Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer AAA Michigan Road Improvement Demonstration Program Economic Analyses Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
Advertisements

Traffic Crash Characteristics for Jackson Area Transportation Study Wayne State University Transportation Research Group November 26, 2007.
JUSTIFY. Methodology for Measuring NaviGAtor ITS Performance ITS Georgia Annual Meeting 2010 Presented By: Prasoon Sinha, P.E, PTOE Department Manager,
PIARC T.C. C2.1 & C2.3 Comparison of National Road Safety Policies & Plans Crash Analysis/Problem Definition & Time of Return Methodology October 2008.
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Safety Benefits of a Traffic Signal Designed for the Color Deficient Devoted to adding reason and knowledge to public policy ScienceServingSociety.com.
Spring INTRODUCTION There exists a lot of methods used for identifying high risk locations or sites that experience more crashes than one would.
Economic Analysis in Transportation Systems CE 7640: Fall 2002 Prof. Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Lec 32, Ch5, pp : Highway Safety Improvement Program (objectives) Learn the components of FHWA’s Highway Safety Improvement Program Know typical.
Lec 11, Ch.8: Accident Studies (objectives) Be able to explain different approaches to traffic safety Be familiar with typical data items that are collected.
Signal Timing Design Example Problems. Intersection of Michigan Avenue and Hewitt Road.
CE 4640: Transportation Design
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Benefit Cost Analysis For Intersection Driver Support Systems David Levinson & Xi Zou 2004.
Research Priorities UTC Safety Summit Pittsburgh, PA ● March 19, 2015 Jessica B. Cicchino.
Third African Road Safety Conference The Economics of Road Safety Stephen Karingi Director, Regional Integration and Trade Division ECA 9 July 2015 Addis.
Murray Boulevard and Farmington Road Intersection Sirisha Kothuri Wei Feng Ping Guo Meead Saberi CEE 550 Transportation Safety Analysis.
8-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #8.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
HSIP SIGN PROJECTS: INDIANA’S EXPERIENCE Laura Slusher, PE Indiana LTAP.
Economic Evaluation of Pavement Alternatives CEE 320 Steve Muench 9/12/ The majority roads are public facilities built with tax money to serve the.
Cost Benefit Analysis Do Speed Cameras Produce Net Benefits? Evidence from British Columbia, Canada.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Quantifying Transportation Needs and Assessing Revenue Options: The Texas Experience presented to The Arkansas Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Hot Spot ODOT Region 1 Kick-Off Meeting March 18, 2015.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
THE HISTORY OF MOBY-DICK David J Russell II. GEOMETRIC DESIGN AND OPERATIONAL FACTORS THAT IMPACT TRUCK USE OF TOLL ROADS David J Russell II.
Local Rural Highway Investment Program (LRHIP)
Presented by: Daniel E. Shamo, P.E. Senior ITS Engineer URS Corporation –Indianapolis, IN Presented by: Daniel E. Shamo, P.E. Senior ITS Engineer URS Corporation.
1 CEE 763 Fall 2011 Topic 1 – Fundamentals CEE 763.
Patrick Hasson Federal Highway Administration Midwestern Resource Center Engineering Safer Intersections.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Highway Costs Spring Highway Transportation Costs Type of CostExamples Highway investment costEngineering design, ROW, grading, drainage, pavement.
Overview of Road Safety in the United States Jeff Michael, Ed.D. Associate Administrator National Highway Traffic Safety Administration February 16, 2009.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
1 Central Laboratories Just what are the Benefits of Cycling Projects? Glen Koorey Principal Researcher, Traffic Engineering & Road Safety Opus Central.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Potential Fairfax County Photo Red Light Program Board Transportation Committee December 10, 2013.
1 Benefit Cost Analysis Typically used for public projects The goal is to determine if benefits exceed costs: Benefit / Cost Ratio > 1 The goal is NOT.
1 CEE 763 Fall 2011 Topic 3 – Safety Management Process – Other Steps CEE 763.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
The Greater Metropolitan Houston Traffic Safety Program October 14, 2004 Ned Levine, PhD Houston-Galveston Area Council Houston, TX 2004 AMPO Annual Conference.
Costs Life cycle costs Past and sunk costs Future and opportunity costs Direct, indirect and overhead costs Fixed and variable costs Average and marginal.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger Rail Alliance December 16, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger.
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
1 Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements (ELCSI) Pooled Fund Study Roya Amjadi, Highway Research Engineer FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center 10/24/08.
PIARC TC C.2.3: Cost-Effectiveness of Safety Measures and Allocation of Resources State of Michigan Time of Return Safety Calculation Larry E. Tibbits.
The Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Data, Partnerships, and Results: The Southeast Michigan Example.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
Role of Safety Performance Functions in the Highway Safety Manual July 29, 2009.
Road Safety Audits Road School, 2011 Rick Drumm, P.E. Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration.
City of Hampton Intersection Safety Initiative Automated Red light Enforcement Program.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Economic Analysis in the Public Sector Benefit/Cost Analysis.
NC Local Safety Partnership Evaluation Methods. Workshop Roadmap Program Background and Overview Crash Data Identifying Potential Treatment Locations.
Caldwell and Wilson (1999) 1. Determine primary rating factor for a road section based on traffic volume and user types 2. Primary rating factor is then.
Impaired driving can be prevented
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Researchers: Charlaine V. Reyes Dyeor Kristy M. Balisi Advisers:
Evaluation of Michigan’s Engineering Improvements for Older Drivers
Network Screening & Diagnosis
Safety Audit Components
SSR.
Clark County, WA Safety Management Program
Presentation transcript:

Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer AAA Michigan Road Improvement Demonstration Program Economic Analyses Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer AAA Michigan

Economic tool for comparing the benefits accrued to the costs incurred based on the number of crashes prevented Benefit Cost Analysis

When do you conduct benefit cost analyses? 1.To choose potential project locations 2. To determine which engineering countermeasures can be economically justified 3. During Post Improvement Evaluation

What are the BENEFITS?  Crashes Prevented Reductions in Congestion and Travel Time Reductions in Maintenance Costs

What are the COSTS? Societal Costs (National Safety Council) –Wage and Productivity Losses –Medical Expenses  Insurance Costs –Motor Vehicle Damage –Employer Costs –Loss of Quality of Life Operations & Maintenance Costs

What are the Current Published Societal Costs? Fatal Collision = $3.1 million A-Level Injury = $153,500 B-Level Injury = $39,500 C-Level Injury = $18,800 Typical Average Value used for Injuries = $34,000 Property Damage Only (PDO) = $1,800 Source: National Safety Council NSC on the web:

How do you Calculate the Benefit Cost Ratio?  Benefits B/C Ratio =  Costs

Choosing Potential Project Locations Source: Michigan State Police Which location should you choose?

Which Location to Choose? Step #1 – Determine the average annual costs currently being accrued at each intersection. Forest & Van Dyke 11 PDO 11 Injuries Annual Cost=(11*$1800)+(11*$34,000)=$393,800 BENEFIT TERM

Step #2 – Assuming that crashes and injuries will decrease by 15% each how much will your costs decrease? PDO Savings = Annual # of PDO * Crash Reduction Factor * PDO Societal Cost PDO Savings = 11*0.15*$1800 = $2970 Injury Savings = Annual # of Injuries * Crash Reduction Factor * Injury Societal Cost Injury Savings = (11*0.15*$34,000) = $56,100 BENEFIT TERM

 Benefits = PDO Savings + Injury Savings  Benefits = $59,070 BENEFIT TERM

Step #3a – Estimate the cost to implement the improvements –Estimated Improvement Cost (EIC) = $100,000 Step #3b – Assign a discount rate & find the corresponding capital recovery factor (CRF) Discount Rate = 8% Project Life Span = 10 years CRF =  Costs = EIC * CRF = $100,000 * = $14,900 COST TERM

Determine Your B/C Ratio for Forest & Van Dyke  Benefits $59,070 B/C Ratio ==  Costs $14,900 B/C Ratio = 4:1 * I used the EUAB/EUAC method

Now calculate the B/C Ratio for the following intersections Plymouth & Hubbell Greenfield & McNichols Seven Mile & Dequindre

Which Intersection To Choose? IntersectionB/C Ratio Forest & Van Dyke4.0 : 1 Plymouth & Hubbell5.2 : 1 Greenfield & McNichols4.9 : 1 Seven Mile & Dequindre3.3 : 1

Which Engineering Countermeasures are Economically Justified at Plymouth & Hubbell? Westbound Approach of Plymouth

Southbound Approach of Hubbell

Plymouth & Hubbell Condition Diagram Grocery Store Gas Station Auto GarageRestaurant

Hubbell Plymouth Crash Data from 1998 & 1999 Source: UD-10’s from Detroit Police Dept. ISSUES Lots of red light running Left-turns Driveways Signal visibility Sight Distance Plymouth & Hubbell Collision Diagram

Traffic Counts Plymouth Road = 15,000 vehicles/day Hubbell Avenue = 8,000 vehicles/day

What type of improvements would you make to this intersection?

Level of Service ApproachCurrent Conditions With LT Phase on Plymouth EastboundCA WestboundCA NorthboundBB SouthboundBB

Economic Analysis of Improvements Use the same process as was used for choosing intersections to determine whether the countermeasures are justified. Each group will calculate the B/C ratio for their set of countermeasures. Be able to justify why you chose your specific countermeasures

Economic Analysis of Improvements (cont.) Signal, Pavement Markings & Signs Only Signal, Pavement Markings, Signs & Geometric Group ## of Countermeasures Crash Reduction Factor Project Cost 1115%$70, %$80, %$90, %$100, %$100, %$125, %$150, %$175,000

B/C Analysis to Meet Specific Criteria AAA must meet a minimum criteria a B/C ratio of 2:1 over two years for any investment at an intersection. How do you calculate a maximum investment using a specific B/C criteria?

Step #1: Set the B/C equation equal to the criteria you are tying to meet. Use a B/C of 2:1 over 2 years and assume a crash reduction of 20%, a discount rate of 8% and a project life of 5 years. Assume the intersection has 20 PDO and 7 Injury Crashes.  Benefits 2 = =  CostsMax Inv * CRF

Calculate the  Benefits  Benefits=(20*$1800*0.20)+(7*$34,000*0.20)  Benefits = $54,800

Using Algebra Calculate the Maximum Investment  Benefits$54,800 Max Inv = = 2*CRF2* Max Inv = $107,784