12/28/2001 #1 LEO 2001 IN SITU DATA Profiling Optics and Water Return (POWR) Package Joe Rhea and Gia Lamela.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Richard Young Optronic Laboratories Kathleen Muray INPHORA
Advertisements

Upgrades to the MODIS near-IR Water Vapor Algorithm and Cirrus Reflectance Algorithm For Collection 6 Bo-Cai Gao & Rong-Rong Li Remote Sensing Division,
Resolution Resolving power Measuring of the ability of a sensor to distinguish between signals that are spatially near or spectrally similar.
Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.
Class 8: Radiometric Corrections
REMOTE SENSING Presented by: Anniken Lydon. What is Remote Sensing? Remote sensing refers to different methods used for the collection of information.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Radiometric and Geometric Errors
Chapter 13 Tetracorder. Simple definition of band depth D = 1 - R b /R c where R b is reflectance in band center and R c is reflectance in continuum at.
Retrieval of smoke aerosol loading from remote sensing data Sean Raffuse and Rudolf Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trends Analysis Washington.
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Atmospheric Correction Curtiss O. Davis Code 7203 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375
Remote sensing in meteorology
Soil Moisture Estimation Using Hyperspectral SWIR Imagery Poster Number IN43B-1184 D. Lewis, Institute for Technology Development, Building 1103, Suite.
Hyperspectral Imagery
Center for Remote Sensing and Computational Ecology January 7-9, 2002HyCODE Workshop 2002 Santa Barbara, CA HyCODE Workshop 2002 Florida Environmental.
Energy interactions in the atmosphere
01/15/2003 #1 LEO-15 Data, Presentations and Publications Curtiss O. Davis, Bill Snyder, Jeffrey Bowles & W. Joe Rhea Code 7212 Naval Research Laboratory.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
METO 621 Lesson 27. Albedo 200 – 400 nm Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV) The previous slide shows the albedo of the earth viewed from the nadir.
Introduction to Digital Data and Imagery
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Mixed Pixels and Spectral Unmixing 1 Spectral Mixtures areal aggregate intimate Linear mixing models (areal.
Reflected Solar Radiative Kernels And Applications Zhonghai Jin Constantine Loukachine Bruce Wielicki Xu Liu SSAI, Inc. / NASA Langley research Center.
1 Image Pre-Processing. 2 Digital Image Processing The process of extracting information from digital images obtained from satellites Information regarding.
The use of MOD09 product and in situ data in a reservoir Valério, A.M.; Kampel, M.; Stech, J.L. alineval, milton, stech COSPAR Training.
Radiometric and Geometric Correction
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
Spectral Requirements for Resolving Shallow Water Information Products W. Paul Bissett and David D. R. Kohler.
Spectral Characteristics
Resolution Resolution. Landsat ETM+ image Learning Objectives Be able to name and define the four types of data resolution. Be able to calculate the.
Chapter 5 Remote Sensing Crop Science 6 Fall 2004 October 22, 2004.
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
Digital Image Processing GSP 216. Digital Image Processing Pre-Processing – Correcting for radiometric and geometric errors in data Image Rectification.
Electromagnetic Radiation Most remotely sensed data is derived from Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). This includes: Visible light Infrared light (heat)
Estimating Water Optical Properties, Water Depth and Bottom Albedo Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Coastal Habitat Mapping S. C. Liew #, P.
What is an image? What is an image and which image bands are “best” for visual interpretation?
Towards a Hydrodynamic and Optical Modeling System with Remote Sensing Feedback Yan Li Dr. Anthony Vodacek Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory.
Retrieving Water Leaving Radiances from MODIS Land and Ocean Color Channels Bo-Cai Gao 1, Marcos J. Montes 1, Rong-Rong Li 1, Heidi M. Dierssen 2, and.
Hyperspectral remote sensing
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
NASA’s Coastal and Ocean Airborne Science Testbed (COAST) L. Guild 1 *, J. Dungan 1, M. Edwards 1, P. Russell 1, S. Hooker 2, J. Myers 3, J. Morrow 4,
NRL 7333 Rb = 1-  1+  1+  2 Non- Linear b1- b2q3 influences We developed improved SeaWIFS coastal ocean color algorithms to derived inherent optical.
Data Models, Pixels, and Satellite Bands. Understand the differences between raster and vector data. What are digital numbers (DNs) and what do they.
MODIS Preprocessing (before L1B) Changes over the Last Year (and looking forward) Chris Moeller and others CIMSS; Univ. Wisconsin July 13, 2004 Thanks.
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
MODIS Near-IR Water Vapor and Cirrus Reflectance Algorithms & Recent Updates for Collection 5 Bo-Cai Gao Remote Sensing Division, Code 7232, Naval Research.
AATS-14 measurements during COAST J. Livingston R. Johnson M. Kacenelenbogen C. Chang P. Russell.
Stratospheric Aerosol Size Distribution Retrievals Using SAGE III Mark Hervig GATS Inc. Terry Deshler University of Wyoming.
NOTE, THIS PPT LARGELY SWIPED FROM
DATA PROCESSING & ANALYSIS. DATA ANALYSIS ADDITIONAL DATA PROCESSING Dark Corrections Interpolate to bins of wavelengths Quality Control (tilting corrections,
Rev 131 Enceladus’ Plume Solar Occultation LW Esposito and UVIS Team 14 June 2010.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Vision of the Brillouin lidar operated from a helicopter. The center ray represents.
Building an Integrated Ocean Color Sensor Web at the Land-Sea Interface UCSC UARC/ARC Ames GSFC BSI SARP.
# x pixels Geometry # Detector elements Detector Element Sizes Array Size Detector Element Sizes # Detector elements Pictorial diagram showing detector.
Cloud Detection: Optical Depth Thresholds and FOV Considerations Steven A. Ackerman, Richard A. Frey, Edwin Eloranta, and Robert Holz Cloud Detection Issues.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic representation of the near-infrared (NIR) structured illumination instrument,
Remote sensing/digital image processing. Color Arithmetic red+green=yellow green+blue=cyan red+blue=magenta.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Electromagnetic Radiation
Relative Spectral Response and Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps Luisa M. Lara IAA-CSIC Granada (SPAIN)
Digital Data Format and Storage
Hydrolight and Ecolight
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
USING GOES-R TO HELP MONITOR UPPER LEVEL SO2
Absolute calibration of sky radiances, colour indices and O4 DSCDs obtained from MAX-DOAS measurements T. Wagner1, S. Beirle1, S. Dörner1, M. Penning de.
GOES -12 Imager April 4, 2002 GOES-12 Imager - pre-launch info - radiances - products Timothy J. Schmit et al.
UVIS Calibration Update
Sensor Effects Calibration: correction of observed data into physically meaningful data by using a reference. DN  Radiance (sensor)  Radiance (surface)
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Presentation transcript:

12/28/2001 #1 LEO 2001 IN SITU DATA Profiling Optics and Water Return (POWR) Package Joe Rhea and Gia Lamela

12/28/2001 #2 LEO 2001 IN SITU DATA Specifics of Data Collected July 22 Through August 2, )Profiling Optics and Water Return (POWR) Package InstrumentWhat is measured HistarWater Absorption and Attenuation at 103 wavelengths ac-9 unfilteredWater Absorption and Attenuation at 9 wavelengths ac-9 filteredCDOM Absorption at 9 wavelengths Hydroscat-6Backscattering in 6 wavelengths WetStarStimulated Fluorescence (460nm out / 695nm in) Seabird CTDConductivity (Salinity), Temperature, Depth Water bottles 8 bottles, each 2.5 liters (total 20 liters of water) 2) Pad Absorption, including Ap, Ad, Aph, and Ag 3) Chlorophyll concentration derived from both Turner and HPLC 4) Above-water Rrs ( nm) - Collected when sky conditions permitted 5) Sun Photometer - Collected when sky conditions permitted 6) Total Suspended Sediments / Laser particle Counter

12/28/2001 #3 LEO 2001 IN SITU DATA Summary of Data Collected July 22 Through August 2, 2001 Item:Processed by:Count:Status: Optic ProfilesRhea/Lamela55In Progress RrsJ. Rhea17Completed Pad AbsorptionG. Lamela23Completed Turner [Chl_a]G. Lamela23Completed HPLC [Chl_a]C. Trees19Completed Sun PhotometerW. Snyder19Completed TSS/LPCM. Sydor> 21In Progress Total stations sampled: 32

12/28/2001 #4 LEO 2001 IN SITU DATA Rrs Spectra Collected July 22 Through August 2, 2001

12/28/2001 #5 LEO 2001 IN SITU DATA Station Locations, July 22 Through August 2, 2001

12/28/2001 #6 LEO 2001 IN SITU DATA Station Locations for Selected Rrs Spectra

12/28/2001 #7 LEO 2001 IN SITU DATA Selected Rrs Spectra

12/28/2001 #8 PHILLS LEO-15 Data Status Curtiss O. Davis, Jeffrey Bowles & William Snyder Code 7212 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375

12/28/2001 #9 Data Summary Data Collected. –Data collected 7/22,, 7/23, 7/25, 7/27, 7/28, 7/31, 8/01 and 8/02/2001. –7/23 & 7/ meter in-shore survey. –7/27 & 8/02 Hi-Resolution (0.8 m) in-shore survey. –7/31 AVIRIS over-flight. –8/01 Time series (with AVIRIS over-flight). –7/22 & 7/28 Engineering flights with science capability. Status Summary. –Data display small (~ 1 pixel) spatial displacement from laboratory calibration. –Some (< 1% of total) data contain dropped bands. –Pre and Post deployment laboratory wavelength calibrations agree, but differ slightly from flight data. –Derived reflectance has been compared twice with simultaneous ASD observations and are in reasonable agreement. –However, water pixels located next to bright land features display a rising reflectance at wavelengths greater than 0.7 microns. Likely cause is sensor internal light scattering. –Reflectance below 0.7 microns appears to be minimally effected. –Latitude and longitude positional information available.

12/28/2001 #10 Code 7212 Web Site (rsd- Quick-looks available on Code 7212 Web Site (rsd- –JPEGS of each aircraft scan. –PowerPoint and Excel files displaying/listing planned scan coordinates.

12/28/2001 #11 Small Spatial Calibration Shift Across the Array The top figure is an RGB calibrated image of the first 150 lines of Run15Seq03 taken during the morning of 7/31/2001. The bottom figure is the same scene but with the radiometric calibration coefficients file shifted by 1 spatial pixel. Result of Using Original Calibration Coefficient File Result of Shifting Original Calibration Coefficient File 1 Spatial Pixel

12/28/2001 #12 A small (1-2 nm) Wavelength Shift Across the Array The top figure is the oxygen line of vegetation spectra extracted from various samples across run15seq00 taken on 7/31/01 am. The detector was in low gain. The bottom figure is averaged spectra taken from the left, middle and right third of the same image. The change in line shape suggests that there is a small spectral shift across the detector array. The bin width for this data set is ~4.8 nanometers. The change in line shape suggests that the spectral shift is probably 1-2 nanometers. This amount agrees with more quantitative analysis using Tafkaa.

12/28/2001 #13 Pre and Post LEO-15 PHILLS1 Wavelength Calibrations Agree But Flight Wavelengths Are Shifted By A Small Amount 512 channel linear calibrations were derived for Pre (cal010711) and Post (cal010815) LEO-15 deployment using Spec_Cal_Peak_Find1.pro. The wavelength calibrations for the 512 bands were then “collapsed” to produce 128 band wavelengths using Bin_Wav_Band.pro. The wavelengths shown above are the bin center wavelengths derived for the 128 bands. Agreement between the two calibrations appears to be within 0.33 nanometers. This difference is much smaller than the wavelength offsets derived for cal using Tafkaa to obtain the best goodness of fit about selected atmospheric absorption lines for Run15Seq03 on 7/31/01. Band #cal010711cal010815DiffTafkaa Offset micronmicronnmnm

12/28/2001 #14 Spectral Stray Light Correction Required Scene averaged calibrated spectrum of water image. The different curves represents a prob512 of 0.0 (black), 1.0 (green) and 1.6 (red) x of spectral stray light. Note that the radiance goes negative for 1.6 x (the value used to correct last years images).

12/28/2001 #15 Data Calibration Procedure The PHILLS-1 calibration coefficients file has been derived using pre- LEO-15 laboratory calibration data. Observed counts are corrected for spectral stray light using a delta function scattering approximation with prob512 = 0.96 x spectral band data summed to 64 spectral bands to reduce small band to band calibration systematic effects. Radiometric calibration coefficients were computed using sample averaged laboratory wavelength calibration values. Resultant calibration coefficient file was then linearly “stretched” to match wavelength shifts computed by Tafkaa for flight data and then spatially shifted by 1 pixel. It is this stretched and shifted laboratory calibration coefficient file that is applied to the spectral stray light corrected flight data to produce the radiance data.

12/28/2001 #16 Line (Frame) Banding Example ( Run05seq05) Streaks are evident in the data, which for PHILLS-1 are most evident in spectral band 128. Inspection of these streaks indicates that they are properly placed spatially, but are spectrally shifted by one band. Inspection of one flight line with 8129 frames indicates that 64 lines are so shifted. If this is representative of the rest of the data, this indicates that 64/8129 lines or less than 1% of the data have this problem. A bad lines mask, identifying the bad lines, will be distributed with each data cube.

12/28/2001 #17 Sun Photometer Data are Available for Atmospheric Correction Data are available at 0.440, 0.675, 0.870, And Microns. A power law is fit to the data to obtain optical depth at 550 nm. –Data above 0.9 microns are excluded.

12/28/2001 #18 Sun Photometer Data Summary

12/28/2001 #19 Great Bay Region Analysis ( Run15seq03) This image was collected at an altitude of 8500 feet. The sensor frame rate was 25 fps, data is binned into 64 spectral channels and the gain was low. The image is 1000 pixels wide and 1024 pixels long. The spatial resolution is 1.8 meters. The data has been calibrated using a calibration coefficients obtained with a laboratory plaque calibration setup corrected for spectral stray light. “X’s” mark the location of spectra shown on the following slides. X(1) X(2) X(3) X(4)

12/28/2001 #20 7/31/01 Run15seq03 Region #1, #2 Reflectance The single pixel Rrs derived from region #1 (S:551,L:985) and region #2 (S:956,L:708) of the PHILLS1 image shown previously. Also shown (as a blue line) is the smoothed ASD spectrum measured simultaneously from the R/V Northstar located near region #1. A mid-latitude summer atmospheric model has been assumed with marine aerosol (  = 0.12), relative humidity of 70% and 2 m/s wind speed. Water vapor was determined on a pixel by pixel basis. Agreement between ASD and aircraft derived reflectance is fair to good in the micron range. However, an excess reflectance is apparent at longer wavelengths for region #1.

12/28/2001 #21 7/31/01 Run15seq03 Region #3, #4 Remote Sensing Reflectance The single pixel Rrs for two other regions in the image are shown. Region #3 was taken from [S:748,L:262] and region #4 from [S:488,L:838]. Also shown (in blue) for comparison is the ASD reflectance derived for Region #1. The Region #3 spectrum shows the effect of viewing the bottom through shallow water. The region #4 spectrum is for a land pixel and shows the characteristic red edge rise in reflectance caused by plant material.

12/28/2001 # Run15seq03 (996 nm) This image shows the relative reflectance at 996 nanometers. An equalization stretch has been applied to the image. Note the “glow” around the land features. It is in these regions that the rise in near-IR reflectance is most pronounced. This glow might be caused by atmospheric scattering or stray light entering the detector from inside, or possibly outside, the instantaneous FOV defined by the spectrometer slit. Note that the ASD measurement #1 shown previously occurred in a region with no land (that is, bright) features within the IFOV. X(1)

12/28/2001 #23 Latitude and Longitude Information Latitude and longitude information can be derived for each pixel in a scene based on in-flight C-MIGITS data and derived detector offset information. Comparison of known and computed positions of manmade features observed with low altitude data taken on 8/01/2001 were used to derive the sensor offsets. These sensor offsets were then used to derive “time offsets” for each of the other flights. Reasonable (5-10 pixel) RMS positional errors were obtained. It is therefore possible to produce latitude and longitude information for each scene based on the time offsets derived for each flight and the single set of sensor offset parameters. Positional errors are expected to be on the order of 10 meters or less for normal flight altitude data. This positional information will be stored in IGM files that will accompany any image that we provide and can be used in ENVI to georectify an image as desired.

12/28/2001 #24 Image Georectification Example IGM files will accompany any image that we provide and can be used to georectify an image as desired. An challenging example is shown above. It will probably be necessary to “rubber sheet” any georectified image to other ground truth information if spatial accuracy < 10 meters is desired. Original ImageGeorectified Image

12/28/2001 #25 Products For each image sequence requested, the following products will be provided. –Radiance and/or Remote Sensing Reflectance (Rrs) data cube. –Band lines mask. –Positional (IGM) file for that data cube. –A land mask file will also be produced if an Rrs file is produced. We prefer to download data to the user’s FTP site. It may be possible for a user to download data from our site but NRL security requirements will need to be met. We can make CDs of SMALL data sets. Products will be produced with the best available information available at the time but will require user feedback to help identify, quantify and remove any remaining or newly discovered systematic effects.