Probability Grid: A Location Estimation Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks Presented by cychen Date : 3/7 In Secon (Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Detecting MAC Layer Back-off Timer Violations in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Venkata Nishanth Lolla, Lap Kong Law, Srikanth V. Krishnamurthy, Chinya Ravishankar,
Advertisements

Computer Networks Group Universität Paderborn Ad hoc and Sensor Networks Chapter 9: Localization & positioning Holger Karl.
Range-Free Sensor Localization Simulations with ROCRSSI-based Algorithm Matt Magpayo
“Location-Aided Routing (LAR) in Mobile Ad Hoc Network” by Young-bae ko Nitin H. Validya presented by Mark Miyashita.
Convex Position Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks
A Mobile Infrastructure Based VANET Routing Protocol in the Urban Environment School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, PKU, Beijing, China.
1 Security in Wireless Sensor Networks Group Meeting Fall 2004 Presented by Edith Ngai.
A Key Management Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks Using Deployment Knowledge Presenter: Todd Fielder.
Analyzing Multi-channel MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks Presenter: Zhong Zhou.
Beneficial Caching in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Bin Tang, Samir Das, Himanshu Gupta Computer Science Department Stony Brook University.
Localization from Mere Connectivity Yi Shang (University of Missouri - Columbia); Wheeler Ruml (Palo Alto Research Center ); Ying Zhang; Markus Fromherz.
SUMP: A Secure Unicast Messaging Protocol for Wireless Ad Hoc Sensor Networks Jeff Janies, Chin-Tser Huang, Nathan L. Johnson.
Approximate Initialization of Camera Sensor Networks Purushottam Kulkarni K.R. School of Information Technology Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay.
Taming the Underlying Challenges of Reliable Multihop Routing in Sensor Networks.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Wireless Sensor Networks 17th Lecture Christian Schindelhauer.
Range-free Localization Schemes for Large Scale Sensor Networks
Novel Self-Configurable Positioning Technique for Multihop Wireless Networks Authors : Hongyi Wu Chong Wang Nian-Feng Tzeng IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING,
Dynamic Medial Axis Based Motion Planning in Sensor Networks Lan Lin and Hyunyoung Lee Department of Computer Science University of Denver
Adaptive Self-Configuring Sensor Network Topologies ns-2 simulation & performance analysis Zhenghua Fu Ben Greenstein Petros Zerfos.
Ad-Hoc Localization Using Ranging and Sectoring Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, Amit Dhariwal, Ramesh Govindan, Gaurav Sukhatme Computer Science Department,
Jana van Greunen - 228a1 Analysis of Localization Algorithms for Sensor Networks Jana van Greunen.
Scalable and Distributed GPS free Positioning for Sensor Networks Rajagopal Iyengar and Biplab Sikdar Department of ECSE, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
A Distributed Localization Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks with Improved Grid-Scan and Vector- Based Refinement Jang-Ping Sheu, Pei-Chun Chen, and.
Sensor Positioning in Wireless Ad-hoc Sensor Networks Using Multidimensional Scaling Xiang Ji and Hongyuan Zha Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering,
Authors: Sheng-Po Kuo, Yu-Chee Tseng, Fang-Jing Wu, and Chun-Yu Lin
Introduction to Sensor Networks Rabie A. Ramadan, PhD Cairo University 3.
Localization With Mobile Anchor Points in Wireless Sensor Networks
2015/10/1 A color-theory-based energy efficient routing algorithm for mobile wireless sensor networks Tai-Jung Chang, Kuochen Wang, Yi-Ling Hsieh Department.
Boundary Recognition in Sensor Networks by Topology Methods Yue Wang, Jie Gao Dept. of Computer Science Stony Brook University Stony Brook, NY Joseph S.B.
1 A Bidding Protocol for Deploying Mobile Sensors GuilingWang, Guohong Cao, and Tom LaPorta Department of Computer Science & Engineering The Pennsylvania.
Multi-hop-based Monte Carlo Localization for Mobile Sensor Networks
Location Estimation in Ad-Hoc Networks with Directional Antennas N. Malhotra M. Krasniewski C. Yang S. Bagchi W. Chappell 5th IEEE International Conference.
1 Mobile-Assisted Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks Nissanka B.Priyantha, Hari Balakrishnan, Eric D. Demaine, Seth Teller IEEE INFOCOM 2005 March.
Salah A. Aly,Moustafa Youssef, Hager S. Darwish,Mahmoud Zidan Distributed Flooding-based Storage Algorithms for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks Communications,
A Novel Mechanism for Flooding Based Route Discovery in Ad Hoc Networks Jian Li and Prasant Mohapatra GlobeCom’03 Speaker ︰ CHUN-WEI.
An Energy Efficient Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks Seema Bandyopadhyay and Edward J. Coyle Presented by Yu Wang.
Energy-Efficient Shortest Path Self-Stabilizing Multicast Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Ganesh Sridharan
Relative Accuracy based Location Estimation in Wireless Ad Hoc Sensor Networks May Wong 1 Demet Aksoy 2 1 Intel, Inc. 2 University of California, Davis.
Neighborhood-Based Topology Recognition in Sensor Networks S.P. Fekete, A. Kröller, D. Pfisterer, S. Fischer, and C. Buschmann Corby Ziesman.
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
1 Shape Segmentation and Applications in Sensor Networks Xianjin Xhu, Rik Sarkar, Jie Gao Department of CS, Stony Brook University INFOCOM 2007.
A New Hybrid Wireless Sensor Network Localization System Ahmed A. Ahmed, Hongchi Shi, and Yi Shang Department of Computer Science University of Missouri-Columbia.
Probabilistic Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors : Nadeem Ahmed, Salil S. Kanhere, Sanjay Jha Presenter : Hyeon, Seung-Il.
A Passive Approach to Sensor Network Localization Rahul Biswas and Sebastian Thrun International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2004 Presented.
Differential Ad Hoc Positioning Systems Presented By: Ramesh Tumati Feb 18, 2004.
Ad Hoc Positioning System (APS) Using AOA Dragos¸ Niculescu and Badri Nath INFOCOM ’03 1 Seoyeon Kang September 23, 2008.
Ad Hoc Positioning System (APS)
1 Probabilistic Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Nadeem Ahmed, Salil S. Kanhere and Sanjay Jha Computer Science and Engineering, University of New.
Dr. Sudharman K. Jayaweera and Amila Kariyapperuma ECE Department University of New Mexico Ankur Sharma Department of ECE Indian Institute of Technology,
University “Ss. Cyril and Methodus” SKOPJE Cluster-based MDS Algorithm for Nodes Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks Ass. Biljana Stojkoska.
Opportunistic Flooding in Low-Duty- Cycle Wireless Sensor Networks with Unreliable Links Shuo Goo, Yu Gu, Bo Jiang and Tian He University of Minnesota,
GLIDER: Gradient Landmark-Based Distributed Routing for Sensor Networks Qing Fang, Jie Gao, Leonidas J. Guibas, Vin de Silva, Li Zhang Department of Electrical.
Computer Science 1 Using Clustering Information for Sensor Network Localization Haowen Chan, Mark Luk, and Adrian Perrig Carnegie Mellon University
By: Aaron Dyreson Supervising Professor: Dr. Ioannis Schizas
November 4, 2003Applied Research Laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis APOC 2003 Wuhan, China Cost Efficient Routing in Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless.
Modeling End-to-end Distance for Given Number of Hops in Dense Planar Wireless Sensor Networks April Chan-Myung Kim
1 GPS-Free-Free Positioning System for Wireless Sensor Networks Farid Benbadis, Timur Friedman, Marcelo Dias de Amorim, and Serge Fdida IEEE WCCN 2005.
A Multicast Routing Algorithm Using Movement Prediction for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Huei-Wen Ferng, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science.
HCRL: A Hop-Count-Ratio based Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks Sungwon Yang, Jiyoung Yi and Hojung Cha Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University,
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
KAIS T Sensor Deployment Based on Virtual Forces Reference: Yi Zou and Krishnendu Chakarabarty, “Sensor Deployment and Target Localization Based on Virtual.
1 Power Efficient Monitoring Management in Sensor Networks A.Zelikovsky Georgia State joint work with P. BermanPennstate G. Calinescu Illinois IT C. Shah.
KAIS T Location-Aided Flooding: An Energy-Efficient Data Dissemination Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Harshavardhan Sabbineni and Krishnendu Chakrabarty.
Density-Aware Hop-Count Localization (DHL) in Wireless Sensor Networks with Variable Density Sau Yee Wong 1,2, Joo Chee Lim 1, SV Rao 1, Winston KG Seah.
Scalable and Distributed GPS free positioning for Sensor Networks Rajagopal Iyengear and Biplab Sikdar IEEE International Conference on Communications.
Author:Zarei.M.;Faez.K. ;Nya.J.M.
Localization for Anisotropic Sensor Networks
Presented by Prashant Duhoon
任課教授:陳朝鈞 教授 學生:王志嘉、馬敏修
Wireless Mesh Networks
Presentation transcript:

Probability Grid: A Location Estimation Scheme for Wireless Sensor Networks Presented by cychen Date : 3/7 In Secon (Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks) 2004Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks

Outline  Introduction  The Probability Grid Localization Scheme  The Localization Scheme  Performance Evaluation  System Implementation And Evaluation

Introduction  Propose a location estimation scheme completely decentralized not require special location or range finding infrastructure uses a probabilistic approach makes use of additional knowledge of topology deployment

Introduction  Assume a sensor network is deployed in a controlled manner The goal is to form a grid topology. The deployment is not completely random  an approximation to a uniform or even grid distribution

 The anchor nodes only a small percentage either equipped with GPS or can acquire their location information through other means. do not have any increased communication range  The remaining sensor nodes are unaware of their location The sensor nodes

The Probability Grid Localization Scheme  Assumption : the nodes are deployed in a grid topology the unit length of the grid is known to all the nodes in the network  allow small errors in the true positioning of nodes around the vertexes of a grid.  Our localization problem To identify the correct position in the grid for each sensor node.  The localization error leave for future research

Parameter Definitions  M x N : the dimensions of the grid topology  S : the set of all the nodes  A : the set of all the anchors Both sets, S and A, are sets of ordered pairs (i,j) representing the grid points where the nodes are located.  : hop-count vector the hop count from each of the anchors in the set A to the node ‘ k ’ is the hop count from anchor 1 to node k.

The Probability Grid Matrix  : the probability of node ‘ k ’, positioned at (i, j), to be hops from the l-th anchor. observe that is a discrete random variable that represents the number of hops for a particular Euclidian distance

The Probability Grid Matrix  The main features that the distribution function needs to exhibit are: : the distance between the node and one anchor  : the number of hops existent between the node and the anchor

The Probability Grid Matrix  Narrow and skewed positively for small values of λ For smaller values of λ  τ has a limited range of possible values with higher and higher values being less and less probable (positively skewed).  Become broader and relatively symmetric for larger values of λ. λ increases, the number of possibilities for the hop count (τ) increases and the distribution becomes bell-shaped

The Probability Grid Matrix  Through simulations, a Poisson distribution is a good approximation  Define

The Probability Grid Matrix  Obtain the Probability Grid Matrix  Let The position of node k in the grid : The location of node k :

The Localization Scheme  Our localization protocol is similar to the DV-Hop scheme  But it improves upon it by exploiting deployment information.

Phase 1 - Flooding  The anchors flood the network with packets containing their IDs, their location and a hop count, initially set to zero. global flooding or controlled flooding (all nodes are expected to hear from at least three anchors).  During the flooding period, sensor nodes keep track of the shortest distance (number of hops) to each of the anchors they heard from.

Phase 2 - Compute the correction factor  Correction factor : an estimation for the Euclidian distance of one hop  Anchor positioned at (x i, y i ) compute : where is the number of hops between the current anchor, positioned at (x i, y i ), and the anchor positioned at (x j, y j ).

Phase 2 - Compute the correction factor  The correction factor is received only by the sensor nodes in the vicinity of the anchor.  Sensor node only uses the “ first ” correction factor it received to estimate its location.

Phase 3 - Invoke The Probability Grid algorithm 1.Calculate λ the distance, in hop count units, between the evaluated grid point and one anchor.  PS. is the actual hop count 2.Calculate, and the Probability Grid matrix F k to estimation the location of node k,  k S-A

Performance Evaluation  Experimental results obtained through Simulations using GloMoSim, a discrete-event simulator developed at UCLA

Localization Error versus Anchors Percentage

Localization Error versus Network Size

Localization Error versus Number of Neighbors

Localization Error versus Imprecision in Anchor Positioning

System Implementation & Evaluation  The implementation was done on MICA2 motes from Berkeley. consisted of 25 motes, positioned in a 5x5 grid, approximately 12 meters apart.

Real System Evaluation Results