“Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons,”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Value-at-Risk: A Risk Estimating Tool for Management
Advertisements

Market Risk Cheryl J. Rathbun Citigroup Chief Operating Officer
© K.Cuthbertson, D.Nitzsche 1 LECTURE Market Risk/Value at Risk: Basic Concepts Version 1/9/2001.
Introduction CreditMetrics™ was launched by JP Morgan in 1997.
Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed. 1 “One can no more ban derivatives than the Luddites could ban power looms in the early.
FIN 685: Risk Management Topic 6: VaR Larry Schrenk, Instructor.
Chapter 4 Return and Risks.
Chapter 4 Return and Risk. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.4-2 The Concept of Return Return –The level of profit from an investment,
Chapter 4 Return and Risks.
Financial Risk Management Framework - Cash Flow at Risk
Chapter 21 Value at Risk Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 8th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2012.
1 AFDC MAFC Training Program Shanghai 8-12 December 2008 Value at Risk Christine Brown Associate Professor Department of Finance The University of Melbourne.
The VaR Measure Chapter 8
VAR.
Chapter 21 Value at Risk Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 8th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2012.
Risk Management Jan Röman OM Technology Securities Systems AB.
FRM Zvi Wiener Following P. Jorion, Financial Risk Manager Handbook Financial Risk Management.
Mafinrisk Market Risk Course
Copyright 2001 A. S. Cebenoyan1 B Policymaking in Financial Institutions Professor A. Sinan Cebenoyan NYU-Stern-Finance.
Market-Risk Measurement
Saunders and Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th Edition 1 “My interest is in the future because I am going to spend the rest of my life there.”
The Three Common Approaches for Calculating Value at Risk
Market Risk Chapter 10 © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Part B.
Chapter 6 The VAR Approach: CreditMetrics and Other Models.
Why New Approaches to Credit Risk Measurement and Management? Why Now?
Value at Risk (VAR) VAR is the maximum loss over a target
Portfolio Loss Distribution. Risky assets in loan portfolio highly illiquid assets “hold-to-maturity” in the bank’s balance sheet Outstandings The portion.
Risk and Return Intro Returns HPR CAGR YTM, RCYTM APR and APY DY
Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives 6 th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull Chapter 18 Value at Risk.
Value at Risk.
FRM Zvi Wiener Following P. Jorion, Financial Risk Manager Handbook Financial Risk Management.
Alternative Measures of Risk. The Optimal Risk Measure Desirable Properties for Risk Measure A risk measure maps the whole distribution of one dollar.
Revision Lecture Risk Management. Exam There will be 2 and a half questions from the topics operational risk, market risk, foreign exchange risk, interest.
Market Risk Chapter 10 © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill 1 Market Risk Chapter 10 Financial Institutions Management, 3/e By Anthony Saunders.
©2003 McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved Slides by Kenneth StantonMcGraw Hill / Irwin Chapter Market Risk.
Analytics of Risk Management III: Motivating Risk Measures Risk Management Lecturer : Mr. Frank Lee Session 5.
The Oxford Guide to Financial Modeling by Ho & Lee Chapter 15. Risk Management The Oxford Guide to Financial Modeling Thomas S. Y. Ho and Sang Bin Lee.
Mrs.Shefa El Sagga F&BMP110/2/ Problems with the VaR Approach   Bankers The first problem with VaR is that it does not give the precise.
Chapter 2All Rights Reserved1 Chapter 2 Measuring Return and Risk Measuring Returns Measuring Risk Distributions.
11 Topic 4. Measuring Market Risk 4.1 Benefits of measuring market risk 4.2 Mathematical preliminaries 4.3 VaR measure 4.4 RiskMetrics model 4.5 Historical.
Market Risk Chapter 10 © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. K. R. Stanton.
Fundamentals of Futures and Options Markets, 5 th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull Value at Risk Chapter 18.
Value at Risk Chapter 16. The Question Being Asked in VaR “What loss level is such that we are X % confident it will not be exceeded in N business days?”
Market Risk A financial firm’s market risk is the potential volatility in its income due to changes in market conditions such as interest rates, liquidity,
Asmah Mohd Jaapar  Introduction  Integrating Market, Credit and Operational Risk  Approximation for Integrated VAR  Integrated VAR Analysis:
Measurement of Market Risk. Market Risk Directional risk Relative value risk Price risk Liquidity risk Type of measurements –scenario analysis –statistical.
 Measures the potential loss in value of a risky asset or portfolio over a defined period for a given confidence interval  For example: ◦ If the VaR.
Market Risk.
Value at Risk Chapter 20 Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 7th International Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull 2008.
Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 5th edition © 2002 by John C. Hull 16.1 Value at Risk Chapter 16.
Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 4th edition © 1999 by John C. Hull 14.1 Value at Risk Chapter 14.
Market Risk Chapter 10 © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Part A
Banking Tutorial 8 and 9 – Credit risk, Market risk Magda Pečená Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Science, Charles University in Prague,
CHAPTER 10 Market Risk Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Value at Risk (VaR).
Types of risk Market risk
The Three Common Approaches for Calculating Value at Risk
Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall
Overview This chapter discusses the nature of market risk and appropriate measures Dollar exposure RiskMetrics Historic or back simulation Monte Carlo.
Market-Risk Measurement
Chapter 12 Market Risk.
JPMorgan’s Riskmetrics and Creditmetrics
Types of risk Market risk
Financial Risk Management
Value at Risk Chapter 9.
Lecture Notes: Value at Risk (VAR)
Lecture Notes: Value at Risk (VAR)
Market Risk.
Measuring Exposure to Exchange Rate Fluctuations
Presentation transcript:

“Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons,” Woody Allen Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed. Market Risk The impact of unanticipated changes in market conditions (interest rates, exchange rates, securities prices) on the market value and earnings of the FI. Widespread adoption of Value at Risk (VaR) methodologies. VaR is the minimum losses incurred under adverse market conditions. That is, if tomorrow is a “bad day” measured statistically such that only 1% of all days have even worse conditions. First commercially available VaR model was RiskMetrics. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed. The Concept of VAR Example of VAR applied to market risk. Market price of equity = $80 with estimated daily standard deviation = $10. If tomorrow is a “bad day” (1 in 100 worst) then what is the value at risk? If normally distributed, then the cutoff is 2.33 below the mean = $80 – 2.33(10) = $56.70. 99% VAR = $23.30 Figure 6.1. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Appendix 1.1 A Brief Overview of Key VAR Concepts Banks hold capital as a cushion against losses. What is the acceptable level of risk? Losses = change in the asset’s value over a fixed credit horizon period (1 year) due to credit events. Figure 1.1- normal loss distribution. Figure 1.2 – skewed loss distribution. Mean of distribution = expected losses (reserves). Unexpected Losses (UL) = %tile VAR. Losses exceed UL with probability = %. Definition of credit event: Default Mode: only default Mark-to-market: all credit upgrades, downgrades & default. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed. FIGURE 1.1 Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed. RiskMetrics Daily Earnings at Risk (DEAR) = (Dollar MV of position) x (Price sensitivity of position) x (Potential adverse move) = (Dollar MV of position) x (Price volatility) DEAR calculated for each source of market volatility: interest rates, security prices, exchange rates. RiskMetrics uses a 95th percentile VAR. BIS uses a 99th percentile for capital requirements. The VaR is calculated over an N-day period VAR = DEAR x N Finally, aggregate VAR over the entire portfolio using correlation coefficients. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

DEAR for Interest Rate Risk Use duration model: DEAR = -MD(R)/(1+R) FI has a $10m long position in a bond with MD=12.5 yrs. Exposed to interest rate increases. Only a 1% chance that rates will increase more than 10 bp per day. DEAR = -12.5($10m)(.0010) = -$125,000 5 day VaR = 125,000 x 5 = $279,508 Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

DEAR for Exchange Rate Risk US FI has $100m short position in euros. Exposed to increases in euro/$ FX rate. There is only a 1% chance that the euro will go up more than 50 bp per day. DEAR = ($100m) x (.0050) = $500,000 5 day VaR = $500,000 x 5 = $1,118,034 Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed. Portfolio DEAR For the 2 risk example: DEAR = [DEAR2intrate + DEAR2FXrate + 2int,FXDEARintrateDEARFXrate]0.5 Correlation coeff. int,FX = -.05 DEAR = [125,0002 + 500,0002 + 2(-.05)(125,000)(500,000)]0.5 = $509,289 Portfolio DEAR is NOT the sum of the individual DEARs if correlations are < 1. 5 day Portfolio VAR = $509,289 x 5 = $1,138,804 Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Backtesting Using the Historic Approach Actual security distributions are not normal. Exhibit skewness and fat tails. Use current positions. Apply to observed market fluctuations over the past 500 days. For a 1% VAR, the 5th worst day out of 500. For a 5% VAR, the 25th worst day of 500. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Example of Back Simulation Using a Bond Portfolio $50 million bond portfolio with MD=4.5 yrs 20 days of actual rate changes DEAR=$50m x MD x R The 5th worst day is day 3 for a Loss of $900,000. If this were 500 observations, then the 1% VaR=$900,000 Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Advantages & Disadvantages of Back Simulation Non-parametric. Uses available data. But insufficient no. of observations. But, past data may not be indicative of the future. Monte Carlo simulation generates additional observations that conform with historical distribution by multiplying the var/covariance matrix by a random number generator. Typically constructs from 10,000 to 100,000 observations. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

The BIS Standardized Market Risk Framework Can use the standardized framework or internal models. Capital Charge = 99th %-DEAR x 3 x 10 If use internal models, must be approved and back-tested. Traffic light system: If underestimates risk < 4 days out of 250, then green light and multiplier=3 If between 4-9 days of underestimates of risk, then yellow light and multiplier > 3. If 10 days or more underestimated risk, then red light and multiplier is set at 4. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

BIS Standardized Model for Fixed Income Securities Specific Risk Charge = measures risk of liquidity or credit event. Multiply risk weight x position amount. Risk weights: 0% (US Treasuries), .25%-1.6% for investment grade (qual) corporate of varying maturities, 4%-8% for junk (non qual) corporate of varying maturities. General Market Risk Charge = MD x interest rate shock expected for each maturity Vertical Offsets = disallowance factors limiting hedging of long and short positions in the same maturity bucket. 10% disallowance. Horizontal Offsets within Time Zones: Zone 1 (1 mo-12mos) 40% disallowance, Zone 2 (>1yr-4yrs) 30% disallowance, Zone 3 (>4yrs) 30% disallowance. Horizontal Offsets between Time Zones: Zone 1&2 40% disall., Nonadjacent Zone 1& 3 150% disallowance. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

BIS Standardized Model for Equities For each stock: the long positions are totalled (ex: $200m) and the short positions are totalled (ex: $125m). X Factor = 4% of sum of long and short positions = .04 x 325 = $13 million Y Factor = 8% of net of long and short positions = .08 x 75 = $6 million Total Capital Required = x factor + y factor = 13 + 6 = $19 million for one stock. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.

BIS Standardized Model of Foreign Exchange Long Currency Positions Totalled Short Currency Positions Totalled Capital Charge = 8% of the higher of the longs or the shorts. If Long $125m yen + $500m euros = +$625m and Short $75m British pound + $100m Canadian dollar = -$175m then capital charge = .08 x 625m = $50 million. Saunders & Cornett, Financial Institutions Management, 4th ed.