_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca 905.525.9140 x23318.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systematic Approach
Advertisements

AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Evaluating Websites. Why is it so important to evaluate websites ? Think about these differences… Print Books or Magazine Articles  Checked for accuracy.
By amy woodworth With adaptations from erin Herberg’s “Evaluating web sites by type” Evaluating Web Sources.
SOURCES finding & evaluating them. Evaluating the AUTHORITY of a source – what questions should we ask? Is the author or organization identified? What.
Chapter 4 Research UP B Class.
_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318.
Websites vs. Databases Glenforest Secondary School Library Resource Centre Primary Source: M. Rosettis, St. Augustine.
LEDDY LIBRARY Managing Employees Help Is Always Available! You can , phone, or just drop by and see me: Katharine Ball Business Librarian.
Evaluating Sources This presentation was created using information from Teaching Information Literacy: 35 Practical, Standards-Based Exercises for College.
Library Research Using the WWW (World Wide Web) An Introduction.
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
EVALUATION OF INTERNET RESOURCES FOR HISTORY Or Being a history detective on the web! By Michelle Ward Okanagan College Library
RESEARCHING & EVALUATING Summer 2008 Melanie Wilson Academic Success Center MSC 207.
 Can be daunting with its volumes of resources  Takes skill & perseverance.  Should be done with prudence when: › selecting sites for your students.
Should I really use THIS website? Aimee Riordan SMHS Library Science Class.
Finding Credible Sources
Evaluating Internet Sources. What Should You Do?  Identify the author and evaluate the author’s credentials  Identify bias and incomplete information.
How is the process of publishing printed material
Internet Sources An Introduction to evaluating information on the Internet.
EVALUATING ONLINE SOURCES. GOAL Identify criteria to evaluate websites. Evaluate websites to determine their usefulness for research & your own personal.
Assessing information on the internet: how to know if information is good Version
Introduction to Website Evaluation Patricia Heeter EME6415.
How to Research– Finding RELIABLE Information. Getting Started  Where is the first place you go when you start researching a project?  Google, Wikipedia,
Web Research Guide Evaluating Websites Mrs. Roesler September 2012.
SCARAB Substance No depth or written for children. Lacking the depth needed for your purpose. Written for the general public. Depth of coverage.
Evaluating Web Sources By Kathy West English II Research.
EVALUATING INTERNET SOURCES
I know it isn’t always true or accurate, but it IS information….
  Cite web sources  Use search engines to search the Internet and locate information.  Determine the relevance of information.  Evaluate the currency,
EVALUATING SOURCES HOW DO I DETERMINE A RESOURCE’S CREDIBILITY?
  There are five basic criteria to consider. 1.Authority 2.Reliability 3.Currency 4.Scope 5.Relevance  information is taken from
Evaluating Internet Resources Mike Burgmeier Coordinator of Library Instruction Olson Library, Northern Michigan University Kevin McDonough Reference and.
What is a scholarly website and what just looks like one…
Citing a website article - MLA Cite it at easybib.com Website: A collection of online informational pages on the world wide web that typically covers related.
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website! Ms. Fauss ens/Evaluating%20Websites.pdf.
The 5 W’s (and 1H) of Cyberspace
Information Literacy Program Critically Evaluating
Evaluating Web Resources
Evaluating Sources.
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website!
Evaluating Information Sources
CRAAP Test: Meriam Library California State University, Chico
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Do Now: January 21, 2015 Sentence Composing Tools: Adjective Clause Take Notes: -What is an adjective clause? Provide multiple examples -What’s the difference.
FATMA ISMED K1-09 Websites in ELT.
Looking for information?
Using Credible Internet Sources
Evaluating Web Resources
Evaluating Sources.
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
ABCs of Source Reliability
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
ABCs of Website Evaluation
Web Evaluation The C. R. A. A. P. Test.
Evaluating Information
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
ABC’s of Research.
SCARAB.
Evaluating Print and Electronic Sources
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Questioning and evaluating information
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
What is a scholarly website and what just looks like one…
Evaluating Internet Resources
CRAAP.
Presentation transcript:

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Commerce 2KA3 Library Tutorial #2 Evaluating Business Information Sources March 2009

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Session Overview Review criteria used to evaluate sources Practice evaluating selected documents noted on our Course Guides page for Commerce 2KA3:

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 From:

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 The Onion How did you assess this source? What did you look at?

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Authority Who is the author and/or publisher? –Person, organization or company? –Credentials or affiliations noted? –Expert or generalist? –Reputable, well-known? –Contact details provided / verifiable?

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Scope Does the source have a specific focus or deal with a specific topic? Does the information in the source relate to a specific geographic region (or regions)? Does it include detailed or very general information?

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Accuracy Are sources cited? Can the accuracy of the information provided be verified by other sources (e.g., are there references included in a bibliography?) Errors in spelling or grammar? Are any links broken or incorrect?

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Currency Is there a clearly noted publication date (or last-updated date)? Is the information in the source current/up-to-date? Are dates that pertain to specific information or events within the document clearly noted?

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Objectivity Author or publisher closely affiliated with the company or industry discussed? Is information factual and unbiased, or is it based on particular perspectives, arguments, or opinions not backed up with facts?

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 The Onion: America’s Finest News Source ? Authority: Content & language suggests that this is a news parody site. Most articles do not list an author. Scope: Broad range of topics. Worldwide stories. Does not have long, in-depth articles. Accuracy: Stories not typically backed up with facts or other sources. Currency: Older & newer articles featured. Not an “up-to-date & as it happens” news site. Objectivity: Articles are satirical in nature.

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 From:

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 BBC News Article about Blondes Authority: Mentions “experts in Germany” but no further details about study. Article is on a reputable website (BBC news). Scope: Blondes in general, worldwide. Accuracy: No precise study identified, nor any real data presented to back up the findings Currency: September 27, Bit dated. Objectivity: Fairly balanced. Provide counter opinion of professor Jonathan Rees. For more info on this story, check out:

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Exercise: Evaluate the Selected Sources using these Criteria Authority: Author? Publisher? Scope: Specific or broad topics? Geographic focus? Accuracy: References cited? Spelling & grammar? Currency: Up-to-date? Publication date? Other dates included? Objectivity: Bias? Factual content or opinion-based?

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 News Article Example 1: LexisNexis

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 News article via LexisNexis Authority: Telecom reporter in reputable source (Globe and Mail). Scope: Company-specific, product-specific, Canadian focus with reference to US market Accuracy: No sources cited. Currency: August 29, 2008, slightly dated Objectivity: Company spokesperson referenced (potential bias—company perspective), factual information

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 News Article Example 2:

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 North Denver News Article Authority: Author noted, but fictious. Revealed in editor’s note linked at bottom of article. Scope: About a specific event. Info about the iPhone limited. Accuracy: No cited sources. Currency: Date noted (August 2007), but a bit old. Objectivity: No obvious affiliation with Apple, the iPhone manufacturer. Editor’s note indicates article is satirical.

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Company Profile Example 1: Fpinfomart.ca

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 RIM Profile via FPinfomart.ca Authority: CanWest is a well-known and reputable publisher. Authors are in-house analysts (Check Products & Services link) Scope: Company specific, Canadian Accuracy: Use primary sources and then analyze, verify and standardize content (Check Products & Services link). Currency: copyright at bottom of page, very recent news articles, and financial figures Objectivity: Factual information provided. No specific sources cited, but corporate & regulatory sources noted in Products & Services link. Not affiliated with company.

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Company Profile Example 2:

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Dow Company Profile Authority: Hard to establish. Research reveals the site created by an activist group called The Yes Men. Scope: Lacks typical features of company web site. About Us, Facts & Figures missing. Accuracy: Most links lead to unrelated content. Somewhat poorly written. Currency: Footer date stamped Dated content. Objectivity: Biased content. Activist angle upon closer examination.

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Industry Profile Example 1: FAITS

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 VoIP Report via FAITS Authority: Written by industry analyst. Publisher long-time, respected provider of IT info (see About link) Scope: Industry specific, fairly narrow topic, US focus (deduced from content) Accuracy: No obvious errors in spelling/grammar. Very few sources noted. Links in report work. Currency: October 2008, relatively recent Objectivity: Has facts & opinion. Author is noted as an independent telecommunications analyst. Not affiliated with companies discussed.

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Industry Profile Example 2:

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 InfoTech Landscape in Canada Authority: Compiled by MBA students from Kogod School of Business Scope: Very broad, somewhat disorganized content. Accuracy: Sources & links pages provided, but references incomplete Currency: Content is approx. 10 years or older. Last updated Objectivity: Generally factual content with some analysis.

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 SWOT Analysis Example 1: Business Source Complete

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 TELUS SWOT via BSC Authority: Datamonitor reputable author & publisher. Source of information noted in disclaimer at beginning of document. Scope: Specific company, Canadian Accuracy: Spelling/ grammar fine, info. provided about the sources used. Currency: June 2008 (fairly recent/ slightly dated) Objectivity: Not affiliated with the company, primary and secondary sources used, factual info. and analysis

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 SWOT Analysis Example 2:

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Bharti Airtel SWOT Analysis Authority: No specific author noted. Commercial site (.com in url) Scope: Company specific. Some reference to telecom industry. Accuracy: Only one reference provided and it’s incomplete. Indicates sources are publicly available, but no details provided. Disclaimer indicates page is for educational purposes only. Currency: Fairly recent info. Dates listed up to Objectivity: Fairly balanced, factual content.

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Parting thoughts … Use the 5 evaluation criteria as a guideline when assessing sources. Usefulness & relevance of sources will vary depending on the info. needed. Be a critical consumer of information. If possible, verify content with other sources.

_________________________________________________________________________________ McMaster University Libraries library.mcmaster.ca x23318 Questions? Please Complete Our Tutorial Evaluation Thanks for your participation!