational Structures 2.
Ontology and the Future of Biomedical Research Barry Smith
1 An Ontology of Relations for Biomedical Informatics Barry Smith 10 January 2005.
The Role of Foundational Relations in the Alignment of Biomedical Ontologies Barry Smith and Cornelius Rosse.
1 Beyond Concepts Barry Smith
1 Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith. 2 Main obstacle to integrating genetic and EHR data No facility for dealing with time and instances (particulars)
The Meaning of Part (Discussion) Anand Kumar MBBS, PhD IFOMIS, Department of Medicine, Univ. of Saarland, Germany. BIOMEDICALONTOLOGYBIOMEDICALONTOLOGY.
1 Logical Tools and Theories in Contemporary Bioinformatics Barry Smith
AN INTRODUCTION TO BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGY Barry Smith University at Buffalo 1.
Phenotype annotation using ontologies Chris Mungall (+ BS) Berkeley Bioinformatics and Ontologies Project (BBOP) National Center for Biomedical Ontology.
Tutorial on Ontology Design Barry Smith and Werner Ceusters.
1 Ontologies in Biomedicine: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly Barry Smith
1 A General Introduction to Biomedical Ontology Barry Smith
Anatomical Information Science Barry Smith
1 Part II. The Ontology of Biomedical Reality Some Terminological Proposals.
1 What an Ontology is For Barry Smith University at Buffalo Common Anatomy Reference Ontology Workshop.
A Formal Theory for Spatial Representation and Reasoning in Biomedical Ontologies Maureen Donnelly Thomas Bittner.
From Knowledge Representation to Reality Representation Barry Smith.
1 The Future of Clinical Bioinformatics: Overcoming Obstacles to Information Integration Barry Smith Brussells, Eurorec Ontology Workshop, 25 November.
Cell Reproduction.
REPRODUCTION IN LIVING THINGS The reproduction is the ability of living things to give rise to other similar.
Semantic Relations in the Environmental Domain Gerhard Budin.
Switch on Webex.
Standardization of Anatomy Parts and Wholes – From Function to Location Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany)
ON REASONING WITH IMAGES: THE USE OF IMAGES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH Thomas Bittner Louis Goldberg University at Buffalo.
1 Principles of (Biomedical) Ontology Design Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center for Biomedical Ontology (
Why we need the OBO Core Michael Ashburner, Suzanna Lewis and Barry Smith.
Introduction to Anatomy & Physiology. ANATOMY THE STUDY OF THE FORM & STRUCTURE OF THE HUMAN BODY THE STUDY OF THE FORM & STRUCTURE OF THE HUMAN BODY.
Core 6 (University at Buffalo) Dissemination of Ontology Best Practices Barry Smith (PI) Fabian Neuhaus (Post-Doc) Werner.
+ CARO 2.0 & FUNCARO David Osumi-Sutherland. + Review of CARO (v1) Many definitions are complicated and opaque: ‘anatomical group: “[An] anatomical structure.
The ‘regulates’ relationships Chris, David, Tanya.
Ontological Foundations of Biological Continuants Stefan Schulz, Udo Hahn Text Knowledge Engineering Lab University of Jena (Germany) Department of Medical.
Proposed formal definition of a stage A part of the lifetime event of an entity –Lifetime event of a cell (e.g. cell cycle) –Lifetime event of an organism.
How to Distinguish Parthood from Location in Bio-Ontologies Stefan Schulz a,b, Philipp Daumke a, Barry Smith c,d, Udo Hahn e a Department of Medical Informatics,
Meiosis 5.3. I. Cell Division Replaces worn out or damaged cells Replaces worn out or damaged cells Frequency of division varies by cell type Frequency.
1 How to Build an Ontology Barry Smith
Switch on Webex. Examples of new ontologies using BFO Actionable Intelligence Retrieval System (AIRS) US Transcom (Transportation Command) Enterprise.
What is an Ontology? A representation of knowledge in a domain In theory Thomas Gruber (1993) “An ontology is a formal, explicit specification of a shared.
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith 1.
+ From OBO to OWL and back again – a tutorial David Osumi-Sutherland, Virtual Fly Brain/FlyBase Chris Mungall – GO/LBL.
1 How to build an ontology Barry Smith
1 The OBO Relation Ontology: Preliminaries Barry Smith
1 The Logic of Biological Classification Barry Smith
Upper Ontology Summit The BFO perspective Barry Smith Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo National Center for Ontological Research National.
Ifomis.org 1 Ontology and Its Applications II Barry Smith
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences R T U New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences R T U.
Ontology III Cristian Cocos (CLIStFX). Recap What Why (interoperability, “Tower of Babel,” the problem of “human idiosyncrasy”) Upper-Level Ontology,
New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences R T U Discovery Seminar /UE 141 MMM – Spring 2008 Solving Crimes using Referent.
1 The Future of (Biomedical) Ontology: Overcoming Obstacles to Information Integration Barry Smith (IFOMIS) Manchester
1 Standards and Ontology Barry Smith
What is an ontology and Why should you care?
Intro to Anatomy – Lesson 3
Chapter 20 What is a human? Page 622.
Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith.
BIOLOGY Unit 7 Notes: Living Organization
Status Report from Relations Branch
Status Report from Relations Branch
Ontology in 15 Minutes Barry Smith.
Process: a raised area or projection
Standardization of Anatomy Parts and Wholes – From Function to Location Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany)
Standardization of Anatomy Parts and Wholes – From Function to Location Stefan Schulz Department of Medical Informatics University Hospital Freiburg (Germany)
Grade 8 Science “Cells, Tissues, Organs & Systems”
Multi-celled organisms only
Body Systems Text Lectures 6 lecture course: saeed alhussani.
Presentation transcript:

1 The OBO Relation Ontology Genome Biology 2005, 6:R46 based on the fundamental distinction between instances and universals takes instances and time into account

2 A515287DC3300 Dust Collector Fan B521683Gilmer Belt C521682Motor Drive Belt Catalog vs. inventory

3 Part_of as a relation between universals is more problematic than is standardly supposed heart part_of human being ? human heart part_of human being ? human being has_part human testis ? testis part_of human being ?

4 two kinds of parthood 1.between instances: Mary’s heart part_of Mary this nucleus part_of this cell 2.between universals human heart part_of human cell nucleus part_of cell

5 Definition of part_of as a relation between universals A part_of B =Def. all instances of A are instance-level parts of some instance of B human testis part_of adult human being but not adult human being has_part human testis

6 Continuants (aka endurants) have continuous existence in time preserve their identity through change exist in toto whenever they exist at all Occurrents (aka processes) have temporal parts unfold themselves in successive phases exist only in their phases Fundamental Dichotomy

7 part_of for processes A part_of B =def. For all x, if x instance_of A then there is some y, y instance_of B and x part_of y where ‘part_of’ is the instance-level part relation EVERY A IS PART OF SOME B

8 part_of for continuants A part_of B =def. For all x, t if x instance_of A at t then there is some y, y instance_of B at t and x part_of y at t where ‘part_of’ is the instance-level part relation ALL-SOME STRUCTURE

9 is_a (for processes) A is_a B =def For all x, if x instance_of A then x instance_of B cell division is_a biological process

10 is_a (for continuants) A is_a B =def For all x, t if x instance_of A at t then x instance_of B at t abnormal cell is_a cell adult human is_a human but not: adult is_a child

11 These definitions make reasoning possible Whichever A you choose, the instance of B of which it is a part will be included in some C, which will include as part also the A with which you began The same principle applies to the other relations in the OBO-RO: located_at, transformation_of, derived_from, adjacent_to, etc.

12 A part_of B, B part_of C... The all-some structure of the definitions in the OBO-RO allows cascading of inferences (i) within ontologies (ii) between ontologies (iii) between ontologies and EHR repositories of instance-data

13 OBO Relation Ontology Foundationalis_a part_of Spatiallocated_in contained_in adjacent_to Temporaltransformation_of derives_from preceded_by Participationhas_participant has_agent

Fiat and bona fide boundaries

Continuity Attachment Adjacency Containment

16 Containment involves relation to a hole or cavity 1: cavity 2: tunnel, conduit (artery) 3: mouth; a snail’s shell

17 Fiat vs. Bona Fide Boundaries fiat boundary physical boundary

18 Connection The body is a highly connected entity. Exceptions: cells floating free in blood.

19 Modes of Connection Modes of connection: attached_to (muscle to bone) synapsed_with (nerve to nerve, nerve to muscle) continuous_with (= share a fiat boundary)

20 head of condyle neck of condyle fossa fiat boundary the temporomandibular joint

21 a continuous_with b = a and b are continuant instances which share a fiat boundary This relation is always symmetric: if x continuous_with y, then y continuous_with x

22 continuous_with (relation between types) A continuous_with B =Def. for all x, if x instance-of A then there is some y such that y instance_of B and x continuous_with y

23 continuous_with is not always symmetric Consider lymph node and lymphatic vessel: Each lymph node is continuous with some lymphatic vessel, but there are lymphatic vessels (e.g. lymphs and lymphatic trunks) which are not continuous with any lymph nodes

24 Adjacent_to as a relation between types is not symmetric Consider seminal vesicle adjacent_to urinary bladder Not: urinary bladder adjacent_to seminal vesicle

25 instance level this nucleus is adjacent to this cytoplasm implies: this cytoplasm is adjacent to this nucleus type level nucleus adjacent_to cytoplasm Not: cytoplasm adjacent_to nucleus

26 Applications Expectations of symmetry e.g. for protein- protein interactions may hold only at the instance level if A interacts with B, it does not follow that B interacts with A if A is expressed simultaneously with B, it does not follow that B is expressed simultaneously with A

c at t 1 C c at t C 1 time same instance transformation_of pre-RNAmature RNA adultchild

28 transformation_of A transformation_of B =Def. Every instance of A was at some earlier time an instance of B adult transformation_of child

C c at t c at t 1 C 1 tumor development

C c at t C 1 c 1 at t 1 C' c' at t time instances zygote derives_from ovum sperm derives_from

two continuants fuse to form a new continuant C c at t C 1 c 1 at t 1 C' c' at t fusion

one initial continuant is replaced by two successor continuants C c at t C 1 c 1 at t 1 C 2 c 1 at t 1 fission

one continuant detaches itself from an initial continuant, which itself continues to exist C c at t c at t 1 C 1 c 1 at t budding

one continuant absorbs a second continuant while itself continuing to exist C c at t c at t 1 C' c' at t capture

35 To be added to the Relation Ontology lacks (between an instance and a type, e.g. this fly lacks wings) dependent_on (between a dependent entity and its carrier or bearer) quality_of (between a dependent and an independent continuant) functioning_of (between a process and an independent continuant)

36 instance to universal: lacks continuant to continuant: connected_to function to process: realized_by process to function: functioning_of function to continuant: function_of continuant to function: has_function quality to continuant: inheres_in (aka has_bearer) continuant to quality: has_quality ? interacts_with,...