Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 21, 2004 Likelihood of Confusion 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trademark and Unfair Comp.
Advertisements

Search engines Trademark use. Once they follow the instructions to click here, and they access the site, they may well realize that they are not at a.
CYBERSQUATTING: PREVENTION AND REMEDIATION STRATEGIES NET2002 – Washington, DC April 18, 2002 Scott Bearby NCAA Associate General Counsel Copyright Scott.
Trademark Inringement Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Trademarks Kieran G. Doyle Long Island Import Export Association.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School February 27, 2008 Likelihood of Confusion.
Advising Businesses That Are Advertising and/or Conducting Business Online By: Elizabeth P. Hodes.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 19, 2008 False Designation, False Advertising.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School November 9, 2004 Dilution (cont’d)
Trademarks, part II Jared Ellias. Squirt v. 7-Up V. The Squirt Company v. The Seven-Up Company et al. (E.D. Mo. 1979) 207 U.S.P.Q. 12.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 21, 2004 Use in Commerce.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School January 14, 2009 Introduction.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School February 18, 2009 Genericism, Abandonment.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 12, rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 11, 2007 Trademark – Dilution.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 14, 2004 Trade Dress - Part 2.
Copyright Law Boston College Law School February 11, 2003 Formalities.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 19, 2004 Likelihood of Confusion.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School August 31, 2004 Introduction.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 8, 2009 Dilution.
Intellectual Property
Establishing Protection Intro to IP – Prof. Merges
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 7, 2008 Trademark – Infringement.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 9, 2008 Trademark – Dilution.
Establishing Protection Intro to IP – Prof. Merges
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 2, 2008 Dilution.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 5, 2004 Registration.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 28, rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School March 30, 2009 Trademark – Infringement.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 11, 2008 Trademark – Domain Names.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School November 16, 2004 Attribution & Publicity.
Trademark Inringement Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 5, 2008 Types of Confusion, Trademark Use.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School March 25, rd-Party Liability, Statutory Defenses.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School April 9, 2008 Domain Names.
Trademark Inringement Intro to IP – Prof Merges
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 1, 2009 Trademark – Domain Names.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 13, 2007 Trademark – Genericide, Functionality.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 14, 2008 Trademark – Genericide, Functionality.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School November 4, 2004 Dilution.
Trademark Fair Use and Parody Intro to IP Prof Merges
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School November 11, 2004 False Advertising.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School February 13, 2008 Genericism, Abandonment.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 7, 2004 Bars to Registration.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 14, 2004 Abandonment.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 7, 2004 Distinctiveness.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 9, 2004 Trade Dress - Part 1.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar Steve Baron Bradley IM 350 Fall 2010.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School September 28, 2004 Use, Priority.
Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 12, 2004 Genericism.
Chapter 14 Legal Aspects of Sport Marketing
FUNDAMENTALS OF TRADEMARK LAW THE HONORABLE BERNICE B. DONALD U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN SEPT. 18, 2013 LAHORE, PAKISTAN.
Law 227: Trademarks & Unfair Competition Acquisition, Priority & “LOC” June 9, 2009 Jefferson Scher.
Trademarks and the World Wide Web IM 350: Intellectual Property Law and New Media Spring, 2015.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar.
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar
1 Trademarks 101 [derived from numerous class presentations given by Professor Baron in MM 450]
Trademark Cases And now for something confusingly similar
Pooginook Vineyards. Concept Map Pooginook Vineyards CEO: Aron CFO: Brooke Luckystar Publishing Protecting IP: Copyrights and Trademarks Information Sources.
1 Trademarks 101 and emerging trends. 2 A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination of words, phrases, symbols or designs, that.
1 Trademark Infringement and Dilution Steve Baron March 6, 2003.
Trademark Law1  Week 8 Chapter 6 – Infringement (cont.)
Trademark Law1  Nov. 20, 2006  Week 12 Chapter 11 – Trademarks and the Internet.
A FAILING GRADE SCHOOLS AND APPAREL TRADEMARKS
Trademarks III Infringement of Trademarks
How To Protect Intellectual Property:
Chapter 10: Intellectual Property Issues in Sports
IPR infringement in the Cloud BusinessClouds 2017
A FAILING GRADE SCHOOLS AND APPAREL TRADEMARKS
Chapter 3: Trademarks in E-Commerce.
Presentation transcript:

Trademark and Unfair Comp. Boston College Law School October 21, 2004 Likelihood of Confusion 2

Infringement Lanham Act §32(1) (15 U.S.C. §1114): –Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant - (a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services on or in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive … shall be liable in a civil action by the registrant for the remedies hereinafter provided.

Polaroid v. Polarad 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961) Polaroid Factors –(1) Strength of plaintiff’s mark –(2) Degree of similarity of marks –(3) Proximity of products or services –(4) Likelihood of plaintiff bridging the gap –(5) Evidence of actual confusion –(6) Defendant’s good faith –(7) Quality of defendant’s products –(8) Sophistication of buyers

The Network Network v. CBS

Netscape

Internet Uses Sponsored Links Meta-tagging Cybersquatting Typosquatting

Administrative Details Next Assignment –Finish VI.A.2 - Likelihood of Confusion – Types of Confusion